Adelaide and her husband Count Otto II. Design drawing by Bernard van Orley for the tapestry from the series with the genealogy of the House of Nassau, 1530–1535
Adelaide, described as a clever and energetic woman, endeavoured to gradually settle the numerous feuds inherited by her and her son with the local noble families, the powerful lords of Bicken [de], Walderdorff and Haiger [de], although she herself did not disdain to take up the gauntlet forced upon her on one occasion or another. On the other hand, she also resolved many of the pledges entered into by her husband.[1] In the underdeveloped County of Nassau-Siegen, where the local nobility thought they had a free hand, she kept the reins tight.[2]
Otto is not considered to have been a good regent. His short reign was a succession of feuds during which the country was devastated and the sources of prosperity were blocked. To control his expenses, he was forced to pledge possessions frequently and as a result the development of a powerful activity inwardly as well as outwardly was hampered.[8][11] He was forced to sell the Nassau half of the city of Siegen to the Electorate of Cologne and lost all parts of the Land Wildenburg of the Wildenburg Castle (Hunsrück)fief that Nassau had acquired to the County of Sayn. And in 1349, he had to pledge the parish of Haiger and half of Ginsburg Castle to the lords of Haiger [de] and the Electorate of Cologne.[2] In his last feud, against the brothers Gottfried and Wilderich III von Walderdorff, Otto was killed[2][8][13] in a battle, that, according to charters, must have taken place between 6 December 1350 and 25 January 1351.[8][note 4] As the children were still minors, Adelaide assumed regency over the county.[1][2][13][14][15]
Regency
Adelaide is considered to have been a good regent.[2] A clever and energetic woman, she endeavoured to gradually settle the numerous feuds inherited by her and her son with the local noble families, the powerful lords of Bicken [de], Walderdorff and Haiger, although she herself did not disdain to take up the gauntlet forced upon her on one occasion or another. On the other hand, she also resolved many of the pledges entered into by her husband.[1] In the underdeveloped County of Nassau-Siegen, where the local nobility thought they had a free hand, she kept the reins tight. She did have to pledge land to clear her husband's debts, and although ending her husband's numerous feuds was not without sacrifice, these agreements brought her the peace for undisturbed reconstruction.[2] The unfinished feuds and frequent interference from the country's resident powerful nobility forced her to make new debts.[14] As early as 1350/51 she had Tringenstein Castle [de] built as a countermeasure against the new Hessian castle Neu-Dernbach Castle [de].[16] She had built the castle on allodial land of the lords of Bicken and had the ownership rights to the castle hill known as 'Murstein' confirmed in 1352.[17] This way, the feud with Gerlach and Friedrich von Bicken, whose allies were the lords of Wildenburg and Elkershausen, which was highly damaging for both sides, was settled.[18]
Also in 1352, Adelaide succeeded in buying back the former Nassau half of the city of Siegen from the Electorate of Cologne for "zwey dusent alte schyldgulden" ("two thousand old shield guilders").[2] And in that year, she reconciled with the Walderdorff brothers, to whom Otto's death seems to have been mainly attributed.[8][15] With the reconciliation, the Walderdorff brothers had to release the prisoners without ransom, take their goods and tithes in Nassau in fief from the counts and, in addition, provide them with four vassals. Two years later, in 1354, Adolf von Wilmerode, Wilhelm von Hadamar, Rorich Bücher von Lurenburg, Godebracht von Irmtraud and Andreas von Dernbach [de], as helpers in that feud, also reconciled with Adelaide, under the same condition, that each of them dedicate a part of his hereditary property to Nassau in fief.[14] In 1356, Adelaide was forced to conclude a protection alliance with LandgraveHenry II 'the Iron' of Hesse, opening all Nassau castles to the landgrave, during her son's minority.[2]
In the district of Haiger, the noble family of the same name had been very powerful from old times. Under the favour of its feudal lords, it resisted the overlordship of the Counts of Nassau. John's minority seemed to be the most opportune time for it to shake off this yoke completely. Heiderich von Haiger's arrogance went so far that he allowed himself to commit abuses against the person of the young John. An open feud ensued, the ruinous consequences of which, as usual, affected the countryside and its inhabitants. Adelaide, however, did not lack courage and steadfastness to counter the insolence and violence of her enemies with vigour and to defend the rights of her son. There is no doubt that she benefited greatly from the support of her allies, Landgrave Henry II 'the Iron' of Hesse and his son Otto 'the Younger'.[18] The conflict with sword and lance was followed by a legal dispute, before a settlement was concluded in 1357[15][18] by Count Thierry III of Looz, the chairman of the court, in a decision written in 63 articles, which is a most remarkable explanation of the customs and rights of that age.[18] The pledge of the parish of Haiger and half of Ginsburg Castle was undone.[2] It decided the struggle with the lords of Haiger for supremacy in the Mark Haiger in favour of the Nassaus. The lords of Haiger became vassals of the Nassaus.[19] The beneficial consequences of peace and tranquillity became apparent in the next few years.[18]
From 1359 to 1362, Adelaide and John redeemed the most considerable pledges.[15][18] Because of 3200 pounds Heller and 2000 shield guilders, which Holy Roman EmperorCharles IV owed the deceased Count Otto, he assigned 1½ old large tornesel from some water or land tolls. Often to such grants this clause was added: 'when he may acquire it at a prince's or lord's tolls'.[18] If an agreement was reached with the owner of the toll, the toll's duty was increased in proportion to the sum granted, which, of course, should only have been temporary in accordance with the intention, but which may have given rise to many a continuing increase in toll's duty that was detrimental to trade.[20] Adelaide and her son, as it seems, sought satisfaction for the aforementioned debt of Emperor Charles IV to the toll of the Electorate of Mainz at Oberlahnstein,[15][21] which was closest to them. In any case, they had even older claims on the Electorate of Mainz, probably dating back to Roman KingLouis IV's time. As usual, a feud ensued. In the autumn of 1362, ArchbishopGerlach [de],[note 5] invaded Nassau-Siegen with 500 horsemen, each of whom, according to the custom of the time, were accompanied by a few armed footmen. The long known belligerent peasants of the Rheingau scorched, looted and devastated the county, but had to retreat across the Rhine when the floods came, to prevent being cut off.[21] In December of the same year, Gerlach and John signed a peace treaty at Aschaffenburg.[15][21] Gerlach promised to pay 3500 florins and to grant John a tornesel from the toll at Oberlahnstein until he would have drawn 2000 florins from it.[21] Also in 1362, Adelaide handed over the reign to her eldest son.[1][15][21][24]
Adelaide died on 30 September 1376.[3][5][note 6] It is unknown where she was buried.[note 7]
The coat of arms of the County of Vianden became the certification mark of the steel from Siegen, which was hammered as a trademark into the steel by blacksmiths for generations, and with that steel went around the world.[25]
First marriage?
In his genealogy of the House of Nassau, A.W.E. Dek states that Adelaide was first married to Johan v. Dollendorf-Cronenberg.[3] That marriage is not mentioned by A.A. Vorsterman van Oyen in his genealogy of the same house.[7]
Issue
From the marriage of Adelaide and Otto the following children were born:[3][26]
Count John I (c. 1339 – Herborn Castle, 4 September 1416), succeeded his father as Count of Nassau-Siegen. He married on 30 November 1357 to Countess Margaret of the Mark [nl][note 8] (d. 29 September 1409).
The second son, Henry 'the Swashbuckler', although being a clergyman, was nevertheless a brutal fighter of his time, as the disconcerting epithet that his comrades gave him reveals. He even sometimes attacked his eldest brother John.[28]
^Dek (1970), p. 66 states that the name of the mother was 'Lucia v.d. Neuerburg'. Vorsterman van Oyen (1882), p. 89 states that her parents were Count Godfrey III of Vianden and Countess Maria Flandrina of Namur.
^Lück (1981), p. 22, Vorsterman van Oyen (1882), p. 89 and von Stramberg (1865), p. 712 state that the marriage took place in 1331.
^Lück (1981), p. 22 and De Roo van Alderwerelt (1960) state that he was born c. 1300. Given the wedding date of his parents (before 1302), a birth c. 1305 is the most likely.
^Dek (1970), p. 65 and Vorsterman van Oyen (1882), p. 89 state that Otto was killed in December 1350 or January 1351. Becker (1983), p. 12 states that Otto probably was killed in the Westerwald towards the end of 1350. De Roo van Alderwerelt (1960) states that Otto died near Beilstein at the end of 1350. And Ausfeld (1887), p. 708 states that Otto was killed at the end of 1350.
^Archbishop Gerlach of Mainz descended from the Walramian Line of the House of Nassau, and was therefore a distant cousin of Adelaide and her son John.[22][23]
^Vorsterman van Oyen (1882), p. 89 and von Stramberg (1865), p. 712 state that she was still alive on 30 November 1376.
^Dek (1970), p. 66 states that she was buried in Dillenburg. That is very unlikely because, according to Becker (1983), pp. 48–49, Dillenburg did not get its own parish church until 1491. Before 1491, Dillenburg belonged to the parish of Feldbach.
^Her name is incorrectly written as 'of the Marck' in several sources. That spelling of the name is only correct for the cadet branch of her family that bought the Lordship of Sedan in France in 1424, and named themselves 'de la Marck' ever since.
^ abcdefgHoffmann, A.G., ed. (1842). "Johann I.". Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Zweite Section. H–N (in German). Vol. Einundzwanzigster Theil: Johann Infant von Castilien – Johann-Boniten. Leipzig: F.A. Brochhaus. p. 134.
^Hoffmann, A.G., ed. (1842). "Johann I.". Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Zweite Section. H–N (in German). Vol. Einundzwanzigster Theil: Johann Infant von Castilien – Johann-Boniten. Leipzig: F.A. Brochhaus. p. 135.
Becker, E. (1983) [1950]. Schloss und Stadt Dillenburg. Ein Gang durch ihre Geschichte in Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Zur Gedenkfeier aus Anlaß der Verleihung der Stadtrechte am 20. September 1344 herausgegeben (in German) (Neuauflage ed.). Dillenburg: Der Magistrat der Stadt Dillenburg.
Dek, A.W.E. (1970). Genealogie van het Vorstenhuis Nassau (in Dutch). Zaltbommel: Europese Bibliotheek.
Huberty, Michel; Giraud, Alain & Magdelaine, F. & B. (1981). l'Allemagne Dynastique (in French). Vol. Tome III: Brunswick-Nassau-Schwarzbourg. Le Perreux: Alain Giraud.
Lück, Alfred (1981) [1967]. Siegerland und Nederland (in German) (2nd ed.). Siegen: Siegerländer Heimatverein e.V.
De Roo van Alderwerelt, J.K.H. (1960). "De graven van Vianden. Bijdrage tot een genealogie van het geslacht der graven van Vianden tot de vererving van het graafschap in het Nassause huis". De Nederlandsche Leeuw, Maandblad van het Koninklijk Nederlandsch Genootschap voor Geslacht- en Wapenkunde (in Dutch). 1960 (6): 196.
von Stramberg, Chr. (1865). Denkwürdiger und nützlicher Rheinischer Antiquarius, welcher die wichtigsten und angenehmsten geographischen historischen und politischen Merkwürdigkeiten des ganzen Rheinstroms, von seinem Ausflusse in das Meer bis zu seinem Ursprunge darstellt. Von einem Nachforscher in historischen Dingen. Mittelrhein. Der II. Abtheilung. 18. Band. Der Rheingau. Historisch und topografisch (in German). Vol. Vierter Band. Coblenz: Rud. Friedr. Hergt.
Vorsterman van Oyen, A.A. (1882). Het vorstenhuis Oranje-Nassau. Van de vroegste tijden tot heden (in Dutch). Leiden/Utrecht: A.W. Sijthoff/J.L. Beijers.