The system competed with systems similarly amalgamated and controlled by other railroad magnates including that of E. H. Harriman[4][5][6] (who controlled the Union Pacific, Southern Pacific and B&O lines[7][8]) and James J. Hill (who controlled Great Northern).[9] Both Harriman and Hill were involved in the Northern Securities Companyantitrust litigation during this time. Gould sought to avoid similar litigation by acquiring control of railroads that could be chained together at their endpoints to make a longer system; under Gould's plan, Missouri Pacific Railroad would become a holding company owning the other lines in the system.[10] After the 1907 financial panic, there were rumors of a merger of the Harriman and Gould systems.[11] But as many of the eastern roads controlled by Gould entered receivership after 1907 despite receiving investment funds from John D. Rockefeller,[12][13][14] and Gould's ouster from Missouri Pacific leadership in 1915,[15][16] the complete transcontinental plan fell apart.
At its peak the system stretched from San Francisco to Pittsburgh, and comprised the following railroads:
^ abTreese, Lorett (2003). "Section Seven. Pittsburgh Area". Railroads of Pennsylvania: Fragments of the Past in the Keystone Landscape. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. p. 229. ISBN978-0-8117-2622-1. Retrieved September 6, 2009 – via Google Books.