In 1855, Procter's A History of the Book of Common Prayer, with a Rationale of its Offices was first published. A history of the Church of England's official liturgical book, the Book of Common Prayer, Procter produced further editions that reflected the development of liturgical scholarship. According to liturgical historian Walter Frere, the textbook was in the academic tradition of Charles Wheatly's "sound exposition".[2] Again published in 1889, the book contained what historian Stanley Morison called a "valuable" summary of service books from before the Reformation.[3]
This book was revised and expanded by Frere with Procter's approval in 1901.[3]: 82 The expanded version, entitled A New History of the Book of Common Prayer, was part of a number of similar early 20th-century historical studies by members of the Alcuin Club which also included F. E. Brightman's The English Rite.[4]: 9–11, 213–214 Also commonly known as "Procter and Frere", the 1901 revision (and minor revisions thereof) was considered "the standard history" of Anglican history until the release of Geoffrey Cuming's A History of Anglican Liturgy in 1969.[5][6][7][note 2]
Procter was among several 19th-century liturgical historians who were interested in the medieval breviary, a liturgical book containing the prayers of the Divine Office. Procter, jointly editing with liturgist Christopher Wordsworth and the assistance of others including Henry Bradshaw, published the first volume of their breviary in 1879 according to the Use of Sarum based on a 1531 edition printed in Paris.[2] Procter and Wordsworth were leaders of a group of historians investigating English breviaries and their variations. The second and third volumes of their reprinted Sarum breviary were published in 1882 and 1886, respectively.[3]: 81 [note 3]
Personal life and death
Francis Procter married Margaret in 1848; she was the daughter of Thomas Meryon of Rye, Sussex. Together, the couple had eight children: five sons and three daughters. Procter died on 24 August 1905 in Witton and was buried in the parish's churchyard.[2]
Notes
^Joseph Procter's name has also been spelled Proctor.[1]
^In the preface to A History of Anglican Liturgy, Cuming commented that "There can be few textbooks which have had a life over a century, and it was felt that 'Procter and Frere' was beginning to show its age". Cuming also added that his history was not a "rejuvenation" of Procter and Frere's history, but "an entirely new work".[4]: 9–11
^There was an erroneous popular perception that the Use of Sarum was at one point the universal use of England, spurring the use's 19th-century revival. Procter and Wordsworth's edition of the Sarum breviary were not the first republished breviary. In 1854, William John Blew republished the Aberdeen Breviary; Blew's editing was derided by Morison. A previous attempt to reprint the Sarum breviary through publication by subscription failed in 1841 after the first part was published.[3]: 69, 81
^J. S. (January–June 1970). "A History of Anglican Liturgy. Londres, Macmillan, 1969, 450 p.". Archives de sociologie des religions (in French). 15 (29): 202–203. JSTOR41618728.