The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche owned an extensive private library, which has been preserved after his death. Today this library consists of some 1,100 volumes, of which about 170 contain annotations by him, many of them substantial. However, fewer than half of the books he read are found in his library.[1]
The Greeks, Hegel and Spinoza
Nietzsche, who had been a student and a professor of philology, had a thorough knowledge of the Greek philosophers. Among modern philosophers, his reading included Kant, Mill and Schopenhauer,[1] who became major targets of criticism in his philosophy. He also mentions reading Hegel at the age of twenty.[2] Late in life he read Spinoza, whom he called his "precursor", in particular for his criticisms of free will, teleology and his thoughts on the role of affects, joy and sadness.[3] Nietzsche, however, opposed Spinoza's theory of conatus, for which he substituted the "will to power" (Wille zur Macht); and he replaced Spinoza's formula "Deus sive Natura" (God or Nature) by "Chaos sive Natura".
Schopenhauer and Mainländer
Philipp Mainländer's The Philosophy of Redemption, can still be found in the library.[4] Nietzsche read the work, of which a large part is a criticism of Schopenhauer's metaphysics, while he was parting ways with Schopenhauer.[5] Nietzsche kept an interest for the philosopher: among his books was Mainländer, a new Messiah, written by Max Seiling, published a decade later.[6]
^ abBrobjer, Thomas H (1997). "Nietzsche's Reading and Private Library, 1885-1889". Journal of the History of Ideas. 58 (4). Project MUSE: 663–680. doi:10.1353/jhi.1997.0034. ISSN1086-3222.
^In a letter to Hermann Mushacke, 20 September 1865: "Zum Kaffee esse ich etwas Hegelsche Philosophie", quoted in Curt Paul Janz, Friedrich Nietzsche: Biographie, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1981, I, p. 166.
^Brobjer, Thomas H. (2008). Nietzsche's Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography. University of Illinois Press. p. 149. ISBN9780252032455. It was in a letter to Cosima Wagner, 19 december 1876, that is, while reading Mainländer, that Nietzsche for the first time explicitly claimed to have parted ways with Schopenhauer. It may be worth mentioning that Mainländer's book ends with a long section (more than two hundred pages) consisting mainly of a critique of Schopenhauer's metaphysics
^J. T. Fraser, N. Lawrence. The Study of Time II. p. 90.
^Johan Grzelczyk, "Féré et Nietzsche : au sujet de la décadence"Archived 16 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine, HyperNietzsche, 2005-11-01 (in French). Grzelczyk quotes B. Wahrig-Schmidt, "Irgendwie, jedenfalls physiologisch. Friedrich Nietzsche, Alexandre Herzen (fils) und Charles Féré 1888" in Nietzsche Studien, Band 17, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988, p.439
^Wolfgang Müller-Lauter, "Der Organismus als Innerer Kampf. Der Einfluß von Wilhelm Roux auf Friedrich Nietzsche" in Nietzsche Studien, Bd. 7, 1978, p.189-223 (in German)
^Chapter I of Stirner and Nietzsche by Albert Lévy (Paris, Alcan, 1904); for the discussions of a possible influence of Stirner see: Bernd A. Laska: Nietzsche's initial crisis. (German original in: Germanic Notes and Reviews, vol. 33, n. 2, fall/Herbst 2002, pp. 109-133)