This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Maude system" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Maude system" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Maude system is an implementation of rewriting logic. It is similar in its general approach to Joseph Goguen's OBJ3 implementation of equational logic, but based on rewriting logic rather than order-sorted equational logic, and with a heavy emphasis on powerful metaprogramming based on reflection.

Maude is free software, and tutorials are available online. It was originally developed at SRI International,^[1] but is now developed by a diverse collaboration of researchers.^[2]

Maude sets out to solve a different set of problems than ordinary imperative languages like C, Java or Perl. It is a formal reasoning tool, which can help us verify that things are "as they should", and show us why they are not if this is the case. In other words, Maude lets us define formally what we mean by some concept in a very abstract manner (not concerning ourselves with how the structure is internally represented and so on), but we can describe what is thought to be the equal concerning our theory (equations) and what state changes it can go through (rewrite rules).

Maude modules (rewrite theories) consist of a term-language plus sets of equations and rewrite-rules. Terms in a rewrite theory are constructed using operators (functions taking 0 or more arguments of some sort, which return a term of a specific sort). Operators taking 0 arguments are considered constants, and one constructs their term-language by these simple constructs. Maude lets the user specify whether or not operators are infix, postfix or prefix (default), this is done using underscores as place fillers for the input terms.

Reduction equations are assumed to be confluent and terminating. Rewrite rules do not have this restriction.

When Maude "executes", it rewrites terms according to the equations and rewrite rules. Maude rewrites terms according to the equations whenever there is a match between the closed terms that one tries to rewrite (or reduce) and the left hand side of an equation in our equation-set. A match in this context is a substitution of the variables in the left hand side of an equation which leaves it identical to the term that one tries to rewrite/reduce. Equations and rewrite rules can also be conditional rules, which means they have to fulfill some criteria to be applied to the term (other than just matching the left hand side of the rewrite rule).

The rules are applied at "random" by the Maude system, meaning that you can not be sure that one rule is applied before another rule and so on. If an equation can be applied to the term, it will always be applied before any rewrite rule. Maude's built-in search can look for unwanted states and show that no such states can be reached. Maude has the ability to control what rule applications should be attempted at each step using meta-programming, due to the reflective property or rewriting logic.

Maude has been used to validate security protocols and critical code. The Maude system has proved flaws in cryptography protocols by just specifying what the system can do, and by looking for unwanted situations (states or terms that should not be possible to reach) the protocol can be shown to contain bugs, not programming bugs but situations happen that are hard to predict just by walking down the "happy path" as most developers do.

• Clavel, Durán, Eker, Lincoln, Martí-Oliet, Meseguer and Quesada, 1998. Maude as a Metalanguage, in Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Rewriting Logic and its Applications, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 15, Elsevier.
• Martí-Oliet and José Meseguer, 2002. Rewriting Logic: Roadmap and Bibliography. Theoretical Computer Science 285(2):121-154.
• Martí-Oliet and José Meseguer, 1993-2000. Rewriting Logic as a Logical and Semantic Framework. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 4, Elsevier.
• Clavel, Durán, Eker, Lincoln, Martí-Oliet, Meseguer and Talcott (2007). All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework: How to Specify, Program, and Verify Systems in Rewriting Logic (PDF). Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-71940-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

• Maude homepage at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign;
• The Real-Time Maude Tool homepage developed by Peter Csaba Ölveczky;
• An introduction to Maude by Neal Harman, Swansea University (errata)
• The Policy And GOal based Distributed Architecture written in Maude by SRI International.
• Maude for Windows, the Maude installer for Windows, and Maude Development Tools, the Maude Eclipse plugin developed by the MOMENT project at Technical University of Valencia (Spain).