Talk:Abstract Wikipedia
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 July 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
motivation
Wikipedia’s efforts to get its 300 language versions on the same page | The World from PRX alludes to Croatian Wikipedia#Controversy about right-wing bias; if we can get a more explicit source, this may be good to put in a background section. Arlo James Barnes 19:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Arlo Barnes ~2026-33160-42 (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- You rang thrice? Taking the opportunity to put this here, albeit not an RS: blog post Arlo James Barnes 01:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- This might be a better source: MIT@20 book. --denny vrandečić (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
- You rang thrice? Taking the opportunity to put this here, albeit not an RS: blog post Arlo James Barnes 01:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Arlo Barnes Could this Slate article do the trick?
There have been a few examples of Wikipedia language editions with fewer volunteer editors having famously gone off-the-rails, such as the “legendarily bad” Scots Wikipedia or the far-right historical revisionism of Croatian Wikipedia. Perhaps leveraging Abstract Wikipedia as a standard starting place for those editions could help bring some factual rigor to those projects, stopping bad actors whose political goal is to minimize the horrors of the Holocaust.
- Antibabelic (talk) 18:46, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
Asking for pointer
Hi all! The article says "Nevertheless, the project has proved controversial." -- I would love to be pointed to those controversies, and make sure to see them. Could someone point me to them? --denny vrandečić (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.