Make retroactive the reduced sentences for crack convictions (Fair Sentencing Act).
Reduce mandatory sentences, also known as mandatory minimums, for people convicted more than three times for drug crimes, down from life without parole after the third offense to 25 years.
Reduce mandatory sentences for armed career criminals and violent firearm offenses from a 15-year minimum down to 10 years.[3]
Reduce mandatory sentences for drug crimes from 15 to 10 years.[4]
Require the Federal Bureau of Prisons to spend more money to offer more programs and services attempting to reduce recidivism rates and make prisoners participate in productive activities.[6]
The bill would only apply to federal prisoners without changing anything in states' laws or judicial systems.[4]
Sponsors
In addition to Grassley, other sponsors of the bill when it was first introduced included:
Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
To gain more support for the measure, bill sponsors announced revisions on April 28, 2016.[9] Most notably, the proposed amendments would remove provisions related to armed career criminals, add new sentence enhancements for crimes involving fentanyl, and remove the retroactivity of the additional proposed safety valves.
The provision making the Fair Sentencing Act retroactive would remain intact.[10]
Timeline
Oct. 1, 2015 — Bill is introduced.
Oct. 22, 2015 — Senate Judiciary Committee votes 15–5 to send the bill to the floor for a vote.[3]
Oct. 4, 2017 — The bill was reintroduced as S. 1917.[11]
Opposition
Tom Cotton, a Republican senator from Arkansas, has led a group of other Republican congresspeople who are opposed to the bill. Cotton has argued that rates of murder and other violent crime have decreased so much since the 1990s because of "higher mandatory minimums put in place in the 1980s coupled with vigilant policing strategies pioneered by Rudy Giuliani and other American mayors and law enforcement officials."[1] He has also argued that the bill, if passed, would lead to the release of thousands of violent felons.
Support
On the day that the bill was introduced, Molly Gill, of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, said that "it doesn’t go as far as we would like."[12] On October 3, 2015, Marc Mauer, the executive director of the Sentencing Project, told NPR that the bill "is the most substantial criminal justice reform legislation introduced since the inception of the 'tough on crime' movement that brought crimes rate drastically down over the last decades."[4]
Writing in Mother Jones the day after the bill was introduced, Shane Bauer described the bill as "remarkably unambitious" in addressing mass incarceration and argued that it "doesn't live up to its own hype."[14] The bill has been criticized by Nicholas Wooldridge, a defense attorney from Las Vegas, for "creat[ing] the appearance of reform without doing much of anything to effect actual reform."[15]
In March 2016, Marc Morial, the president of the National Urban League, asked Congress to delay action on both the House and Senate versions of the bill until the information could be obtained on its possible effects on blacks and Hispanics.[16]