The Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor was an independent international commission, hosted by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and established in 2005 as the “first global initiative to focus on the link between exclusion, poverty, and the law.” [1] Drawing on three years of research and consultations, the Commission proposed strategies for creating inclusive development initiatives that would empower those living in poverty through increased protections and rights.
The Commission's final 2008 report, Making the Law Work for Everyone, argued that as many as 4 billion people worldwide are “robbed of the chance to better their lives and climb out of poverty, because they are excluded from the rule of law”.[2] In response, the report proposed four “pillars” for legal empowerment of the poor, which, the Commission argued, would enable those living in poverty to become partners in, rather than passive recipients of, development programs. These four pillars are: access to justice and the rule of law, property rights, labor rights, and business rights.[3]
The concept of Legal Empowerment, and the work of the Commission, was grounded in the ideas of Hernando de Soto and his book The Mystery of Capital. The central idea is that the way that the law and the justice sector operate in society is critical to economic growth, yet often overlooked by economists. In the words of the Commission: "The legal underpinnings of entrepreneurship, employment and market interaction are often taken for granted by traditional approaches to development and standard economic theory." Unequal access to justice systems, other forms of dispute resolution, and public services translates to unequal access to economic prosperity and therefore multiplies inequality.
Development scholars such as Dan Banik argued that “the relationship between law and development in the international development discourse was traditionally very narrowly focused on law, lawyers and state institutions.”[5] The result, more often than not, was a “top-down” approach to development, in which aid initiatives often overlooked or excluded the voices of the very people they intended to help.[6] Legal empowerment of the poor, by contrast, sought to bring excluded voices into the development discussion, while at the same time working to expand protections afforded to those living in poverty. Stephen Golub, one of the scholars in the field, argued that legal empowerment “puts community-driven and rights-based development into effect by offering concrete mechanisms, involving but not limited to legal services, that alleviate poverty, advance the rights of the disadvantaged, and make the rule of law more of a reality for them”.[7]
Drawing upon these principles and bolstered by the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, the mission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor emerged as an effort to connect work on access to justice, the rule of law and human rights on the one hand, to efforts to reduce poverty and promote economic growth on the other hand.
Founding of the Commission
The Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, co-chaired by former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Hernando de Soto, Peruvian economist and founder of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy (ILD), was launched in 2005 by a group of developing and industrialized countries including Canada, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, Guatemala, Iceland, India, Norway, Sweden, South Africa, Tanzania and the United Kingdom, and completed its work in 2008.
Members
The Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor was made up of influential policymakers and practitioners from around the world who were believed to be well-positioned to advocate among their peers for legal reforms in developing countries.
Advocates of legal empowerment argued that it was imperative to learn from those who live and work in slums and settlements around the world. Thus, the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, in conducting its research, partnered with grassroots organizations, governments and institutions to hear about the legal challenges faced by the poor. 22 National and Regional Consultations were hosted in Africa, South and Central Americas, Asia, the Middle East and Europe. These national and regional processes grounded the work of Legal Empowerment in local realities, and contributed to recommendations that reflected diverse cultural, socio-economic and political environments.
The Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor’s final report, Making The Law Work For Everyone, argued that legal empowerment initiatives must be grounded in four foundational “pillars”:[8]
•Access to Justice: including the right to legal identity, removal of discriminatory laws against the poor, and increased access to both traditional and alternative justice systems
•Property rights: including recognition of alternative methods of individual and collective ownership
•Labor rights: workers’ rights, protections, and benefits
•Business rights: access to credit and support for the poor (particularly poor women) to start and operate small businesses
Five technical working groups were established to create input reports for the Commission's final report, focusing on Access to Justice, Property Rights, Labour Rights, Business Rights and Roadmaps for Implementation of Reforms. The findings of each of the working groups were published as chapters in the final report Making the Law Work for Everyone - Volume II.
The final chapter of the report Making the Law Work for Everyone, includes implementation strategies, with a range of recommendations and proposals for follow-up activities, including the idea to develop a global ombudsman or global 'Defenders of the Poor'.[9]
Critiques of the Commission
Though scholars and practitioners of legal empowerment programs applaud the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor for bringing legal empowerment of the poor into the international limelight, a number of critiques have been published of its 2008 report on both technical and theoretical grounds. For example, Matthew Stephens, in his article "The Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor: An Opportunity Missed,"[10] argued that the Report lacked sufficient empirical data. Julio Faundez [11] argued that the Commission's policy recommendations were too vague to be implemented effectively.
