Sālhā del talab-ē jām-e Jam az mā mīkard is a ghazal by the 14th-century Persian poet Hāfez of Shiraz. It is no. 142[1] (but in the Ganjoor website, no. 143) in The Divān of Hafez by Muhammad Qazvini and Qasem Ghani (1941), and 136 in the edition of Parviz Natel-Khanlari (1983, 2nd ed.). It is described by A. J. Arberry as "one of the finest poems of Hafez".[2]
In this poem Hafez describes how for years he has looked for the precious cup of Jamshid but in the wrong place. Finally he takes his problem to a "Magian Elder" (that is, to a spiritual guide), who has had the cup all along. The Elder reassures him and counsels him that the answer to his quest lies within himself: Love, not Reason, is the way to find God.
According to Arberry, this ghazal may be one of those from the third and last period of Hafez's life. This period is characterised by "an increasing austerity of style, coupled with a growing tendency towards obscurity and allusiveness".[3] The interpretation of the poem is made more difficult by the fact that in different manuscripts the verses are found in a variety of different orders.
The transcription shows the modern Iranian pronunciation. The letter x is used for kh (as in Khayyam), q for both qeyn and ghāf; " ' " is a glottal stop.
The metre is ramal-e maxbūn ("hemmed ramal "): 3.1.15 in Elwell-Sutton's classification: see Persian metres. In the scheme below, x = anceps (i.e. long or short syllable), u = a short syllable, and – = a long syllable:
This metre is one of Hafez's favourites, and is used in over a quarter (27%) of his poems.[4]
"Overlong" syllables, which take up the position of a long + a short syllable in the metrical pattern, are underlined.
For various recitations of the poem, see External links below.
The text above is that of Qassem and Ghani (1941) usually quoted. However, some manuscripts have a different order of verses. B and RS have the order 1 2 3 4 5 8 6 7 9 10; F has 1 2 6 3 4 8 * 7 9 5 10; and P has 1 2 3 4 8 * 5 7 9 6 10. (The star * represents an extra verse found in manuscripts F and P.)[5] Parviz Natel Khanlari omits verses 6 and 7 in his edition.
Although the Divan (poetry collection) of Hafez, which was organised after his death by his friend Muhammad Gulandam, is arranged by the usual method of alphabetical order of the rhymes, it is possible to make out to a certain extent which poems are early, middle or late. Arberry, in his analysis of Hafez's style, identifies three phases in the poems. In the first, Hafez's ghazals dealt, like those of his predecessor Saadi, with a single theme; there is little trace of mysticism or Sufic allegory or of Hafez's philosophy of unreason. In the second phase, Hafez began to experiment with introducing two or more themes, or even fragments of themes, at once in the same poem; at the same time, he adopted a more spiritual viewpoint, that life is an insoluble mystery, that cannot be solved with philosophy or legalistic righteousness, but only with unreason and love. In the third phase, Hafez's poems become more severe and more allusive, and almost surrealistic in style. Arberry believes that Hafez's philosophy of unreason would have provided him with spiritual comfort in a period of history which witnessed the terrible devastations and massacres of the Mongols.[6]
Similarly, Dick Davis notes the diverse themes in this ghazal: "In its mixture of various religious groupings, and its mingling of references to both secular pleasures (the wine, the beauties of the last stanza) and mystical insight (Jamshid's cup, Hallaj's martyrdom), and in its recommendation that one look inward for the truth (the pearl one has lost) the poem is typical of Hafez's polyphonic/polysemous poetic strategies."[7]
Jām-e Jam "the cup of Jamshid" was famous in Persian poetry as a cup belonging to the legendary king Jam or Jamshid, in which he could see the whole world. The cup appears in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, but there the "world-seeing cup" is not Jamshid's but the cup of a later king, Kay Khosrow; however, it is implied that the cup was once Jamshid's, since he is described as knowing all the mysteries of the world.[8] By the time of the mystic poet Sanā'ī the cup is explicitly stated to be Jamshid's.
In Sana'i's mystical narrative poem Ilāhī-Nāma or Elahi-Nameh, one of the six sections tells the story of a king's son who wanted to possess the cup. His father tells him the true spiritual meaning of the cup, which is that to attain eternity, he must leave behind the world, as Kay Khosow did, and annihilate himself.[9]
The subject of the verb mīkard is del "my heart", which must be understood. The pearl for which my heart was seeking is the pearl of divine knowledge.[10]
The "sea" is used in mystic poetry as a metaphor for divine love. The early 12th-century mystic poet Sana'i wrote:[11]
Those who are lost by the shore of the sea are those who have never experienced the mystic ecstasy and torments of divine love.
Arberry compares ghazal 1 (Alā yā ayyoha-s-sāqī) verse 5:[12]
The "Magian Elder" is literally a Zoroastrian wine-seller (since Muslims were not allowed to sell wine); but in Hafez's poetry it stands for the Pir ("Elder") or Murshid ("Spiritual leader") who helped Sufi disciples in the path leading to union with God.
Arberry compares the ghazal ey hodhod-ē Sabā, verse 7, where he notes: "The poet compares the wine-cup (the symbol of unreason) with the all-revealing mirror of Alexander."
The name Hakīm "the Wise One" is often given to God in the Qur'an (e.g. Qur'an 2.32, 2.129, etc.).[13] Arberry comments: "Can any doubt remain after this verse that Hafiz intends by the imagery of the wine-cup the ecstatic's rapt vision?"[14]
This verse refers (using the Arabic words 'asā "stick", yad "hand" and beyzā "white") to the Qur'an, Sura 20,[15] in which (verses 17–23) God gives Moses two signs: first He transforms Moses's stick into a snake and then He makes his hand white; Moses then uses his stick in a competition of sorcery with the Pharaoh's magicians (verses 56–73).[16] Later in the same Sura (verses 85–99) God reveals to Moses that during his absence the Sāmirī (or Samaritan) has led his people astray by having them worship a Golden Calf. Hafez here appears to conflate the stories of the magician (sāherī) who competed with Moses and the Samaritan (Sāmerī) who led the people astray with the Golden Calf.
Four manuscripts (B, RS, F, and P) have a slightly different text in this verse: ān hamē šo'bade-yē 'aql "all that sorcery of reason".[17] Hafez often adopts the theme that Love, nor Reason, is the way to God. Clarke comments: "As, opposed to the white hand and staff of Mūsā, the sorceries of the sorcerer Sāmiri were ineffective,– so, opposed to love (of God) and to the Pir of the Magians (the Murshid), the sorceries of reason are useless."[18]
The story of the magicians' competition is told in the Bible in Exodus 7:8–13[19] and the story of the Golden Calf in Exodus 32.[20] In the Bible, however, it is not a Samaritan but Moses' brother Aaron who makes the calf.
Verse 8 refers to the Sufi mystic Husayn Mansur Al-Hallaj, who was tortured and hanged for heresy or blasphemy in Baghdad in 922. He is famous for having uttered the phrase ana al-Ḥaqq "I am the Truth" (a description often given to God himself).
The idea that the gallows which killed al-Hallaj lifted its head proud as well as tall is implied in Arberry's translation: "That friend ... glorified the tree that slew him for his crime."[21]
Following this verse two manuscripts have an extra verse. One manuscript has it in the following form:[22]
The other has:
In four of the early manuscripts verse 9 follows directly on verse 7.
The phrase rūḥu-l-qudus(i) "the spirit of holiness" occurs four times in the Qur'an (see Holy Spirit in Islam); for example, Qur'an 2.87, where God says ayyadnā-hu bi rūḥi-l-qudus "we supported him (Jesus) with the Holy Spirit".[23]
A similar idea to this verse is expressed in Hafez's ghazal 407 (in the Qazvini-Ghani edition) Mazra'-ē sabz-e falak, verse 3: "If you go pure and naked like the Messiah to Heaven, from your lamp a hundred rays will reach the Sun."
Bot (literally "Buddha") is a word used in Persian poetry to describe a beautiful youth. The long locks of the beloved are compared to a chain which holds the lover captive. The Elder is advising Hafez that he is now on the right path towards union with God.
Several translators have made versions of this ghazal, among them Walter Leaf (1898), John Payne (1901),[24] Arberry (1947),[25] and Dick Davis (2008).[26] One of the earliest is the following by Herman Bicknell, published in 1875:[27]
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.138.34.66