The doxazosin arm was discontinued early on in the trial because of a higher rate of combined cardiovascular events and admissions for heart failure compared with chlorthalidone. The study concluded that major CHD events did not differ between initial use of chlorthalidone versus lisinopril or amlodipine. As a result, the Joint National Committee (7) guidelines of 2003, recommended the cheaper but equally effective diuretics as a first line treatment for hypertension. The study also confirmed the previously held views that ACE inhibitors were less effective in blood pressure control and stroke prevention in men of African and Caribbean descent.[3][4]
Background
By the mid-1990s, there was increasing awareness of the relative reduction of risks for stroke and CHD with lowering blood pressure, and the main drugs in use were initially diuretics and beta-blockers.[5] Shortly after, other newer classes of blood pressure lowering drugs were developed and the ALLHAT study aimed to clarify their relative values with the aim to also answer which one to use first.[3]
Since 1971, the Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials ([1]) at The University of Texas School of Public Health has played a leading role in cardiovascular disease and vision research by serving as a coordinating center for 25 nationwide multicenter clinical trials. The CCCT's primary function is to provide and coordinate all operations, procedures, and activities of a large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial. The CCCT serves as the Clinical Trials Center (Data and Clinical Coordinating Centers) for the ALLHAT. The CTC was led by C. Morton Hawkins (1993-2000) and Barry R. Davis (2000-2016).
ALLHAT showed that major CHD events did not differ between initial use of chlorthalidone versus lisinopril or amlodipine. As diuretics proved equally effective and were cheaper, the Joint National Committee 7 guidelines of 2003, recommended diuretics as a first line treatment for hypertension. The study confirmed the previously held views that ACE inhibitors were less effective in blood pressure control and stroke prevention in men of African and Caribbean descent. The study also revealed that calcium channel blockers did not cause higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding or cancers and they were not less effective than other antihypertensives.[3]