13 seats were contested in the election with 2 seats available in St Nicholas ward after a Labourcouncillor stood down.[3] Labour defended 7 seats as against 5 for the Conservatives and 1 for the independents.[4] Meanwhile, the decision of the British National Party to put up a candidate in Holy Trinity ward received attention in the press.[3]
Worcester was a top Conservative target council in the 2003 local elections,[5][6] with gains here seen as important signal for the parties performance at the next general election.[7] The Conservatives had controlled the council as a minority administration since the 2000 election and were hoping to win a majority.[4] They said Labour had been out of touch when they ran the council and had made poor decisions such as using green fields for transport schemes.[4] However, Labour attacked the Conservatives for the council's budget, including a council tax rise of 9.5% and poor waste collection services; as well as the controversy over the closing and then rescue of Swan Theatre in Worcester.[4]
The level of postal voting in the election was up on previous years with 5,000 postal voting forms being sent, compared to 3,000 in 2002.[8][9]
Election result
The results saw the Conservatives win a majority on the council,[10] after gaining 2 seats from Labour but losing 1 seat to the Liberal Democrats.[11] This meant that Labour only held 10 seats which was the lowest number of seats they had held on the council up to then.[11] However Labour did manage to retain Holy Trinity ward, defeating the British National Party who came second in the ward.[11]Voter turnout was low, dropping as low as 18% in St Barnabus ward.[11]
^Sherman, Jill; Kite, Melissa (11 April 2003). "Blair risks forfeiting a dozen councils to mid-term blues". The Times. p. 16.
^Courtauld, Charlie (27 April 2003). "Worcester Woman is unimpressed and may not be voting at all ; The Tories invented her, then wooed her. But she seems likely to rebuff them again on Thursday". The Independent. p. 10.
^Walker, Jonathan (22 April 2003). "Demand for postal votes on the rise". Birmingham Post. p. 4.