Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic, applications 47621/13, 3867/14, 73094/14, 19306/15, 19298/15, and 43883/15 (ECtHR April 8, 2021), is a 2021 case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), holding that the nation of the Czech Republic did not violate the European Convention on Human Rights by imposing a vaccination mandate on children in that country.^[1][2]

The legal challenge was initially filed by Czech citizen Pavel Vavřička, who had received a fine for refusing to vaccinate his children for tetanus, hepatitis B, and polio. The court found that the public health interest in achieving herd immunity from contagious diseases outweighed the individual right to privacy, and that the Czech law contained sufficient provisions for the exemption of those with medical or religious reasons for not receiving vaccination, neither of which were demonstrated by the objecting parent.^[1]

The case was the first in which the ECtHR had ruled on the question of compulsory vaccination.^[1]

• Vaccine hesitancy

• Nilsson, Anna (2021). "Is Compulsory Childhood Vaccination Compatible with the Right to Respect for Private Life? A Comment on Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic". European Journal of Health Law. 28 (3): 323–340. doi:10.1163/15718093-bja10048. ISSN 1571-8093.
• Katsoni, Spyridoula (Sissy). "What Does the Vavřička Judgement Tell Us About the Compatibility of Compulsory COVID-19 Vaccinations with the ECHR?". voelkerrechtsblog.org. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
• Ważyńska-Finck, Katarzyna (2 June 2021). "Anti-vaxxers before the Strasbourg Court: Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic". Strasbourg Observers. Retrieved 17 November 2021.

This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e