PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Bildungsbürgertum (German: [ˈbɪldʊŋsˌbʏʁɡɐtuːm]) is a social class that emerged in mid-18th-century Germany, as the educated social stratum of the bourgeoisie, men and women who had received an education based upon the metaphysical values of idealism and classical studies of the Graeco–Roman culture of Antiquity.^[1] In sociological contrast to the Kleinbürgertum, the petite bourgeoisie of Germany, the Bildungsbürgertum were the intelligentsia or the upper economic-stratum of the German bourgeoisie.

Term

The term Bildungsbürgertum was coined in 1920s Germany, by the political right wing to communicate anti-bourgeois sentiment based upon the perceived incompatibility of temperament in a person who claims to being both a 'genuine' intellectual and a Bürger, a bourgeois.

In the German compound word Bildungsbürgertum, the word Bildung denotes "culture" and "education", as defined in the Age of Enlightenment.^[2] Bildung also corresponds to the educational ideal presented in the works of Wilhelm von Humboldt and so Bildung connotes that education is a life-long process, not merely the acquisition of knowledge and training.

Formation

The Bildungsbürgertum social class emerged in the society of Germany in the middle of the 18th century. The social distinction of the Bildungsbürgertum was their university education in the humanities, literature, and science, and holding state public-office. As a social class of rich people, the Bildungsbürgertum first emerged in the societies of the free imperial cities, where they gained material wealth, achieved a social status, and had access to education, which was based on Alexander von Humboldt's educational ideal; that Bildung (culture and education) aimed towards human perfectibility, that a person's potential could be realized through a Classical education.

In late-stage absolute monarchy, the management of state required many educated officials to realise orders and reforms. To avert a French-style violent revolution in Germany, the government created a national status class of men and women to receive a classical education that would prepare them to discharge the duties and responsibilities of political administration; thus the Bildungsbürgertum social class was defined culturally, not socio-economically. The German universities established to educate the administrative social class, e.g. Humboldt University, became the institutional model for modern universities elsewhere in Europe.

At its origin, nationalism was a liberal ideal, and in German nationalism, the Bildungsbürgertum usually were members of the politically liberal factions of German society. Therefore, the cultured bourgeoisie usually were at the fore of the politics for establishing a sovereign nation state for the Germans; yet, by the 1870s, most of the Bildungsbürgertum had become politically conservative and reactionary, having lost their progressive liberalism to the reductive ideology of nationalism. At the end of the 19th century, the social-class characteristics of the Bildungsbürgertum were:

possessing an academic education
in-group behaviour, self-isolation from other social classes; neo-aristocratic thinking concerning social stature and pedigree
high self-recruitment
social prestige at being perceived as a more-important person of great wealth
predominantly Protestant
considered the "cultural élite"
dominated certain professions

In the 18th century, academic occupations such as professors, gymnasium (grammar school) teachers, physicians, pharmacists, attorneys, judges, Protestant ministers, engineers and leading officials were strongly represented among the Bildungsbürger.

In Germany the Bildungsbürgertum exercised first influence before the bourgeoisie as the commercial class gained more influence during industrialization from 1850 onwards. In France and Britain, it developed mainly as a commercial class and could, by virtue of its economic strength, claim political power. In Germany the formation of the bourgeoisie occurred only in the first half of the 1800s, to be politically active. It played a crucial role in the revolution of 1848, which nevertheless failed.

A well-known example for an individual associated with the term Bildungsbürgertum is the 20th-century writer Thomas Mann.

According to sociologist Liah Greenfeld, the rise of the Bildungsbürger facilitated the creation of a German national identity.^[3]

References

^ "Meet the Germans – Typically German - Meet the Germans – and find out what's typical about them". Goethe-Institut. Retrieved 2019-02-13.
^ Leicht, Kevin T. (2002). "An Outline of the Social History of Socialism". The future of market transition. JAI Press. p. 59. ISBN 9780080544472 – via Google Books.
^ Greenfeld, Liah (1996). "Nationalism and Modernity". Social Research. 63 (1): 3–40. ISSN 0037-783X. JSTOR 40972337.

Literature

Werner Conze, Jürgen Kocka (red.): Bildungsbürgertum im 19. Jahrhundert. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart 1985 ff.
- 1. Bildungssystem und Professionalisierung in internationalen Vergleichen. 1985, ISBN 3-608-91254-1.
- 3. Lebensführung und ständische Vergesellschaftung. 1992, ISBN 3-608-91558-3.
Lothar Gall: Bürgertum, liberale Bewegung und Nation. Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Orbis-Verlag, München 2000, ISBN 3-572-01175-2.
Michael Hartmann: Der Mythos von den Leistungseliten. Spitzenkarrieren und soziale Herkunft in Wirtschaft, Politik, Justiz und Wissenschaft. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M. 2002, ISBN 3-593-37151-0.
Malte Herwig: Eliten in einer egalitären Welt. wjs-Verlag, Berlin 2005, ISBN 3-937989-11-0. (Website zum Buch)
Oskar Köhler: Bürger, Bürgertum. I: Staatslexikon. Herder, Freiburg/B.
- 1. 1985, ISBN 3-451-19301-9 Sp. 1040 ff. (mit weiterführender Literatur)
Mario R. Lepsius (red.): Das Bildungsbürgertum als ständische Vergesellschaftung. In: Derselbe: Lebensführung und ständische Vergesellschaftung. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart 1992, ISBN 3-608-91558-3.
Pia Schmid: Deutsches Bildungsbürgertum. Bürgerliche Bildung zwischen 1750 und 1830. Dissertation, Universität Frankfurt/M. 1984.
Klaus Vondung (red.): Das wilhelminische Bildungsbürgertum. Zur Sozialgeschichte seiner Ideen. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1976, ISBN 3-525-33393-5.