Grand Gulf's reactor is the most powerful in the US and the 7th most powerful in the world,[3][4] with a core power of 4408 MWth[5] yielding a nominal gross electrical output of 1443 MWe.
Grand Gulf is operated by Entergy, which also owns 90% of the station through their subsidiary, System Energy Resources Inc. The other 10% is owned by Cooperative Energy.
Units 2 and 3
Adjacent to the operating Grand Gulf station, is an unfinished concrete structure that was to be the containment for Unit 2, a twin to the existing Unit 1. In December 1979, staggered by construction cost, Entergy (then called Middle South Utilities) stopped work on Unit 2.
On September 22, 2005, it was announced that Grand Gulf had been selected as the site for a GE ESBWR reactor. For details, see Nuclear Power 2010 Program. This was to be Unit 3.
On January 9, 2009, Entergy indefinitely postponed work towards the license and construction of Unit 3. In September 2015 the NRC withdrew the COL for the ESBWR unit, at the request of Entergy.[8]
Electricity Production
Generation (MWh) of Grand Gulf Nuclear Generating Station[9]
Year
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Annual (Total)
2001
946,566
827,395
943,421
373,230
769,005
886,934
921,701
577,561
892,961
939,180
909,769
936,159
9,923,882
2002
942,615
850,731
937,821
898,970
920,634
774,045
929,756
881,648
324,094
733,226
909,649
956,270
10,059,459
2003
913,462
834,804
958,592
725,835
939,541
910,173
945,844
943,499
905,510
951,060
918,863
955,273
10,902,456
2004
954,299
630,422
204,870
926,499
947,366
917,959
945,455
944,332
920,171
951,935
927,442
962,016
10,232,766
2005
960,091
764,933
962,587
925,347
948,825
915,437
941,316
926,900
517,061
352,002
926,522
936,825
10,077,846
2006
953,661
867,326
859,264
846,413
600,537
836,421
868,533
867,998
905,894
951,101
923,926
937,512
10,418,586
2007
949,348
853,823
470,576
478,499
740,277
908,575
945,593
770,366
434,552
946,499
916,109
944,567
9,358,784
2008
792,280
708,874
811,788
904,539
944,431
904,995
938,324
927,518
617,447
13,971
880,470
952,153
9,396,790
2009
947,301
859,709
937,261
903,564
935,134
897,343
925,096
925,987
891,679
935,897
912,378
927,166
10,998,515
2010
927,032
838,099
720,744
641,334
103,232
899,621
927,176
915,585
902,584
932,927
903,900
931,007
9,643,241
2011
916,397
811,767
905,744
861,059
904,637
794,883
878,144
887,012
872,837
886,627
734,647
883,035
10,336,789
2012
896,989
536,825
-7,775
-6,737
-10,447
271,292
899,636
971,194
1,000,457
1,077,666
996,207
670,827
7,296,134
2013
311,378
954,564
1,069,948
1,030,120
1,066,904
983,340
978,908
878,096
990,253
697,135
850,641
1,053,222
10,864,509
2014
1,008,823
292,730
138,072
778,925
1,032,810
937,411
967,125
965,377
994,435
1,048,219
1,035,260
1,052,996
10,252,183
2015
1,029,720
586,059
1,057,543
974,571
1,047,768
971,407
1,030,521
1,004,044
967,470
1,049,136
986,999
1,009,350
11,714,588
2016
1,013,775
611,185
3,560
964,026
1,064,006
704,577
294,454
1,045,677
236,051
-13,622
-12,913
-13,504
5,897,272
2017
-13,018
725,378
994,890
360,908
1,033,296
973,559
861,051
796,529
-14,481
844,226
485,966
316,344
7,364,648
2018
502,875
649,325
1,035,677
189,417
-5,898
-6,427
129,490
867,532
725,282
1,051,752
1,004,849
775,596
6,919,470
2019
1,050,888
802,699
1,029,762
944,497
714,750
1,018,894
1,044,043
1,045,968
944,263
1,056,678
511,651
868,421
11,032,514
2020
1,036,228
746,816
-4,509
-7,062
409
772,960
935,853
297,805
880,380
868,888
145,989
797,177
6,470,934
2021
1,037,173
961,328
1,056,392
647,047
969,219
1,015,771
1,020,360
1,045,211
989,338
1,001,905
1,030,001
998,313
11,772,058
2022
1,059,368
871,081
0
0
910,407
1,004,532
165,636
646,908
1,012,974
1,021,251
992,970
915,203
8,430,330
2023
1,067,948
963,699
1,064,949
1,006,957
1,034,524
973,879
1,018,681
1,032,973
1,001,343
1,047,328
1,020,881
516,459
11,749,621
2024
922,542
978,862
41,634
1,034,828
953,128
995,101
1,039,168
1,030,913
1,012,603
--
Surrounding population
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[10]
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Grand Gulf was 6,572, a decrease of 18.6 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 321,400, a decrease of 0.4 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Port Gibson (5 miles to city center), Vicksburg (25 miles).[11]Alcorn State University is 25 miles southwest of the plant.
Seismic risk
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Grand Gulf was 1 in 83,333, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[12][13]
Release of low levels of tritium into Mississippi River
After heavy rains in late April 2011, workers were pumping standing water collected in the abandoned, never-completed Unit 2 turbine building into the Mississippi River. Detectors sounded alarms at the presence of tritium in the water, and the pumping was stopped. The accidental release was reported to the Mississippi Health Department and the NRC. As of the dates of the news reports, it was unknown both how much tritium had entered the river and how the tritium had collected in the standing water, given that Unit 2 was not an operational reactor and had never been completed. It is unknown how much tritium entered the river because samples were not taken at the leak time. The NRC is investigating to find the source of the leak.[14][15][16]
Tritium is a very low level beta emitter with an approximate half-life of 12.3 years and it cannot penetrate the outer dead layer of skin. The main concern with this isotope is inhalation or ingestion.[17]