Infant vision concerns the development of visual ability in human infants from birth through the first years of life. The aspects of human vision which develop following birth include visual acuity, tracking, color perception, depth perception, and object recognition.
Unlike many other sensory systems, the human visual system – components from the eye to neural circuits – develops largely after birth, especially in the first few years of life. At birth, visual structures are fully present yet immature in their potentials. From the first moment of life, there are a few innate components of an infant's visual system. Newborns can detect changes in brightness, distinguish between stationary and kinetic objects, as well as follow kinetic objects in their visual fields. However, many of these areas are very poorly developed. With physical improvements such as increased distances between the cornea and retina, increased pupil dimensions, and strengthened cones and rods, an infant's visual ability improves drastically. The neuro-pathway and physical changes that underlie these improvements in vision remain a strong focus in research. Because of an infant's inability to verbally express their visual field, growing research in this field relies heavily on nonverbal cues including an infant's perceived ability to detect patterns and visual changes. The major components of the visual system can be broken up into visual acuity, depth perception, color sensitivity, and light sensitivity.
By providing a better understanding of the visual system, future medical treatments for infant and pediatric ophthalmology can be established. By additionally creating a timeline on visual perception development in "normal" newborns and infants, research can shed some light on abnormalities that often arise and interfere with ideal sensory growth and change.
Development
Acuity
Visual acuity, the sharpness of the eye to fine detail, is a major component of a human's visual system. It requires not only the muscles of the eye – the muscles of orbit and the ciliary muscles – to be able to focus on a particular object through contraction and relaxation, but other parts of the retina such as the fovea to project a clear image on the retina. The muscles that initiate movement start to strengthen from birth to 2 months, at which point infants have control of their eye. However, images still appear unclear at two months due to other components of the visual system like the fovea and retina and the brain circuitry that are still in their developmental stages. This means that even though an infant is able to focus on a clear image on the retina, the fovea and other visual parts of the brain are too immature to transmit a clear image.
Visual acuity in newborns is very limited as well compared to adults – being 12 to 25 times worse than that of a normal adult.[3] It is important to note that the distance from the cornea at the front of the infant's eye to the retina which is at the back of eye is 16–17 mm at birth, 20 to 21 mm at one year, and 23–25 mm in adolescence and adulthood.[1] This results in smaller retinal images for infants.
The vision of infants under one month of age ranges from 6/240 to 6/60 (20/800 to 20/200).[4] By two months, visual acuity improves to 6/45 (20/150). By four months, acuity improves by a factor of 2 – calculated to be 6/18 (20/60) vision. As the infant grows, the acuity reaches the healthy adult standard of 6/6 (20/20) at six months.[5]
One major method used to measure visual acuity during infancy is by testing an infant's sensitivity to visual details such as a set of black strip lines in a pictorial image. Studies have shown that most one-week-old infants can discriminate a gray field from a fine black stripped field at a distance of one foot away.[6] This means that most infants will look longer at patterned visual stimuli instead of a plain, pattern-less stimuli.[7] Gradually, infants develop the ability to distinguish strips of lines that are closer together. Therefore, by measuring the width of the strips and their distance from an infant's eye, visual acuity can be estimated, with detection of finer strips indicating better acuity. When examining an infants preferred visual stimuli, it was found that one-month-old infants often gazed mostly at prominent, sharp features of an object – whether it is a strong defined curve or an edge.[8] Beginning at two months old, infants begin to direct their saccades to the interior of the object, but still focusing on strong features.[9][10] Additionally, infants starting from one month of age have been found to prefer visual stimuli that are in motion rather than stationary.[11]
Faces
Newborns are exceptionally capable of facial discrimination and recognition shortly after birth.[12][13] Therefore, it is not surprising that infants develop strong facial recognition of their mother. Studies have shown that newborns have a preference for their mothers' faces two weeks after birth. At this stage, infants would focus their visual attention on pictures of their own mother for a longer period than a picture of complete strangers.[14] Studies have shown that infants even as early as four days old look longer at their mothers' face than at those of strangers only when the mother is not wearing a head scarf. This may suggest that hairline and outer perimeter of the face play an integral part in the newborn's face recognition.[15] According to Maurer and Salapateck, a one-month-old baby scans the outer contour of the face, with strong focus on the eyes, while a two-month-old scans more broadly and focuses on the features of the face, including the eyes and mouth.[10]
When comparing facial features across species, it was found that infants of six months were better at distinguishing facial information of both humans and monkeys than older infants and adults. They found that both nine-month-olds and adults could discriminate between pictures of human faces; however, neither infants nor adults had the same capabilities when it came to pictures of monkeys. On the other hand, six-month-old infants were able to discriminate both facial features on human faces and on monkey faces. This suggests that there is a narrowing in face processing, as a result of neural network changes in early cognition. Another explanation is that infants likely have no experience with monkey faces and relatively little experience with human faces. This may result in a more broadly tuned face recognition system and, in turn, an advantage in recognizing facial identity in general (i.e., regardless of species). In contrast, healthy adults due to their interaction with people on a frequent basis have fine tuned their sensitivity to facial information of humans – which has led to cortical specialization.[16]
Depth perception
To perceive depth, infants as well as adults rely on several signals such as distances and kinetics. For instance, the fact that objects closer to the observer fill more space in our visual field than farther objects provides some cues into depth perception for infants. Evidence has shown that newborns' eyes do not work in the same fashion as older children or adults – mainly due to poor coordination of the eyes. Newborn's eyes move in the same direction only about half of the time.[17] The strength of eye muscle control is positively correlated to achieve depth perception. Human eyes are formed in such a way that each eye reflects a stimulus at a slightly different angle thereby producing two images that are processed in the brain. These images provide the essential visual information regarding 3D features of the external world. Therefore, an infant's ability to control their eye movement and converge on one object is critical for developing depth perception.
One of the important discoveries of infant depth perception is thanks to researchers Eleanor J. Gibson and R.D. Walk.[18] Gibson and Walk developed an apparatus called the visual cliff that could be used to investigate visual depth perception in infants. In short, infants were placed on a centerboard to one side which contained an illusory steep drop (“deep side”) and another which contained a platform of the centerboard (“shallow side”). In reality, both sides, covered in glass, was safe for infants to trek. From their experiment, Gibson and Walk found that a majority of infants ranging from 6 to 14 months-old would not cross from the shallow side to the deep side due to their innate sense of fear to heights. From this experiment, Gibson and Walk concluded that by six months an infant has developed a sense of depth. However, this experiment was limited to infants that could independently crawl or walk.[18] To overcome the limitations of testing non-locomotive infants, Campos and his colleges devised an experiment that was dependent on heart rate reactions of infants when placed in environments that reflected different depth scenarios. Campos and his colleagues placed six week-old infants on the “deep end” of the visual cliff, the six week-old infants' heart rate decreased and a sense of fascination was seen in the infants. However, when seven month-old infants were lowered down on the same “deep end” illusion, their heart rates accelerated rapidly and they started to whimper. Gibson and Walk concluded that infants had developed a sense of visual depth prior to beginning locomotion. Therefore, it could be concluded that sometime at the spark of crawling around 4–5 months, depth perception begins to strongly present itself.[19]
Cues
From an infant's standpoint, depth perception can be inferred using three means: binocular, static, and kinetic cues. As mentioned previous, humans are binocular and each eye views the external world with a different angle – providing essential information into depth. The convergence of each eye on a particular object and the stereopsis, also known as the retinal disparity among two objects, provides some information for infants older than ten weeks. With binocular vision development, infants between four and five months also develop a sense of size and shape constancy objects, regardless of the objects location and orientation in space.[20] From static cues based upon monocular vision, infants older of five month of age have the ability to predict depth perception from pictorial position of objects.[21] In other words, edges of closer objects overlap objects in the distance.[22] Lastly, kinetic cues are another factor in depth perception for humans, especially young infants. Infants ranging from three to five months are able to move when an object approaches them in the intent to hit them – implying that infants have depth perception.[20]
Color vision
Color vision improves steadily over the first year of life for humans due to strengthening of the cones of the eyes.[citation needed] Like adults, infant color vision derives from three cone cell types with long-, mid- and short-wavelength opsins that are sensitive to different parts of the visible range. The signals from these cones recombine in the precortical visual opponent process to form a luminance channel and two chromatic channels (red-green and blue-yellow) that comprise an individual's trichromaticcolor gamut. The number of colors an infant can see is proportional to the size of their gamut, which is proportional to the dynamic range of each of the three channels. These dynamic ranges increase with age, leading to the development of color vision.
It is generally accepted across all current research that infants prefer high contrast and bold colors at their earlier stages of infancy, rather than saturated colors.[23] One study found that newborn infants looked longer at checkered patterns of white and colored stimuli (including red, green, yellow) than they did at a uniform white color. However, infants failed to discriminate blue from white checkered patterns.[24] Another study – recording the fixation time of infants to blue, green, yellow, red, and gray at two difference luminance levels – found that infants and adults differed in their color preference. Newborns and one-month-old infants did not show any preference among the colored stimuli, while three-month-old infants preferred the longer wavelength (red and yellow) stimuli to the short-wavelength (blue and green) stimuli, and adults had the opposite. However, both adults and infants preferred colored stimuli over non-colored stimuli. This study suggested that infants had a general preference for colored stimuli over non-colored stimuli at birth, though infants were not able to distinguish the different colored stimuli prior to the age of three months.[25]
Research into the development of color vision using infant female Japanese macaques indicates that color experience is critical for normal vision development. Infant monkeys were placed in a room with monochromatic lighting limiting their access to a normal spectrum of colors for a one-month period. After a one-year period, the monkey's ability to distinguish colors was poorer than that of normal monkey exposed to a full spectrum of colors. Although this result directly pertains to infant monkeys and not humans, they strongly suggest that visual experience with color is critical for proper, healthy vision development in humans as well.[26]
Light sensitivity
The threshold for light sensitivity is much higher in infants compared to adults. From birth, the pupils of an infant remain constricted to limit the amount of entering light. In regards to pupil dimensions, newborns' pupils grow from approximately 2.2 mm to an adult length of 3.3 mm.[2] A one-month-old infant can detect a light threshold only when it is approximately 50 times greater than that of an adult. By two months, the threshold decreases measurably to about ten times greater than that of an adult. The increase in sensitivity is the result of lengthening of the photoreceptors and further development of the retina. Therefore, postnatal maturation of the retinal structures has led to strong light adaptations for infants.[27]
Vision abnormalities in infants
Vision problems in infants are both common and easily treatable if addressed early by an ophthalmologist.
^ abHirano, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Takayama, H.; Sugata, Y.; Matsuo, K. (1979). "Ultrasonic observation of eyes in premature babies. Part 6: Growth curves of ocular axial length and its components (author's transl)". Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 83 (9): 1679–1693. PMID525595.
^ abBanks, M. S.; Salapatek, P. (1978). "Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 17 (4): 361–365. PMID640783.
^Dobson, V.; Teller, D. Y. (1978). "Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies". Vision Research. 18 (11): 1469–1483. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90001-9. PMID364823. S2CID11782387.
^Courage, M. L.; Adams, R. J. (1990). "Visual acuity assessment from birth to three years using the acuity card procedure: Cross-sectional and longitudinal samples". Optometry and Vision Science. 67 (9): 713–718. doi:10.1097/00006324-199009000-00011. PMID2234832.
^Bronson, G. W. (1990). "Changes in infants' visual scanning across the 2- to 14-week age period". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 49 (1): 101–125. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(90)90051-9. PMID2303772.
^ abMaurer, D.; Salapatek, P. (1976). "Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants". Child Development. 47 (2): 523–527. doi:10.2307/1128813. JSTOR1128813. PMID1269319.
^Braddick, O. J.; Atkinson, J. (2009). "Infants' Sensitivity to Motion and Temporal Change". Optometry and Vision Science. 86 (6): 577–582. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a76e84. PMID19417703.
^Field, T. M.; Cohen, D.; Garcia, R.; Greenberg, R. (1984). "Mother-stranger face discrimination by the newborn". Infant Behavior and Development. 7: 19–25. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80019-3.
^Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). "Mother's face recognition in newborn infants: Learning and memory". Infant and Child Development. 10 (1–2): 67–74. CiteSeerX10.1.1.569.3165. doi:10.1002/icd.248.
^Pascalis, O.; De Schonen, S.; Morton, J.; Deruelle, C.; Fabre-Grenet, M. (1995). "Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension". Infant Behavior and Development. 18: 79–85. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90009-8.
^Campos, J.J. Hiatt, S., Ramsay, D., Henderson, C., & Svejda, M. (1978). The emergence of fear on the visual cliff. The origins of affect. New York: Plenum.
^ abBornstein, M. & Lamb, M. (1992) Developmental Psychology. 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ.
^Kavšek, M.; Granrud, C. E.; Yonas, A. (2009). "Infants' responsiveness to pictorial depth cues in preferential-reaching studies: A meta-analysis". Infant Behavior and Development. 32 (3): 245–253. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.02.001. PMID19328557.
^Teller, D. Y.; Peeples, D. R.; Sekel, M. (1978). "Discrimination of chromatic from white light by two-month-old human infants". Vision Research. 18 (1): 41–48. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90075-5. PMID307296. S2CID34040855.
^Adams, R. J.; Maurer, D.; Cashin, H. A. (1990). "The influence of stimulus size on newborns' discrimination of chromatic from achromatic stimuli". Vision Research. 30 (12): 2023–2030. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(90)90018-G. PMID2288103. S2CID2272321.
^Adams, R. J. (1987). "An evaluation of color preference in early infancy". Infant Behavior and Development. 10 (2): 143–150. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90029-4.
Calanque de Sugiton (dimasuki kapal turis). Sebuah calanque (dari kata Korsika praindoeropa calanca (jamak calanche) dengan arti inlet; Occitan calanca) adalah formasi tanah dalam bentuk lembah dalam degnan sisi terjal, berupa batu kapur, menjorok ke laut. Dapat dianggap sebagai fjord Mediterania. Lokasi Contoh terbaik formasi ini dapat ditemukan di Massif des Calanques (Massís dei calancas dalam Occitan, bahasa lokal) di département Bouches-du-Rhône di Prancis. Jaringan ini membentang sep...
CepogoDesaNegara IndonesiaProvinsiJawa TengahKabupatenBoyolaliKecamatanCepogoKode pos57362Kode Kemendagri33.09.03.2013 Luas3.950.900 haJumlah penduduk... jiwaKepadatan... jiwa/km² Pasar sayur Cepogo, Boyolali. Cepogo adalah desa di kecamatan Cepogo, Boyolali, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Pembagian wilayah Desa Cepogo terdiri dari 22 dukuh yang bernaung dalam 4 dusun: Dusun Dukuh I Cepogo, Jambean, Bendosari, Wates, Kupo dan Banaran II Sidomulyo, Wonosari, Tumang, Tegalrejo III Tumang Gunungs...
Artikel ini menggunakan kata-kata yang berlebihan dan hiperbolis tanpa memberikan informasi yang jelas. Silakan buang istilah-istilah yang hiperbolis tersebut. (Pelajari cara dan kapan saatnya untuk menghapus pesan templat ini) Bukit Fraser (Inggris: Fraser's Hillcode: en is deprecated ) adalah resor bukit yang terletak di Punggung Bukit Titiwangsa di Negara Bagian Pahang, Malaysia. Bukit Fraser mendapatkan namanya dari James Louis Fraser, seorang petualang kolonial dan pemburu hebat asal Bri...
القوات الجوية الألمانية القيصرية الدولة القيصرية الألمانية الإنشاء 1913 الانحلال نوفمبر 1918 جزء من الجيش الإمبراطوري الألماني الاشتباكات الحرب العالمية الأولى تعديل مصدري - تعديل رمز القوات الجوية الألمانية القيصرية حتى 1915 القوات الجوية الألما...
Komandan Korps Marinir Amerika Serikat(CMC)Bendera Komandan Korps MarinirPetahanaJenderal USMC David H. Bergersejak 11 July 2019Department of the NavyAnggotaGabungan Kelapa StafAtasanSecretary of DefenseSecretary of the NavyKantorThe Pentagon, Arlington County, Virginia, U.S.Ditunjuk olehPresidenwith Senate advice and consentMasa jabatan4 tahunRenewable once (In time of war or during a national emergency declared by Congress)Dasar hukum10 U.S.C. § 5043Dibentuk28 November 1775d...
Perdana Menteri Irlandia beralih ke halaman ini. Untuk kegunaan lain, lihat Perdana Menteri Irlandia (disambiguasi). TaoiseachPetahanaSimon Harrissejak 9 April 2024Departemen TaoiseachGelarTaoiseachbahasa Irlandia: A ThaoisighAnggotaDáil ÉireannKabinetDewan NegaraDewan EropaAtasanOireachtasKediamanSteward's LodgeKantorGovernment Buildings,Merrion Street, Dublin, IrlandiaDicalonkan olehDáil ÉireannDitunjuk olehPresiden IrlandiaMasa jabatanSepanjang masih dipercaya mayoritas anggot...
Terrorist attack in Tripoli (2015) Corinthia Hotel AttackThe Corinthia Hotel main towerLocationCorinthia Hotel Tripoli, Tripoli, LibyaCoordinates32°53′50″N 13°10′13″E / 32.89722°N 13.17028°E / 32.89722; 13.17028Date27 January 2015 (2015-01-27) 09:00 (UTC+2)Attack typecar bombing; mass shooting, suicide bombingDeaths10 (not including the perpetrators)Injured5Perpetrators Islamic State[1] Wilayat Tarabulus Motive2013 arrest of Abu ...
American theoretical physicist, futurist and author Michio KakuKaku in 2020Born (1947-01-24) January 24, 1947 (age 77)San Jose, California, U.S.EducationHarvard University (BA)University of California, Berkeley (PhD)Known forLight-cone string field theoryPhysics of the ImpossiblePhysics of the FutureThe Future of the MindThe God EquationSpouseShizue KakuChildren2Awards Klopsteg Memorial Award (2008) Sir Arthur Clarke Lifetime Achievement Award (2021)[1] Scientific careerFiel...
La cattedrale di Noto Basilica SAn Giovanni Battista - Vizzini Il barocco siciliano definisce le espressioni di tale movimento artistico in Sicilia realizzate fin dall'inizio del XVII secolo, soprattutto nel campo dell'architettura e delle arti decorative. La definizione è stata utilizzata anche per indicare in particolar modo la declinazione di questo stile, caratterizzata da un acceso decorativismo, senso scenografico e cromatico, del periodo del tardo barocco.Tale maniera rientra in un pi...
Clade of non-flowering, naked-seeded vascular plants Not to be confused with the flowering plant genera Gymnosperma and Gymnospermium. GymnospermTemporal range: Carboniferous–Present PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Various gymnosperms. Scientific classification Kingdom: Plantae Clade: Tracheophytes Clade: Spermatophytes Clade: Gymnospermae Living orders[1] Cycadopsida Cycadales Ginkgoopsida Ginkgoales Pinopsida Cupressidae Araucariales Cupressales Pinidae Pinales Gnetidae Ephedrales...
Type of voltage regulator This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Linear regulator – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) Block scheme for voltage regulator in an electronic circuit In electronics, a linear regulator is a voltage regul...
This article is about the song by Mase. For the song by Joyner Lucas, see Not Now I'm Busy. For the Hey Arnold! episode, see List of Hey Arnold! episodes. 1998 song by Mase featuring The LOX, Black Rob and DMX24 Hrs. to LiveSong by Mase featuring The LOX, Black Rob and DMXfrom the album Harlem World ReleasedFebruary 20, 1998Recorded1997GenreHip hopLength4:18LabelBad BoyAristaSongwriter(s)Carlos BroadyDeric D-Dot AngelettieMason BethaDavid StylesJason PhillipsSean JacobsRobert RossEarl Simmons...
Islet off the coast of Penang Island in Malaysia Rimau IslandNative name: Pulau RimauRimau IslandLocation within George Town in PenangGeographyLocationSoutheast AsiaCoordinates05°14′51″N 100°16′21″E / 5.24750°N 100.27250°E / 5.24750; 100.27250Adjacent toMalacca StraitAdministration MalaysiaState PenangCity George Town Aerial view of Rimau Island (foreground), southeastern tip of Penang Island (middle) and Jerejak Island (background) Rimau Island i...
Extinct genus of fishes TrichiurusTemporal range: Eocene - Recent PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Trichiurus lepturus Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Scombriformes Family: Trichiuridae Subfamily: Trichiurinae Genus: TrichiurusLinnaeus, 1758 Type species Trichiurus lepturusLinnaeus 1758. Trichiurus is a genus of cutlassfishes belonging to the family Trichiuridae. Species Species within this genus include:[1] Tr...
Universitas Utahbahasa Latin: Universitas Utahensis Tampilkan peta yang diperbesarTampilkan peta yang diperkecil InformasiNama sebelumnyaUniversitas Deseret (1850–1892)[1]MotoBayangkan, lalu Lakukan (bahasa Inggris: Imagine, then Do)[2]JenisUniversitas riset negeriDidirikan28 Februari 1850; 174 tahun lalu (1850-02-28)[1]Lembaga indukSistem Pendidikan Tinggi UtahAfiliasi akademikAAU[3]ORAUSpace-grantDana abadi$1,07 miliar (2020)[...
Species of shark Spadenose shark Conservation status Near Threatened (IUCN 3.1)[1] Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Chondrichthyes Subclass: Elasmobranchii Subdivision: Selachimorpha Order: Carcharhiniformes Family: Carcharhinidae Genus: Scoliodon Species: S. laticaudus Binomial name Scoliodon laticaudusJ. P. Müller & Henle, 1838 Range of the spadenose shark Synonyms Carcharias muelleri J. P. Müller & Henle, 183...