Submission declined on 3 March 2026 by BenTanXiaoMing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by BenTanXiaoMing 5 months ago. Last edited by BenTanXiaoMing 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 27 December 2025 by TheTechie (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by TheTechie 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 17 December 2025 by 45dogs (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by 45dogs 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 17 December 2025 by 45dogs (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by 45dogs 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 17 December 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. Declined by Theroadislong 7 months ago.

• Comment: User:Whimsicalworks, DO NOT edit further until you have responded to the COI warning I have issued to you. I have reverted your latest edit to this draft because you made it without the mandatory response. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:07, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Please do not link to external sites directly in the article body, but rather in an "External links" section at the end of the article. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk | contributions 00:56, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Still a lack of independent, reliable sources with significant coverage on Jac Min. See WP:IMDB. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 18:28, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Do not remove the previous declines, please. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 18:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Lack of indpendent, reliable sources; a single source is not enough, especially one that does not have significant coverage of the article subject. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 18:03, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Whimsicalworks (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Jac Min・竭明
Born	(1987-04-14) April 14, 1987 (age 39) Singapore
Education	Catholic High School, Singapore Victoria Junior College School of Art, Design and Media, Nanyang Technological University (BFA)[1]
Occupations	Film Director Commercial Director Film Producer Screenwriter Editor
Years active	2009–present
Organisation	Semicolon
Spouse	Felicia Ong
Website	竭明是・jac min is →

Benjamin Tan, known professionally by his anglicised Mandarin name, Jac Min・竭明, is a Singaporean director of films and commercials^[2][3] whose work is characterised by an emphasis on timeless visual composition and narrative-driven storytelling. His projects frequently employ rhythmic visual patterns and tightly constructed narratives, resulting in works that integrate sensory and cerebral, conceptual elements.^[4]

He is a firm believer in marrying artistry with industry.

With a background in post-production, motion graphics and lighting, he works across multiple media and techniques. His practice often combines practical effects with computer-generated imagery and animation, reflecting a hybrid approach to visual production.

His creative approach prioritises narrative clarity and structural coherence, with complexity emerging from the application of simple foundational storytelling principles. His work consistently demonstrates a deliberate and methodical approach to storytelling, focusing on relatable, grounded moments intended to foster audience engagement.

Jac Min's work has been screened at international film festivals including Kinofest (2009), the Asian Hotshots Berlin Festival for Film and Video Art, the Seoul International Extreme-Short Image and Film Festival (2010), and the Asian Film Symposium (2007). His work has also been curated by organisations such as onedotzero and the National Museum of Singapore, and exhibited internationally, including at TWEAK II in Ireland. His feature documentary コーダ Coda^[5] won the Audience Choice Award^[6][7][8] at the 36th Singapore International Film Festival.

In addition to his independent work, he has produced commercial projects^[9] that have received industry recognition^[10] at award shows including the Cannes Lion, Spikes Asia, and the Gong Awards.

In 2008, he was awarded the Media Education Scheme Scholarship by IMDA, Singapore, for his undergraduate film studies. Following the completion of his undergraduate research programme at Nanyang Technological University in 2010, he was named an NTU President's Research Scholar for his film Xiang/Yan, completed under the mentorship of Assistant Professor Michael Tan . In 2017, he served as a jury member for the Digital category at the Crowbar Awards.

He is a founding partner of Semicolon^[2], a boutique production company with a focus on commercials and branded content.