Imprisonment in ancient Rome was not a sentence under Roman law. Incarceration (publica custodia) in facilities such as the Tullianum was intended to be a temporary measure prior to trial or execution.[1] More extended periods of incarceration occurred but were not official policy, as condemnation to hard labor was preferred.[2]
Increasingly during the Imperial era, a long-term sentence, often for life, was hard labor at the mills, mines, or quarries,[5] which might be privately or publicly owned. Slaves or lower-status citizens sentenced to hard labor were held in camps at these worksites, which employed a combination of free, enslaved, and convict labor.[6] On large commercial agricultural estates (latifundia, sometimes compared to plantations), enslaved laborers who had offered resistance were kept chained in semi-underground places of imprisonment called ergastula.
The first Roman prison was said to have been built by Ancus Marcius and enlarged by Servius Tullius, during the semilegendary period of the Roman kings. The Porticus Argonautarum, built by Agrippa on the Campus Martius, is thought by some to have been used as a temporary prison.[7] Among other structures used as prisons in Rome, only that built by Augustus and named after Octavia has left considerable ruins.[7] The prison in Alba Fucens is described as dark, underground, and small.[8] The most famous place of incarceration was the Mamertine Prison.[9]
The tresviri or triumviri capitales oversaw prisons and executions, along with other functions that, as Andrew Lintott notes, show them to have been "a mixture of police superintendents and justices of the peace,"[10][11][12] playing some role also in administering prison guards.[13][14] The capitales were first established around 290–287 BC[15] and were supervised by the urban praetor.[16]
Conditions and design
The prisons were filthy, poorly ventilated, and were underground.[17] The prisons would be divided into outer and inner areas. The inner parts of the prison were more secure and darker. Prison would not have had individual cells. They would have had groups of prisoners chained together in different rooms. Prisons would often times be very crowded.[8] The prisons were designed to psychologically and physically torture a prisoner into confessing. Emperor Valens drafted a law which required the confession to be submitted in written form. The prisons would also be designed to strip the prisoner of dignity. There was very little rations in the prison, because friends and family were expected to supply the prisoners needs.[17] The Christian Church would provide charity to prisoners. Emperor Constantine regulated the amount of charity the Christians could provide. A Bishop would have the right to administer prisons according to Canon law. The presence of Christian priests in prisons reminded the guards to treat the prisoners well, although the prisoners still lived in horrible conditions.[18] The prisoners were not segregated by gender.[19]
References
^Richard A. Bauman, Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome (Routledge, 1996), p. 23.
^Fergus Millar, "Condemnation to Hard Labour in the Roman Empire, from the Julio-Claudians to Constantine," in Rome, the Greek World, and the East: Society and Culture in the Roman Empire (University of North Carolina Press, 2004), vol. 2, pp. 122 ("the carcer was employed for the retention of prisoners awaiting trial or punishment," but "any tendency for it to be used as a place of sentence was always resisted"), and p. 130.
^Millar, "Condemnation to Hard Labour in the Roman Empire," p. 131.
^Edward M. Peters, "Prison before the Prison: The Ancient and Medieval Worlds," in The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in West Society (Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 14.
^Millar, "Condemnation to Hard Labour," pp. 123, 131 et passim.
^John E. Stambaugh, The Ancient Roman City (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), p. 347, note 4, and p. 348, note 13; O.F. Robinson, Ancient Rome: City Planning and Administration (Routledge, 1994), p. 105.