This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ryulong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I don't feel like adding the leg summary, someone else will do it...--Markoszarrate (talk) 23:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-02T23:09:00.000Z","author":"Markoszarrate","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Markoszarrate-2011-10-02T23:09:00.000Z-The_Amazing_Race_Latinoam\u00e9rica_3","replies":[]}}-->

You just can't add the results, man.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:10, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, I would like you to be a bit less aggressive with me. Secondly, wikipedia is an encyclopedia that EVERYONE can edit and improve. I have the impression that the changes on your english page are only according to your tastes. It's not because it looks only better on the french wiki page that I changed the annotation, it's because it takes less space. Thirdly, in the french wikipedia page, as you told me to, I added a reference to the english page in the reference section at the bottom. Finally, on the map in the race summary section, would it be better if you added Yogyakarta after Jakarta or let it like this?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Orfeoedeuridice (talk • contribs)

Fine. Everyone can improve it, but it doesn't mean that it actually is improved. Good. And no, because Jakarta and Yogyakarta are too close together to matter.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Oh, Yogyakarta isn't as close as I thought. It is being fixed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong, just dropping by to mention that the ratings for the US Table are currently wrong, the person has sourced from Zaptoit but according to TVBythenumbers final ratings for Sunday, The Amazing Race only got 10.87 million not 13 million as it says on the ratings table for Episode 2, see here http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/10/04/sunday-final-ratings-desperate-housewives-pan-am-adjusted-up-unscrambled-amazing-race-the-good-wife/105907/ just wondering if you could correct the table please? As IP users can't edit at the moment, so I can't change lol82.15.8.146 (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-04T23:13:00.000Z","author":"82.15.8.146","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-82.15.8.146-2011-10-04T23:13:00.000Z-Amazing_Race_19_Ratings","replies":[]}}-->

I will add this, but just remember that you can ask anyone to do it on the talk page by using {{edit requested}}. Also, you could sign up for an account.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

There's no need to use CAPITALISED WORDS in an edit summary; the info is already sourced further down the page, anyhoo. Ironholds (talk) 23:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-05T23:48:00.000Z","author":"Ironholds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ironholds-2011-10-05T23:48:00.000Z-Steve_Jobs","replies":[]}}-->

It wasn't sourced when I was putting that in. I had like a crapload of edit conflicts to go through.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ryulong,

I have recommended that Great Leader (Kamen Rider) be merged into Kamen Rider. If you are willing, feel free to complete the merger. As a side note, I like your userboxes; after seeing the ones on your userpage, I decided to use some myself.

Neelix (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-06T13:33:00.000Z","author":"Neelix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Neelix-2011-10-06T13:33:00.000Z-Kamen_Rider","replies":[]}}-->

I'm not sure where to merge it, because the article is all over the place.—Ryulong (竜龙) 18:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Noticing the result of the "FOX show debuts by decade" TFD discussion (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 28#FOX show debuts by decade), you may want to mass-nom the others that you mentioned. You should cite the discussion that just finished as precedent. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-07T02:16:00.000Z","author":"SchuminWeb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SchuminWeb-2011-10-07T02:16:00.000Z-\"FOX_show_debuts_by_decade\"_deletion_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

I fail to see how the Grantland.com source is not reliable, it is from a site owned by ESPN and was written by Tom Bissell a noteworthy critic. Considering most game reviews are primary in nature anyways, it seems to me to be a reliable source and a reliable review. --147.226.210.145 (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-13T19:37:00.000Z","author":"147.226.210.145","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-147.226.210.145-2011-10-13T19:37:00.000Z-Grantland.com","replies":["c-147.226.210.145-2011-10-13T19:41:00.000Z-147.226.210.145-2011-10-13T19:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

I apologize. It just appears odd to have a review on a game released so long ago to suddenly appear on a website two days ago. I will revert myself.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem. --147.226.210.145 (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-13T19:41:00.000Z","author":"147.226.210.145","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-147.226.210.145-2011-10-13T19:41:00.000Z-147.226.210.145-2011-10-13T19:37:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The Samurai Origin episodes really should go to the front of the list for consistency with the other episode lists. In every PR episode list with the exception of Samurai the "#" column has always reflected the chronological order within the season itself and the "№" column reflected overall episode order (for all seasons) as whole. If you go with the airdate and production order/chronological order listing thing that you have Samurai currently under every other season would have to have their episodes re-jiggered/moved to reflect. "Snip It" from Ninja Storm, "Wormhole" from SPD, several flip flopped episodes spanning MMPR season 1, Zeo, Time Force, etc. and practically the nightmare that would be the entire MMPR re-version season.172.162.105.127 (talk) 03:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-16T03:30:00.000Z","author":"172.162.105.127","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-172.162.105.127-2011-10-16T03:30:00.000Z-Power_Ranger_Samurai_Origin_episodes","replies":[]}}-->

So switch the numbers around for Samurai.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:05, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I couldn't help but overread this dispute. What's going with you and ban proposals? There's a lot of disputes you're in.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:25:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:25:00.000Z-What's_this_about_a_ban?","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:31:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:25:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

Noxiousnews is a net loss to the project and TonyTheTiger thinks that because I pointed out his unhelpful templates that I should be banned from saying people should be banned or make deletion requests.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Oh. I'm not fully understanding what's going here because I only read half of that ban page but, I'll take your word for it.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:31, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:31:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:31:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:25:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:37:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:31:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

I proposed TonyTheTiger be banned from making templates because of the TFDs I started. He is retaliating by saying I should be banned from AFD, TFD, etc., and from proposing that people be banned.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

What exactly are TFDs and AFDs? I'm assuming they're templates. If so, what kind?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:37:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:37:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:44:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:37:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

WP:Templates for discussion (TFD) and WP:Articles for deletion (AFD). There's also WP:CFD, WP:RFD, WP:SFD, and WP:MFD. And the templates in question list every single program that either has been on a single US TV network or lists all of the programs currently (and soon to be) on a single US TV network.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I see. Well, good luck. BTW, like my new signature?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:44:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:44:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:52:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:44:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

Looks fine.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm thinking of changing it again though.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:52:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:52:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:58:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:52:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

You should try to include the numbers in your user name.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Is it that important?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 22:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T22:58:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:58:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:04:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:58:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

You shouldn't obscure your real username in your signature by omitting parts of it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Actually it was Wikipedia that initially created Cyberpower. The only modification I did to it was the style as you see now.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 23:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T23:04:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:04:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T22:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:24:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:04:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

But you are "Cyberpower678".—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

But I really want to be cyberpower because on the first site I registered on, cyberpower wasn't available. Cyberpower678 was so I used that, I use that to universalize my username however, I really wanted to be cyberpower. Do you still think it's wrong?—cyberpower (Talk to Me)

If you go to WP:CHU, you might be able to request to take Cyberpower.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Ugh. I'd rather change my username. I think I'll do that instead. I want to make a flashy signature, one that stands out but isn't disruptive. I'm currently clueless what to put in. Got any ideas?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 23:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T23:24:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":14,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:24:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:04:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

The point is that you can request that User:Cyberpower be renamed so you can change your username to Cyberpower.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T23:27:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cyberpower-2011-10-19T23:27:00.000Z-What's_this_about_a_ban?","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:30:00.000Z-Cyberpower-2011-10-19T23:27:00.000Z"],"displayName":"User:Cyberpower"}}-->

Doesn't that change my login username too?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 23:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T23:30:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:30:00.000Z-Cyberpower-2011-10-19T23:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:35:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:30:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

If you do it, you will log in as "Cyberpower" instead of "Cyberpower678".—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

That will cause issues for me since every username I have is cyberpower678. I will just change my signature. BTW, is there a Wikipedia code that will display the number of edits a user has made?—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 23:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-19T23:35:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:35:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:01:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:35:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

I'm not sure how that will work. ANd there is no code that will display it. It does show up in Special:Preferences, though.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia has all these codes and templates to make life more difficult for everybody but, it doesn't have that simple code. It should be something like, Special:Preferences/edits.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 00:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-20T00:01:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:01:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-19T23:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:17:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:01:00.000Z"],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

Special:Preferences is different for everyone. There might be a code, but I certainly don't know where to find it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

It's probably there somewhere.—cyberpower (Talk to Me) 00:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-20T00:17:00.000Z","author":"Cyberpower678","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:17:00.000Z-Cyberpower678-2011-10-20T00:01:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"cyberpower"}}-->

Thanks. I didn't know for sure if this was directly related or a separate complaint.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-21T07:03:00.000Z","author":"Amadscientist","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amadscientist-2011-10-21T07:03:00.000Z-Redirect_at_ANI","replies":["c-Amadscientist-2011-10-21T07:38:00.000Z-Amadscientist-2011-10-21T07:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

It appeared to be.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I would have to agree at this point. I always have the problem of taking instruction a little too literal. I "considered" it separate only in that I was making the complaint against the Admin for the action itself, but I defer to your judgement.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-21T07:38:00.000Z","author":"Amadscientist","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Amadscientist-2011-10-21T07:38:00.000Z-Amadscientist-2011-10-21T07:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I fixed the article, so now you can remove the tag.The Gypsy Vagabond Man (talk) 03:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-30T03:54:00.000Z","author":"The Gypsy Vagabond Man","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Gypsy_Vagabond_Man-2011-10-30T03:54:00.000Z-Sydnee_Michaels","replies":[]}}-->

Those aren't reliable sources.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

The Pokémon article had four different dash styles so I made them all the same style using one of the two allowed by Wikipedia's Manual of Style. So why did you immediately come along and change them all again? It's especially odd since you broke a link by doing so. --Kitsunegami (talk) 08:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-31T08:42:00.000Z","author":"Kitsunegami","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kitsunegami-2011-10-31T08:42:00.000Z-Pok\u00e9mon","replies":[]}}-->

It's fixed and it now has the right dash style as proscribed in the references that you modified for some reason in your edits.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)