Submission declined on 26 November 2025 by Robert McClenon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft duplicates another submission, Deliverect, currently submitted for review. To save time, we will review the other submission only. Any future edits or improvements should be made on that submission, not here. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Robert McClenon 8 months ago. Last edited by Aoidh 2 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 25 November 2025 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bobby Cohn 8 months ago.

• Comment: This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
  Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.
  Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.
  You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.
  If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:50, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Interviews, About Us company webpages, press releases, routine coverage and PR announcements do not rise to the threshold of either WP:RELIABLE or WP:NOTABLE. We also don't care about 5 whole sections describing "Products and services" a failure of WP:NOTADVERT, WP:NOTPRICE, WP:NOTCATALOGUE.
  This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
  Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: Previous draft at Draft:Deliverect Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Deliverect is a Belgian software as a service (SaaS) company headquartered in Ghent that develops middleware for the hospitality industry.^[1] Founded in 2018, the company provides a platform that integrates digital food orders from third-party delivery services—such as Uber Eats, Deliveroo, and Glovo—directly into a restaurant's point of sale (POS) system.^[2]

The company was co-founded by Zhong Xu, Jelte Vrijhoef, Jérôme Laredo, and Jan Hollez, who had previously developed cloud-based POS systems acquired by Lightspeed.^[1] Deliverect's software acts as a central hub for order management, automating the flow of inbound digital requests to the kitchen to reduce manual entry errors.^[3]

Deliverect has expanded through strategic acquisitions to diversify its product offerings. In May 2023, the company acquired ChatFood, a social commerce platform, to enhance its dine-in ordering and social media integration capabilities.^[4] In December 2024, it acquired Tabesto, a French firm specializing in self-service kiosks and payment terminals, to expand its in-store digital solutions.^[5]

In April 2021, the company raised $65 million in a Series C funding round led by DST Global and Redpoint Ventures.^[6] Deliverect reached unicorn status in January 2022 following a $150 million Series D round led by Coatue Management and Alkeon Capital, which valued the company at $1.4 billion.^[2]

By July 2025, the company reported processing an accumulated total of one billion orders across its global network.^[7] The company's platform is utilized by over 50,000 establishments globally, including partners such as Taco Bell, Burger King, and Unilever.^[8]

Category:Software companies of Belgium Category:Technology companies established in 2018 Category:Companies based in Ghent