PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Archives

(2020–22) 1, (2023) 2, 3, (2024) 4, 5, 6, 7

Speedy deletion nomination of Transformare l'organizzazione dei luoghi di detenzione. Persone transgender e gender nonconforming tra diritti e identità

Hello TheLonelyPather,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Transformare l'organizzazione dei luoghi di detenzione. Persone transgender e gender nonconforming tra diritti e identità for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Transformare l'organizzazione dei luoghi di detenzione. Persone transgender e gender nonconforming tra diritti e identità to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding revised draft of E and B modes (Polarization)

Hi I have sent you couple of messages requesting a review of the revised draft - may I again request here once to bring to your notice the earlier messages thru my talk page over last week.

Would be happy to receive your review and possibly sufficient work done for removal of earlier decline. Jn.mdel (talk) 11:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looping you in

Just wanted to give you a heads up on an off-project discussion I had with a couple fellow editors regarding future articles in the Christian subject area. Do you have any key Christianity articles that you feel should be a priority to getting to GA or FA in 2025? ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti Thanks for the ping! I believe that FAs are more of a personal effort and so I am not inclined to push people to do it. That being said, I would like to see the following articles becoming GA in 2025. I believe that there are a plethora of sources available regarding these important subjects. I am trying to be inclusive for all denominations through this list.

Place: Notre-Dame de Paris—if Westminster Abbey can get GA then so can "the most famous of the Gothic cathedrals of the Middle Ages" (Britannica).

Bible: First Epistle to the Corinthians—important, relevant, and (somehow) contentious. One could argue that we Wikipedia editors have a responsibility to provide prevalent and accurate scholarship up here to the general public.

Person: Francis Xavier—I was about to put Thomas Aquinas here but it would take years to bring his article to GA; fortunately Francis Xavier didn't write that much and would make a suitable candidate.

Book: Mere Christianity—highly notable, sources are plenty, and the book isn't that long.

Institution: Seminary—we need to fix this article. It is in dismal state.

Council: First Council of Nicaea—need I say more?

My personal priorities for 2025, right now, are

Johann Adam Schall von Bell—German polymath missionary in China.
Lin Zhao—martyr during the Cultural Revolution.
Jingjiao Sanwei Mengdu Zan—a little surprise for you all.

Happy Advent to you! Let us expect some beautiful articles happening next year. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 21:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:41:40, 11 December 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by TheFenlandFather

TheFenlandFather (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Old Catholic Apostolic Church (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the review and for the reasons given for not approving the article. It’s not going to be an easy one to fix as the article is about the Old Catholic Apostolic Church, for which the authoritative source of information, and citations, is the web site and documents of the Old Catholic Apostolic Church!

I’m struggling to see how I can cite other sources. Do you have any concrete suggestions?

TheFenlandFather (talk) 15:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out, @TheFenlandFather. I think it will be helpful for you to read WP:Notability. To quote from Wikipedia's general notability guideline: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

If you cannot find significant independent coverage of your topic, then I am afraid that it is not suitable for Wikipedia—yet. Feel free to go to WP:Teahouse if you have other general questions as well. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 16:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]