Old English Latin alphabet

The Old English Latin alphabet generally consisted of about 24 letters, and was used for writing Old English from the 8th to the 12th centuries. Of these letters, most were directly adopted from the Latin alphabet, two were modified Latin letters (Æ, Ð), and two developed from the runic alphabet (Ƿ, Þ). The letters Q and Z were essentially left unused outside of foreign names from Latin and Greek. The letter J had not yet come into use. The letter K was used by some writers but not by others. W gained usage in late Old English under Norman influence, as seen towards the end of the Peterborough Chronicle manuscript, though in this period W was still a ligature and not a full-fledged letter. The manuscripts MS Harley 208, Stowe MS 57, and Cotton Titus D 18 differ in how they arrange the non-standard Old English letters (Harley has Ƿ–ЖƖÞ, Stowe has Ƿ–ЖÞ, Titus has Ƿ–Þ–Ð), but all three manuscripts place them after the standard Latin letters.

A table entitled "The Saxon-Alphabet" on the last page of John Fortescue's The Difference between an Absolute and Limited Monarchy (1st ed., 1714)[1] The first column ("Figure") of the table shows the letters of the Old English Latin alphabet, and the second column ("Power") their modern equivalents.
Letter IPA
A, a /ɑ(ː)/
B, b /b/
C, c /k/, /tʃ/
D, d /d/
E, e /e(ː)/
F, f /f/, [v]
G, g /g/, [ɣ], /j/
H, h /h/, [x], [ç]
I, i /i(ː)/
K, k /k/
L, l /l/
M, m /m/
N, n /n/
O, o /o(ː)/
P, p /p/
R, r /r/
S, s /s/
T, t /t/
U, u /u(ː)/, /w/ (rare)
X, x /ks/
Y, y /y(ː)/
Ƿ, ƿ /w/
Þ, þ /θ/, [ð]
Æ, æ /æ(ː)/
Ð, ð /θ/, [ð]
Digraph IPA
cg [dʒ]
ch (rare) [x]
ea /æɑ(ː)/
eo /eo(ː)/
gc (rare) [dʒ]
ie perhaps /iy(ː)/
io perhaps /iu(ː)/
ng [ŋg], [ndʒ]
sc /sk/, /ʃ/
th (rare) /θ/, [ð]
uu (rare) /w/
Trigraph IPA
cgg (rare) [dʒ]
ncg (rare) [ndʒ]

History

Old English was first written using Anglo-Saxon runes in the 5th century. In 597, the arrival of the Gregorian mission in Kent marked the beginning of the Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England, and with it the reintroduction of the Latin alphabet to Britain, where it was used to write English for the first time. The earliest attested instances of Old English being written using the Latin script were in Anglo-Saxon law codes, including one drawn up in 616 on behalf of King Æthelberht of Kent.[2] A minuscule half-uncial form of the alphabet was introduced with the Hiberno-Scottish mission[3] during the 8th century. This was replaced by Insular script, a cursive and pointed version of the half-uncial script. This was used until the end of the 12th century when continental Carolingian minuscule replaced the Insular, along with a shift in spelling conventions toward the Old French alphabet, leading to Middle English.

The letter eth ⟨ð⟩ was an alteration of Latin ⟨d⟩, and the runic letters thorn ⟨þ⟩ and wynn ⟨ƿ⟩ are borrowings from futhorc. Also used was a symbol for the conjunction and, a character similar to the number seven (⟨⁊⟩, called ond or a Tironian et) which is still used in Irish and Scottish Gaelic, and a symbol for the relative pronoun þæt, a thorn with a crossbar through the ascender (). Macrons ⟨¯⟩ over vowels were used, though rarely, to indicate long vowels.[citation needed] A macron was also used occasionally as a nasal indicator.

References

  1. ^ Fortescue, John (1714). The Difference between an Absolute and Limited Monarchy: As it More Particularly Regards the English Constitution (1st ed.). London, UK: John Fortescue Aland; printed by W. Bowyer in White-Fryars, for E. Parker at the Bible and Crown in Lombard-Street, and T. Ward in the Inner-Temple-Lane. OCLC 642421515. Being a Treatise Written by Sir John Fortescue, Kt. Lord Chief Justice, and Lord High Chancellor of England, under King Henry VI. Faithfully Transcribed from the MS. Copy in the Bodleian Library, and Collated with Three Other MSS. Publish'd with some Remarks by John Fortescue-Aland, of the Inner-Temple, Esq; F.R.S..
  2. ^ Upward, Christopher; Davidson, George W. (2011). The history of English spelling. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-1-4051-9024-4.
  3. ^ Crystal, David (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press. p. 203. ISBN 0-521-26438-3.

Bibliography