Austrocheirus was a medium-sized theropod measuring 5.5–6.5 metres (18–21 ft) long.[4][5]
A cladistic analysis indicated Austrocheirus had a basal position in the Abelisauroidea, but was more derived than Ceratosaurus and Berberosaurus. This would make it the first known mid-sized abelisauroid which did not possess the reduced forelimbs seen in other members of that clade.[1]
The referral of Austrocheirus to Abelisauroidea was challenged by Oliver Rauhut (2012), who claimed that the putative abelisauroid synapomorphies used to justify this referral are actually also present in the skeletons of non-abelisauroid theropods. Thus, according to Rauhut, Austrocheirus can be only classified as a theropod dinosaur of uncertain phylogenetic placement.[6] A partial ulna, manual claw and metatarsal that belongs to the holotype of Austrocheirus further supports Rauhut's argument, with the important morphological differences preventing its classification to a particular clade of theropods; for this reason, the authors suggested that it is best to classify this genus under incertae sedisAverostra, before more materials are discovered.[3]
^Sickmann, Zachary T.; Schwartz, Theresa M.; Graham, Stephan A. (2018). "Refining stratigraphy and tectonic history using detrital zircon maximum depositional age: an example from the Cerro Fortaleza Formation, Austral Basin, southern Patagonia". Basin Research. 30 (4): 708–729. Bibcode:2018BasR...30..708S. doi:10.1111/bre.12272.
^Grillo, O. N.; Delcourt, R. (2016). "Allometry and body length of abelisauroid theropods: Pycnonemosaurus nevesi is the new king". Cretaceous Research. 69: 71–89. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2016.09.001.
^Oliver W.M. Rauhut (2012). "A reappraisal of a putative record of abelisauroid theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England". Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 123 (5): 779–786. Bibcode:2012PrGA..123..779R. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.05.008.