Hello, VoxLuna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Nivus|(talk)|(desk) 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is VAAM a scientific or marketing name? The inclusion of an athlete's feelings counts sounds like product endorsement, so I removed that. Widefox 16:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vespa amino acid mixture is used in both the National Geographic story (itself a distillation of the TV program) and in other studies (such as this PubMed article and one at the L’Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique). Searching for its acronym, VAAM, gets you a lot of supplement ads/websites but a few relevant entries as well. I would argue that hoodia is mentioned in venues both promotional and scientific, too. By the way, you added a {{cn}} but missed the fact that it said "liquid liquid".

As for the athlete's claim, it was a statement of fact (that she believes it worked). While it may ultimately have been a product endorsement, the first study above claims "a significant effect on the respiratory exchange ratio and ratings of perceived exertion", and the second said the VAAM may have provided "energy sources for muscles during exercise." So I may restore it with these citations when I revisit the article. — VoxLuna ^(talk)  22:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] The following term was not found: vaam. See Details. No items found.

OK VAAM is marketing term.

An athlete's claim is not scientific and is hearsay. I have removed it, as it is product endorsement. Wikipedia is not a space for advertising claims or product endorsement. As an athlete and scientist myself, I am not happy with the inclusion of any of these preliminary studies without a balance, or knowing if the studies are paid for by the companies. "Vespa amino acid mixture" does not sound scientific - usually the active ingredient will be identified and used, so I am very sceptical. Sugar is energy, but it needs no special mention in Sugar. Widefox 00:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better to me! Ditch mine! --SFoskett 16:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I uploaded the original to Wikicommons, added a few bells and whistles (geolocation, etc), and replaced the one in the article. Thanks! — VoxLuna ^{T / C} 

I've given you the rollback bit per your request. Sorry it took a while to get to it, been off Wikipedia for the past week or so. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryan Derksen (talk • contribs) 23:29, 11 Nov 2008

NP, I'm patient. ;) Thanks for your help, and here's hoping I don't munge things up too terribly. — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   09:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you changed the trim listed on that Geo Storm image I uploaded from GS to GSi. I based the original image description on the badge on the car, which is GS. What was your change based on? IFCAR (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you saw this, because for some reason I couldn't find an appropriate user/talk page when I did the edit. Originally I was going to add the reasoning to the image's talk page, but there was a warning that says "nobody ever looks at this" so I tried to be descriptive in the edit summary. I knew these things as an owner of a 1990 GSi, but I'll try to source them/rationalize below, as my knowledge alone is WP:OR. There were two changes I made:

1. From GS to GSi. This one's easy... on the Geo (as opposed to the Impulse), there were only two trim levels available, base (sometimes called 2+2 but unbadged) and GSi. Base models have obvious external cues, such as no ground effects, wheel covers instead of rims, no air dam/fog lights, lack of open headrests on the seat, and no rear wiper[2]. So basically, if it has all these, it should be a GSi. Now, I agree, I can't make out any "i" in the insignia. Perhaps it broke off or isn't visible at this resolution. But I can't find any mention of "GS" as a trim level online.

2. The year, from "1990-1991" to "1991". GSi's had (only) cast alloy rims with a flat, more spoke-like appearance in 1990[3] (later they were used for some base models, but not GSi's). In your photo they are "swirls," which were A) only available on a GSi, and B) only MY 1991 onward. You can also determine year based on the badging: if it's upper and lowercase ("Storm GSi") it's a 1990, if it's all uppercase ("STORM GSi") then it's 1991 or later — unfortunately, it's hard to see which here. The car does have the solid spoiler, so that means 1990 or '91 (it's "open" in later versions [4]). Last but not least, the pop-up headlight covers were used on '90-91 only.

Yep, these are tiny little details that nobody really cares about except wikignomes. Hope this helps! — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   23:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I trusted you on the year, but I just wanted to check where you were coming from on a trim that didn't seem to match the badge.

And about image talk pages -- I have almost every file I've uploaded in my watchlist, and I assume I'm not the only one. So using that page doesn't necessarily mean you'll be entirely ignored. IFCAR (talk) 03:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:467191491 l.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 23:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Signatures#Images. You should not have an image in your signature. As an alternative, you could look for a unicode symbol to replace it. Sorry, Sven Manguard Wha? 18:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It actually says "must not use images". But to be honest, being that WP:SIG is guideline, and since I made sure to use an SVG file, I've never thought it an issue (nor has anyone else in 4 years). I researched this whole matter extensively last night, and there are several problems, not the least of which is it being transcluded at all. So I can't justify using this method, nor the crescent, anymore. Thanks, VoxLuna (talk) 05:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I only noticed because I saw a box that said "14px" in it next to your name somewhere. My internet was being temperamental. I wouldn't sacrifice the color and personality, I'd just swap out for a unicode if I were you. Hope you find something that works. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The whole transclusion thing is worded poorly. As long as you're substituting the signature, so that the actual code appears on the page, not the template itself, you're fine. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VoxLuna. I adjusted your signature in the autoconfirmed status proposal as it was breaking the count, making it appear that the statement you supported had fewer supports than it actually did. It may be useful to go back through your edits to check on other instances where your signature may have caused problems. SilkTork *^{Tea time} 09:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, I'm very sorry that happened. I've recently been trying to sort out some unfortunate issues with the signature... one of the tasks I had lined up was to fix each Talk Page instance in the past. I'll make this a higher priority now. I wish I could simply change the template, but transclusion itself is frowned upon, as it turns out. Thanks for fixing that, and bringing it to my attention. — VoxLuna (talk) 03:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

VoxLuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:TorNodeBot has incorrectly assessed this IP as being a Tor exit node. However, this address has never allowed such traffic to exit. Please use a private medium (e.g. email) for any discussion that may expose my IP address.

Accept reason:

Granting IPBE. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no evidence of a block affecting this account. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The user doesn't want to post the autoblock template as it would give away their IP, thus I've reverted my decline. Maybe an IPBE is in order here. Kwsn (Ni!) 14:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I never got around to properly acknowledging your help, so here's my belated thanks for fixing me up. You might consider documenting my particular case at Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exemption/log — I skimmed through it, and there appears to be only one comment in two years related to Tor. Again, thanks! — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   19:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your version in the introduction section:

[…] produce instant text feeds within a courtroom and distribute them in ASCII format right after a proceeding.

My suggested correction:

[…] produce instant text feeds within a courtroom and distribute them in plain text format right after a proceeding.

Are you ok with this?

Reasoning: I think you intended plain text. ASCII is just one particular implementation of plain text, the most popular and widely used one for sure, and therefore probably used almost like a synonym, but the encyclopedically correct approach would be using the general term. An example for the same misused terminology would be to falsely use Pampers as a general terms for diapers (particular brand name for general product class). The problem gets even more obvious, if you think about voice writers, who dictate languages which need Non-ASCII characters! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PutzfetzenORG (talk • contribs) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although this was a while ago, I'm sure I intended for it to mean plain text, so that correction is just fine. BTW, you don't necessarily need to ask permission to change or improve upon an article, unless you think it's a contentious issue. (Also, be sure to sign your Talk Page messages with the five tildes.) Thanks! — VoxLuna (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know that I do not need to ask for editing permission, but I wanted to do so, as I'm not knowledgeable about the topic (Stenomask), thus I was keen to know the previous author's intention. I traced the addition of the "ASCII" part back to you through WikiBlame. I will apply the edit now. --PutzfetzenORG (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see that you were a long-time WP user until I went to your talk page to add the {{Talkback}} template, so I assumed you were new. Also, ...

And as you are knowledgeable on the topic I would appreciate your participation in Talk:Stenomask#Stenomask_developed_in_the_1940ies_-_Speech_recognition_added_later --PutzfetzenORG (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

... I'm probably not any more knowledgable about the Stenomask than the average person. Most likely, I had been reading up on the subject elsewhere and was just imparting some tidbit onto the page. You might try placing the {{Expert|Technology}} tag on the article itself or its talk page, which will show this:

This article needs attention from an expert in Technology. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Technology may be able to help recruit an expert.

Hope this helps. — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   21:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that info! I will act accordingly. --PutzfetzenORG (talk) 10:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the signature: I always used the toolbar signature icon, which inserts --~~~~.

1. What's wrong with that?
2. Why should I use 5 tildes instead?

1. Maybe you just forgot in the message above. If you look at the paragraph beginning with "Reasoning", the autobot has signed it for you: "— Preceding unsigned comment added by PutzfetzenORG (talk • contribs) 16:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)"[reply]
2. I'm sorry, I was quite mistaken -- it should be four tildes. I was thinking "five" because that's what I add after I sign with my template, to append the current time. In other words, I type {{User:VoxLuna/sign}} ~~~~~. My apologies for any confusion there. — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   20:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged. --PutzfetzenORG (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"How to insert the large images of quotation marks on either side of a <blockquote>'d chunk of text."

You can use {{cquote}}, but it is not supposed to be used in articles per WP:MOSQUOTE. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 23:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I eventually discovered and experimented with the fat quotes tag, but didn't like the look of it. I also tried simple <blockquotes>, but ultimately chose {{quotation}}. I hope this has improved the appearance and function of Brian_Wilson#Comments_by_other_musicians significantly. — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   22:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catching up after Christmas activity - regarding the ability to localise dates/words, that is something technology should be able to do, and there was an automated date formatting that was used for some years. Unfortunately, it was decommissioned after a heavy debate (see MOS:UNLINKDATES). The only way to autoformat was to link the dates (e.g. 29 December 2012), thus displaying according to user's preferences. This would have been a good technological advance, but numerous editors felt otherwise. Another concern is that if bots were to attempt such formatting, these would cause problems when encountering verbatim items such as quotations and titles, and would not always be effective at dealing with the numerous syntax/spelling errors in articles. Hope this explanation helps. Dl2000 (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bennett & Elliott states on page 305 of the 2003 (5th) edition that no narcotic effect has been observed in either helium or neon. I know that it remarks on page 304 that noble gases cause the same signs and symptoms as air, but vary in their potency, but Peter Bennett goes on to consider in detail helium, neon and hydrogen on the next page, where he makes clear that any narcotic potency for helium and neon is too small to have been observed, and in any case is swamped by the antagonism of the increased hydrostatic pressure (the "pressure reversal effect"). I've therefore restored the previous text. There was already a section on the talk page discussing the issue, but I've made a new section in case you want to discuss it further. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello VoxLuna,
you tell us on your user-page that you have a PGP-key, but you don’t provide it. Could you please use a pgp-template with an ID-field (like Template:User PGP)? Also it would be great if you could send me your key-ID by wiki-mail or leave it on my talk-page. Thanks :-). --DaB. (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't currently use PGP and have not generated a new key for the current 2-year period (I have them expire on a regular basis). I have removed the reference to the old key, and the category on the page, for now. — VoxLuna ☾ ^orbit_land   23:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copperhead (politics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberty Head large cents. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VoxLuna. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VoxLuna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

VoxLuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23138 was submitted on Nov 05, 2018 09:04:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VoxLuna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Voxluna-phone.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Voxluna-cplx.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ML350 interior.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ML350 front.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]