However, in the weak formulation, this equation is only required to hold when "tested" against all other possible elements of V. This "testing" is accomplished by means of a bilinear function B : U × V → R which encodes the differential operator Λ; a weak solution to the problem is to find a u ∈ U such that
The achievement of Lax and Milgram in their 1954 result was to specify sufficient conditions for this weak formulation to have a unique solution that depends continuously upon the specified datum f ∈ V∗: it suffices that U = V is a Hilbert space, that B is continuous, and that B is strongly coercive, i.e.
the space U could be taken to be the Sobolev space H01(Ω) with dual H−1(Ω); the former is a subspace of the Lp spaceV = L2(Ω); the bilinear form B associated to −Δ is the L2(Ω) inner product of the derivatives:
Hence, the weak formulation of the Poisson equation, given f ∈ L2(Ω), is to find uf such that
Statement of the theorem
In 1971, Babuška provided the following generalization of Lax and Milgram's earlier result, which begins by dispensing with the requirement that U and V be the same space. Let U and V be two real Hilbert spaces and let B : U × V → R be a continuous bilinear functional. Suppose also that B is weakly coercive: for some constant c > 0 and all u ∈ U,
and, for all 0 ≠ v ∈ V,
Then, for all f ∈ V∗, there exists a unique solution u = uf ∈ U to the weak problem
Moreover, the solution depends continuously on the given data: