User talk:Xander756

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-January_2015-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z-January_2015"],"text":"January 2015","linkableTitle":"January 2015"}-->

January 2015

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-January_2015-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z-January_2015"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-January_2015-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z-January_2015"],"text":"January 2015","linkableTitle":"January 2015"}-->
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing your BLP violations and personal attacks after a previous block. You cannot edit this talk page because you continued to use it for personal attacks last time you were blocked; you may appeal to WP:UTRS or email me. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z","author":"HJ Mitchell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HJ_Mitchell-2015-01-07T19:42:00.000Z-January_2015","replies":[],"displayName":"HJ\u00a0Mitchell"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-On_your_block-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z-On_your_block"],"text":"On your block","linkableTitle":"On your block"}-->

On your block

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-On_your_block-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z-On_your_block"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-On_your_block-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z-On_your_block"],"text":"On your block","linkableTitle":"On your block"}-->

Could you e-mail me your best recollection of what you stated in your appeal? For instance, what did you say about Sarkeesian there and did you provide any sources?--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 00:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","author":"The Devil's Advocate","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z-On_your_block","replies":["c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:56:00.000Z-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

I received your e-mail, just so you know.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 00:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-08T00:56:00.000Z","author":"The Devil's Advocate","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:56:00.000Z-The_Devil's_Advocate-2015-01-08T00:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed"],"text":"Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate closed","linkableTitle":"Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate closed"}-->

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate closed

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed"],"text":"Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate closed","linkableTitle":"Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate closed"}-->

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1.1)

(i) The community Gamergate general sanctions are hereby rescinded and are replaced by standard discretionary sanctions, which are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed.

(ii) All sanctions in force when this remedy is enacted are endorsed and will become standard discretionary sanctions governed by the standard procedure from the moment of enactment.

(iii) Notifications issued under Gamergate general sanctions become alerts for twelve months from the date of enactment of this remedy, then expire. The log of notifications will remain on the Gamergate general sanction page.

(iv) All existing and past sanctions and restrictions placed under Gamergate general sanctions will be transcribed by the arbitration clerks in the central discretionary sanctions log.

(v) Any requests for enforcement that may be open when this remedy is enacted shall proceed, but any remedy that is enacted should be enacted as a discretionary sanction.

(vi) Administrators who have enforced the Gamergate general sanctions are thanked for their work and asked to continue providing administrative assistance enforcing discretionary sanctions and at Arbitration enforcement.

1.2)

Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in this case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:

(i) Accounts with a clear shared agenda may be blocked if they violate the sockpuppetry policy or other applicable policy;

(ii) Accounts whose primary purpose is disruption, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely;

(iii) There are special provisions in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;

(iv) The default position for BLPs, particularly for individuals whose noteworthiness is limited to a particular event or topic, is the presumption of privacy for personal matters;

(v) Editors who spread or further publicize existing BLP violations may be blocked;

(vi) Administrators may act on clear BLP violations with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;

(vii) Discretionary sanctions permit full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has become aware of sanctions for the topic – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

The Arbitration Committee thanks those administrators who have been helping to enforce the community general sanctions, and thanks, once again, in advance those who help enforce the remedies adopted in this case.

2.1) Any editor subject to a topic-ban in this decision is indefinitely prohibited from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, (a) Gamergate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

4.1) NorthBySouthBaranof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

5.1) Ryulong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

5.3) Ryulong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely banned from the English Language Wikipedia. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

6.2) TaraInDC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished for treating Wikipedia as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

7.2) Tarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

7.3) Tarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Wikipedia by motion of the Arbitration Committee.

8.2) The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

8.3) Subject to the usual exceptions, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 48-hour period. This applies for all pages on the English Wikipedia, except The Devil's Advocate's own user space. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.4) Subject to the usual exceptions, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely prohibited from editing any administrative or conduct noticeboard (including, not not limited to; AN, AN/I, AN/EW, and AE), except for threads regarding situations that he was directly involved in when they were started. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.5) The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Wikipedia by motion of the Arbitration Committee. Further, the committee strongly suggests that The Devil's Advocate refrains from editing contentious topic areas in the future.

9) TheRedPenOfDoom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished for treating Wikipedia as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

10.1) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing Tutelary (talk · contribs) from editing under the Gamergate general sanctions. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. Tutelary (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

12) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic bans preventing ArmyLine (talk · contribs), DungeonSiegeAddict510 (talk · contribs), and Xander756 (talk · contribs) from editing under the Gamergate general sanctions. The topic bans for these three editors are converted to indefinite restrictions per the standard topic ban.

13) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing Titanium Dragon (talk · contribs) from editing under BLP enforcement. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. Titanium Dragon is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

14.1) Loganmac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

15) Willhesucceed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

18) The Arbitration Committee urges that knowledgeable and non-conflicted users not previously involved in editing GamerGate-related articles, especially GamerGate-related biographies of living people, should carefully review them for adherence to Wikipedia policies and address any perceived or discovered deficiencies. This is not a finding that the articles are or are not satisfactory in their present form, but an urging that independent members of the community examine the matter in light of the case.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z","author":"Callanecc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Callanecc-2015-01-29T00:46:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Case\/GamerGate_closed","replies":[]}}-->

UTRS

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-UTRS","replies":[]}}-->

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Xander756 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #28737 was submitted on 2020-01-29 03:06:17. This review is now closed.