sFlow, short for "sampled flow", is an industry standard for packet export at Layer 2 of the OSI model. sFlow was originally developed by InMon Corp.[1] It provides a means for exporting truncated packets, together with interface counters for the purpose of network monitoring. Maintenance of the protocol is performed by the sFlow.org consortium,[2] the authoritative source of the sFlow protocol specifications. The current version of sFlow is v5.
An sFlow system consists of multiple devices performing two types of sampling: random sampling of packets[7] or application layer operations,[8] and time-based sampling of counters.[7] The sampled packet/operation and counter information, referred to as flow samples and counter samples respectively, are sent as sFlow datagrams to a central server running software that analyzes and reports on network traffic; the sFlow collector.[9]
Flow samples
Based on a defined sampling rate, an average of 1 out of n packets/operations is randomly sampled. This type of sampling does not provide a 100% accurate result, but it does provide a result with quantifiable accuracy.[10]
Counter samples
A polling interval defines how often the network device sends interface counters. sFlow counter sampling is more efficient than SNMP polling when monitoring a large number of interfaces.[11]
sFlow datagrams
The sampled data is sent as a UDP packet to the specified host and port. The official port number for sFlow is port 6343.[12] The lack of reliability in the UDP transport mechanism does not significantly affect the accuracy of the measurements obtained from an sFlow agent. If counter samples are lost then new values will be sent when the next polling interval has passed. The loss of packet flow samples results in a slight reduction of the effective sampling rate.
The UDP payload contains the sFlow datagram. Each datagram provides information about the sFlow version, the originating device’s IP address, a sequence number, the number of samples it contains and one or more flow and/or counter samples.
Several protocol enhancements.[14] This is the current version, which is globally supported.
Related technologies
A well known alternative is NetFlow[15] (see below). Moreover, depending on the IT resources available it could be possible to perform full packet captures[16] using dedicated network taps (which are then subsequently analysed).
NetFlow, IPFIX
NetFlow and IPFIX are flow export protocols that aim at aggregating packets into flows. After that, flow records are sent to a collection point for storage and analysis.[15] sFlow, however, has no notion of flows or packet aggregation at all.
sFlow allows for exporting packet data chunks and interface counters, which are non-typical features of flow export protocols. Note however that (recent) IPFIX developments provide a means for exporting SNMPMIB variables[17] and packet data chunks.[18]
While flow export can be performed with 1:1 sampling (i.e., considering every packet), this is typically not possible with sFlow, as it was not designed to do so. Sampling forms an integral part of sFlow, aiming to provide scalability for network-wide monitoring.[19]