Catrine da Costa (19June 1956 – c. July 1984) is a Swedish murder victim whose remains were found in Solna, north of Stockholm, in 1984. Da Costa had been dismembered, and parts of her body were found in plastic bags on 18July and 7August. The case is known as styckmordsrättegången ('the dismemberment murder trial'). How da Costa died has not been established as her vital organs and head have never been found.
Background
Da Costa, a prostitute in Stockholm in early 1984,[1][2][3] disappeared during Pentecost on 10 June, or soon thereafter.[3] On 18 July, parts of her dismembered body were discovered under a highway overpass in Solna, just outside Stockholm; additional body parts were discovered elsewhere on 7 August.[2][4] Da Costa's body was identified by her fingerprints.[3] Her head, internal organs, one breast and genitalia have never been found,[3][2] and no cause of death could be determined.[2]
Shortly thereafter,[2] Teet Härm, a forensic pathologist in a laboratory at Karolinska Institutet, was suspected of the crime.[1] He was known to have met prostitutes in the past, and his workplace was located between the two places where the victim's body was found.[2] He was arrested and released.[1]
At this time, the wife of Thomas Allgén,[2] a general practitioner, alerted the police that their 17-month-old daughter might be an incest victim.[5] Pediatric examinations found no evidence of abuse,[5] and the doctor and his wife separated in late 1984.[1] Later in 1985, the wife told police that her 27 month old daughter had begun talking about witnessing a dismemberment.[5][6] Since the pathologist and the general practitioner knew each other superficially, the police connected the cases.[7] The following trials also contained testimonies from the 2½-year-old child's stories, interpreted by her mother and evaluated by a child psychologist and child psychiatrist.[2]
In 1986, police resources were stretched thin after the murder of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, so the dismemberment case was shelved until the following year. Härm and Allgén were arrested in late 1987 and brought to trial in January 1988.[8]
Trials
The first trial ended in a mistrial after the lay judges were interviewed for the newspaper Aftonbladet on 9 March 1988 and commented on the court's justification for its judicial decision.[9] In a second trial, the lower court asked the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare to investigate the circumstances of the case[1] and found that da Costa's cause of death was unknown. As a result, the two defendants were acquitted, since it could not be established that da Costa died under suspicious circumstances. Although in its verdict the court found that the defendants had in fact dismembered the victim's body,[9] the statute of limitations for that crime had expired.[10]
The case has been the focus of several books, investigative articles and television documentaries. Author Hanna Olsson published the book Cathrine och rättvisan ('Cathrine and the Justice') in 1990, highlighting the patriarchal nature of the justice system and how women in prostitution were not seen as reliable witnesses. Journalist Per Lindeberg published Döden är en man ('Death is a Man') in 1999, questioning the police investigation and contending that the men were victims of a miscarriage of justice caused partially by extensive media coverage. In 2003 journalist Lars Borgnäs published Sanningen är en sällsynt gäst ('Truth is a Rare Guest'), opposing Lindeberg's position and theorizing that da Costa was murdered by a serial killer.[12]
In 2006, the doctors demanded SEK 40 million (about US$4.8 million) in damages for loss of income during the years they could not practice and for defamation.[13][14] Their demand was refused when the Chancellor of Justice, who handles questions of voluntary damages, ruled that such a large claim should be handled by the courts.[15]
On 3 April 2007, the two men's attorney registered their claim for SEK 35 million in damages at the Attunda lower court.[16] On 30 November 2009, the trial of the Swedish state began, ending shortly before Christmas.[17][18] In an 18 February 2010 judgement, the court ruled that the doctors were not entitled to damages.[18][19]
^Nyberg, Patrik (30 January 2010). "Patrik Nybergs intervju med obducenten" [Patrik Nyberg interview with the pathologist] (in Swedish). Nyhetsverket.se. Archived from the original on 18 June 2015. Retrieved 27 September 2014.