This user may have left Wikipedia. Vale of Glamorgan has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

117Avenue (talk) 03:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vale: Please join in and share your views at the discussion about the Canadian Yeshiva & Rabbinical School at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Canadian Yeshiva & Rabbinical School. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of federal by-elections in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to George G. King, William Gray, Thomas Osborne Davis and Duncan Graham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up: in general, it's not a good idea to blank categories and move everything to a new category you have created. I understand what you are doing with the Labor-Progressive politicians categories and why and you should probably go ahead and finish what you are doing, but for the future please use WP:CFD to rename categories. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bruce Magnuson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Strike

James Aubrey Simmons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pipeline

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tom McEwen (politician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

All you have to do is review someone else's contribution and you are OK to go. Drop me a line on my talk page when you have, and I'll update the ? to a tick. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've responded at Template:Did you know nominations/Photo Bits --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador leadership elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noel Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tom McEwen (politician), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the 1945 Canadian federal election, Yukon Communist Tom McEwen came within 162 votes of being elected to parliament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom McEwen (politician).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hastings—Frontenac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Larry McCormick

History of neighbourhoods in Toronto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Long Branch

Streetcar suburb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Long Branch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Santorum vs santorum". Thank you. --The Gnome (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Gilligan's Island name perplex me. By removing the sentence "A father would not typically refer to their son by the last name. Given that Schwartz was involved in the making of the movie, its very likely that this is strong evidence that Gilligan's full name is Gilligan Whitehead." the discussion of a 'very brady sequel' looks like an unrelated tidbit of information rather than providing evidence to solving the problem of the name, which this section refers to. The evidence is just as useful as the prior text on the page that suggests its a last name since Mr. Schwartz had once penned 'Wily' in some notes prior to the first pilot episode. Perhaps the is suitable text for you to consider, certainly it makes Gilligan more likely to be a first name as fathers don't refer to their son's by last name. Let me know what your thoughts are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtagchair (talk • contribs) 17:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC) Wow, thanks for your fast response! Yes I undertand your position now. Thanks for the help here. However, the entre Gilligan Wiki is lighthearted speculation on a fictional character. The prior line in the name section says, "The writers, heightening the folklore surrounding Gilligan, omitted the first mate's name despite providing the names of the others." is speculation that the writers intentionally heighted the folklore by omitting the first mate's name. There is no evidence of that or reference from the writers which proves that. So what can we do to round out that snippet which meets the wiki rules, otherwise it looks like a dangling little sentence which the reader may not connect its purpose. "This has caused some to speculate that this is further evidence that Gilligan is a first name." Or "This may have caused speculation that Gilligan is a first name since a father would not call his son by last name" or "This has caused speculation that Gilligan is Gilligan Whitehead" or "Mr. Schwartz, in his final film, perhaps allowing the fan piece together the clue on Gilligan's full name." Any thoughts there? Thanks for fast response and input. 71.233.36.106 (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Loret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Loret until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 09:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NDP Leaders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 117Avenue (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of federal by-elections in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alphonse Desjardins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jim Brochu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Stephen Schwartz and Hello, Dolly!

Independent Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberal

List of federal by-elections in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William McDougall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Marxist Left (Brazil). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  22:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ontario New Democratic Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balance of power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited A. A. MacLeod, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cape Breton and Black Rock, Nova Scotia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etobicoke Centre is not officially vacant. Ted Opitz has eight days to decide whether to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, so he's not actually out of office yet. Bearcat (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vale thank you for the courtesy of contacting me however I have clearly read that Jon Cryer endorsed John McCain and that his agent made it clear that Cryer was not a republican but never said that Cryer did not endorse John McCain nor did Cryer ever intend a fundraiser for President Obama or any other canidate his agent statement to me seemed like spin of already established fact also she again never denied he endorsed McCain anyway I read you won't be on wiipedia for a while due to personal issues I wish you the best and look forward to hearing back from you but will revert the edit back unless new information is brought to my attention — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.39.105 (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to read my reasoning on the Cryer talkpage and talk back to me if you find any new information or flaws in my logic but to make a brief summation of it here Cryer's agent made clear that he is not a republican and that republicans were quick to associte him with them the agent never expressly denied Cryer endorsed McCain which does from what I see make the claim that Cryer endorsed McCain erronous also reports of celebrities endorsing McCain generally if not always list Cryer so to say some reports is inaccurate also after many extensive searches I have never found evidence that Cryer attended anyother candidates fundraisers which leads me to believe his agent is trying to spin established fact and as an enclyopedia we must be careful of those who would spin the truth to thier desire so leaving that cryer endorsed McCain and his agents statements seems like the best way to represent both sides and reflect the sourced materials---sorry if I made this to longwinded and boring I'm new at this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.39.105 (talk) 22:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the people involved in the dispute over whether or not a non-free image can be used at Kim Jong-un, do you agree with what I've written in the above page about Hammersoft's behaviour in his opposition to one? Does this match your perception of him? If so, would you be prepared to be co-certifier of that request for comment? Krolar62 (talk) 01:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Unforgettableid (talk) 04:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Most Wanted Nazi War Criminals according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Most Wanted Nazi War Criminals according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 02:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ida Lucas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character who appeared in only a handful of episodes of a TV show. No in-depth coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Psychonaut (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catherine Pinhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Pinhas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tapestry (CHFI) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapestry (CHFI) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ontario general election, 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]