This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ryulong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

That's very rude.
--The Skunk 02:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, you weren't signed in so I had no idea it was you. Secondly, what you did add to the page is in violation of Wikipedia:User page in some way.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

It's my page. I'm going to put on it what I want. If what is up there now against some damn guidelines then so is what you keep reverting it too. Revert my edits again and I'm going to report you. I do not appreciate you VANDALIZING my page. Don't do it again. --The Skunk 02:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I am not "vandalizing" any page. Your userpage is not for you to post your qualms against the world. It is not a blog for you to maintain.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I just finally figured this part out ^^;; I found information about GekiRed on www.d-boys.com, which says that Suzuki Hiroki would be playing him. I can't find the site that had the information for Nagayama Takashi. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kasey sanada (talk • contribs) 02:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC).

Do not worry. I have added the information concerning Hiroki to the page, and gave it a reference.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks a lot, and sorry for all the trouble ^__^ I will try to find that other page for Nagayama— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasey sanada (talk • contribs)

Okay :) Just remember to reference it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Please ban User:Mark Wilson123 based on User_talk:Mark_Wilson123 and The Agents 2:Benson and the fox cub. Thanks. -Slash-^μιλώ 02:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not an admin.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

That's a very good point. Sorry! =) -Slash-^μιλώ 03:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I should submit you for a RfA...later. Off to find an admin.

Wouldn't be the first time.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your work with vandalism, but especially tonight (New Years Eve, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you with this barnstar.S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Thankee.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Bearly541 01:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

I suppose I should add my own thanks on top of that. Happy New Years! --tjstrf talk 02:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Is the page really not about sock puppetry? The talk page does talk about a person that might use that account for evading bans. If not, then my apologies for reverting User talk:WikiMediaFndn's page. --Specter01010 02:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

It's essentially an attack page made up by a sockpuppet or someone impersonating User:Cplot who has been banned.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

sigh Yeah; adding the category "Fictional rapists" to Yakko, Wakko, and Dot should have been a tipoff... —tregoweth (talk) 00:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Hasn't he been doing this for some time?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Do you think you can help add pics to GARO? I'm know enough to add the pics on my own, but not too sure how to make it stay with copy right rules on wiki. Do you think you can help out if I added a pic and you'll just validate them? Thanks for your time.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Taikage (talk • contribs).

I've just found another sockpuppet of the banned user Bobabobabo, called User:Bobobobo, which I can obviously tell is a sockpuppet, by the username, plus they've been vandalisng pages. Only recieving a warning from an Ip address.--Rasillon 12:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Unlikely.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

was there any specific you didn't like? _→AzaToth 16:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

The huge list of the numbers. I'm just used to the old one D:—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Now why'd you have to go and deny Ga-Jin the Vadal Otaku (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)'s request for unblock [1]?! Did you ever stop to think that maybe I, as the unblocking admin, should get the opportunity to stop smelling like poo?! Geez Ryulong, stop thinking about the good of the encyclopedia for once and think about me! Thanks for nothing!  :)

But seriously, thanks for the reverts over there, Metros232 00:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, I have a question. Why did you revert my edit at the AIV. I thought I brought up a valid point. Cheers anyway. — Arjun 02:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

You accidentally linked to the watchlist in the commented out section, thought it'd screw everything up, and I removed him myself as he was not active.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Oops, sorry about that! Cheers! — Arjun 02:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to keep the individual guides, however, I agree the pics add little to each and you can go ahead and remove them. Currently I am still in the process of not only adding the new guides, but updating the old, so give me some time to work on them and improve the quality level. Drake Clawfang 04:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Seeing as there are several hundred (and school starts up again for me, soon) I would prefer not to do it by myself. If you have other users who also do these (like Benten) please work on this without me :(—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong. You reverted the changes made by Heyjokerman and Sookiehocky to the above page. I agree with your revert, as both users seem to be single-use socks. However, I have two comments.

• The Millhouse example should be included, as it can be cited. See my references on the talk page.
• The external link to the "Over 9000" video link should also be included. Although it was included by Heyjokerman, it is a valid example of a meme.

-- Rossj81 05:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Google is not a reliable source. And whether or not Jack Spicer or Millhouse not being memes being a meme itself is not something that we should list, as there is no way we can reliably source either.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Ryulong. I understand your comment that Google is not considered a reliable source. Furthermore, Guidelines for notability (even though it was rejected) also states Google should not be used as an indication of notability. However, Milhouse is the best example (of which I know) of a Forced Meme, and I believe at least one example should be included for this section of the article. The 4chan page lists it as an example of a Forced Meme. Would be happy with including Milhouse if we added a reference to Urban Dictionary, a source which could be seen as fairly dependable w.r.t. memes? -- Rossj81 06:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I removed Millhouse from the 4chan article for the same reason as at Internet meme. It cannot be accurately sourced (and urbandictionary does not count either).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message of support to this user. --Guinnog 08:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• 199.80.117.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Continued incivility as soon as a week-long block expired (listed before, but has editted after the final warning) --—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, this looks to be too complex for WP:AIV as it isn't a case for simple vandalism. I don't understand the context of the talk edits because they don't look to be vandalism in any way. Perhaps you should post this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard with more details to get some feedback. Cheers, Deathphoenix ʕ 21:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

He's really just being a dick because there were issues regarding reliable sources during the summer.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... it's definitely too complex to be simple vandalism. You'll need to post your report to another forum. Sorry, Deathphoenix ʕ 21:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I've renamed your account to Ryulong. (& the fake account to Ryulong-fake.) -- ChongDae 00:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed you added User:Hshillerista to AIV, but they have an empty talk page. Is this a mistake? I have to go to bed, but I thought I'd give you the heads up that they don't have any warnings if it was an error or something. Peace, delldot | talk 05:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Helen Shiller was recently unprotected due to editwarring from this person's earlier incarnations.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the nihongo templates to the Kabuto Rider Pages.. I've been meaning to do that for awhile. But seriously.. Tentō Sōshi? ^.* Cheers. | Floria L 02:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

That's what my Kanji-Romaji converter gives me. But it also gave me "Kagami Shin" for Gatack :/ Feel free to rendaku it up.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Can you give me an example of his sockpuppet blocked for a week? I noticed he had no warnings at all, so decided to be conservative. -- ReyBrujo 08:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Done, sorry for the delay. -- ReyBrujo 08:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem. However, you should probably read up on his antics at AN and ANI.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I happened across some of LibearyGay's edits and I think Rainbowangie is just trying to revert some of their overzealous changes. If you take a look at Libeary's edit history you will see they are going around adding speedy deletion templates all over the wiki for petty reasons on articles that if they were to be deleted should probably be taken to AfD. I'm not really familiar with wiki-stalking, but I think Rainbowangie's behavior is justified. Anyway, I'd appreciate another head being involved with the situation. Thanks. Paul^C/_T+ 10:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I see that both need looking at, but I have to sleep now :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 11:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks anyway then. Have a good night. Paul^C/_T+ 11:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I suggest taking them to afd. Notability is asserted in both case, hence they are not speedyable (not meaning tht I want them to remain however). Viridae^Talk 22:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I do not think that the articles assert any notability, as the only links are to the user's own website, an alexa ranking, and an online store where they get their supplies.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I was specifically referring to "The work of the group has been featured on the SciFi Channel "Ghost Hunters" and the Travel Channel "Weird Travels" to name a few." in the ghost hunters article and something similar in the bio. Viridae^Talk 22:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, you found the AFD.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, I would like to ask about your addition of {{prodwarning}} to Bus routes in Singapore. Perhaps it may just be a list, but many lists like these feature in Wikipedia. There are examples of such lists for the Bronx, Manhattan, Sydney (and 200 to 900 series as well, in fact), etc... then would those articles also go AfD according to WP:NOT#INFO as well? There is no point merging this list into other articles as it is 44 kilobytes large. In fact, it was split from Bus transport in Singapore as the page was getting too big. Actually, what exactly is your gripe with the article that you had to propose this article for deletion? It would be nice if you could suggest something to improve the article, because as far as I can see, nothing more can be done. 리지강.wa.au 19:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I would think that they should be considered WP:NOT#INFO as well. People do not use Wikipedia as a bus schedule.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The January issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Why did you revert my edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism? There is alot of vandalism on the Burlington, Ontario page. FellowWikipedian 22:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

AIV is for reporting specific individuals. What you want is probably WP:ANI for such a report.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I have listed a report on ANI. FellowWikipedian 23:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for joining Telugu Wikipedia. Welcome message for you, posted here

Kajasudhakarababu 06:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about readding the wrong name to AIV, totally got muddled up, didn't realise it had already been sorted as well. Sorry for any inconvenience it caused RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or lets have banter} 10:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sokay.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I would actually request that the account be blocked indefinitely for solely disruptive edits :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I considered that, but I am giving them 24 hours to think about their actions. It would not be the first time that someone who started out as a vandal came good. If they continue and get reported again I have no doubt they will get an indef block. Viridae^Talk 10:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Looks like a repeat act, though. Contribs a few days ago are nearly the same.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, saw them. And normally I would just block hiom for 24 hours first then indef if the actions were repeated afetr the block. However I have just realised what the name means so they get a username block. Viridae^Talk 10:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I do indeed :P Viridae^Talk 10:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your support in my my RfA, which passed with a tally of 117/0/1. I hope that my conduct as an admin lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page should you need anything or want to discuss something with me.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sheesh, is he trying to distract us by creating dozens of accounts? —tregoweth (talk) 05:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

And taggin them.—Ryūlóng (竜龍)

The boy's not right, that's for sure. —tregoweth (talk) 07:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, with all hopes, Dmcdevit dealt with the sock farm and hardblocked the IP.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Ryulong. Here [2] is the diff where I removed the listing from WP:RM after completing the move request, which had been posted under "Uncontroversial proposals". I checked the external sources (1 and 2) before completing the move, and noted that they both used the spelling "Carranger". Does that answer your question? -GTBacchus^(talk) 07:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I even contacted jgp off wiki once I found the diff myself. I agree with him now, though (CarRanger was in CamelCase to distinguish Car from Ranger :P)—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks greatly for helping out with the Gundam AFDs. Cheers, Moreschi ^Deletion! 18:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I saw that you were a fellow Cane, and I just wanted to pop in and say hi! If you ever need anything just stop by don't hesitate to ask! Mystify85JEC 21:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

First of all I would like to tell you good work on shortening the main Super Sentai page as I would find how acceptable it is not being too long as I admit the old trivia comments were overly long. Second I found a website that had Bakuryuu Sentai Abaranger fansubs that I had downloaded over the past few days and found inaccurate information on Abaranger that was caused due to information from the Power Rangers Dino Thunder version and fixed it correctly. If you would like to look at the footage yourself I can give you the link. -Adv193 02:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I won't be having that much access to fansubs or the like for a while, as school's starting up again and I won't be able to use various means of downloading videos. The only known subbing of Abaranger comes from Hong Kong and I'll look into your changes in the article to see what you actually did. Please, bring up this stuff at WT:TOKU.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay and just so you know the biggest inaccurate mix-up of information between the Abaranger and Power Rangers Dino Thunder version that I had to cleanup had to do with the Lijewloid Two-Worlds' KillerGhost profile. I also intend to submit the inaccurate inforamation problem on the Toku link -Adv193 02:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, this is the same detial freak who came up with data on DaiVoyager for Operation overdrive; a month or two back. I recently had the fortuen of veiwing subbed Episodes of Kamen Rider Ryuki, and noted that the Overview section was slightly incorect as to how Shinji becomes Ryuki. I thus expanded the article a bit, inproving it's accuracy...but also making it longer. I also noticed you are the last named editor of th epage, and as I know how proficent you are as a wikipedian, I've brought this up to ensure I haven't accidentaly created a problem. In short, I'm just checking with a known proffesional to see if these changes work. Whatever results, I just thought i'd bring that up, sir. Shotesu 04:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

I know nothing about Ryuki. Ask someone at WT:TOKU—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I can help. By the way, Ryu, you never answered me about posting at WP: TOKU.74.195.3.199 03:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I (coffee4binky) went in to edit something, and my browser and stuff glitched. Luckily, the browser did not close and I was able to restore whatever was considered erased. I think i was just going to put a {{fact}} in like i usually do, but was distracted by my power and phone company's current winter woes.

Just out of curiousity, what's JS mean? -- Kendrick7^talk 06:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

JavaScript—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I have never seen so many barnstars in a user page before. Anyways this might sound kind of funny or weird but before I seen your userbox template that said you where jewish I thought you where Asian or chinese. What does Ryulong stand for anyways?King Lopez 03:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

It's Japanese (Ryū) and Chinese (Lóng) for dragon, which I was interested in when I first came up with the nickname, and I've been too lazy to think of another one.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

My response to Ilena's continued personal atacks all over the place (as well as my offer to her) can be found here. -- Fyslee 11:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I would love to help out, but am currently only halfway through the game.  :( If you can't get anyone else, though, I'll go ahead and look it over. Spoilers be damned. -- Merope 20:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

It's more along the line of "was I wrong in violating 3RR to uphold both WP:SPOILER and WP:FU/the image policy?"—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I totally missed that. Keep up the good work! alphachimp 20:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I was trying to revert back, but I was unable to get back far enough. Thanks for straightening it out. --Petercorless 21:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Being the idiot I am, I forgot the add in the romanization for everything in the article. You seem to be good at it, could you give it a try? I'll work on the image in the meantime. Floria L 01:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I have nominated you for adminship, see your RfA with the link above. Good luck Somitho 06:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I threw in a co-nom so I could have a chance to rave about how awesome you are :-) --Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

With regards to [3]:

You say that "Dr Blass abused the process". How? Even if he really did take advantage of the blanking in some way, I think you should tell Jimbo Wales to undo his own blanking rather than take it upon yourself to undo the actions of someone who's the "supreme authority" around here. Just my $0.02. Flyingtoaster1337 07:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

See the discussion Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Piotr Blass for why I did so.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Flyingtoaster1337 07:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Merope (talk · contribs) is a female, based on a userpage box and the fact that Merope in Greek mythology was a female (foster mother, daughter, wife). Hbdragon88 23:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Whats_her_face.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apple glyph2.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. I have deprecated it with a font hack, .—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that image has since been orphaned by someone adding a new version to the original image Image:Apple glyph.png and reverting all links from the image I uploaded. Please speedy delete it, it is redundant. Nihiltres 04:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: that font hack does not show up for me! Do not use it, since it won't show up for many users, if it does not show up for me (standard installation of Mac OSX 10.4.8, the latest version) Nihiltres 04:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I realize it now.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for intervening on the Capella University matter. It appears as if the user in question may also be using a Capella University IP address User_talk:68.117.38.94 which has been previously warned for vandalism. Shac1 05:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks also for putting request for speedy deletion regarding the vandalism to my user page. What steps, if any, do I need to take in order to get it removed? Shac1 05:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

{{db-owner}} also works.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

looks like I jumped the gun on my comment in the wiki AIV page, sorry. I seem to hate vandals as much as you. Just didn't see the reason to report them, but now I do. Thanks for the good work, keep it up. --Xiahou 01:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. Have a good night.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[4] -- I was going to do something witty and revert it with the edit summary "YES!" but you beat me to it. :D -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 09:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Another plan foiled Σ:3—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my talk page while I was blocking that vandal. =) -- Gogo Dodo 09:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I was trying to be helpful. I realize that the tone is that of a modern-day pediatrician or social worker, but that is, to some degree, my perspective. Abortions were terribly dangerous back then but they were probably known to Elizabeth I because she seems like somebody who demanded facts rather than fairy tales from her Privy Council. But if you would "rather not talk about it" because there is no data, I suppose the whole "virginity" section can go since it is all just speculation and context. Of course, that popular "Virgin Queen" label has to stick around even though it is just a label and tells us no facts about Liz. Your choice.

Honestly, do you think her advisors did not see fit to sit her down at an early age and ensure that she understood such matters just as bluntly and clearly as possible? They had the future of an entire Nation in their hands. -- 71.156.102.142 10:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I removed unsourced information. If you have a book or something that mentions it, please cite it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I have to get off - just noticed this - could you please put a warning at least? SatuSuro 08:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

A bit busy; will do so in a bit.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that SatuSuro 09:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for 'correcting' Ral's vote at your RfA. I assumed it was a numbering error, but Gracenotes fixed it and you pointed out that Ral withdrew the vote. The only reason I can give for thinking that the numbering had been messed up is that the vote hadn't been struck through, which I thought was normal. I should have checked, and will do so next time I think there has been a mistake. In fact, I'll probably contact the !voter in question instead of rushing in to correct. I've apologised to Ral, but most of all, I'm apologising to you. Best of luck with the RfA. Carcharoth 11:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I didn't think it was affecting the count (unless you're referring to how Ral didn't strikeout his vote, which was a bit odd.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

I have added it to the Precious line up, though I may change the name if the titluar Precious is suppose to be Pandora's Box or another box of misfortune. Fractyl

Sounds good.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Once your RFA closes, you'll have a nice spot in the hall of WP 100's. Just thought I'd tell you. :p Floria L 19:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

You seem to forget that there is a WP:200 now :(—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

"Weapons of Mass Destruction", Ryulong. You're a fine editor, and a zealous defender of the wiki, but unfortunately over the preceding months I've seen a few too many instances of rash and/or poor judgment to support your RfA. If you pass, I hope you exercise caution with the tools. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 21:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay... But your account has only been around for a week now.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Correct. But I've been here a lot longer. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 21:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

An administrative advice was followed in posting the checkuser. Please, do not revert it! --Virtual Realities 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

It was reverted by someone else first, and the case was blank.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Virtual Realities is an Art Dominique sockpuppet. TheQuandry 04:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Whatever. I've never had any knowledge of him prior.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

The {example}"Yaiba of Darkness (3-47)" brackets should remain, especially for one-time charatcers like the Jougami. Fractyl

No. It is really crufty. Single characters do not really need to have a mention of what episode they showed up in. If anything, simple "In Task X..." should be used instead.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Anyway I agree with both of you on this subject, I agree with what Fractyl that some kind of identification should be used because it would make the article easier for people to understand and Ryulong I will also agree that an alternative method should be considered in order to help with article quality. -Adv193 05:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Massive overhaul done to Negative Syndicate.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I've restored the Juuken (獣拳, Jūken, Beast-Fist) brackets to effect Juuken, its branch-styles, & the Narakudou Society to maintain the fact that eastern martial arts are untranslated even in English. And to note, "Naraku" could mean "Underworld" too(Which would make sense in terms of the undead army Lio has). Fractyl

True, although untranslating "Kempo" was a bit unnecessary.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey Ryulong, judging by the types of edits and editing style, 2006Wii seems to be a sockpuppet of you know who. --Benten 23:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Looked into it. Unconfirmed as of yet (also, please link to the contribs...).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Now I see it. I had an inkling, but there were also some conflicting things.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Hi Ryulong, another one: Valelaexmay. Would you also mind semi-protecting my talk page as well? Thanks. --Benten 23:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

??

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=102543420
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=102543317

Especially the first, blocked last month... ARV going wonky? /wangi 23:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Come again?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

You reported those two in the 10 mins or so... 65.111.169.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) was already indefblocked since December (open proxy) and the second appears to have no contribs (and certainly has never had a talk page). Just trying to piece it together! Ta/wangi 23:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh. Bobabobabo editted out of there, didn't check to see if it was blocked already (it may need a hardblock). The user created a confirmed sockpuppet—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

You know what I'm talking about. -- Altiris Exeunt 10:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

On second thoughts, forget it...I was reading things one hour after they actually happened...sorry. -- Altiris Exeunt 10:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea, although it has become apparent that he/she is not paying attention to feedback on her/his user talk page thusfar. --Kukini 17:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with reverts on the what seems to be ongoing vandalism of the Neopets page! Good work :) Benbread 22:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

This is the first time I'm posting information on wikipedia, yes it is about my new company, but no it is not supposed to be blatant advertizing. I would like to inform the world that we do exist and what we are doing how should I properly do that on wikipedia 76.170.250.253 05:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC) dallen02

Wikipedia is not the place to do this. If your record company is mentioned by a major news source, then it could be notable. But wanting to inform the world that you do exist is spam, sorry.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

okay how do i delet it then?

It might be done, but I think I can do it now :)—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I have made you a sysop. Please be sure you are well versed in our policies before using the shiny new buttons. Raul654 06:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong, as co-nominator on your RFA, I'd like to congratulate you on getting the mop, have fun with the shiny new buttons :) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 06:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

If you really believe you should be admin, then you should respect community consensus and not use the buttons until we've settled this issue. (No, I'm not saying you should resign, but if you really respect the community you will hold off using the buttons until we sort this out.) – Chacor 06:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, you lucky bum, you got in, I didn't think you'd pull it off. Well, I believe this last RfA has taught you to go a bit easy on the stuff you receieved as criticism, so I believe you will make a fine admin - much quicker to block vandals than just waiting at AIV. (though it will be weird not having another commoner with ridiculously high edit count!!). Patstuart^talk|edits 06:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I tend to endorse Chacor's point about not using your new tools until this has been discussed and sorted on WT:RFA; less trouble overall, I think. Whilst I have no opinion on what Raul654 has done related to whether he should or should have promoted you, I give you my sincerest congratulations and thanks for all your past work on Wikipedia, and give you my best wishes for the future. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

:/ So I can't

1. Speedy delete an image I tagged myself for being redundant
2. Re-semi/move protect my userpage, testing everything out?
3. Speedy delete a page that I tagged myself and with the author's request (seen above)

—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You can do whatever you please, really. I'm just giving you a kind suggestion, and naturally whether you wish to accept it in full, in part (ie. do what you said above) or not at all is your decision and yours only. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

My point of asking you not to was partially because the last time we had such an RFA pass, we all know what happened. People started asking Carnildo to step down. I think that you should voluntarily just avoid the tools for now. (There is discussion at WT:RFA, btw, so if you want to make any comments...) – Chacor 06:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on your RfA! Now here comes the sordid part: though I wholeheartedly support your new adminship position, due to the extreme and potentially controversial circumstances surrounding the closing of your RfA, I suggest holding off on the most controversial of admin buttons (namely, blocking powers, among others) and suggest diverting your efforts to clearing out clearcut cases in CSD (or protecting your talkpage) until the community or the b'crats have reached a definite decision. However, I support the legitimacy of your new position as servant to the Wikipedia community, and I will wholeheartedly support your continued quest to benefit Wikipedia, the community, and its editors. Again, congratulations! (yes, I know I sound like a harbinger of doom masquerading as an enthusiastic supporter) --²¹⁰physicq (c) 06:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Right, then. Off to close some AFDs?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Eh, clearcut cases, yes. Try to stay off some controversial cases for a while, if you want to keep your newly adminated hands clean. Though, of course, you can do so if you wish. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 06:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong, my recommendation to any new sysop is to use the tools slowly and gradually. But, a crat has made the decision, and you have the buttons. I see no reason for you to hold off as a few users have their knickers in a bunch. Give 'em a whirl and clear some backlogs :)

For everyone else, leave him alone? Congrats again mate  Glen  06:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Face it, he had no consensus. Asking the opposition to piss off won't help. – Chacor 06:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thats something you'll have to address with Raul. Ryulong in the meantime has every right to clear some backlogs (hint hint! ;)  Glen  06:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Wait a second, Ryulong has been promoted, as exactly expected of him in the system, and you guys don't want him to use the tools? That's not fair at all. If his powers get revoked, fine, but don't expect him to sit back and do nothing in the meantime. Patstuart^talk|edits 06:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

though I agree with Glen and Physics' solution of going it slow... Patstuart^talk|edits 06:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Being pissed off about an apparent case of "more discretion than usual" won't help either, though I do ask for restraint. And let's not argue on this talk page, do so at WT:RFA. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 06:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, this discussion is better centralised at WT:RFA. I guess my point was to stay away from the controversial stuff, per Glen and others above. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, and enjoy the shiny buttons. Ask if you need help with anything, and go clear out CAT:CSD. --Slowking Man 06:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Nag nag nag; you should disable anon-only when blocking suspected or known proxies, as no one, including registered users, should be able to use them (however, this does not inlcude Tor nodes, as some editors use them to circumvent government censorship). And there are also some helpful templates for tagging Talk pages! The More You Know…--Slowking Man 07:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Congrats, although make sure you don't let the debate get to you, regardless of the outcome or the stances. — Deckiller 07:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Congrats, I second the motion you help at CSD, always a huge backlog there. VegaDark 07:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Yep, CSD is too big of a backlog, just get some sleep in between CSD sessions. Oh, and remember that just because its tagged for CSD doesn't mean hit delete, there is the odd good article in there tagged by vandals etc. As for the open proxy, that was routine, I see no problems whatsoever with that block -- Tawker 07:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm actually surprised and disappointed to hear that you've been asked to step down and wait for a new nomination. I don't think that's needed (yet, anyway, unless Raul's promotion gets overruled), but thanks for acknowledging the uproar that has occurred. – Chacor 08:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I'm not surprised. Right after Carnildo's highly controversial promotion, two users asked him to step down [5], which he declined. You know, I'm wondering - would it be this controversial had he gotten 70%? If one opposer switched to support... Hbdragon88 09:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

There is no reason at all that you should not use the buttons if you have them. We have these tools to use for the benefit of the project, and to decline to use them productively doesn't help anything. I am sure you will use them responsibly as all admins should endeavor to do. Cheers, NoSeptember 09:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Seeing as I went from oppose to neural to support, I covered the full range of possible votes on your RfA, and I want you to know you have my full trust and support. Regardless of what any naysayers may say, I believe you will use your bit wisely and responsibly. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. I'm always willing to help. Hey, i may even ask you questions as I'm sure there are things about which you're much more knowledgeable. Congrats, and please don't step down. Just prove the fearful wrong. (^_^) ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 10:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't envy your position at all, but there's no reason why you shouldn't be out there using the bit. A trained monkey could do most of it, maybe even an untrained one. CAT:CSD is a good place to start. Have fun/wangi 10:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Use the tools to your advantage; if the situation with the promotion is reversed, at least you'll know you performed extremely well for the encyclopedia during the brief period you had the tools. — Deckiller 10:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand what all the fuss is about. The possibility that Ryulong might abuse his tools has been compensated by the fact that he is willing to put himself into AOR. You should let him use the tools as much as possible, and judge him on that, his actual administrator actions. Not how much of a chance he might accidentally block a user unfairly. Ryulong's a great benefit to the encyclopedia, and should be allowed to use his tools to the full potential. Floria L 10:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Congratulations - I was glad to see that you were selected ... you do quite a bit for the project. --BigDT 13:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You will have seen my !vote and also my comments. If you stay active as an admin, please read them very carefully before you hit the block button in non-obvious cases. Your dedication to the project are well-known, are appreciated, and are presumably what led to your being promoted with the RfA closing numerically where it did, but the concerns that have been expressed are equally real. Please take them into account and consult with others in any close cases. Regards, Newyorkbrad 13:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi - I'm just joe average so we have not had any contact - but here's what I think you should do. At the moment, you are in the middle of situation that is not of your own making - rightly or wrongly, it has created a "drag" on your Administration and seems to be heading for quite a bit of wiki-drama. I would suggest that you stand down immediately and then be re-nominated in 4 weeks or so. I think this would be of real benefit to you for a number reasons:

1) What better sign is there to the community that you are an admin who listens? surely that has to win over some of the naysayers in your previous RFA. People talk about "a few extra buttons" but people seem to willing to fight tooth and claw for those extra buttons - you would be indicating to the community that you take their concerns seriously.

2) You will help to avert some wiki-drama - again showing how you wish to build consensus in the community and show the strength of your character.

3) It will eliminate one of the brickbats that is surely going to throw your way if you continue under your current mandate (which many will claim is not a mandate but rather a favourite son appointment - I am NOT saying this is how I see it, but how it is clear quite a few do).

However the choice is yours - if you don't wish to stand again, I wish you well as an admin and I'm sure you will do an excellent job. If you do stand again, I'll be first in line to make the case for strong support.

--Fredrick day 16:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Good luck on being an Administrator. To be honest, I always thought you were one, as did several other Users. As for that question I asked, thanks again for answering it. The situation with that User at the moment is certainly an interesting one. Anyway, as I said, good luck! Acalamari 16:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You have already stated in your RfA that you would be willing to join Category:Administrators open to recall. I saw your note at the top of your talk page and do not find that necessary, despite having been one of your opposers. What I would like to see is that you fulfill this "campaign promise" as soon as possible, and reassure people that any missteps can be easily and discreetly handled. Whatever you decide, good luck and gods bless. I'm sure you didn't ask for this wiki-drama. -- nae'blis 18:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

First of all, congrats. I agree with Nae'blis. You should list yourself on Category:Administrators open to recall as soon as possible, assuring unhappy users who'll certainly be monitoring you that you are willing to be recalled if they find out that you've misused the tools. Now you shouldn't refrain from using the tools you were given access to, just be extra cautious and I'm sure nobody will complain.--Húsönd 19:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Done (now that I'm actually editting regularly at this time of the day).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

All of that was sourced. Every single statement. Is there something in particular you question? The portions you removed had to do with the structure of the US-led air force, which I would claim is common knowledge, and the problems between Vann and Cao, which is widely commented on in Bright Shining Lie. Like I said, I hate drawing from a single source, notably a US-only one, but everything in that article is sourced. Maury 19:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I was assuming good faith with the other editor. There were no citations in the sentences that were removed, I'll look back on it right now.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You have access now. To access, do /msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins - or, if your irc client is smart, /cs invite #wikipedia-en-admins . This will only work for the nameserv-verified nick Ryulong. (I'm not sure it's case sensitive. If it doesn't work and I'm on, /msg me or Mackensen, who also has level 40.)

BTW: Raul promoted you and is extremely clueful and respected and somewhat less willing than me to put up with any shit. If in his judgement you passed, then you passed. YOU THINK YOU CAN PUT DOWN THE MOP? HAH! IN SOVIET WIKIPEDIA, JOB FIND YOU!!! - David Gerard 20:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

It looks like someone re-created the Chris Benoit Fan Page that you previously deleted. I spotted it and won't have a chance to post it for Speedy Deletion before I have to log out, but I wanted to make you aware. Slavlin 22:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I wonder why you deleted the Gault Middle School Page while it was being worked on as of today January 24, 2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry292 (talk • contribs) 17:04, January 24, 2007

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Piotr Blass. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Jreferee 23:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to say congrats on your Rfa, I supported you in it and I think your doing a great job. I know its all kicking off at the minute, but I hope it all goes in your favour RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 01:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to congratulate you. Nice job. Glad you made it. Danny 02:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the article, I was very confused but didnt realize that the user was copy and pasting the section into many Basque articles. Thanks for all your good work.--Joebengo 04:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed that you speedily deleted this article as "nonsense" and closed its AfD listing. This was not a speedy deletion candidate. It was entirely coherent, documented a term with more than 11,000 Google hits, and cited a reputable source for one of its claims. (The aforementioned Google search turns up others.) It was created by a user in good standing (with an "Anti-Hoax Barnstar," I might add).
Even if a majority of the article was a hoax, this is explicitly not a speedy deletion criterion:

• CSD G1: Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, badly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes. [1]
  
• Hoaxes: Articles that present unverifiable and probably false ideas, theories, or subjects. Occasionally these can be deleted as vandalism if the article is obviously ridiculous, but remotely plausible articles should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum. [2]
  
• Note that hoaxes are not speedy deletion candidates. It is not enough for just one or two editors to investigate a hoax. There have been cases in the past where something has been thought to have been a hoax by several editors, but has turned out to be true, and merely obscure. [3]
  

Please restore this article and handle the matter through the proper channels. Thank you! —David Levy 05:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick! Thanks again!  :-) —David Levy 05:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. And for a hoax, it is a bit nonsensical :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Here is something that updates every hour and will help you with your new job :) --Parker007 06:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong, I just received your message saying that "removing content from Wikipedia" is considered vandalism.

Thank you, but... in this case, the material which I removed was vandalism.

Did you read the material which you re-inserted into Blessed Virgin Mary?

User 207.118.29.48 is on a massive vandalism campaign, rapidly editing dozens of pages to spread his theory that Catholics are actually pagans who secretly worship a Babylonian goddess named Semiramis. He has been asked several times, by several people, to provide references or sources; but instead he simply re-inserts his unsourced material without comment. He has been using these user ids:

Melchizedekjesus
69.29.202.188
69.29.232.110
69.29.232.220
69.29.251.180
69.29.253.82
207.118.29.48

When I received your message, I was about to request help from the Mediation Cabal. Instead I'll request it from you: can you do something to stop this massive campaign of bigotry and vandalism? -- 70.171.8.250 08:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I've fixed it, but I would post on the admin's notice board for wider assistance.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong. I noticed that one of your first actions as an admin (congratulations for that, by the way) was to speedy delete an article stub I'd started (East Anglian Daily Times). It transpires that it was deleted before I had a chance to step in. It was tagged as db-blank which seems surprising as it was a stub article, with an external link. It wasn't really blank and wasn't really out of context either, since it was stubbed correctly. A very quick Google search shows the EADT has a circulation of just less than the Eastern Daily Press so why wasn't the article prod'ed instead? I'm not too bothered but the justification for speedy delete seems to be missing in this case. The Rambling Man 08:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

It was a short article that provided little context. All that was stated was that it was a newspaper that serves two regions of England. The other article you mention has a bit more meat to it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

But surely a prod would have been sufficient? It would have given me (or anyone else) time to do something about your concerns. Typically db-blank is used for malformed articles which clearly are unsalvageable. I do not believe this article fell into this category. I'm pretty disappointed that I see dozens of prods on articles that really don't provide context and are blank, but this article which had a stub tag, and a reliable external link was simply speedied. The Rambling Man 08:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

...I'll restore it prior to yesterday, when the db-tag was likely added to the page. Then you'll have time to work on it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. The Rambling Man 09:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

This is one point many opposers made at your RFA, Ryulong, I hope you learn from this and not be too quick to hit the "delete" tab at the top of the page, especially when it comes to new articles. This case involved an established user; had it involved a newbie I'm not so sure the newbie would be inclined to stay on and edit Wikipedia. I also doubt that the article would have been restored if it was a newbie. – Chacor 00:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the rename redirect move. I don't know if you saw it on my talk page (which changes anyway since this is a shared dynamic IP address). 75.33.67.39 09:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Under all the commotion, which seems to have settled down now, i never got to say congrats for becoming an admin. And now I am. Congrats. :p Floria L 19:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For always beating me at reverts, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. ST47Talk 20:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on becoming an admin! Quendus (84.13.242.45 21:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC), couldn't be bothered to sign in)

you might want to inform rooster teeth of the deletion and block. they have a link to it on there homepage lol—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spartanchief177 (talk • contribs).

Which homepage? The Rooster Teeth article or the Rooster Teeth website?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Roosterteeth.com (They put the link up before the article was made to try and get someone to make it). Fritzmonkey 23:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

by the way, can I have some of your edits now? :D T. Kewl the First 22:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't spare any. There are orphans in Africa who don't have a single edit!—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I've noticed you around, and you've always seemed like a solid editor. So I'm really surprised that you forced User:IMTHEWORLDSGREATEST to vandalize Wikipedia by threatening her via IM in order to earn medals for yourself. Um... Shame on you? :) -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

You get medals for that? I want some! :-D ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 23:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a little not before anyone blocks the user, I just gave him a no personal attacks warning for his attacks to you on his talk page RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your block of 66.197.217.245 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), et al. for being spambot/open proxies: I appreciate the speed at which you block these IPs which are being exploited by people using automated software like this one to spam. However, after you block one, please put {{subst:openproxy}} on its user talk, so that if the IP allocation ever changes and its no longer a proxy, the next occupant won't be scratching their heads why they're blocked (explaining in the block log is a little terse IMO). I don't think it will slow you down a single bit, will it? :) Flyingtoaster1337 05:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Okie dokie—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, Ryulong, on your sucessful request for adminship! We think you'll do a great job as an admin. Keep it up! -- Altiris Exeunt 06:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

just wanted to say thanks in regards to 58.10.102.143, it was getting frustrating to need to continuously revert. Lord of Haha 06:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for unblocking me, I just want you to know, That I wrote a very large part of that Article yesturday, and some of the information has changed, and then you protected the article, how am I supposed to change it? There is wrong information, and I would like to change it please. Thank you very much MCRluvr 06:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I protected the article because of User:MCRluvsME which you apparently created. You can request that the article be editted by using {{editprotected}} on the talk page, which will notify another admin to change the article.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I did not create MCRluvsME, I know who did, but it wasn't me, she created it at the same time that I did.

--MCRluvr 06:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Right, sorry. Names are too similar. I will block both and unprotect the article for now.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much, that is one of my former friends, and once she found out what part of the article I wrote, she went and deleted it all, I called her and she admitted she did it, I really, really appreciate this! --MCRluvr 06:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I also just want to ask one thing, will MCRluvsME, be able to edit that article? because she has said she was going to delete it all.

--MCRluvr 01:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

MCRluvsME is blocked indefinitely for impersonating you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Just heard of your recent "promotion." It's amazing how much one can miss when one isn't paying attention to it (I've had my head stuck in Michigan radio stuff for the last two weeks). Congrats on the promotion -- may you only abuse your powers if it helps me. ;-) JPG-GR 06:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Belated congratulations from me, too, Ryulong. Welcome to the admin team and all the best with your adminship. Cheers, Sarah 12:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I had semi-portected my usertalk since I was under constant attack from Cplot et al. It doesn't seem to be working at this time. Maybe it needs to be reset at semi-protection and if you don't mind, I would appreciate it.--MONGO 07:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Cplot is using sleepers, now. The latest one was made five days ago.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I see, I hadn't noticed that...good eye and thanks.--MONGO 07:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

How are the new tools helping out? — Deckiller 10:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I believe that User:Mathmo is trying to avoid being busted for a WP:3RR by editting while logged out as evidenced here. I haven't reverted the last edit as I have no desire to further this edit war. He clearly doesn't care about WP:FAIR (or possibly other policies, based on his contribs). Just bringing it to someone's attention. JPG-GR 20:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I have since reverted the page and requested semi-protection. JPG-GR 20:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Cfd nominations are per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 25#Actors by series.

Best wishes,

Xdamr^talk 23:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Blast it!

<bangs head on table, again, again, again, again....>

Ok, give me a few minutes break and I'll see what I can do.

Xdamr^talk 23:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that's what I just noticed :)

Xdamr^talk 23:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Nah, I was only wanting to restrict the moves... what I done did that, didn't it? /wangi 00:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Argh, scratch that. I'm an idiot. Thanks for fixing that!! /wangi 00:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

So, in keeping with my rather eccentric picture awards, have some bananas. -Amark moo! 04:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Are you telling Ryulong to go bananas with his admin tools? rofl. Hbdragon88 07:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I will get a monkey to eat them right away. -Amark moo! 15:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

No idea who you are but appreciate the helping hand you gave a few months back. Still, I can't get my head around all the many things that there are and if there's an easier way to understand the world of wikipedia then please do tell me. If not, I'll just happily go about editing rubbish and finding spelling mistakes i.e. generally making wikipedia a better place. Thanks again (Děkuji = Thank you in Czech). Zuracech lordum 15:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:JB196_socks. Could you please close these afd's, as we've been instructed? No one seems to be getting it. -146.186.221.141 (Patstuart on enforced wikibreak) 21:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the Cplot sock's edit to WP:AN3. It really startled me to see my name show up under there... Cheers, PTO 05:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Cpot sounded better.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

BS"D

Question for you. Why did you delete the Scotland Picture? I am curious. It has everthying to do with that section of the article.

Please respond on my talk page

Thank You --Shaul avrom 14:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

It had no copyright information. If it is provided, you can upload it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

What was that for? On my talk page? _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  20:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how to fix it? I noticed there was a problem recently. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  20:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I dont' know.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I fixed it. I had to go into Portal:Box-header and add an "if" statement. I've done that several times when things weren't working my way...rather than try to fix them, alter the template to suit my needs! Haha. But it'd be useful for others too. Thanks for trying to help! _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  20:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. I just wish I could have done more to do so.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

May I ask why you deleted the article about the opera singer Gabriel Renaud. With all due respect, I doubt you are able to ascertain the notoriety of an opera singer in Latin America.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elchuchulo (talk • contribs).

The article was just a list of operas he performed in. No notability was asserted.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Have you looked at the website ? Elchuchulo

Again if an international opera singer is not notorious I wonder who is. Elchuchulo

The article did not assert the individual's notability not notoriety. Please read WP:MUSIC to see why the article was deleted.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, he satisfies #4, unfortunately, you have to be able to speak Spanish in order to understand it.

"En los últimos años ha participado en numerosos conciertos y presentaciones operísticas, tanto en ciudades del interior del país como en otros países de Latinoamérica, cantando en Venezuela, Uruguay, Brasil, Perú y Chile."

Elchuchulo

Well, maybe you should write about him at the Spanish Wikipedia. I don't think he'd be included here, really, because he was notable in Latin America.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The goal of wikipedia is to provide a database of human knowledge in various languages, i.e. the English Wikipedia's content is not limited to matters pertaining to the English-speaking world and so forth. After you admitted that this singer qualifies for "notability", the logical course of action is to let me create the article. Elchuchulo

I apologize for my above statement, but the text of the article did not assert the individual's notability. If you can rewrite the article so that notability is asserted, including any sort of information from Spanish that you can include in English, more than just "Gabriel Renaud is a tenor from Argentina. He was born in the city of Buenos Aires. He performed multiple operas:" and list the operas, then the article can be included. Please write that article here so it conforms with the various manuals of style that Wikipedia has.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I will as soon as I have a chance. Thank you for your understanding. Elchuchulo

However, I noticed you gave him six months, as opposed to an indef ban, though the usage was only LB edits. Is there a difference in policy for usernames vs. IPs wrt ban times? MSJapan 22:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Which IP was this?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh! I was told to do so by the checkuser that rooted it out.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

The オオ in オオアバレンオー is pronounced distinctly. If it were OhAbarenOh, it would be spelled with オー, as it is at the end of the name. When speaking the name, the characters speak the o sounds very distinctly separate. And, as I said, it is オオアバレンオー, not オーアバレンオー. Angel the Techrat 01:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The use of Hepburn romaji is easier here.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Then it would be helpful if all of the symbols used in the Hepburn system actually appeared on most browsers or could be types using the alt-#### system.. Reguardless, the o sounds are distinct. It would be ō'ōAbarenō, I suppose (if clipping characters that don't show up properly pastes them properly..). <edit> Okay. O-O- works. It at least shows the sounds to be separated. And ou 王 is translated as king. I just kept with the oh convention because it was used everywhere else in the article. I dislike it, myself, because people only use it to keep english-speakers from pronouncing ou as "ow". Anyway, the plain romaji is ooabarenoo, which is of course confusing and frustraiting, because that style of romaji also fails to show when a vowel is distinctly doubled or just stressed by the us of ー. Angel the Techrat 02:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, there's really no good way to write it. "OhOh" is good, but it makes it seem that the O's are longer.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Question: Why did you delete our photo, "patsy2.jpg"? The photo is our property and we stated as much in our license info. Please respond, at your earliest convenience, on our talk page. Thank you. InfoSource 16:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)User:InfoSOurce 8:25, 28 January 2007

According to your response to my earlier inquiry--as to why the photo was removed from the Patsy Moore page on Wikipedia--you stated:

"I deleted it because it did not have copyright information. As it is now, it has the wrong copyright information, which is a criterion for speedy deletion. If you work for Ms. Moore, please e-mail permissions at wikimedia.org to provide us with an image of Ms. Moore that can be released under the GFDL or other such copylefts found at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.—19:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)"

Would that be "[email protected]"? If so, I e-mailed "patsy2.jpg", taken by photographer Victory Anderson—and for which she granted written and full permission for use by Patsy Moore, her site (http://www.patsymoore.com), and any future projects of Ms. Moore—to that address. The photo is, in fact, being used as the cover for an upcoming audio single. The only way we now know of reaching Ms. Anderson is via an e-mail address which was also forwarded to "[email protected]".

What is the PROPER license for us to employ in order to make that happen? We would like nothing more than to rectify this matter as soon as possible and to avoid an ongoing episode of put the picture up/take the picture down.

Also, can you elaborate on what words of Ms. Moore's entry constitute 'weasel words' and why all citations were removed only to be replaced by a warning that no citations exist?

Your prompt advisement, left on our discussion page, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Best regards, InfoSource 02:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Seamus Byrne (InfoSource) pmDOTcom & Associated Sites Administration

The proper license would be {{GFDL}} or some other copyleft license. The copyright will be figured out by the time WP:OTRS deals with it. And there are various reasons why I cleaned up the article, which could be understood by visiting WP:AWW, WP:FOOTNOTE, and the other correct pages.

Also, if this account is to be used by more than one person, then it may have to be blocked for being a role account.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

No, according to the definition I just read, this is not a 'role account'. Although I am not the only person working for pmDOTcom, I am the only person authorized to make actual changes to the page and, as far as I know, I am the only one who has done so—outside of Wikipedia editors, of course. Do you have reason to believe otherwise?

InfoSource 02:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)InfoSource

You use "we" a lot, though. That's what is confusing me.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for the confusion. When the original invitation to submit an entry arrived from Wikimedia, it was sent to the Webmaster for pmDOTcom, who then forwarded it to our administrative address. I think of pmDOTcom Administration as "we"; but, in fact, it is only I who responded and submitted the entry, as well as subsequent edits. I assure you, I act alone, here. Anyway, I'll try to get this page up to code ASAP and understand that you have several inquiries to deal with, but more specificity would be helpful. I will refer to WP:AWW and WP:FOOTNOTE, nonetheless.

InfoSource 11:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)InfoSource

Oh! What does the following comment of yours mean?: "Yikes! stubbification is necessary".

InfoSource 11:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)InfoSource

I've made what I believe to be the requested changes to the page. Will you let me know if I'm now to code?

InfoSource 23:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)InfoSource

A bunch of users, all identified as blocked socks of User:Bobabobabo, have in the past few minutes all created indentical User talk pages with some warning message you left someone back in October. All the created pages are identical: Ones so far are: User talk:Cosmosbunny, User talk:RyēlØng, User talk:LordPrincess, User talk:Fabu-Vinny, User talk:Pikaraichu, User talk:Bluesheep02. Looks like all were blocked back in November. Doesn't make any sense that I can see, but I thought you might want to look at them. Fan-1967 03:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yargh...—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

They were deleted as redirects to nowhere.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Do you need assistance? I have AWB. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 04:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm getting Betacommand to do some work with a template I've created. If you check my contribs, you'll see what to do.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to pester, but is there a list of talk pages of Bobabobabo's sock accounts? --²¹⁰physicq (c) 04:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:BOBA (yes, it's a cross namespace redirect, but it's easier that way)—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Those cross-name redirects are not considered harmful; the harmful ones are those that are from the mainspace to the other space. Usertalk space to Wikipedia space are okay, like how WP:JIMBO redirects to Jimbo's user talk page, or how WP:WOW once redirected to WT:LTA/Willy on Wheels. Hbdragon88 06:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Ugh. I've totally given up on episodes...they're everywhere, and they'll never fall in AFD. The only way to destroy them is to uproot them where they're not being protected - Power Rangers was an elegant example, being able to merge most of the episodes in one fell swoop (well, after everybody else had rmoved the prods). If I try to broaden my reach too far I'll go insane, so I think I'll try to keep it all down to merging all of the stupid article within the WP:PCP - Mt. Silver is my next target, for instance. Hbdragon88 06:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

They're all linked to one page, though.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

This stub of restaurant was created 1 day ago. It was written with a neutral point of view, a description of its basic business operation and background, a short list of its competitors, and it was flagged PROD the very same day for lack of notability due to ghit and was proposed for deletion in 5 days. The business does not have a dire need of an online presence due to the nature of its business but is known in the Greater Sacramento area and some part of San Francisco Bay Area. The PROD based on ghit was unfair, and as it turned out, this stub was then deleted the next day.

Please consider undeleting this stub and allow for improvements/corrections. Thank you. - Waliwala 07:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello,

I noticed that you have removed a map from my page. Would it be safe to post this map in the others place?

SoutheastAsia1200Map.JPG

Regards.

Wiki Raja 07:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I deleted the original one because it was in one of the CSD categories. If it's on the commons, you can use it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

And those are identical, so it would have been deleted regardless. You are free to put commons:Image:SoutheastAsia1200Map.JPG on your user page.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I just saw you have deleted the entry for "The Black Balloon (film)". As reason for doing so you claimed it is a non existing film. WRONG! The film is in Production, it's actually shot at the moment. All information given by me were correct and most of them can be checked on various websites, here a list (just a sample list, not complete): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0865297/ http://www.iconmovies.net/blackballoon/ http://www.if.com.au/Press/2007/01/15.html http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21002619-5006013,00.html Even though the film is not released yet, as it is not finished yet, still the interest in it is quite high, driven by the cast and their appeal to certain target audiences.

The Black Balloon 08:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I also deleted it because of your user name, you should not be writing an article about your film. Please wait for someone else to come along and write an article about the film from a non-biased perspective (and if it gets critical acclaim). Wikipedia and IMDB are not the same thing; or so long as information about a film is verifiable and neutral, it can be written about in Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

It is not my film! Somebody else started the article (which should be visible in the history)! I just corrected some parts (as they weren't correct) and added actors and crew, which are on IMDB and other online sources. I wouldn't have started an article, I just didn't want incorrect facts to be distributed. And because this is majorly a very young target group, who is already interested in the film, wrong facts get circulated very quickly and rumors are getting started, which is in nobodies interest. Isn't it? The Black Balloon 08:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize. I am currently working on restoring the article.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! The Black Balloon 08:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the autoblock unblock. Might want to make it official by adding the unblocked template to my talk page or something :P – Chacor 10:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Meh. Process wonk :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, if you're still around, got autoblocked again. Posting as NSLE from the secure server because I can't remember my Chacor password (I auto-login) and didn't want to have to reset it. Could you please unblock again? Cheers. NSLE 10:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I got the extra one. Try it. NoSeptember 10:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Your last comment, somewhat bemused me, would you explain? 1B6 10:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

It's 5:14 am; J Di was talking about this in an IRC channel. I investigated. I deleted the IP's talk. I deleted the IP's contributions to your talk. Don't retaliate to him anymore, just Revert, block, ignore.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I wish to take action against J di, I want her admin privileges removed. Just read her archive pages, see howmany negative comments there are. 1B6 10:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

There's nothing that J Di did wrong that I can see. I don't see any reason that he did that requires desysopping. I think you should keep away from him as best as you can and not aggravate things any further.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. Thank you for your intervention in the extraordinarily intense attack on this user. A the attacker appears to be an established user, or his sockpuppets do, would a complete protection not be better? User:Gwernol could, after all, remove it if he wanted to change his page. I know that I am probably interfering, but he was very helpful to me when I was a newbie, and it distresses me to see the level of vandalism he is being hit by.--Anthony.bradbury 12:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Might like to know... Part Deux 02:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I noticed you deleted Anthony E Caruso (deletion log link) and I was wondering how to handle a situation where the article has been recreated (as Anthony e caruso) and the creator is quite irate with me, and yet the creator continues to ignore my advice about including sources or otherwise bringing the article up to the point where it might qualify to survive. It is autobiographical to boot, so I'm not sure if it would qualify even with sourcing. Should I just speedy delete tag it again? Or is there some other process I could use? Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Dealt with, spoke to the author.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I have direct sources from Entprenuer as well as other recognizable publishers. If these are added in the appropriate way I would like to have my artice.

I noticed you are an undergraduate student...are you also a special level helper here that decides what is ok to stay?

You can request that your article be created by another user who will be able to write it in a non-biased way and whatnot. And on my undergraduate level in college, I do not understand what you mean. I am an administrator of Wikipedia if that's what you mean.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

oh right....i was confused...

No problem.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, just a quick question. I am a newbie here, what was the grounds of your deleting the picture that I had added to the kebab page yesterday about how adana kebap was being made? I am from Adana, Turkey (Although I don't live there anymore). No offense, just wondering, so that I act accordingly in wikipedia.

Thank you,

Hakki —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hakkiy (talk • contribs) 13:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

It was tagged with the wrong copyright tag. You should have released it under GFDL if you made it yourself.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong: No actually is it not an image I have made myself, it is an image from that reference numberred as [3] (local kebap house). So that's why i haven't chosen GFDL. How can we restore it? 10:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC) (hakkiy)

Well, I am not sure what copyright tag should be used.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Let it be, just waste of my time looks like we can't come to an agreement. Never mind.

I created a page called Adam4Adam which I think perhaps you deleted because it had previously been created and didn't pass an AfD. However, I had nothing to do with previous versions nor did I even know about them. My version, I believe, met WP:V and WP:N and was in no way spammy. It was, if anything, slightly critical in that while NPOV, it presented info about the company that many would regard negatively. This doesn't seem fair nor to anyone's benefit. Please help me understand this process. House of Scandal 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I've restored it; I can see that it was not the same content. The {{db-g4}} tagging was out of line.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

The article was deleted again before I even signed on today. I understand your deletion was done in error. The admin who deleted it the second time is refusing to make this right on the basis of me not being polite enough for his liking. Despite references from The Washington Post etc., the admin has claimed the article asserted no notability. I am a good Wikipedian. I have had 45 DYK's in the past 60 days. I am really frustrated at this lack of fairnes. I hope that since you had some accidental involvement in this article, you might assist. Thanks. -House of Scandal 15:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

...and am enjoying it very much. You can check it out on my page. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 22:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

I didn't block him (I don't intend to unblock myself given the comments he has made). However, given that he hasn't been indef blocked by the community (see discussion on just started on ANI to hopefully do this) he should probably be unblocked or given a set blocking time. JoshuaZ 02:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

It's an autoblock that you've blocked as a sockpuppet. It's like getting caught in your own lie.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but I'm not sure he knew there was a policy against sockpuppeting. (I'd rather just have him get banned, but if that isn't happening...)JoshuaZ 02:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Now he does know it. I will replace the unblock template with a warning about sockpuppetry.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

You have just reverted all my moves in the past several months without apparent reason. My moves were documented on the Talk pages. Could you please not just automatically revert, but rather enter into a discusson? MapMaster 02:51, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I told you why on your talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

No, you simply asserted that "Bohemund" is the English spelling. As mentioned on the article's talk page, Encyclopedia Brittanica and Encarta both use "Bohemond" and that spelling has twice the English Google hits than "Bohemund".

You also have failed to explain why you revert each of the 3 other un-related article moves I've made in the past several months, all in two minutes time. You cannot have spent much time studying the merits of these moves. It seems more like revenge for daring to be bold. MapMaster 03:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I was told by another administrator to look into it. It appeared that you were violating use English. I reverted on that basis. Also, your lack of good faith is disturbing me.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

MapMaster, stop flipping out at other editors. This is Wikipedia, where anyone is free to edit. Do not grumble over this issue just because another user felt your pagemoves were incorrect. Ryulong did the pagemove on behalf of Adam Bishop (talk · contribs) and I suggest you contact him (nicely!) asking why the pages were moved. Nishkid64 03:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I am attempting to get a discussion going on the Talk page, but no one seems to be interested in talking, just asserting and reverting. I would still be interested in knowing why Ryulong assumed bad faith on my part and auto-reverted all my article moves in past month. MapMaster 03:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I know there's a problem with the Wiesenthal article which has been improperly created as a mix of both a disambiguation page and an attempt at onomastics. However having both Wiesenthal and Wiesenthal (disambiguation) as redirects, that doesn't look right either. Were you planning to work on those further? Thanks - Introvert • ~ 06:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:SU for more information.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the reference. It helps (and I knew of this problem for quite some time, by now) -- but still does not answer my question. I guess what I am saying, is that a page that has <Name (disambiguation)> as its title, should be a disambiguation page and not a redirect. There has to be a valid disambig for the Wiesenthals - we already have at least two (Charles Fredrick Wiesenthal, Simon Wiesenthal). And secondly, while I recognize the problem and agree that the original work was a mess that needs attention and lots of help, I believe that it just is not right to throw all that editor's effort out of the window and turn the thing into a mere redirect. There's definitely valuable contents in the original article which has its right and worth. Let me know if you disagree (I hope you won't) -- otherwise, I'll try and at least separate disambiguation from the onomastic, and then pass it on back to you if you would like to help. How does this sound? OK? - Introvert • ~ 07:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

You can create the decent disambiguation page. Just watch it for Mr. SU.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yep -- will try when I get the time (maybe not at once). Please help if you are available. Take care - Introvert • ~ 07:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, I've just unblocked Doublelxp (talk • contribs). It looks like you may have misinterpreted his clean ups as vandalism. --  Netsnipe  ►  15:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it was a late night fixing all of that bullshit. I'll apologize for my misplaced block.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)