San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 27, 2021
Full case name	San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Docket no.	20-334
Citations	593 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subdivision (e) of that rule.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
Majority	Alito, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. App. P. 39

San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subsection (e) of that rule.^[1] Rule 39 is about awarding the costs of the appeal to the victor, and subsection (e) is about the taxation of such an award.^[2]

• Text of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., No. 20-334, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e