François Perrier (French pronunciation:[fʁɑ̃swapɛʁje]; 25 July 1922 – 2 August 1990) was a French doctor, psychiatrist, and psychoanalyst.
Perrier played a prominent role in Lacanianism and in post-Lacanian psychoanalysis.
Career
Perrier studied medicine and psychiatry in Paris; and became a psychoanalyst after a first analysis with Maurice Bouvet, a second with Sasha Nacht, and a third with Jacques Lacan.
As a Lacanian, he became one of the so-called 'three musketeers' of leading disciples, to be known as the 'troika': Serge Leclaire, Wladimir Granoff and François Perrier.[1]
Perrier was called by Élisabeth Roudinesco "the wandering troubadour of Lacanianism, naive and passionate, as whimsical as his master (whose genius he lacked), but a prodigious theorist of female sexuality, hysteria, and love".[2]
In a more critical judgement, linking his obsessive father complex to his ambivalent search for a psychoanalytic master, she also considered him to have frittered away his career "between presumptiousness and aimlessness".[3]
Together with Granoff, and Leclaire, in the early 1960s Perrier attempted to have the SFP acknowledged formally by the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA).[4] After the failure of their efforts, it was at Perrier's house, in the presence of Jacques Lacan and Nathalie Zaltzman, his ex-wife, that the founding of the Ecole Freudienne de Paris took place in 1964.
Perrier was the first to resign from the board of the new institution, in 1966, over the question of training; and in 1969, in what has been called the third schism in French psychoanalytic history, he, along with Piera Aulagnier, Jean-Paul Valabrega, and (a minority of) others broke away from the EFP to set up a fourth group: the Organisation psychanalytique de langue francaise (OPFL).[5] The first president of the Quatrième Groupe, Perrier would eventually resign from it in 1981.
Perrier came to conclude that Jacques Lacan was "a troublemaker of genius";[6] and that his followers were "travellers in the realm of 'Translacania'", as he would call it.[7]
Letter to Lacan
Roudinesco highlighted for critical attention a letter he wrote to Lacan in 1965, shortly after the EFP was formed:[8]
You are in the process of destroying what you claim to found, whether it be a school or a treaty of trust with your friends... bringing out the fact that your own relationship to any collegiate body is that of a loner, one who excludes himself voluntarily and rejects all groups... The difficulty you have in relating to any independent group, especially if it consists of true friends, always brings you back to the special relationship, the two-man understanding dependent on complicity toward any third person. And so you always divide but never rule".[9]
Unfortunately, for all the acuteness of Perrier's diagnosis of the organisational impasse Lacan's personality would create, he had no solution, other than his eventual departure for the Fourth Group.[8]
Work
Perrier produced a large body of work, ranging from phobia (1956), psychosis (1956 and after), and erotomania (1966), to alcoholism and female sexuality, while also contributing to the question of the training analysis (1969).[10]
On erotomania, Perrier made a link between the early observations of Clérambault and Lacan's later work.[11] He saw motherhood as a way for female sexuality to live out its disturbances, but also as an opportunity to work through them.[12]
In a witty formulation on love and childhood, Perrier argued that "what kills childhood is knowledge; what kills love is knowledge. Yet...there is no true love except in the aptitude of a subject, or two subjects, to return to childhood".[13]
^Julia Kristeva, Hatred and Forgiveness (2011) p. 89
^A Dufourmantelle/C. Porter, Blind Date (2007) p. 31
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (April 2011) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
View a machine-translated version of the French article.
Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:François Perrier (psychanalyste)]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template {{Translated|fr|François Perrier (psychanalyste)}} to the talk page.