1964 United States Supreme Court case
Jackson v. Denno |
---|
|
|
Full case name | Nathan Jackson, Petitioner v. Wilfred Denno, Warden |
---|
Citations | 378 U.S. 368 (more) |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
|
Prior | United States v. Denno, 309 F. 2d 573 (2nd Cir. 1962) |
---|
|
1. Under the New York procedure, the trial judge must make a preliminary determination of the voluntariness of a confession and exclude it if in no circumstances could the confession be deemed voluntary.
2. Petitioner is entitled to a state court hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of the confession by a body other than the one trying his guilt or innocence, but that does not necessarily entitle him to a new trial. |
|
- Chief Justice
- Earl Warren
- Associate Justices
- Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart Byron White · Arthur Goldberg
|
|
Majority | White, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan, Goldberg |
---|
Concur/dissent | Black, joined by Clark (Part I) |
---|
Dissent | Clark |
---|
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Clark, Stewart |
---|
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings |
Stein v. New York (1953)[1] |
Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the process of determining whether a criminal defendant's confession was voluntary or coerced. The case was argued on December 9 and 10, 1963, and decided on June 22, 1964. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Byron White, the Court held that the rule requiring the jury in a criminal trial to determine the voluntariness of a confession, which was in place in New York at the time, was unconstitutional. This decision overruled the Supreme Court's prior decision in Stein v. New York, a 1953 case in which the Court had upheld the same New York rule against a constitutional challenge.[2][3][4]
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
References
External links