ZEPHYRIS' TALK PAGE
FEEL FREE TO ADD A MESSAGE! Please add new entries to the bottom, and don't forget to sign your name by typing four tildes: ~~~~.	Archives Archive 1 Archive 2

Hello Zephyris. I am a student in this graduate-level course. My project is to work to hopefully get an article to good article status, and I have chosen mTORC1 as my article. I am at the phase where I am supposed to elicit responses and found your user page under the molecular and cellular biology page. If you have any input to the article, that would be great. If not, that is okay as well. Thanks. Flemingrjf (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhizoxin.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC) DMacks (talk) 05:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this in the commons because I suspect the coin on the right to be genuine just really badly worn. AJUK ^Talk!! 10:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zephyris,

I have just posted the helicopter anatomy picure in my blog. Sorry, I have only read now, that I should ask for permission first. Sorry for being so impolite. I just didn't know. Please let me know if you want me to remove the picture. You can find it here: http://helikopterhysterie.blogspot.com/ It will be tomorrow's entry. The blog is about helicopters, mostly it is original content and it is published daily.

Best regards

Freedman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.210.104.208 (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, expecially for something like a blog post, please do go ahead and use it! Credit is all I ask... - Zephyris _Talk 11:43, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris.

I would like to use one of your images at PurposeGames.com

It is the "Helicopter Anatomy" image.

If you're not familiar with PurposeGames, please have a look at it. In particular, see my profile at:

http://www.purposegames.com/profile/1325

if you check my games (available through the profile), you'll see that I make a habit of referencing the original author, and providing links to the sourcepages.

I will check back here for an answer. You could also leave me a message on my message board, but that would mean you'd have to register at PG, which you may not wish to do.

At PG, I go by the name Tickman. Here, I use the name Chadron (though I have yet to do anything at Wikipedia).

Chadron (talk) 19:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Chadron[reply]

As long as you give proper credit then I am very happy with you using this image! enjoy :) - Zephyris _Talk 15:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original author of that photo is Glenn Bloom at www.helicopterpage.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.162.241.122 (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated One Time for All Time, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Time for All Time. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am an editor with a publishing company and we would like to use one of your images in our textbook. Would you please post an email address at which I can contact you with more information? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.50.2 (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact my hotmail.com email address: be_very_happy_or_else@ - Zephyris _Talk 20:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have sent an email to your hotmail address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.50.2 (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zephyris. I'm trying to work on a pathway, and I'm stuck with something on the Complex Enzymatic Reaction template. I saw your name as a major contributor to the editing of that template. I'd really appreciate your help. I've copied out my complaint here so you won't have to travel far. Thanks a bundle! Shiningheart (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) How do I edit the size of images in this template? I've tried a variety of things, but to no avail. I'm still a rookie, so I don't want to edit any changes in the template itself. Can anyone assist? Thanks. You can check out my talk page to see the pathway I'm editing and the problem I've encountered.[reply]

To change the image size you just need to add the desired size in the template in the correct format. It gets complicated because of the crazy table and template formatting but if you just follow the following example it should always work fine:

To enter the following image with a width of 25px

Fructose.png

Enter the following in the template instead of just "Fructose.png"

Fructose.png{{!}}25px

The "{{!}}" encodes a pipe ("|") in a form that the template can cope with so it gets passed to the image properties.- Zephyris _Talk 12:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Anamanaguchi - Helix Nebula Excerpt.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris, As an editor working for a publication company I would like to ask for permission to use one of your pictures, the diagram of needles with different bevels. Here is the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NeedleBevels.svg. Can we have your permission to use this? We will of course be happy to reference your work and provide a link to the page. Let me know if you require any further information from me. I will be happy to email you any details you require Many thanks. B 213.212.70.122 (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the slow reply; I am very happy for you to use this image. A reference to me (Richard Wheeler (Zephyris)), Wikipedia and a link to the page in question would be perfect. - Zephyris _Talk 08:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris, as a researcher I would like to ask for permission to use one of your pictures in a paper, the diagram soil classification. Here is the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SoilComposition.png. Can we have your permission to use it? we will reference your work and provide a link to the page. Let me know if you require any further information from me. I will be happy to email you any details you require. Thanks Johann F. Osma ([email protected]) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.158.242.170 (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris,

I didn't understand your edit to Axenic. Is axenic culture any more important for studying these organisms than others? I'd have thought it less important in these cases for the reasons described in the last section of that article. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 15:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Axenic culture is definately important for parasite and symbiote research. For example study of a human parasite would be almost impossible if you could not grow the organism in the lab. Obviously study of the organism in the host is also important, but with totally different research aims. - Zephyris _Talk 13:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zephyris, I recently noticed your stirling engine animation (File:Alpha_Stirling.gif ) One thing that's missing in the schematic dough, is the flow of (hot/cold) gas back trough the regenerator. At http://www.animatedengines.com/vstirling.shtml , this is included in the schematic making things allot more clear. At first, when I saw your image, I didn't quite grasp it inmediatelly (needed to cross-compare with other images first). As such, I think this change of the animation is vital. In addition, another things which isn't quite clear is the heating and cooling. As I understand it, this only happens intermittently, and not constantly. Perhaps that you could draw out the heat exchangers connected to a short pipe, and apply coloring depending on when they cool/heat (I'm guessing this is done via valves ?)

Finally, a same approach needs to be followed with the beta stirling animation.

Thanks in advance,

KVDP (talk) 08:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You make good points but sadly (for the time being at least) I just don't have time to update the images. Maybe at some point in the future, my animation skills have come on a long way since then! - Zephyris _Talk 21:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made updates to 2 of your images:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alpha_Stirling_frame_1.png
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beta_Stirling_frame_1.png

I think they're correct (check anyway dough), so I will probably get started on the other images if you give me permission. I'll also need your support, especially since I've got some administrators watching every move I make on wikimedia commons (ie Andy Dingley, Globbet, ...) After the images are done (and checked), you can then make a new version of the animated gif. I hope this will save you allot of the time required so that we can finish it immediatly. Thanks in advance, KVDP (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zephyris,

I'm not sure whether you noticed it, but the image improvements I proposed have been deleted since then. Aldough 1 image modification contained errors (beta stirling, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Gamma_Stirling_frame_1.png ), the alpha stiling did not contain any, so the only explaination I can think of was the fact that I did not have your explicit support to make the new versions for your images. Is it thus possible to get your explicit support ? In addition, I'll probably alter the cycle, so that frame 1 is also the first stroke. Perhaps it's best that I sent you the images first via e-mail when they're done (perhaps best via your hotmail adress, rather than the PATH-one ? That way checking goes quicker and perhaps you can upload them (that way it's clear you support the modifications). Thanks in advance.

KVDP (talk) 12:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if there were serious mistakes in one image then the other wiki users would have been suspicious of the changes to other images, sorry you have had difficulties with this. If you get any more problems you can leave me a note and/or direct them here and I will do some talking too! I am very happy to check images etc. if you send them to me, my hotmail address would be best. Good luck, and thank you for contributing! - Zephyris _Talk 21:57, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the future it would be best if you uploaded your images to Commons. That way every Wikimedia site can make use of them, not just Wikipedia. If you don't have an account there already click this link and it will automatically create an account on all Wikimedia sites for you at once. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 10:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated one of your pictures I thought would make a great FP. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 10:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! - Zephyris _Talk 13:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Oxalis Triangularis Photonasty Timelapse.ogv, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:PaperAutofluorescence.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular T · C 13:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image stacked or juxtaposed ? Stitching a panorama usually implies horizontal juxtaposition. This image is 4x3. Could you provide more more detail on how this image was made. Is this "Art" or "News" ?~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is stitched in x and y, 4 images across and 3 images tall. It's not a focus stack, it is just merged neighbouring images, so is as you would see down the eyepiece of the microscope. - Zephyris _Talk 08:50, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm writing to thank you for and compliment you on the picture you took for diatomaceous earth. It's very informative! My dogs and I have fleas and Kunstformen der Natur, respectively, so it's an interesting topic for me. --Sean 17:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks, it is always nice to have your work appreciated, I hope I can contribute more images like it in the future! - Zephyris _Talk 19:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alitta succinea (epitoke form).jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Alitta succinea (epitoke form).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular talk 14:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday Richard! matt (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:4StrokeEngine Ortho 3D Small.gif, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 19:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Well done! The compression ratio correction truly makes this a gif worthy of being featured. I'm a little disappointed that I've lost an FP in the process, but as they say all good things must come to end... At any rate, for you work to enhance and replace the old gif, and your swift correction of the compression ration, I hereby award you The Graphic Designer's Barnstar. Outstanding effort, and keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 22:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zephyris!

Recently a translation of Oxidative phosphorylation was proposed to FA in the spanish wikipedia. I desagree with this nomitation, because I think that the article is a bit obsolete and lacks relevant information about thermodinamics and mechanisms, and also the structure of the article, even when its quite good, it's not the best it can be.

Now I'm trying to improve the article by myself. I wonder if you could make a new unlabeled image like this but using data from

PDB ID: 3M9S instead. I tried to do so with PyMol, as you can see here, but it can't be used in commons, as the picture states that can be used only for education. ¿Any clue? Thanks in advance: --Gustavocarra (talk) 17:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• How about this? I aligned the alpha helix-rich membrane domain horizontally as this seemed like a sensible orientation. - Zephyris _Talk 19:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, Zephiris for your time and quick answer! Very nice with these metallic colors! The orientation in my image shows both the new-found cavity in which is thought to have place the electron transfer to ubiquinone, and also shows the HL helices, wich unfortunately are in the opposite side of the membrane domain, and are very important to explain the proton translocation mechanism in this model. So I hope you could represent the lipid bilayer as in your former image to give 3D impresion. Iron clusters are not necessary since I know their location and can be added when I label the image. Anyway, the lipid bilayer could be represented with dimension lines if you couldn't add it.

Tons of thanks, Zephyris —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavocarra (talk • contribs) 17:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this? - Zephyris _Talk 21:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice! Thank you, Zephyris! I'll work in the labels the next days and I'll tell you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gustavocarra (talk • contribs) 16:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I found a vector version of File:Metabolism 790px.png, but File:Metabolism 790px partly labeled.png does not have one and removing the English labels and their shadows one by one using Inkscape is really annoying. Could you upload a SVG version, so that we can use it on other language Wikipedias? Matthias M. (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found File:Metabolism_790px_unlabeled.png in your contribution history which can be used for translation... Matthias M. (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

my fault, Sorry! --91.89.248.220 (talk) 23:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyris, I responded with as much factual information as I thought would be helpful at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/CG image of espresso tamper. Please see if that makes as much sense to you as it does me. Greg L (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving me a message, it is very kind of you! I have given my follow up comment at WP:FPC, it's quite short :) - Zephyris _Talk 09:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YW. Do you think the image is eye-catching to the point readers will want to read the accompanying article? Greg L (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this image has a typo: the imidazolium should have a hydrogen, not nitrogen on the nitrogen of its left side. --vuo (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Much thanks for your constructive review of my featured picture candidate on the cosmic calendar. I have tried to fix the issues you raised and would like to repost it as a featured image. Could you critique the current version? Your prior review was very helpful:

• Image is now native 1600 * 1200 png
• Description has been updated. I was previously relying on the article to explain the image
• I left the calendar at 3 timelines with december 31st having most information, but I tried to graphically separate out human evolution on December 31st. I did not add a 4th timeline for the hours of the day as I couldn't get it to work without graphically cluttering the image.
• Most text changes you suggest are adopted. I left "dinosaurs at top of food chain" because it captures a key idea, which is that mammals were blocked from diversifying and advancing because dinosaurs were the dominant life form. Is there a better way to say that with fewer letters?

Thanks again! - Efbrazil (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:DNA Structure+Key+Labelled.pn NoBB.png, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular talk 00:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Leaf Tissue Structure.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 01:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:QR Code Structure Example 2.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 04:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zephyris, would you consider removing your comment from the focus stacking nomination? The user you're replying to seems to be a bit of a troll, and doesn't need any more food... I agree that it's a bit of a strange comment he made, I think other people will see this too. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I've seen the other ongoing discussions and see what you mean... - Zephyris _Talk 12:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Your images are great, btw! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 13:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:FocusStack BrightFieldLightMicroscopy DiatomaceousEarth.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular talk 03:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hello :) I have made an horizontal version of those 7 images for the french version of "focus stacking" article (so that it will fit better with the text). Of course I specified you was the author when I loaded it. DamienBerthelemy — Preceding unsigned comment added by DamienBerthelemy (talk • contribs) 10:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In your excellent ball and stick DNA picture,

DNA Structure+Key+Labelled.pn NoBB.png

there is an inset showing blowups of two consecutive base pairs in the main picture. The lower base pair CG is correct but I think there is a problem with the upper one. In the blowups, the upper pair is TA, but in the main molecule it is GC. Maybe you can redraw the base pair in the main molecule to make it consistent with the blowup. (The next base pair up in the main molecule is indeed TA, but it is not angled conveniently for viewing---the T eclipses the A too much). Alternatively, you might want to redraw both the main molecule and the upper blowup to be AT. This would have the advantage of showing that the double helix can accommodate base pairs in any orientation, i.e. with either the purine or the pyrimidine on either strand, without distorting its overall shape. The way the main molecule is now, with GC above CG, shows this nicely, so an alternative fix would be to keep the main molecule the same and change the upper blowup to be GC. But that would have the disadvantage of not showing all four bases in the blowups. You clearly have a flair for this, so I leave it in your hands.CharlesHBennett (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, good spot. You are absolutely right. I will have a look at correcting this asap. - Zephyris _Talk 19:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a much better quality version of the image that hasn't been jpeg'd to death :), if you care reconsidering your vote.Tinss (talk) 20:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, I am very happy to support this version :) - Zephyris _Talk 11:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. In Bath Oliver, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Cracker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris... I saw that you prepared / uploaded the image File:DNA orbit animated.gif. I am thinking of using it on another article and it would be helpful to know the base pair sequence. I am thinking of putting your image adjacent to the base pair sequence to illustrate what a list of pairs represents at a molecular level. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, EdChem (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll have to look into that a little bit, I definitely have the source files somewhere! I will drop you a message when I find it. - Zephyris _Talk 13:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise.

Link: Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates#Delist procedure changes Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:PaperAutofluorescence.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 31, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-31. —howcheng {chat} 20:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Oxalis Triangularis Photonasty Timelapse.ogv is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 27, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-02-27. —howcheng {chat} 22:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Diatomaceous Earth BrightField.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 2, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-03-02. —howcheng {chat} 18:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Microtubule, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Midbody and Cillium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Zephrys,

for our student textbook about Charles Darwin (Die Entstehung der Arten, illustrated and commented by Paul Wrede and Saskia Wrede) we kindly ask you for permission to use the coloured model of the DNA.

Our book will be published in German by VCH-Wiley. It is addressed to beginners in biology like students or highly educated laymen. Publication will be December 2012.

With best regards

Paul Prof. Paul Wrede Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Institut für Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) email: [email protected] Tel.: 030-838 71349 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul wrede (talk • contribs) 15:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Complex biochemical reaction has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Biochemical reaction has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:DNA Structure+Key+Labelled.pn NoBB.png is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 17, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-17. —howcheng {chat} 18:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Leaf Tissue Structure.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 3, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-12-03. —howcheng {chat} 12:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote on the edited animation when you can. Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can replace it by one similar to your nice animations used in the A-DNA and Z-DNA articles. A static picture doesn't give nearly as good an idea of the 3d structure.CharlesHBennett (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris!

I am creating a p53 Wiki for a class I am taking, and I used an image of yours . I credited the picture to you and I also provided a link. Thank you! Your image helped a lot! Keri Sullivan (talk) 07:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Keri Sullivan[reply]

Great! I am glad you found it useful :) - Zephyris _Talk 14:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris,

on Commons you uploaded a series of cool turbofan animations: Turbofan Unlabelled.gif. Thanks for that. Unfortunately the shaft is turning in the wrong direction, pushing the air contrary regarding the arrows. Maybe you still have the source files four this animation and can process these animations again? This would be great. Thank you.

Regards, Berg2 (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How did I not notice that! I will see if I can find the source files... - Zephyris _Talk 11:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris- You had previously commented on this nomination. I wanted to let you know I have uploaded an alternate version of the original image. Thanks.--Godot13 (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well over a year ago you voted on an image of an archimollusc which was a candidate for Featured Picture. I am renominating it now after many changes, most of them I hope for the better. If you have new thoughts, comment, or suggestions, they would all be appreciated. Thank you! KDS4444^Talk 17:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thermostat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shaking Torch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've a suggestion for you. The Wikiversity Journal of Medicine accepts submissions of medically-related images for publication. The format is to give some scientific background, describe the history of any previous versions of the image, references and sources, and the decisions made for how to present the information. It's an interesting way of having a searchable (on google scholar) cite-able record. It was featured in the signpost last week too (link).

• E.g.: Häggström, Mikael (27 March 2014). "Diagram of the pathways of human steroidogenesis" (PDF). Wikiversity Journal of Medicine. 1 (1). doi:10.15347/wjm/2014.005.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

Your diagrams such as File:HumanEmbryogenesis.svg would be great candidates for submission. I think its an interesting experiment in bringing together the Wikipedia and Academic communities so I'm also submitting {{Eukaryote_gene_structure}}. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 01:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to know which software you used to create Image:DNA Structure+Key+Labelled.pn NoBB.png. I am interested in an DNA-Model for my PhD-Work (academic and non-profit work), I thought you might send me the model, or tell me where I can find a database. You can find my contact data on the website of my institute at TU Wien.  — Johannes Kalliauer - talk | contributions 11:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I made this using Blender. I wrote a custom converter from PDB using the PDB file 1BNA (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1BNA) to OBJ, and then used modifiers in blender to make the final model. - Zephyris _Talk 12:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for help. Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology#Vitamins - specifically B vitamins articles. Thank you! Donama (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Azaroonus (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I like your image of the hemocytometer counting grid Hemocytometer but I would like to edit it slightly for my students as we use the Bürker Türk counting chamber which is slightly different. Would you be able to share an vector graphics (svg) version of the file so that I can edit it? I will also upload my edits (with attribution and share alike)

Just keep your pictures to yourself, mate! Fortunately, the WWW is much larger than just Wikipedia. No one needs you (or Wikipedia)! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 21:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Biochemistry, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Biochemistry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Biochemistry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:34, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Loveheartjustsayno.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris, the images you create are stunning! May I ask you which software did you use to create File:Leaf Tissue Structure.svg or File:Leaf Structure.svg? Nicola Trozzi (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I question the accuracy of the WHO data used in your chart "Deaths per 100,000 population due to African trypanosomiasis by country in 2002". The 1.46121 deaths/100,000 people in Madagascar for the year 2002 figure I doubt as the tsetse fly is/was not present in Madagascar and I can find no record of sleeping sickness in Madagascar in either English or in French. The current WHO data shows no trypanosomiasis in Madagascar. ^[1] Skimble skamble (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Skimble skamble (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very slow reply I realise, but I've checked the source data and it does list 1.5 for Madagascar in 2002. - Zephyris _Talk 20:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Biochemistry, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Biochemistry (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Biochemistry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 20:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zephyris. Chhandama and I were talking about T. brucei and I see you added [1] the text about flagellar attachment to the tsetse midgut. I don't think the (recently added) citations support that but I don't know of any other source that will either. I was wondering if you could support that 16 years later. Thanks. Invasive Spices (talk) 12 March 2022 (UTC)

I thought I would check with you before adding a short section on light scanning photomacrography to your focus stacking page. I already incorporated text and a link to the focus stacking page. Here is the text I would like to add to the your page. Let me know if that would work for you.

Prior to the introduction of digital photography, light scanning photomicrography an analog technique was used to capture macro images with extreme depth of field using film-based cameras. Unlike focus stacking, which digitally combines multiple images taken at different focal planes, light scanning photomicrography achieves this effect in a single exposure. [[User:Audiopraming|Audiopraming]] ([[User talk:Audiopraming|talk]]) (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]