Submission rejected on 27 April 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Rejected by ChrysGalley 3 months ago. Last edited by ChrysGalley 3 months ago. Ask for advice

Submission declined on 7 April 2026 by Robert McClenon (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robert McClenon 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 30 March 2026 by Bonadea (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Bonadea 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 March 2026 by guninvalid (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by guninvalid 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 23 March 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove: promotional language: see Words to watch; personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader; informal language. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Declined by Pythoncoder 4 months ago.

• Comment: End of the road, too much time has been spent on this. This version would have been declined for being AI written, per WP:NEWLLM and WP:AIATTR but the reality is that very few companies can get over the corporate depth requirements. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: This draft is written from the viewpoint of the vendor of the product, focusing on what the company says about the product. Product notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
  This draft does not establish product notability. You may ask for advice about product notability at the Teahouse.
  This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NPRODUCT is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
  You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.
  In particular, see and refer to WP:NPRODUCT for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.
  There is very little information in this draft. An article should give a reader some information about what the product is and does without the need for the reader to view the sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Wikipedia's readers have no interest in knowing that a product has been reviewed in various places, if there is no information about what the reviewers say (they are generally super negative – why is that not reflected in the draft?) or even about what the product is! bonadea contributions talk 15:34, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Please do not remove past AfC decline templates. These are left for future reviewers so that they can review your draft and check that any prior concerns have been addressed. Removing these templates can make it more difficult for your draft to be accepted. Thank you. guninvalid (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Consistent overattribution. guninvalid (talk) 06:47, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Airwheel Technology Co., Ltd. is a Chinese smart-hardware technology company with R&D and manufacturing centers in Brussels, Los Angeles, and Jakarta. Established in 2013, the company specializes in the development and production of smart electric suitcases, self-balancing scooters, smart wheelchairs, and portable mobility devices. Its "rideable luggage" has gained significant traction in international markets and across social media platforms.^[1][2][3]

2013: Focused on the research and development of self-balancing scooters.^[4]

2015–2017: Expanded the product line to include smart helmets, electric scooters, and folding e-bikes.

2016: Unveiled the S9 at CeBIT in Hannover, Germany. The company described it as its "first-generation wheeled robot" or a "service robot base."^[4]

2018–Present: Underwent a strategic pivot into the smart luggage market with the SE3 rideable series. This was followed by the development of the SR5 (a suitcase with autonomous following technology) and the H3 series of smart electric wheelchairs for the senior market.^[5]

2022: On August 9, Airwheel’s Indonesian partner, PT. Rohartindo Nusantara Luas Tbk (IDX: TOOL), went public on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. According to the prospectus, the explosive growth of Airwheel’s smart luggage business—with a 200% year-on-year revenue increase in 2021—was the primary driver behind the IPO.^[6]

Airwheel has been featured in The Times, which described its products as "tools that redefine travel logic," highlighting their utility for navigating long distances in airport terminals. The Guardian and Forbes have also analyzed its autonomous tracking technology and contributions to micro-mobility, discussing the legal status and innovative nature of rideable luggage.^[7][8]