High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is a 2010 United States Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust action and a 2013 civil class action against several Silicon Valley companies for alleged "no cold call" agreements which restrained the recruitment of high-tech employees.

The defendants were high-technology companies Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar, Lucasfilm and eBay, each of which was headquartered in Silicon Valley, in the southern San Francisco Bay Area of California.

The civil suit was filed by five plaintiffs. It accused the tech companies of collusion between 2005 and 2009 to refrain from recruiting each other's employees.

"No cold call" agreements

Cold calling is one of the main methods used by companies in the high-technology sector to recruit employees with advanced and specialised skills, such as software and hardware engineers, programmers, animators, digital artists, Web developers and other technical professionals.[1] Cold calling involves communicating directly in any manner with another firm's employee who has not otherwise applied for a job opening. Cold calling may be done in person, by phone, letter, or email.[2] According to the legal brief filed by a plaintiff in one of the class-action cases, cold calling is an effective method of recruiting for the high-technology sector because "employees of other [high-technology] companies are often unresponsive to other recruiting strategies... [and] current satisfied employees tend to be more qualified, harder working, and more stable than those who are actively looking for employment."[3]

The challenged "no cold call" agreements are alleged bilateral agreements between high technology companies not to cold call each other's employees. The DOJ alleges that senior executives at each company negotiated to have their employees added to 'no call' lists maintained by human resources personnel or in company hiring manuals. The alleged agreements were not limited by geography, job function, product group, or time period. The alleged bilateral agreements were between: (1) Apple and Google, (2) Apple and Adobe, (3) Apple and Pixar, (4) Google and Intel, (5) Google and Intuit,[4] and (6) Lucasfilm and Pixar.[5]

The civil class action further alleges that agreements also existed to (1) "provide notification when making an offer to another [company]'s employee (without the knowledge or consent of the employee)" and (2) "agreements that, when offering a position to another company's employee, neither company would counteroffer above the initial offer."[3]

Department of Justice antitrust action

On September 24, 2010, the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a complaint in the US District Court for the District of Columbia alleging violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al., the Department of Justice alleged that Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar had violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by entering into a series of bilateral "No Cold Call" Agreements to prevent the recruitment of their employees (a similar but separate suit was filed against Lucasfilm on December 21, 2010[6]). The DOJ alleged in their Complaint that the companies had reached "facially anticompetitive" agreements that "eliminated a significant form of competition ... to the detriment of the affected employees who were likely deprived of competitively important information and access to better job opportunities." The DOJ also alleged that the agreements "were not ancillary to any legitimate collaboration", "were much broader than reasonably necessary for the formation or implementation of any collaborative effort", and "disrupted the normal price-setting mechanisms that apply in the labor setting".[4] The same day it filed the suit, the DOJ and the defendants proposed a settlement.[7]

A final judgment enforcing the settlement was entered by the court on March 17, 2011.[8] Although the DOJ Complaint only challenged the alleged "no cold call" agreements, in the settlement the companies agreed to a broader prohibition against "attempting to enter into, entering into, maintaining or enforcing any agreement with any other person to in any way refrain from, requesting that any person in any way refrain from, or pressuring any person in any way to refrain from soliciting, cold calling, recruiting, or otherwise competing for employees of the other person", for a period of five years, a period which the court was allowed to extend.[8] The settlement agreement did not provide any compensation for company employees affected by the alleged agreements.[9] Lucasfilm entered into a similar settlement agreement in December 2010.[5]

Civil class action

In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509[10]) is a class-action lawsuit on behalf of over 64,000 employees of Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm (the last two are subsidiaries of Disney) against their employer alleging that their wages were repressed due to alleged agreements between their employers not to hire employees from their competitors.[11][12] The case was filed on May 4, 2011 by a former software engineer at Lucasfilm and alleges violations of California's antitrust statute, Business and Professions Code sections 16720 et seq. (the "Cartwright Act"); Business and Professions Code section 16600; and California's unfair competition law, Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. Focusing on the network of connections around former Apple CEO Steve Jobs, the Complaint alleged "an interconnected web of express agreements, each with the active involvement and participation of a company under the control of Steve Jobs ... and/or a company that shared at least one member of Apple's board of directors". The alleged intent of this conspiracy was "to reduce employee compensation and mobility through eliminating competition for skilled labor".[13]

On October 24, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted class certification for all employees of Defendant companies from January 1, 2005 through January 1, 2010.[9]

As of October 31, 2013, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm had reached a tentative settlement agreement. Pixar and Lucasfilm agreed to pay $9 million in damages, and Intuit agreed to pay $11 million in damages.[9] In May 2014, Judge Lucy Koh approved the $20 million settlement between Lucasfilm, Pixar, and Intuit and their employees. Class members in this settlement, which involved fewer than 8% of the 65,000 employees affected, were to receive around $3,840 each.[14]

The trial of the class action for the remaining Defendant companies was scheduled to begin on May 27, 2014. The plaintiffs intended to ask the jury for $3 billion in compensation, a number which could in turn have tripled to $9 billion under antitrust law.[15] However, in late April 2014, the four remaining defendants – Apple Inc, Google, Intel and Adobe Systems – agreed to settle out of court. Any settlement was to be approved by Judge Lucy Koh.[16][17]

On May 23, 2014, Apple, Google, Intel, and Adobe agreed to settle for $324.5 million. Lawyers sought 25% in attorneys' fees, plus expenses of as much as $1.2 million, according to the filing. Additional award payments of $80,000 were sought for each named plaintiff who served as a class representative.[18] Payouts were to average a few thousand dollars based on the salary of the employee at the time of the complaint.[19][20]

In June 2014, Judge Lucy Koh expressed concern that the settlement would not be a good one for the plaintiffs. Michael Devine, one of the plaintiffs, said the settlement was unjust. In a letter he wrote to the judge he said the settlement represented only one-tenth of the $3 billion in compensation the 64,000 workers could have made if the defendants had not colluded.[19]

On August 8, 2014, Judge Koh rejected the settlement as insufficient on the basis of the evidence and exposure. Rejecting a settlement is unusual in such cases. This left the defendants with a choice between raising their settlement offer or facing a trial.[21]

On September 8, 2014, Judge Koh set April 9, 2015 as the actual trial date for the remaining defendants, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for December 19, 2014. Also, as of early September 2014, the defendants had re-entered mediation to determine whether a new settlement could be reached.[22]

A final approval hearing was held on July 9, 2015.[23] On Wednesday September 2, 2015, Judge Lucy H. Koh signed an order granting Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement.[24]

The settlement website stated that Adobe, Apple, Google, and Intel had reached a settlement of $415 million and other companies settled for $20 million.[20] According to the settlement website, Gilardi & Co., LLC distributed the settlement to class members the week of December 21, 2015.[25]

See also

References

  1. ^ Singer, Bill. "After Apple, Google, Adobe, Intel, Pixar, And Intuit, Antitrust Employment Charges Hit eBay". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 30, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  2. ^ DOJ. "Complaint, US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al" (PDF). DOJ. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  3. ^ a b "Complaint, Hariharan v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al" (PDF). Lieff Cabraser. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 22, 2015. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  4. ^ a b "Complaint, US v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al" (PDF). Department of Justice. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  5. ^ a b Richey, Warren (December 21, 2010). "Lucasfilm settles antitrust case over wage suppression of top animators". The Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on December 13, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  6. ^ "Complaint, US v. Lucasfilm Ltd". Department of Justice. Archived from the original on May 11, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  7. ^ "Justice Department Requires Six High Tech Companies to Stop Entering into Anticompetitive Employee Solicitation Agreements" (Press release). United States Department of Justice. September 24, 2010. Archived from the original on January 11, 2016. Retrieved January 14, 2016.
  8. ^ a b "U.S. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al.: Final Judgment". United States Department of Justice. March 17, 2011. Archived from the original on January 31, 2016. Retrieved January 14, 2016.
  9. ^ a b c "Judge OKs class-action suit against Apple, Intel, Google, Adobe". San Jose Mercury News. October 25, 2013. Archived from the original on December 13, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  10. ^ Dan Levine (April 24, 2014). "Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring conspiracy". Chicago Tribune. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 4, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2016.
  11. ^ Rosenblatt, Joel (October 25, 2013). "Apple, Google Must Face Group Antitrust Hiring Lawsuit". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved October 27, 2013.
  12. ^ "Judge Grants Class-Action Status in Silicon Valley Hiring Suit". The Wall Street Journal. October 3, 2002. Archived from the original on May 20, 2022. Retrieved October 27, 2013.
  13. ^ "Complaint, Hariharan v. Adobe Systems Inc., et al" (PDF). Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2016.
  14. ^ Cooley, Brian (May 16, 2014). "Judge approves first payout in antitrust wage-fixing lawsuit". CNET. Archived from the original on January 13, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2016.
  15. ^ "Dockets & Filings: In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation". Justia. Archived from the original on November 1, 2013. Retrieved December 2, 2013.
  16. ^ Levine, Dan (April 24, 2014). "Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring, salary conspiracy". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 15, 2015. Retrieved January 17, 2016.
  17. ^ Levine, Dan (April 24, 2014). "Apple, Google agree to settle lawsuit alleging hiring conspiracy". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 31, 2015. Retrieved January 17, 2016.
  18. ^ "Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe Settle for $324.5 Million". Bloomberg. May 23, 2014. Archived from the original on May 24, 2014. Retrieved May 26, 2014.
  19. ^ a b "Judge questions settlement in Silicon Valley no-poaching case". San Jose Mercury News. June 19, 2014. Archived from the original on February 4, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2016.
  20. ^ a b Roberts, Jeff John. "Tech workers will get average of $5,770 under final anti-poaching settlement". Fortune. Archived from the original on December 24, 2021. Retrieved December 24, 2021.
  21. ^ "Court Rejects Deal on Hiring in Silicon Valley". The New York Times. August 9, 2014. Archived from the original on May 13, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
  22. ^ "Judge Koh Sets April 2015 Trial In Tech Anti-Poach Row". Archived from the original on January 4, 2015. Retrieved January 13, 2015.
  23. ^ "Court preliminarily approves $415m settlement of high-tech no-poaching lawsuit". March 25, 2015. Archived from the original on July 8, 2015. Retrieved June 30, 2015.
  24. ^ "Apple, Google to Pay $415 Million in No-Poach Case". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on December 24, 2021. Retrieved December 24, 2021.
  25. ^ "High-Tech Employee Antitrust Settlement". High-Tech Employee lawsuit. Archived from the original on February 19, 2022. Retrieved December 24, 2021.

Read other articles:

British national identity

State or quality of embodying British characteristics Part of a series on theCulture of the United Kingdom History Georgian period Napoleonic Wars Regency period Victorian period British Empire Edwardian period First World War Interwar period Second World War Post-war period (social history) Brexit PeopleHistoric peoples Celtic Germanic British English Scottish Welsh Northern Irish Cornish Irish Manx Modern ethnicities British identity White British Asian British Black British British Jews Br...

 

 

Heo Young-ji

Ini adalah nama Korea; marganya adalah Heo. Heo Young-jiHeo Youngji di fansigning Kara pada 30 Agustus 2014Nama asal허영지LahirHeo Young-ji30 Agustus 1994 (umur 29)Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea SelatanNama lainHur Young-jiYoungjiPekerjaanPenyanyiaktrisentertainerKarier musikGenreK-popInstrumenVokalTahun aktif2014 (2014)–sekarangLabelDSP MediaArtis terkaitKaraChamsonyeoK.A.R.DDSP Friends Korean nameHangul허영지 Hanja許齡智 Alih AksaraHeo Yeong-jiMcCune–ReischauerHŏ ...

 

 

Marek Walczewski

Marek WalczewskiMarek Walczewski (tengah) saat pemfilman Gruszka n. Lesko.Lahir(1937-04-09)9 April 1937Kraków, PolandiaMeninggal26 Mei 2009(2009-05-26) (umur 72)Warsawa, PolandiaPekerjaanPemeranTahun aktif1963–2004 Marek Walczewski (9 April 1937 – 26 Mei 2009) adalah seorang pemeran asal Polandia. Ia tampil dalam 55 film dan acara televisi antara 1963 dan 2004. Sebagian filmografi Passenger (1963) Ruchome piaski (1969) The Third Part of the Night (1971) The Weddi...

Kapitayan

Halaman ini berisi artikel tentang agama Jawanik yang bersifat monoteistik. Untuk agama Jawanik yang bersifat non-monoteistik, lihat Kejawen. Kapitayanꦏꦥꦶꦠꦪꦤ꧀JenisAgama asli Nusantara (Suku Jawa)TeologiMonoteismeBadanpemerintahanMajelis Nasional Agama JawaWilayahJawa Tengah & Jawa TimurBahasa Bahasa Jawa Kuno (biasa digunakan pada ritual keagamaan) Bahasa Jawa (terutama Bahasa Bagongan) Kantor pusatJawa TengahPengakuanDiakui sejak 2017, sebagai Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yan...

 

 

Headbutt

Attack using the head For other uses, see Headbutt (disambiguation). A negro fight in Venezuela, 1874. Caricature of capoeira carioca from Rio, using cocada headbutt. A headbutt or butt[1] is a targeted strike with the head, typically involving the use of robust parts of the headbutter's cranium as the area of impact. The most effective headbutts strike the most sensitive areas of an opponent, such as the nose, using the stronger bones in the forehead (frontal bone) or the back of the...

 

 

German submarine U-575

German World War II submarine The crew after return from seventh patrol History Nazi Germany NameU-575 Ordered8 January 1940 BuilderBlohm & Voss, Hamburg Yard number551 Laid down1 August 1940 Launched30 April 1941 Commissioned19 June 1941 Nickname(s)Liliput FateSunk by Allied warships and aircraft on 13 March 1944[1] General characteristics Class and typeType VIIC submarine Displacement 769 tonnes (757 long tons) surfaced 871 t (857 long tons) submerged Length 67.10 m (2...

Western Desert cultural bloc

Aboriginal Australian cultural region in Central Australia Map of Indigenous Australian cultural regions; the Western Desert cultural bloc is marked Desert The Western Desert cultural bloc (also capitalised, abbreviated to WDCB, or just Western Desert) is a cultural region in central Australia covering about 600,000 square kilometres (230,000 sq mi), used to describe a group of linguistically and culturally similar Aboriginal Australian nations. Languages The term Western Desert cul...

 

 

ソー (オー＝ド＝セーヌ県)

Sceaux 行政国 フランス地域圏 (Région) イル＝ド＝フランス地域圏県 (département) オー＝ド＝セーヌ県郡 (arrondissement) アントニー郡小郡 (canton) 小郡庁所在地INSEEコード 92071郵便番号 92330市長（任期） フィリップ・ローラン（2008年-2014年）自治体間連合 (fr) メトロポール・デュ・グラン・パリ人口動態人口 19,679人（2007年）人口密度 5466人/km2住民の呼称 Scéens地理座標 北緯48度4...

 

 

Armata del Golfo

L'Armata del Golfo fu l'armata dell'Unione operativa nell'area del golfo degli Stati controllati dalle forze dell'Unione, per lo più in Louisiana e Alabama, durante la guerra di secessione americana. Storia Il Dipartimento del Golfo fu creato quando l'ammiraglio David G. Farragut conquistò, nel 1862, la città di New Orleans. Al comando del Dipartimento fu posto il maggior generale Benjamin F. Butler, già comandante delle forze di occupazione dell'Unione. Le truppe presenti nel Dipartiment...

1961 Illinois Fighting Illini football team

American college football season 1961 Illinois Fighting Illini footballConferenceBig Ten ConferenceRecord0–9 (0–7 Big Ten)Head coachPete Elliott (2nd season)MVPTony ParrilliCaptainGary BrownHome stadiumMemorial StadiumSeasons← 19601962 → 1961 Big Ten Conference football standings vte Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T No. 2 Ohio State $ 6 – 0 – 0 8 – 0 – 1 No. 6 Minnesota 6 – 1 – 0 8 – 2 ̵...

 

 

The Revengers' Comedies

1989 play by Alan Ayckbourn The Revengers' Comedies1991 West End production posterWritten byAlan AyckbournCharactersHenry BellKaren KnightlyImogen Staxton-BillingDate premiered13 June 1989Place premieredStephen Joseph Theatre, Scarborough, North YorkshireOriginal languageEnglishGenreBlack comedyOfficial siteAyckbourn chronology Mr A's Amazing Maze Plays(1988) Invisible Friends(1989) The Revengers' Comedies is a play by Alan Ayckbourn. Its title references that of The Revenger's Tragedy. The p...

 

 

Health care reform

Governmental policy Health care reform is for the most part governmental policy that affects health care delivery in a given place. Health care reform typically attempts to: Broaden the population that receives health care coverage through either public sector insurance programs or private sector insurance companies Expand the array of health care providers consumers may choose among Improve the access to health care specialists Improve the quality of health care Give more care to citizens De...

Galileo (satellite navigation)

Global navigation satellite system This article is about the global navigation satellite system. For the probe to the planet Jupiter, see Galileo (spacecraft). GalileoCountry/ies of originEuropean UnionOperator(s)EUSPA, ESATypeCivilian, commercialStatusInitial services[1][2][3]CoverageGlobalAccuracy20 cm (public since 24 January 2023)Constellation sizeNominal satellites30 (24 active + 6 spares)Current usable satellites23 usable, 1 not available, 4 not usable (09/2022)&...

 

 

Blackwattle Bay

Bay in Sydney Harbour, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Blackwattle BayBlackwattle Bay Pontoon, GlebeBlackwattle BayLocationSydney Harbour, New South WalesCoordinates33°52′21″S 151°11′20″E / 33.872564°S 151.188912°E / -33.872564; 151.188912Part ofSydney HarbourPrimary outflowsJohnstons BayBasin countriesAustraliaSettlementsGlebe Blackwattle Bay is a bay located to the south–east of Glebe Island and east of Rozelle Bay on Sydney Harbour, in New...

 

 

Iron Man (serie animata 2010)

Questa voce sull'argomento anime e manga è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Iron Manアイアンマン(Aian Man) Serie TV animeRegiaTakeshi Koike SceneggiaturaWarren Ellis, Toshiki Inoue Char. designTakahiro Umehara MusicheActivation (sigla iniziale), The Fight Never Ends (sigla finale) StudioMadhouse ReteAnimax 1ª TV1º ottobre – 17 dicembr...

Wee Tian Siak

Questa voce sull'argomento cestisti taiwanesi è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Wee Tian SiakNazionalità Cina Taiwan Singapore Altezza190 cm Pallacanestro Termine carriera1958[1] CarrieraSquadre di club Nanyang Siang Pau Nazionale 1948 Repubblica di Cina1952 Taiwan1956-1958 Singapore Il simbolo → indica un trasferimento in prestito.   Modifica dati su Wikidata · Manuale Wee Tian Siak[2], conos...

 

 

東方神起

東方神起 左がチャンミン、右がユンホ（2023年12月）基本情報別名 TVXQ!（韓国）出身地  大韓民国 ソウル特別市ジャンル K-POP[1][2]R&B[3]ロック[3]J-POP[4]活動期間 2003年 -レーベル  大韓民国 エスエム・エンタテインメント 日本 rhythm zone（2005年 - 2010年） avex trax（2011年 - ） 事務所  大韓民国 エスエム・エンタテインメント 日本 エ�...

 

 

Alkali metal

Group of highly reactive chemical elements Not to be confused with Alkaline earth metal. Alkali metals Hydrogen Helium Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Neon Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Argon Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Cobalt Nickel Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Krypton Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver C...

Pôle eulérien

Pour les articles homonymes, voir Pôle et Euler (homonymie). Cet article est une ébauche concernant la géométrie. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Dans le cas d'une sphère, chaque point de la surface B qui se déplace à la surface de la sphère décrit un arc de cercle qui ont en commun leur centre de rotation représenté par le pôle eulérien E situé sur la surface A. Un pôle eulérien ...

 

 

Affinity (sociology)

Term in sociology Relationships(Outline) Types Genetic or adoptive Kinship Family Parent father mother Grandparent Sibling Cousin By marriage Spouse Husband Wife Open marriage Polygamy Polyandry Polygyny Group marriage Mixed-orientation Partner(s) Significant other Boyfriend Girlfriend Cohabitation Same-sex Life partner Queerplatonic Friendship (romantic / cross-sex / zone) Intimate and sexual Casual Monogamy Non-monogamy Mutual monogamy Polyamory Polyfidelity Cicisbeo Concubinage Courte...