Hirsh won the British Sociological AssociationPhilip Abrams Memorial Prize for the best first book in sociology for 2004, for his book Law Against Genocide: Cosmopolitan trials.[5] The book, on the significance of "cosmopolitan law", contains an account of the 1999 British trial of Anthony Sawoniuk for Holocaust-related crimes committed in Belarus in 1942.
In 2005, he co-founded the Engage website, a resource for those working to oppose the boycott of Israel.[4] Hirsh took a leading role during 2005-07 in opposing boycotts of Israeli universities proposed by British academics.[6][7] Hirsh told The Guardian, "It may not have anti-semitic motivations, but if you organise an academic boycott of Israeli Jewish academics but no-one else in the world, that is an anti-semitic policy".[8]
His 2017 book, Contemporary Left Antisemitism, which combined narrative and case study with sociological analysis and theory to understand the controversial and contested phenomenon of antisemitism on the left, was published in 2017.[3]
He developed, with Daniel Allington, the AzAs (Antizionist Antisemitism) Scale, for quantitatively measuring antisemitism as expressed in relation to Israel and its supporters.[9] In a 2022 follow-up article, he expounded the subtle transformation of the word "Zionist" into an antisemitic code word for "Jews" by some intellectuals in contemporary academic discourse, which has contributed to the continued presence of institutional antisemitism, warranting the adoption of the "IHRA definition" of antisemitism to address the issue. He also said,[10][11]
[t]he left-wing tradition of antizionism, which professes unconditional opposition to antisemitism, is only one tradition. In the real world that tradition finds itself in a broad alliance with antisemitic movements that do not find the distinction between hostility to Israel and hostility to Jews to be of much significance [...] it is impossible to tell whether an element of antizionist rhetoric is right-wing, left-wing, or Islamist [...] Antizionism does not allow Jews, individuals or communities, to define their own identities. It defines their Zionism for them, against their will, and without consultation. It defines Zionism as racism and as support for apartheid. In so doing it defines most Jews as alien to any decent community of human beings.
He is the founder of the London Centre for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism, which promises to "challenge the intellectual underpinnings of antisemitism in public life".[12]
Published works
Law against Genocide: Cosmopolitan trials, (2003) London: GlassHouse Press, Cavendish Publishing
"Law against genocide" in Freeman, M, (ed) Law and sociology (2006), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
"The trial of Andrei Sawoniuk: Holocaust testimony under cross-examination" in Social and Legal Studies, Vol 10, Issue 4, pp 531–545 (2001)
With Robert Fine, "The decision to commit a crime against humanity" in Archer, M and Tritter, J (eds), Rational Choice Theory: Resisting colonisation (2000) London: Routledge
"Accusations of malicious intent in debates about the Palestine-Israel conflict and about antisemitism. The "Livingstone Formulation", 'playing the antisemitism card' and contesting the boundaries of antiracist discourse." in Transversal. Zeitschrift für Jüdische Studien. University of Graz, Centrum für Jüdische Studien. Graz: Studienverlag ISSN1607-629X, Vol 11, Issue 1, (2010) pp 47 – 77
David Hirsh and Hilary Miller, "Durban Antizionism: Its Sources, its Impact, and Its Relation to Older Anti-Jewish Ideologies" in [1], Vol 5, Issue 1, (2022) ISSN 2472-9906
Edited by David Hirsh, "The Rebirth of Antisemitism in the 21st Century: From the Academic Boycott Campaign into the Mainstream" (2023) London: Routledge ISBN 9781032116624