I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 07:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the disputed controversial content as regards this BLP , there is a thread at the WP:BLPN for discussion or on the talkpage of the article, please do not reinsert it without a clear consensus to do so, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Parishan, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tarak people, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Lack of sources is not a CSD criterion. I suggest WP:AfD or WP:PROD instead. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Olaf Davis (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from continually vandalizing the Template:Armenian Churches. The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is an article and concept you need to accept. You will be reported if you continue your disruptive edits. Serouj (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of this message [1] Aregakn (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See if you would like to comment this --Hittit (talk) 20:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See if you would like to comment the merge of this article. --Hittit (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your necessary edit on Dadivank Monastery article. I hope you will also do same attempts on Yeghishe Arakyal Monastery, Amaras Monastery and Gandzasar monastery articles. 144.122.135.88 (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per rules, you are forbidden to create a FORK. The article intro does claim it's the same instrument. The next time you revert, I will report you the second I am off from vaccation for FORKing an article. I am not required to retrieve the material to unFORK. Ionidasz (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again me, please stop removing an entire section from an article. This is vandalism. Ionidasz (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm new comer in English Wikipedia. My initial impression is that English Wikipedia serves for the point of view of nationalists of Azeris. And I don't adopt the point of view of Turkish nationalist in Wikipedia, too. We must neutralize articles with identifying reliable sources. Takabeg (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Due to a higher population of en:wiki compared to the other projects, there is a greater representation of various points of view, so normally any unconfirmed or "nationalist", as you put it, statements in controversial topics are meticulously questioned and discussed. I can assure you that what you see as "nationalism" is in fact the true state of things, although being familiar with your activity in tr:wiki and the quality of your argumentation on some talkpages here, I can see how this can seem a problem to you. Parishan (talk) 05:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to think and I don't think that you are Azerbaijani nationalist. I know most of them are not nationalis but are lied under influenses of their nationalsms by their educational policy. Its is concerened with sysetmic bias. Türkçeniz var değil mi ? Takabeg (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ermenicem de var. Sizin için hangisi daha kolay? Parishan (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maalesef Ermenicem sıfır (0). Benim için Türkçe (Türkiye Türkçesi yani) daha kolay. Takabeg (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parishan,

I received a reply message from you . Glad to meet you. But I have never sent you a message about the ethnicity of Ismail I. (I have a note in the Talk page of Ismail I about a chronological fact back in 2009, but it was certainly not a message to you) Probably the message was meant to be sent to another user. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. У меня возник спор с маршалом Баграмяном Talk:Maraghar Massacre. Не подскажете к кому мне лучше обратиться чтобы рассудили нас? --Quantum666 (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, в дискуссию включился третий участник Ionidasz. Следовательно формально я не могу обратиться на рекомендованную вами страницу Third opinion. Через какую страницу лучше обратиться к администраторам с просьбой разрешить спор? Мой оппонент отказывается продолжать дискуссию. --Quantum666 (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

По вашему совету написал на странице Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Geopolitical ethnic and religious conflicts. Посмотрите, может выскажете там свое мнение. --Quantum666 (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Прошло уже 2 недели, а запрос на странице остается без ответа. Есть какие то сроки ожидания? И каким должен быть следующий шаг в разрешении данной ситуации? Может стоит обратиться к кому то из администраторов, хорошо владеющих ААтематикой? --Quantum666 (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look here please, I think it could be interesting for you. --Quantum666 (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really disappointed with the way you are discussing this issue: instead of comparing the events of Khojaly with the 1915 Armenian Genocide -which is very ironic-, try to discuss the point of views which destruct all the allegations of the Azerbaijani side. Wikipedia is not an editing battlefield. Kevorkmail (talk) (talk) 04:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parishan, user Magoteers disrupts everywhere and this article that you have edited in. Looks at this article where he reverts all the time dismissing third party sources: [2]. I think he needs to be reported.  Anastasia Bukhantseva  05:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, --BabbaQ (talk) 13:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard a discussion you might be interested in joining is happening on the noticeboard linked here. Concerning your edits on Armenia-Azerbaijan relations in the Eurovision Song Contest.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a thread about this article at the BLP noticeboard here, would you comment if and when you are able thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parishan, after some discussion and comments and as the content was not controversial and there were altogether four users that saw no objection to the content I have replaced it, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is vandalism. The Azerbaijanis are traditionally live not only in Azerbaijan and Iran, but also in Georgia and Dagestan. Azerbaijanis are one of the indigenous peoples of Dagestan. I beg you not to do more. You better translated from Russian wikipedia section on anthropology of Azerbaijanis, but do not engage in vandalism. Талех (talk) 10:44, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can be reformulated more correctly, but not to delete? Azeris in Dagestan are indeed one of the major ethnic groups and about this little known and hardly anyone speaks. Some do not know what Azeris in Dagestan more than Tabasarans and that the Azeris are officially the indigenous people of this republic. Талех (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Azerbaijanis are traditionally live in four countries: Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran and Dagestan (Russia). You know it. In Dagestan, the Azeris are officially one of the indigenous people and the Azerbaijani language is one of the official languages ​​of Dagestan. Why the northern peoples of Russia can be called indigenous, and Azeris in Dagestan, no? Талех (talk) 18:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Parishan .. Article Azeris in Dagestan in the Russian wikipedia shows that Azerbaijanis have long been living in Dagestan, but some Caucasian peoples do not recognize one of the Azerbaijanis one of the peoples of Dagestan. The government of Dagestan, officially secured the Azeris indigenous status .... Талех (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 16:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious to know what you mean by "typical Azerbaijani type" and how you define it. Parishan (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of Azerbaijani friends of mine said that we can distinguish she is Lezgin at a glance, it's very clear that she is no of typical Azeri Turks. I know that they are not POV pushing Azerbaijanis. So I respected their opinion. In this situation we cannot prove both of them (ethnic Azerbaijani or Lezgin). Thus we cannot use that picture in articles related with ethnic group. But we can use it in Azerbaijan. Takabeg (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you realise that what "most of your Azerbaijani friends say" is not credible for Wikipedia? If I have friends who believe in Santa Claus, it does not give me serious reasons to claim that he is real. And if I were to judge by the kind of Azeri people I encounter, then that girl's photo has every right to be in that article. There is no "standard physical look" for an ethnic group. I have known ethnic Azeris with features that are a lot fairer than that girl's. Be careful: you are resorting to racial stereotypes which may qualify as anti-ethnic sentiment on your part. Parishan (talk) 13:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway we cannot prove and know her ethnıcıty (Azeri Turk (Azerbaijani people in Wikipedia) ? Lezgin ? othters ?). That's all. Takabeg (talk) 13:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway we cannot prove and know her ethnıcıty (Azeri Turk (Azerbaijani people in Wikipedia) ? Lezgin ? othters ?). That's all. Takabeg (talk) 13:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is you who cannot prove that she is not Azeri. The author of the photo named the photo 'Azerbaijani girl from Khachmaz'. If you want to challenge that, it is your job to bring forward reasons to doubt that she is Azerbaijani. All you have managed to lay on the table is claims like 'my friend says she doesn't look Azeri' which is unacceptable as rationale for removing an image on Wikipedia. Parishan (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing but your egoistic claim. If I'll able to prove she is an Azerbaijani people (yani "Azeri Turk"), I'll propose to use for the article Azerbaijani people. If I will prove she is a Lezgin, I'll propose in the same way. But unfortunately nobody can prove it. It's easy. Takabeg (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yani Kurdish Takabeg Turk hater Takabeg angry not Turk Kurdish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.89.213.141 (talk) 11:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bu değişikliğinde Talk:Ahmet Ağaoğlu sayfasına hiç başvurmadan sırf Dağlık Karabağı'nın Azerbaycan'ın bir parçası olduğunu vurgulamaya çalıştığın anlaşılıyor, ne yazık ki. Önce WP:NPOV okuyacaksın ve sonra madedeyi düzelteceksin. Biografi maddelerinde Azerbaijan milliyetçiliğinin yapılmanın anlamı yoktur. Takabeg (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I regard as POV is your attempt to disassociate Shusha from Azerbaijan through a biography article. Ahmet Agaoglu was an ideologist who related himself to Azerbaijan and regarded himself as such. The term 'Nagorno-Karabakh' which you are working hard on including into that article was not in use at the time of his birth, having emerged in the midst of ethnic conflicts of the early 1920s. The fact that more sources indicate Agaoglu's birth as 'Azerbaijan' and not 'Nagorno-Karabakh' does not make me atırpecanagan azkaynaganı. Parishan (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O dönemde orası Elisabethpol Governorate'de yer almıyor muydu ? Tarafsız davranabilmen için kendi milliyetçiliğini bastır biraz. Dışarıda istediğin kadar yapabilirsin milliyetçiliğini ama Wikipedia'da asla. Takabeg (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to review the latest edits of an anon IP[3]. I am not sure of the specifics, but the IP appears to be doing massive changes to the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Azerbaijani people for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sureyya Agaoglu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Do we even have an article of someone of both Armenian and azeri descent that is old and incurably ill? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit to this template, not because I think the old version was better but because I think some issues need to be discussed further in order to decide on what the template should try to do. Would you read my comments on its talk page. Based on what I've written there I think I agree with your removal of the Urartian sites, but disagree with your title change to Historical Fortresses in Armenia. Meowy 00:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you added that following text in Andranik Ozanian: He was particularly prominent in the destruction of Muslim settlements and in the planned ethnic homogenisation of regions with once mixed population through populating them with Armenian refugees from Turkey.^[1]

I won't say it's baseless because you gave a source, but would you mind taking a look at this two map from Tsutsiyev' Atlas of Ethno-political histroy of the Caucasus: map 1 and map 2. Those are ethnic maps of the Caucasus region including Karabakh, Nakhichevan and Zangezur, where according to you source Muslim settlements were destroyed by Andranik in 1918-1919. The first map is from 1886/90 and the second one is from 1926. Please looks closely to those regions.

I don't see any major changes in those regions in the period 1890-1926, which includes the years Andranik is accused of destroying Muslim settlements. In fact, I see some Armenian-populated areas of Nakhichevan disappearing. --Yerevanci (talk) 23:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, do you have any sources of many things happened between 1918 and 1926 that prompted refugee Azeris at least partially to return to their ancestral lands, such as safety and patrolling provided by the Soviet government? I don't think so. And why didn't Armenians of Nakhichevan go back to their ancestral lands, if so?

There was no planned destruction of Muslim settlements by Armenians in 1918-1919. There was partial deportation of Muslim population from the war zone, which included some areas of Zangezur. What I mean is this sentence: He was particularly prominent in the destruction of Muslim settlements and in the planned ethnic homogenisation of regions with once mixed population through populating them with Armenian refugees from Turkey. makes the reader think that he was a criminal who destroyed settlements of a group of people just because of their religion and that was his goal, which isn't true. And also, the partial deportation of Muslims from Zangezur was not done to make the region homogeneous, but to make sure that Muslim population of the particular war zone didn't support the enemy forces. The fact that Muslims of other regions that weren't war zones didn't get deported, proves my point.--Yerevanci (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's not a forum, then I'll make edits without discussing! You avoid answering my questions, then why would I bother to discuss?--Yerevanci (talk) 02:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You engaged in an edit war in the article Amaras Monastery. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors here [4]. Sprutt (talk) 02:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:MauriManya is relentlessly replacing in the infobox of the Azerbaijan article, the map "Azerbaijan (orthographic projection).svg" which shows Azerbaijan with its de-jure borders and is replacing it with the map "Azerbaijan with Nagorno Karabakh and region.svg" which shows Nagorno-Karabakh as a legitimate entity. The user is not impartial and neutral and is only and relentlessly doing this unilateral map replacement in the Azerbaijan article, but interstingly enough not in other articles of countries which are in the same situation as Azerbaijan. Could you watch this user and revert his unilateral map replacements of Azerbaijan in the country article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.142.52 (talk) 10:47, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salam, bunun kimi bir adlandırma vardırmı? Esc2003 (talk) 05:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please stop editwarring and discuss at talk. It's better to edit a little later but achieve a full consensus. Day.az is not a source, please read the talk and replay. And please wait for other users to join, as what you're adding is very dubious at least for me. About Bloxham/Chalabian: Antranig Chalabian is specialized on Andranik (he is a respected author), while Bloxham uses Andranik's name just few times in his book and he is not supported by any other reliable sources specialized on Andranik. Thank you! OptimusView (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parishan,

I just reviewed your article and left some comments/concerns on the review page. Please see my comments and feel free to respond there (I believe you have a week according to the rules, but let me know if you need more time). It's a very good article, but I'm having a hard time with the sources, and I need your help to clarify them more. Cheers, Accedie^{talk to me} 05:14, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

(Well, half of one... kinda grosser, if you think about it.)

You're sharing this trout with Nick-D (talk · contribs), for inadvertently "blocking" everyone accused of edit-warring withiin the last 9 hours [5] [6]. No worries, and clearly this is about as honest a mistake as there is, but, to paraphrase National Treasure, someone's gotta go to jail get trouted. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 20:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Black City (Baku) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Please take a look at this. It is just a technical quibble - the article looks good. But if you submit a DYK nomination and have already submitted more than five, you are meant to review someone else's nomination and note that on your nomination. Yours will not be approved until that is done. The idea is to spread the workload of reviewing - but you may actually find it is interesting. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 02:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Black City (Baku), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first oil pipeline in the Russian Empire, laid by the Nobel brothers, fed the refineries in Black City, Baku, now in the Republic of Azerbaijan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black City (Baku). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 23:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

	Azerbaijan National Barnstar of Merit
	For your efforts into producing quality Azerbaijan-related articles. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, over on my talk page at Commons, someone from the Karabakh Project is requesting permission to use the Azeri vowel chart which you created (I subsequently converted it to SVG format). Since I'm not the original author, I obviously can't grant permission, but I thought you might like to respond to the request. Moxfyre (ǝɹʎℲxoɯ | contrib) 03:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I did not see a request with regard to that specific file. In any case, the image was released in public domain; does its use still require my permission? Parishan (talk) 10:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JediXmaster (talk) 04:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editors have indulged in your problematic edits long enough. It's bad enough that many of your edits are disingenuous and outright misleading (some of them are not even properly sourced); it's even worse when you think you can return to some articles years later and unilaterally try to rehash the same shtick by thinking no one else is keeping an on them. I've already made two reverts on two different articles and I hope not to catch you doing something as nefarious again. You known the ArbCom rules so there's no need to remind you but if you continue I won't hesitate to report you in order to curtail such disruptive activity.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and other editors have often abstained from reporting your disruptive edits in the belief that they might cease. But alas, you seem to prefer to railroad in your version even though others editors voice their objections and in spite of the fact that some of the sources do not even support what is being written. If that is not the definition of an editor acting in bad faith, I don't know what is. --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 16:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martuni (village), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aghjaghala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Azerbaijani Canadian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] either as a first or second language, with 115 of those being second-generation immigrants.<ref>[http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/dt-td/Rp-eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Azerbaijani language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shaki

Khadija Ismayilova (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Legal immunity

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware: [7]. Zimmarod (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your page move as undiscussed and potentially controversial - please use WP:RM. GiantSnowman 12:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because both spellings are used by multiple sources - why did you move the page again, especially when I have been trying to discuss it with you? GiantSnowman 09:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please notice that a Note has been added that the republic is de facto and not de jure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.125.48.225 (talk) 20:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC) Where is this consensus? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.125.48.225 (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See here Talk:Armenians#Azerbaijan. --Երևանցի ^talk 21:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A request at arbitration enforcement with which you were involved has been closed. The result is "No action taken. Parishan is reminded that edit warring with anonymous editors is still subject to revert limitations, and to report editors editing in the AA area (including anonymous ones) who are behaving poorly here rather than edit warring with them." Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kurds in Azerbaijan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zangezur and Nakhchivan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Parishan,

I think you'll be interested in Dashgyn Gulmammadov. GEORGIANJORJADZE 00:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look here [8] (scroll down). --Mossadegh-e Mihan-dust (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ravi Shankar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Azerbaijanis in Georgia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A user who has edited a lot at the Aram Mp3s article is now removing sourced information in the incident section at the ESC 2014 article that I guess you added. Just to let you know. I think removal of sourced information needs to be discussed first.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Biçənək

added a link pointing to Russian

Düzyurd

added a link pointing to Dəllər

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political status of Nagorno-Karabakh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Kim]], [http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/05/1044318661193.html Waiting for blow-back (speech delivered in Parliament on 4 February 2003], ''[[The Sydney Morning Herald]]'', 5 February
• PARTNERSHIP WITH THE UNITED STATES]</ref><br />{{flag|New Jersey}} <small>(Feb 2012)</small><ref>[http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bills/AR/144_I1.PDF ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION No. 144 - STATE OF NEW

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check and prevent the incorrect name change of the article Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend".

This was done unilaterally without any discussion and whithout any (widespread) agreement whatsoever.

Could all Azeri users also prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.66.209.203 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging the Ermenikend article with the Armenians of Baku article. The article is interwined with the former Armenian community of Baku and is not separate from it. Furthermore the false corrupted name change from Ermenikend into "Armenikend" is not the norm. Additionally the article is a WP:CONTENTFORK. Sanich^talk 15:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you draw well? If so, we could really use your skills. Please see this. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]