Talk:Auto Dollar

Auto Dollar has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Auto Dollar appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a Chinese warlord put his car on coinage (pictured), in lieu of his own portrait?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2024/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Auto Dollar.

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 15:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Auto Dollar, obverse

... that in lieu of his portrait, a Chinese warlord put his car on the currency (pictured)?

Source: Bevan, Paul (2019). "Zhou Xicheng's "Guizhou Auto Dollar": Commemorating the Building of Roads for Famine Relief". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 29 (2): 345–359. doi:10.1017/S1356186318000561.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chinese characters

Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC).Reply

Very interesting well written, no copyvio, QPQ done and on theme intrestingly enough, hook is interesting. I trust that the source listed confirms this but did go and look for external sources and found that it's true. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Question! I was able to get a properly licensed image for the coin from a friend, as seen here. Would it be alright to include the image alongside the hook? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  - @Generalissima: That would improve the hook add some context. Consider adding it to the article Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    - It's been added to the article; I just wanted to include it as a picture alongside the hook. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
      - @Generalissima: Go ahead. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Arconning · (talk · contribs) 14:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Auto Dollar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 17:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Generalissima Here is everything that needs to be addressed. This review is a token of my appreciation. Arconning (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

- @Arconning: Alright, I think everything is addressed :). Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 14:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk · contribs)

Prose and MoS

Infobox

No issues.

Lead

the Kweichow Auto Dollar, remove the since it's already used before the or. *Optional
one-yuan, remove hyphen.

Background

of Chinese provinces., add the after of.
centrally-produced, remove hyphen since they're supposed to be separate words.
Qing government delayed, add was after government.
quantities of dragon dollars, Displacing the dragon dollar designs, capitalize Dragon per original article linked.

Design and history

Although generally serving, use used instead of last word to be constant with the verb tenses.
It was only minted in that year., remove in.
and a design not matching with, and a design that does not match any.
weight — seven, remove spaces between.

Legacy and collecting

Numismatic Guaranty Company,, remove comma.

Refs

References are formatted properly, all seem reliable.

Spotchecks

Earwig shows "unlikely".
Manual check, seems fine.

Images

Images have proper licenses, are relevant to the article. Congrats on teaching your friend to upload to Commons!

Misc

No ongoing edit war, pretty broad knowledge considering it's a coin made like over a hundred years ago, pretty neutral in my opinion.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

PROFILPELAJAR.COM