Rule of inference of propositional logic
Disjunction elimination Type Rule of inference Field Propositional calculus Statement If a statement
P
{\displaystyle P}
implies a statement
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
and a statement
R
{\displaystyle R}
also implies
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
, then if either
P
{\displaystyle P}
or
R
{\displaystyle R}
is true, then
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
has to be true. Symbolic statement
P
→ → -->
Q
,
R
→ → -->
Q
,
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
∴ ∴ -->
Q
{\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,R\to Q,P\lor R}{\therefore Q}}}
In propositional logic , disjunction elimination [ 1] [ 2] (sometimes named proof by cases , case analysis , or or elimination ) is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof . It is the inference that if a statement
P
{\displaystyle P}
implies a statement
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
and a statement
R
{\displaystyle R}
also implies
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
, then if either
P
{\displaystyle P}
or
R
{\displaystyle R}
is true, then
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
has to be true. The reasoning is simple: since at least one of the statements P and R is true, and since either of them would be sufficient to entail Q, Q is certainly true.
An example in English :
If I'm inside, I have my wallet on me.
If I'm outside, I have my wallet on me.
It is true that either I'm inside or I'm outside.
Therefore, I have my wallet on me.
It is the rule can be stated as:
P
→ → -->
Q
,
R
→ → -->
Q
,
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
∴ ∴ -->
Q
{\displaystyle {\frac {P\to Q,R\to Q,P\lor R}{\therefore Q}}}
where the rule is that whenever instances of "
P
→ → -->
Q
{\displaystyle P\to Q}
", and "
R
→ → -->
Q
{\displaystyle R\to Q}
" and "
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
{\displaystyle P\lor R}
" appear on lines of a proof, "
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
" can be placed on a subsequent line.
The disjunction elimination rule may be written in sequent notation:
(
P
→ → -->
Q
)
,
(
R
→ → -->
Q
)
,
(
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
)
⊢ ⊢ -->
Q
{\displaystyle (P\to Q),(R\to Q),(P\lor R)\vdash Q}
where
⊢ ⊢ -->
{\displaystyle \vdash }
is a metalogical symbol meaning that
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
is a syntactic consequence of
P
→ → -->
Q
{\displaystyle P\to Q}
, and
R
→ → -->
Q
{\displaystyle R\to Q}
and
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
{\displaystyle P\lor R}
in some logical system;
and expressed as a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:
(
(
(
P
→ → -->
Q
)
∧ ∧ -->
(
R
→ → -->
Q
)
)
∧ ∧ -->
(
P
∨ ∨ -->
R
)
)
→ → -->
Q
{\displaystyle (((P\to Q)\land (R\to Q))\land (P\lor R))\to Q}
where
P
{\displaystyle P}
,
Q
{\displaystyle Q}
, and
R
{\displaystyle R}
are propositions expressed in some formal system .
See also
References