This is an archive of past discussions with User:PBS. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Maxwell Wallace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I'm thinking that the community has not been able to settle the twoissues here, so it surely would be appropriate to take them to Arbcom. May I coordinate a submission with you off Wiki (my email is open)? The submission could be in my name (though I'd certainly appreciate if you would kindly look my ideas over), or it could be a joint submission (two or more people). Also please see this. LittleBen (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Your comment
See my reply Phillip. I am suspicious of your sudden interest in this dispute. You must realise it will have no bearing on the outcome of the consus of the title change. I am entitled to state my opinion on your attiutde on this article if I choose to do so. I have not received an adequate response to your resistance to the the operational commanders being added, other than, I presume, it was me that added it. I have only edited this article several times over the past few years, but you - and you alone - have contested every single change to the content. Why? It is quite acceptable to complain that these unreasonable complaints slow down its progression. Editors like me like to get on with things. Under the circumstances I'm justified in saying what I said - which is an observation, not an attack. Dapi89 (talk) 10:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Kenelm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alderley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I see you restored the original pic of the mercat cross on this page after I'd replaced it with a pic of the post-1617 location. Thanks for spotting that error. Kim Traynor (talk) 15:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi PBS. You'll find I've responded to you on my own talk page. Please have a look when you can. Now that I'm here, I find that EEng has accused Binko71100 of being a sockpuppet, and cites Binko's conversations with me. I have a desire to stay out of that dispute & I expect Binko can speak for himself. Thanks for your attention. --Lockley (talk) 21:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm on my phone and for some reason it won't let me edit AN3. I was actually saying the request should've been at RFPP - not 3RR or EW - because it was a page protection request. And I know that you know there's no right version, but your request did happen to coincide with the aeticle being in your preferred state ;-) As I say, I didn't even see the AN3 request before I protected so that's moot. FWIW, having now read the "discussion" you were in the right, so for once an admin might've actually protected a page in The Right Version! Black Kite (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, PBS. You have new messages at Talk:Star Trek Into Darkness. Message added 23:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean François Aimé Dejean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mézières (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. The page number is absolutely necessary when linking to a source that contains the entire document in a single file. However, It is not generally needed when linking to a transcribed article at Wikisource, since the articles are generally quite short. I think that it's a judgement call. The WS article has the page number for the original article together with a link to the correct page of the scanned source, so there is no loss of provenance. I'm interested in your thought on this, and I will preserve the page numbers if you still think they add value in this context. -Arch dude (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
As a separate issue, the DNBIE template is broken. It appends "(DNB00)" to the wstitle, but the DNBIE articles at WS (if any) use a different suffix. Therefore, you should not use the "wstitle=" to reference articles in the Epitiome. continue to use the "title=" instead. In the mean time I will go do some research on the status of the Epitome at WS. -Arch dude (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
If you wish to add the DNBIE to WS, then great, but the template is still broken. The pattern is:
so {{DNBIE}} should append (DNBIE). This assumes you intend to implement a seperate article for each epitome entry. I haven't thought about that project so I have no opinion. The problem in in {{Cite DNBIE}}.-Arch dude (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I have modified "general" to "commander" and supplied a reference. I have added a reference for "chopping wood". Many of Le Marchant's military writings were published anonymously, as is mentioned in the text, purely because they became official army regulations, but it is known that he wrote them. All new arms, of necessity, are first produced as prototypes. Le Marchant's sabre was merely lengthened by an inch at the behest of the generals overseeing the re-arming the cavalry, but it remained his design - it was adopted as the 1796 pattern light cavalry sword, of which I own two examples. Urselius (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
I think the user might have a point -- editing as an IP and then creating an account and using that to continue an edit war isn't sockpuppetry. We encourage people to create accounts; we do not say "create accounts unless you're in the middle of an argument". Perhaps an edit warring 24-hr block would be more appropriate? --jpgordon::==( o )19:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi
In what Wikipedia talk page can I report your maddening witch-hunt against me? I have been contributing dozens of times almost daily since 2005 and am a registered user since 2007, never did I vandalize a page nor tried to negatively affect Wikipedia, so I demand respect from you. I hope you'll be as fast replying to my question as you were fast blocking me for some obscure reason. Answer in my talk page. Good day. Tibulluscall me14:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
You can take it to WP:ANI if you wish, but consider, if having read the guidance about cut and past moves if your complaint is warranted. -- PBS (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Stop behaving like a cyberbully, and go block anonymous and registered users who keep vandalizing pages. You don't seem to be doing a very good job at that, since I keep reverting their editings. You don't respect who believes in this project and is trying to do their best to keep Wikipedia update, clean, unbiased and safe. Tibulluscall me15:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
The move discussion at Talk:Theater District, New York was closed without alerting editors at the relevant Wikiprojects to join in. It has long been the consensus at WP:THEATRE and WP:MUSICALS to spell the word "theatre", in part because theatre professionals prefer this spelling throughout the English-speaking world, and because this spelling is not wrong anywhere, while "theater" is wrong in many places,such as the UK. BTW, I am an American from New York City. Note that nearly all of the Broadway theatres are called "X Theatre". I have re-opened the discussion on the talk page to see if we can get a wider consensus on this issue. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Pbs, A user just mentioned in a talk page discussion that the original title of a current article was 1971 Bangladesh genocide, which he had recently reverted back to the 2005 name. As I was looking through history, you seemed to pop up at the point the name changed and I further noticed you went through several versions. I don't know about how you feel about this now or even if you remember that article, but we're having a convo there about this name. Since you're behind this diff [2] and several others afterwards where the name came up as an issue, I was wondering if you could give us some insight. I don't mean to canvas here -- even if you just want to comment is fine. My intention is merely to get the thinking from an earlier point of time. Crtew (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm not going to engage in an edit war over this, but I had already replied directly to DS's response to my original post. Your insertion of your subsequent response between those two comments, as noted, interrupts the flow and sense. Elbowing aside someone else's comment in that fashion, so that your later comment in effect gains priority over the first chronological response to anyone reading down the page comes across as somewhat arrogant and rude. You may not have been responding directly to me, but we are all discussing common ground there, and I happened to be the first to respond. Can anyone else – myself included even – now insert their own comment in between yours & DS's, and hence above yours in turn, if they happen to think their response to DS is more important that both mine and yours and if they simply say, "But I'm responding to DS, not to PBS"? That's a recipe for totally chaotic and unreadable discussion, and talk page guidelines and custom are pretty clear on it. I'm also assuming you'd rather someone didn't bump down your response in a similar fashion. N-HHtalk/edits14:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
I am not making changes. I am reverting to the last stable version 06:06, 10 February 2013 by Themeparkgc. But reverting my revert you are reintroducing changes made by WhatamIdoing at 05:24, 15 February 2013 diff, while change is being discussed on the talk page. -- PBS (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
No one on the talk page supports your edit, whether you call it an old one or a new one. The problem at that page is that you seem unfamiliar with standard ways of referencing. I'm sorry to say this to you. It is causing you to mix up several different concepts, but rather than listen to what others have to say, you revert (sometimes for weeks or months) and keep on arguing. For example, you don't add page numbers to a bibliography or references section, for obvious reasons, namely that one book might have been cited many times, with different page numbers each time; page numbers therefore belong in the text, in the form of a footnote or Harvard ref. And short cites are not used together with general references; that's not what is meant by a "general reference" on Wikipedia. A general reference is one that is, by definition, not connected to a citation in the text.
Please keep the discussion here. Are you seriously saying that the References section should contain a list of full citations that read like the following? Smith, John. Name of Book. CUP, 2013, pp. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 13, 16, 22, 25, 40, 43, 56, 64, 78, 79, 89, 91, 110, 150, 170, 180–182, etc?
If you look at the discussion about the general references, that started on 30 December 2012 because you objected to a basic copy edit to remove a contradiction. It is now March 9, 2013, and there's no let up, when the only issue is that you haven't understood one point, namely that a section containing "general references" is not the same as one containing full citations linked to (or in some other associated with) short cites in the text. That is, a "general reference" is not the same thing as a "full citation." They might be listed under the same title ("References"), but they are different concepts, with different uses. A general reference is what you use when you copy the old Encyclopaedia Britannica articles, and at the end there is a general reference that says something like "this article incorporates text from X." We call it a general reference, because it is not linked to or associated with any specific point in the article, and doesn't accompany a separate Notes or Footnotes section. Really, no article on WP should be using general references, unless it's a stub. Ideally (in my view), WP:CITE wouldn't even mention them, because all they do is cause confusion.
At least three editors have objected to your version, but still you revert, and expect people to continue discussing. That's the kind of thing the RfC addressed. SlimVirgin(talk)20:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
I got intrigued by this while stub-sorting yesterday - not least by the lack of any really reliable-looking sources! Wondered at first if it was a hoax. Found a couple of refs, and today the City Surveyor's report where it's called "Millennium Inclinator". What would you think about moving it to that title? Could have just done so, but it seemed better to check first as you created it so recently (and there's obviously been some sort of a tiff about it already, from deleted edits). Still seems strange not to have found much in the way of reliable sources - I'd have thought there'd be something in wheelchair guides to London, etc, but not yet found. Nor anything about the grand reopening - perhaps it was done rather quietly out of embarrassment at the waste of money? PamD11:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Would you be interested in a clean start at improving the refactoring page? Things got regretfully sidetracked and I'd be willing to work with you to find a comprobable solution. Mkdwtalk01:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Arbcom has concluded that the claim of outing was bogus. Obviously it was just to keep me blocked and prevent me from defending myself at ANI. Konjakupoet has outed himself with links to his own previous user identity in the ANI discussion.
As you can see from the cautions on his talk page: since returning to Wikipedia, Konjakupoet has continued the same pattern of repeated vicious attacks on other users that he showed under his previous user ID.
It's pretty obvious that the attacks on my repeated advocating of following Wikipedia rules on properly researching and neutrally sourcing BLP names and place names here and here were the result of off-wiki canvassing and mob organizing that is acknowledged here.
I have lots of other facts organized into a case, and would be glad to get your off-wiki input on how to proceed (but my sending of email from WP seems to be disabled at this end). LittleBen (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I work very hard to be nice, and to give other people the benefit of the doubt. But, at some point, circumstances sometimes force me to come out of my geek hole and document the lunacy. It doesn't matter how talented a person may be if they cannot learn to play fairly: if they will not stop trying to control and manipulate—or stop their relentless score keeping, score settling, and organizing of private armies. WP should not be like that, WP should be a friendly community.
I'm a professional (tech.) writer, but no human being is perfectly objective. I always welcome constructive feedback, particularly from somebody like you. Sincere and very best wishes. LittleBen (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Dormer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Pelham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The quality of your arguments has improved, [3], regardless of my thoughts on the subject, I think you are doing a much better job of presenting your thoughts and arguing your position, then in years past. Jeepday (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
An article you worked on Westwood House, appears to be directly copied from http://www.mspong.org/picturesque/westwood_house.html. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westwood House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caroline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Great Ejection may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
manuscript. The index entry for each person contains a biography written in the early 20th century) which, with the exception of a few very well known individuals, records much of what is known
Finding that his brother had procured his election for the County of [[ [[Kildare County (Parliament of Ireland constituency)|Kildare]] (as seat he held from from 1790
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Lenthall may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
of Oxfordshire, p. 318.</ref> He left one son [[John Lenthall (politician)|John Lenthall]] ((1624/5–1681). His brother Sir John Lenthall, who it was said had too much influence with William,
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adolf Furtwängler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
of the Greek sculptors responsible for the originals of many works known only through Roman copies;{{sfn|Sorensen|2000} many of his attributions still stand, though the most recent scholarship in the
Hi Phillip, can you help mediate here Portadown Massacre? No wish to get into an edit but an editor is being difficult, reverting sourced content - re the well documented mutual massacres in Ulster in 161-42. I'd appreciate your input. Jdorney (talk) 17:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Edinburgh Mercat Cross again
I've just met a young neighbour who happens to be a Classics student. He's not too confident about having a go at the tympanum inscription himself, but he says he knows a lecturer who he thinks will be willing. Fingers crossed. Kim Traynor | Talk21:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2013
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please see User talk:TomStar81#Your ideas for what to do about Rotterdam Blitz. This move review has been sitting around for a long time, and the original discussion was in January. You are the only experienced editor who showed up in the original move discussion supporting Rotterdam Blitz. Would you be against my idea for closing the move review? I know that these articles could be organized differently, but as of now I'd support any reasonable idea for getting the move review closed. My own preference would be just to do the move, and leave any reorganizing of the bombing topic for the future. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey PBS, thanks for autoarchiving the talk at Gypsy horse, but can you tweak the parameters so that it archives every 60 days or so and doesn't necessarily archive at any particular length (though I like the preserving of 2-3 threads)? I ask because this article is prone to get a bunch of massive editing, followed by a long lull, so I don't want it too fast to archive, and I don't want long discussions accidentally split. Is that doable? Thanks. Montanabw(talk)05:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander White Pitzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberty, Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You are absolutely right the commands did not spring from nowhere; however, your addition was in error, specifically in MacArthur being in command of ABDA. That was under British command (Wavell) with ANZAC hurriedly put together on the other side of Mac's dissolving Philippine command to organize defense of Australia/New Zealand and the line of supply. The origin of SWPA & POA lies in the Arcadia Conference decision that the Pacific, excluding India and the IO, was a U.S. responsibility and U.S. JCS was working the division:
PS: All those WW II theater command pieces need lots of work for accuracy and I'd include harmonizing the apparently almost completely separate categories of Allied commands and U.S. commands such as we see in that SEA/CBI thing. Palmeira (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I looked at the hits line without looking at the content. In there was the line that said there were no exact matches. So the query was entered correctly and I did miss the important line buried in the results. So if you want to take it to Wikipedia:Move review over this, that would seem to be a reasonable option. However, you would also need to mention this result for the old name. If you do this, I would change my position from support to a comment due to this error which was my plan before doing the query. Don't know what effect that would have. Sorry. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
RfC re WP:LQ
Greetings, PBS. In answer to the objections you raised on the MOS talk page, I have revised the RfC question to address them. Hopefully, you will find the revised RfC question is sufficiently neutral and unbiased that you will feel comfortable enough to express your opinion and !vote on the merits. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Laws of war may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
''Proportionality'' is a principle under international humanitarian law] governing the legal use of force in an armed conflict, whereby [[belligerent]]s must make sure
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Waterloo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
ridge between the regiments of Kempt and Pack around 12:00 {{Harv|Bas|1909|pp=332–333}} (vol. 3))</ref>
infantry, and fell back with losses from musketry fire.{{sfn||Siborne<!--HT-->|1891|pp=14, 38–39}}}} Uxbridge recorded that he tried to lead the Dutch Carabiniers, under Major-General [[Albert
He received an excellent education at the grammar school of Perth and the [University of Edinburgh]], where he was in the summer of 1593, about the time when his mother, and his sister the Countess
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
29 |title=Der_Bognerton (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Erste Phillipston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
|title=Der Keiser als Spileman (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
Friedrichs und Engelbertston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
|title=Der Koenig Friedrichston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
|title=Der Koenig Heinrichston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
Vogelweide%29 |title=Der Leich (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Leopoldston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Meisnerton (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Ottenton (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Reichston um 1200 (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Unmutston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Wiener Hofton (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Der Zweite Phillipston (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Fruehe Lieder bis 1198 (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
|title=Ich sach mit mînen ougen (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
|title=Ich saz ûf einem Steine (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
Ir sult sprechen willekomen (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Lieder bis 1203 (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Lieder bis 1205 (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Lieder bis 1220 (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Lieder der neuen Minne (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Maedchenlieder (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
29 |title=Spaete Lieder (Walther von der Vogelweide) |publisher=eLibrary Projekt (elib.at)], University of Vienna |language=German |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rotterdam Blitz may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
www.archive.org/details/BombingVindicated''"Bombing Vindicated"''] G. Bles, 1944. {{OCLC|1201928}} (Spaight was Principal Assistant Secretary of the Air Ministry (U.K)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angela of Foligno may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Angela was born in 1248 into a wealthy family at [[Foligno]], in [[Umbria]. She married at an early age, she loved the world and its pleasures and, worse still,
the-Catholic-Church-in-England-16th-19th-Century |title=History of the Catholic Church in England (16th – 19th Century |publisher=www.thepapalvisit.org.uk |accessdate=July 2013}}</ref> Elizabeth's
Hi. In my opinion this page should be at Dieppe and the others moved to Dieppe (disambiguation). As far as I'm concerned the Dieppe is the one in northern France. Any objections to me requesting a page move? If you could let me know on my talk page I'd be grateful. Thanks!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld14:33, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello PBS. You posted at ANI for an admin to close this discussion. If I had to do so, it would probably be 'No Consensus', with some suggestion of further negotiations. It looks to me that you could remove some of the objections to 'Madrid' if you would consider the suggestion by User:Jonesey95, to replace the sentence containing Madrid:
"The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopedias and reference works, scholarly journals and major news sources). This makes it easy to find, and easy to compare information with other sources. Often the English version and the local version will be the same, as with Madrid."
Though there isn't agreement that Madrid needs to be replaced, and there isn't consensus for any new single name, there is some discomfort with the current wording, and the above change would reduce (in my opinion) the motivation for future challenges. Let me know if you would object to the above change. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. You might be interested to know that a discussion is developing again on whether to merge the Markt Cross and Mercat Cross pages. The current discussion is here [[4]] Kim Traynor | Talk19:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Lothian question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Now the Ivanonic dispute is over, I just wanted to "reunite" and say that I completely appreciate your viewpoint and that I will consider some of your points in future RM's. Thank you ever so much. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hugh Peters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Committee of Safety and John Hotham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I have used a nifty tool "CatScan" to create a list of articles that contain a {{CathEncy}} template and {{Catholic}} template. I have then imported that list (about 300 articles) and written an AWB script to populate an empty {{Catholic}} template from the {{CathEncy}} template and then delete the {{CathEncy}} template if it is not used as an inline citation.
Your user name came up several times in the first few articles that I examined, some from which I deleted the {{Catholic}} template because I could not see any text currently in the Wikipedia article that could be seen as plagiarised text from the Catholic Encyclopaedia without the attribution template.
I have just restarted going thorough my list in AWB (after a short R&R break) and the first article I looked at is Ambrose Shea. Looking at the text of the Wikipedia article I could not see any text that was copied from the Catholic Encyclopaedia.
Using another useful tool "wikiblame", I can see that you added the template to the article (20:52, 19 January 2009). I then looked further into the article's history:
Revision as of 23:42, 11 Dec. 2006: First big expansion and the source used was presumably the given source "Biography at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online"
Revision as of 08:37, 13 Oct. 2007: template CathEncy added to the external links section by JASpencer, but no text added.
Revision as of 20:52, 19 Jan. 2009: template Catholic added to the external links section by you, but AFAICT there was no need for it.
In the minute that you added the {{Catholic}} to Ambrose Shea you also added the same template to 6 other articles, and in the minute before and after you added the same template to another 7 and 12 articles.
What were the criteria that you used for adding these templates and did they include checking to see if any text had been copied, or closely paraphrased, from a PD source before adding the template?
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Martin Sullivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Potato Famine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tallboy (bomb) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
Mustang is the master bombers --> bombed ''Wizernes'' -- three Lancasters managed to drop Tallboys (one caused the dome to shift out of alignment, two others blocked the entrance.<ref>{{cite web |url=
:}617 Squadron scored six direct hits with Tallboys on the night of .<ref name="DiarySep44">{{harvnb|
;21 December 1944 [Politz]]
;25 April 1945 [Berghof (Hitler)|Berghof]]
The Special Weapons of Barnes Wallis |url=http://www.sirbarneswallis.com/Bombs.htm |publisher=[http://www.sirbarneswallis.com/index.php www.SirBarnesWallis.com |accessdate=August 2013}} ([http://
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Red Army Faction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
she was guilty of was membership in a terrorist organization" {{harv|Smith|Moncourt|2009|p=566).}};</ref>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Affaire Des Fiches may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Charles Williams |publisher=The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon |accessdate=August 2013}}) quotes:
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Popular sovereignty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
action, the will of the people as a whole is the only right standard of political action" (Peters, Jr. 1978, p. 1}};
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Earl of Eglinton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Thomas Finlayson |wstitle=Montgomerie, Alexander (1588-1661) |volume=38 |pages=298–300}} (6th Earl}}
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to English Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
<!--<[[File:Battle-poitiers(1356).jpg|thumb|right|200px|The English army defeats the French at the [[
Tudor and Stuart [[monarch]]s maintained a personal [[bodyguard]] of [[Yeomen of the Guard]] (created by Henry VII and the [[Honourable Corps of Gentlemen at Arms]] or "gentlemen pensioners" (
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It was very considerate of you to leave me that message, and those links. I do use short citations, particularly on longer or denser articled that make multiple references to the same work. But I do have a serious deficit when it comes to templates, or indeed anything that looks like a mathematical or statistical formula; I slow, then freeze over, and cease to function. It's an ancient, pathological panic; an old trick... and I'm getting to be one of Wikipedia's elder dogs, set in his ways, with only a few active neurones to spare for new things. Or old ones, come to that. But I will give it a go. Best, Haploidavey (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Aha. Just discovered the buttons you mentioned....
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Protectorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Harrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
as page to Sir [[Edward Cecil]] in Germany, and distinguished himself by his gallantry at the [[siege of Juliers[[ in 1610. In 1616 he took service under Captain Benjamin Joseph, commander of the ''Globe'', [[East
On 23 October 1615, at the City of London church of [[St Ann Blackfriars]], Apsley married Lucy (a daughter of Sir John St John of [[Lydiard Tregoze]], [[Wiltshire]], and his wife Lucy (daughter
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matthew Thomlinson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
*{{Cite ODNB|first=A. W. H. |last=Pearsall |title=Osborn, Henry (bap. 1694, d. 1771 |origyear=2004 |date=Jan 2008 |id=20878}} {{DNB first|wstitle=Osborne, Henry}}
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alexander Nevill may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
in effecting an orderly retreat, and marched off the field intact.<ref>{{harvnb|Firth|1898|p=86)}} cites ''Life of James II''. i. 353, 354, 359.</ref> The Duke of York's troop of guards, which
Good news. I've finally come across in print a translation of the Latin inscription on the Cross. I've given it exactly as it appears in the 1885 publication, even though it does not seem to be precise (where is that first date of destruction in the original and isn't it astonishing that the writer should make a mistake in the date of the inscription itself?). I assume the book was commissioned to accompany completion of the reconstruction, as it is dedicated to the City Magistrates. Kim Traynor | Talk21:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Is there a particular reason why you had reverted edits I made in the article "The List of Bosnian Genocide Prosecutions?" --Accursius (talk) 09:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
doesn't cite the work but does use the word in its modern spelling.--FeanorStar7 08:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
--FeanorStar7 08:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Monson, 1st Viscount Monson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Marten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Kohima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
seven thousand useless mouths could only have been to use them for propaganda on arrival in India" ({{harv|Thompson|2010|p=208}}.</ref>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Willis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
|first=Robert L. |date=October 2007 |origyear=2004 |id=29587 |title=Willis, Thomas (1621–1675)]}}</ref><ref name = Galileo>[http://galileo.rice.edu/Catalog/NewFiles/willis.html Willis, Thomas].
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Tracy Atkyns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
term]] 1736 to Michaelmas term 1754, and he published condensed reports of them in three volumes (1765, 1667, 1668(; a second edition appeared 1781/2, and a third, edited by [[Francis William Sanders]], in 1794 (
60]]).{{sfn|Firth|Rait|1911|pp=III-XXXVIII}} }} Under its terms all members of the Long Parliament] who were also officers in the Parliamentary army or navy were to either resign their Parliamentary
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Purefoy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
the Parliamentary forces in Warwickshire during [[Booth's Insurrection]].{{sfn|Lee|1903|p=1076}})
the Bedchamber]] and [[Master of the Great Wardrobe]] to King James I {{harv|Betham|1801|p=37}}}.}} with whom he had 6 sons and 4 daughters:{{sfn|Betham|1801|pp=37–38}}
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Carteret may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
S. (reviwer) |date=January 2008 |origyear=2004 |id=4803 |title=Carteret, Sir George, first baronet (1610?–1680}} {{DNBfirst|wstitle=Carteret, George}}
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Style, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You said that there were several theorists but what you're describing is more like a group or place rather than a person. Here is this sentence: Some leading theorists of strategic air warfare, during this period were the Italian Giulio Douhet, the Trenchard school in Great Britain, and General Billy Mitchell in the United States. Every rational person could see it doesn't make any sense whatsoever and you're still not giving me explicit explanation why you wanted to keep the Trenchard school. The keyword here is "theorists" and the definition of a theorists are "persons concerned with the theoretical aspects of a subject; theoreticians." You said that there were several theorists that proposed the same idea then why can you name them instead of naming something like a place of group. I need some source to this information. So far, all i see is Sir Huge Trenchard, not the Trechard School. That's not grammatically sense and doesn't fit with the sentence structure.XXzoonamiXX (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Gilbert Gerard of Crewood
Hi! I noticed you have performed assessment of the Gilbert Gerard of Crewood article, rating it B-class for the WP:MILHIST project. While individual editors are more than welcome to perform such assessments, the Military History project bars major contributors to an article to identify the articles they developed significantly as B-class alone. The project has set up an assessment page for the purpose at WP:MHAR. For that reason, I have provisionally removed B-class checklist entries at the article talk page and I would like to direct you to the WP:MHAR to seek a B-class assessment there. Reviewers there are quite responsive and are likely to process a request within a day or two. Regards.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Indeed, there's no problem if a brand new article meets the B-class criteria in full and it would be ok to classify a brand new article as "B" provided that it meets all the WP:BCLASS criteria and, in case of Military History project ratings, that the B-class rating is awarded by an editor who has not been a major contributor to the specific article per WP:MHA#IR.
The template works as follows: if all five checklist fields are set to "yes", the set class= parameter value will be overridden with "B". If one of the five criteria is set to "no" (or left blank) the parameter value will default to "C", and if two or more criteria are set to "no" the value will default to "Start" - unless of course a classification greater than B is entered there (GA, A, or FL/FA). Personally, I think the article fails at least the B5 criterion (supporting materials), and possibly B2 criterion as well (coverage and accuracy) because no supporting materials (image, infobox and the like) are provided and the article says nothing on his life prior to 1630s and appears to be very sketchy in terms of the last decade or two or so of his life. I may have gotten a wrong impression in that department, but if a reviewer at the WP:MHAR were to hold a similar view they will tell you so and normally offer you pointers on meeting the B-class criteria. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 13:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
As I already said, I may be wrong on the B2, that's why you could take that up with a reviewer at WP:MHAR. As far as the infobox is concerned, MILHIST considers them supporting material per WP:MHA#CRIT (just expand collapsed explanation of B-class criteria there). The MILHIST banner template handles the criteria checklist in this way and while other projects might use the criteria as guideline, MILHIST applies them quite strictly in terms of full compliance. For instance, an article with a single missing reference is treated the same as if half of article contents were unreferenced. If you feel there should be a change in the behaviour of the template, please comment at WT:MILHIST.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The term "sixteenth century" is actually used by historians even in cultures where it wasn't: it's agreed and generally presupposed that we mean CE. Not surprisingly, there are many, probably hundreds, of articles that use the term in their title and many more that refer to different centuries. There are certainly plenty on 16th century MPs. "Tudor" is the name of a royal dynasty and its power was confined to England, Wales, parts of Ireland and the Pale of Calais. Not Scotland. Not France. Not anywhere else. So the idea that it's somehow more "recognisable" than the name of the century is plainly ethnocentric. It also presupposes that the royalty define their century, which wasn't true even then, and is now clearly an ideological preference not shared by the vast majority of English speakers. It is far less common for anyone to use even the word "Stuart" in the same way and "Hanoverian" is pretty well always reserved just for the dynasty. No-one would refer to a French jurist of the same period as a "Valois judge". The Tudor's have acquired this unique privilege mainly because of the way that a particular way of doing history claimed a hegemonic place in English academia - a long time ago. That and a bit of help from Horrible Histories. Sjwells53 (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I noticed that you flagged the ancestry tree on Charles II for lack of sources. Perhaps there is less need for specific citation for this sort of tree as:
A) It is unlikely that there would be any single source, or even a reasonably small number of sources, that would be available to cover such a tree,
and
B) As all the persons in the tree have links to their own article, the reader could easily verify any particular relationship they found interesting by refering to such a linked page.
Even a useful biography of the scion of such a tree is unlikely to mention all the ancestors to 4 generations - but the presence of such trees is useful to the reader. Urselius (talk) 14:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly desirable, but the level of citation would be unworkable. You could easily end up with an article with more references for the family tree than for the text itself. Urselius (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Lawful image
I learned a great deal here. Not just about our policy on this, but on those specific set of images. After a lengthy look into the full copyright issue, I have concluded that you are fully correct and that an apology is deserved. Sorry for my lack of understanding of this issue. You made a good call and...you pushed me enough to find all the relevant policies and legal information myself and that is even better in my book. Thank you and my sincere apologies once again. I will update the GA review.--Mark Miller (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi PBS. Please would you tell me why this editor believes Pat Sheahan (publican) is notable? I cannot see it. I realise there is a system that reviews this factor in new articles, what might the system have found that I cannot see? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 12:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
led to his expulsion from the dominions of the Church.<ref>{{harvnb|Pollard|1901|p=112–113}} (Horace Wapole, Memoirs of George III, ed. Barker, i. 237 ; Cust, Dilettanti Soc. pp. 9-10.</ref>}}
} cites Cust, p. 9.</ref> He took a prominent part in hhe proceedings of the ''[Dilettanti Society]]'',
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Calthorpe may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 99 call may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
|url=http://www.2005lions.net/tour_1974_article_01.shtml |title=Rampant Lions - South Africa 1974] |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071027204433/http://www.2005lions.net/tour_1974_article_
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Portland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
1653 [[Julian calendar]]<ref name=date group=lower-alpha/>{{efn|28 February – 2 March 1653 ([[Gregorian calendar]]}}
naval '''Battle of Portland''', or '''Three Days' Battle''' took place during 18-20 February 1653 (28 February – 2 March 1653 ([[Gregorian calendar]]),{{efn|name=date|During this period in English
a son of Sir[[ Edward Aston]] of [[Tixall]] and his second wife Anne Lucy of [[Charlecote Park]].{{efn|
for joint naval operations to patrol and suppress piracy.{{sfn|Loomie|2008}} The Prince of Wales (the future [[Charles I of England]] accompanied by the [[George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Abbotts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
{for|his contemporary with a similar name who also sat in the Short Parliament but for the
Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant |edition=new reprint in 6 volumes) |location=Gloucester, U.K. |publisher=Alan Sutton Publishing |volume=I |pages=45–46}}
Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant |edition=new reprint in 6 volumes) |location=Gloucester, U.K. |publisher=Alan Sutton Publishing |volume=II |pages=65, 142}}
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Twisleton may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
was elder brother of the well known [[John Williams (archbishop of York)|John Williams]], sometime (1621–1625] when Bishop of Lincoln, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, and afterwards (1641–1650) Archbishop of
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Valentine Greatrakes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
*The public commotion which Greatraks caused gave rise to a novel (in French0 by M. St. Evremond, entitled, ''The Irish Prophet'', in which he finely plays on the
ac.uk/boyle/workdiaries/WD26Clean.html |first=Robert |last=Boyle |year=1666 |title=Work-diary XXVI] |chapter=Accounts of cures performed by Valentine Greatrakes |publisher=Birkbeck, University of
] (1605–1663) of Spargor, Cornwall — the eldest son (by Judith Meredith) of John Godolphin (the younger brother of Sir [[William Godolphin (1567–1613)]] — and Ruth (died before 1658),
Thats very unfortunate. Ironically we were both working from the same source. You would have thought that the system could warn you when proposing to make an edit that someone else was already editing. Anyway I'll keep out until the dust has settled.Plucas58 (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, congratulations on your DYK! The hook is fantastic and I'm sure it will get a lot of hits. I just have a question about your reference formatting. In all my years on Wikipedia, I have never seen page numbers linked to the URL. In fact, when I was reviewing the article for DYK, I thought all your sources were offline. Every other article I've seen has the name of the book in blue, so readers can easily click on it to see the page in question. Best, Yoninah (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the article, and do feel free to add your new Cheshire-related items in future. As I wrote in my edit summary, I reverted the edit because you added the article at the wrong end of the list (oldest items not newest items) and also removed the newest article not the oldest. I restored the Tarvin in the English Civil War article in the correct position in my next edit. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
I tend not to use revert very often but was worried the article you incorrectly removed might get lost in the wash if I didn't revert -- and then I noticed that the new articles bot had deposited a whole slew of other new ones that needed adding too, and decided to do a full update while I was at it... I've amended the rather confusing instructions to (hopefully) make the end that new items are meant to be appended to clearer. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Do you really want me to put those two sources after every single line? I was still working on the article, but hey, you have it.--86.6.187.246 (talk) 13:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
I know this article very well, I was the one who sat there and copied from the leafy pages those 'quotes' and loosely paraphrased the majority of the text (when tens of irrelevant pages weren't being skipped), maybe sometimes too closely, and I was inspired by your comments about how close to have another go through and reduce further the fatter than necessary wording, even though copyright isn't an issue. At the time of writing it, from two single sources, inline citations weren't my thing and certainly didn't appear necessary. I could say "make your mind up" either I'm paraphrasing too closely or it needs further citing from the source but both cannot be true at the same time, no? If your asking me to go fetch Varley's book back out the stacks and go through and find page numbers, ask nicer.--86.6.187.246 (talk) 13:53, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, for the Plant background, I was just looking at Samuel Rawson Gardiner after finding nothing online (but I'm at home so no janet/Uni-wide dbs available) to see if Plant got his Privy Council being at Oriel from him. Apologies for being slow on the uptake regarding Plant vs Plant.--86.6.187.246 (talk) 00:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Have heard back from the librarian today about Varley's book, which apparently has been in the hands of one of the previous history dons for some years now, so she is looking at getting a second copy. That said, (the first) I know this particular chap and occasionally get to see him, so it may be some weeks or some months before I manage to get hands on a copy. However (another one) having re-read Clyde Grose's summary, he noted that the book is not very readable, with few exact citations, mostly marginal notes which then reference the numbers of the books as listed in the second volume of Falconer Madan's 1912 Oxford books (which our library does not have copy of), — "[t]he scholar will be irked at times by the indefiniteness or complete absence of references for documents mentioned or printed." But (the third) with your excellent additions into the sources of the two diaries (which Varley most certainly used), I had hoped to be assisted by Varley's notes in completing Walker as I had done with Dugdale, but am now reconciled (per Grose) in completing the tracking back from Walker instead. That is likely to leave some few sentences of opinion and note from Varley himself, in amongst the accounts from the two diaries and letters quoted, for which distinct page numbers would likely be no problem (although of no real worth - per Grose). I shall also be continuing in my attempt to improve the text throughout. --I also edit on 86.6.187.246 when not on 163.1.147.64 (talk) 01:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I am mostly done, there are a few bits here and there that I am going to look to re-source if possible, and I still have another few hours worth of copy editing the text to do yet. Are there any heinous crimes (excepting apostrophe and mdash abuse) that you feel I need look at?--163.1.147.64 (talk) 23:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for the invitation and for restarting the interest. I don't know how much you know of the history. Some years ago, almost the entire content of EB1911 was dumped uncritically into Wikipedia, complete with OCR errors, and then some heroes started to sort out the conflict with existing articles that had more contemporary information. One challenge of note was that EB articles were sometimes much more comprehensive than WP and it was a challenge to decide what was still relevant after 100 years (obscure mythical figures yes, technology not so much). We did the same with Nuttall but that was much easier to complete.
I also joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/1911 verification. Pretty soon I was the only one; I started on the B's because others were making random attacks on the A's, and gave up 65% of the way through. The idea was to walk through the WP articles in the EB index, where there was a mix of modern and old text, deciding which ones still had EB text, and cleaning it up where necessary. My working notes are at User:DavidBrooks/sandbox.
Work on the citation templates has slowly continued, and the partial Wikisource has come on line since then, and I honestly haven't kept up to date. So I may stave off the occasional boredom and pick it up again. It may even be necessary to re-examine those 782 "B" articles that I already reviewed. David Brooks (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Also, I just found another problem with the templates (after all these years). Some articles in wikisource contain a disambiguation descriptor in parentheses, which is absent from the encyclopaedia itself. I just edited George Abbot (author) which links to the Wikisource article "Abbot, George (writer)". However in the printed book according to the online scans the article is just "Abbot, George" (one of two with the same heading). It's not strictly accurate to describe the EB1911 article as "Abbot, George (writer)"; that's not what the original book says. I don't think either the EB1911 or the Wikisource1911Enc template has the capacity to effectively pipe the text to the differently-named article. I left that page in an inconsistent state so you can see what I mean. Thoughts? David Brooks (talk) 22:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
While looking at your resolution example in George Abbot (author), I noticed in the change[5] you also added Endnotes. I forget the latest section ordering and attribution conventions, but shouldn't that be either on a new line or its own section? David Brooks (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the message
I was away at a funeral this past weekend, so was away from a computer a bit longer than usual. Thanks for the note, I've responded and hope it helps. Please let me know if I can continue helping in any way - I'll be watching the page just in case. GRUcrule (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Lord Mayor of York
I certainly can have a look at the site you suggest. I seem to have used it in the past for the York MPs. I assume you feel we can use their list of city sheriffs. I have recently completed the list of the Canterbury sheriffs, so why not York.Plucas58 (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Question
Hi. Was there genocide in early 19th century British Ceylon? See here. I'm no expert, but it looks like very heavy POV pushing. -- 20:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Tobby72 (talk)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
in power, and applied himself particularly to the Speaker of the Rump Parliament [William Lenthall]], who, in expectation of gaining him in marriage for his daughter, espoused his interest with great
resistance was left with a moping up operation, after his death his successor [Edmund Ludlow]] was faced with even less effective military opposition, and after [[Charles Fleetwood]] arrived in
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fenton baronets may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
(England)|Restoration]].{{sfn|Shaw|1906|p=224}})<ref>{{harvnb|Lodge|Archdall|1789|p=229}} like, {{{harvnb|Burke|Burke|1844|p=605}}, state that Maurice Fenton was made a baronet by the Lord
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roger Fenwick (Roundhead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lockhart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Wheler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1st Foot Guards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Jessica ChastainChastain pada tahun 2016LahirJessica Michelle Chastain24 Maret 1977 (umur 46)Sacramento, California, ASPendidikan Kolese Kota Sacramento Akademi Seni Drama Amerika Serikat Sekolah Juilliard (BFA) PekerjaanAktrisproduserTahun aktif1998–sekarangOrganisasiFreckle FilmsKarya terkenalThe Help (2011)Zero Dark Thirty (2012)The Eyes of Tammy Faye (2021)selengkapnya...Suami/istriGian Luca Passi de Preposulo (m. 2017)Anak2Pengharg...
Ini adalah daftar aliansi militer. Masa lampau Periode Vedik 1700–1000 SM - Sepuluh suku membentuk aliansi melawan Tritsu dalam Pertempuran Sepuluh Raja Periode Helenik Aliansi konfederasi negara-kota Yunani 502–449 SM - Peperangan Medik Liga Helenik - Athena, Lacedemonia, Makedon, lain-lain 431–404 SM - Perang Peloponesia Liga Delos - Athena, Argos, Chios, Samos, Lesbos, lain-lain Liga Peloponesia - Lacedemonia, Corinth, Thebes, Syracuse, lain-lain Abad Pertengahan 634–1853 Perang Kr...
Secangkir coklat panas Cokelat panasKarakteristikJenishot beverage (en), stimulant foodstuff (en) dan makanan berbahan dasar cokelat AsalMesoamerika KomposisiKakao padat susu gula air cair cokelat Warnacokelat dan Kadru (warna) [sunting di Wikidata]lbs Cokelat panas adalah minuman panas yang dibuat dari cokelat atau kakao bubuk dan gula, dengan air atau susu hangat. Beberapa studi telah menunjukkan bahwa cokelat panas menyehatkan karena antioksidan yang terkandung dalam kakao.[1]&...
Католический соборАрхикафедральная базилика Успения Пресвятой Девы Марииукр. Архикатедральна базиліка Успіння Пресвятої Діви Марії 49°50′26″ с. ш. 24°01′50″ в. д.HGЯO Страна Украина Город Львов Конфессия Римско-католическая церковь Епархия Архиепархия Львова...
State highway in Georgia, United States State Route 156SR 156 highlighted in redRoute informationMaintained by GDOTLength34.3 mi[1] (55.2 km)Major junctionsWest end US 27 / SR 1 near ArmucheeMajor intersections SR 136 Conn. in Calhoun US 41 / SR 3 in Calhoun I-75 in CalhounEast end US 411 / SR 61 north of Ranger LocationCountryUnited StatesStateGeorgiaCountiesFloyd, Gordon Highway system Georgia State Highway S...
Sukrosa, atau gula dapur, tersusun dari glukosa dan fruktosa. Dimer dari asam karboksilat dalam fase uap. Dalam ilmu kimia, dimer adalah senyawa kimia yang terdiri dari dua molekul (disebut monomer) yang identik atau mirip, dan terikat bersama-sama. Kimia Secara umum, dimer merujuk kepada sebuah molekul yang disusun oleh dua subsatuan (monomer) yang identik dan terikat bersama-sama. Monomer-monomer ini dihubungkan oleh ikatan kovalen atau ikatan lain yang lebih lemah seperti ikatan hidrogen. ...
Musical instrument ShviWoodwind instrumentOther namesTav shviClassification Woodwind Wind[1] Aerophone Related instruments Dilli Kaval The shvi (Armenian: շվի, whistle, pronounced sh-vee) is an Armenian fipple flute with a labium mouth piece.[2] Commonly made of wood (apricot, boxwood, or ebony) or bamboo and up to 12 inches (300 mm) in length, it typically has a range of an octave and a-half.[3] The tav shvi is made from apricot wood, it is up to 18 inches (46...
American soldier and politician For other people named William North, see William North (disambiguation). This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (August 2022) William NorthPortrait by Charles Willson Peale, 1785United States Senatorfrom New YorkIn officeMay 5, 1798 – August 17, 1798Appointed byJohn JayPreceded byJohn Sloss Hobar...
Cette page d’homonymie répertorie les différents sujets et articles partageant un même nom. Sur les autres projets Wikimedia : Isidore, sur le Wiktionnaire Pour les articles homonymes, voir Saint Isidore et Saint-Isidore. Isidore est un nom propre qui peut désigner : Isidore est un nom de personne masculin issu du grec ancien Ἰσίδωρος / Isídôros qui signifie « cadeau d'Isis ». Il peut aussi être un patronyme. Variantes linguistiques En français, il a ...
Kaiserliche MarineBandiera di guerra della Kaiserliche Marine durante la prima guerra mondiale Descrizione generaleAttiva1871-1919 Nazione Germania ServizioForza armata TipoMarina militare Stato MaggioreBerlino Battaglie/guerrePrima guerra mondiale Parte diForze armate dell'Impero tedesco ComandantiDegni di notaAlfred von Tirpitz SimboliInsegna 1867-1892 Insegna 1892-1903 Bandiera di bompresso Voci su marine militari presenti su Wikipedia La Kaiserliche Marine o Marina imperiale fu la ma...
Bài này viết về một hiện tượng vật lý. Đối với các định nghĩa khác, xem Điện (định hướng). Tia sét và chiếu sáng đô thị là hai trong những hiện tượng ấn tượng nhất của điện. Bài viết vềĐiện từ học Điện Từ học Lịch sử Giáo trình Tĩnh điện Chất cách điện Chất dẫn điện Cảm ứng tĩnh điện Điện ma sát Điện thông Điện thế Điện trường Điện tích Định luật Coulo...
Information technology media business InfoWorldMarch 26, 2007 cover of InfoWorldPublisherPopular Computing, Inc. (CW Communications, Inc.)InfoWorld Publishing, Inc. (IDG Communications, Inc.)First issue11 December 1978; 45 years ago (1978-12-11)Final issue2 April 2007 (2007-04-02)[1] (Now published online)CountryUnited StatesBased inSan FranciscoLanguageEnglishWebsitewww.infoworld.comISSN0199-6649 InfoWorld (IW) is an American information technology me...
طيران الأمن طيران الأمن—طيران الأمن تفاصيل الوكالة الحكومية البلد السعودية الاسم الكامل القيادة العامة لطيران الأمن تأسست 1395 هـ المركز الرياض، السعودية الإدارة المدير التنفيذي عبد العزيز بن محمد الهويريني الدائرة رئاسة أمن الدولة تعديل مصدري - تعديل القي...
The flag of the KAU as devised by Jomo Kenyatta in 1951 Part of a series on the History of Kenya Overview Timeline of Kenya List of years in Kenya Pleistocene Koobi Fora Hominins Olorgesailie Aechulean hand axe culture Kariandusi prehistoric site Enkapune Ya Muto Nataruk Neolithic Lothagam North Monumental Cemetery Kalokol Pillar Site Elmenteitan Culture Cushitic expansion Eburran industry Hyrax Hill African Iron Age Sirikwa culture Bantu expansion Nilotic expansion Urewe culture Thimlich Ohi...
Kanazawa Institute of Technology金沢工業大学TypePrivateEstablished1965LocationNonoichi, Ishikawa, JapanWebsitewww.kanazawa-it.ac.jp Kanazawa Institute of Technology (金沢工業大学, Kanazawa Kōgyō Daigaku) is an institution of higher learning in Nonoichi City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. It is often called KIT, or koudai (工大, kōdai) for short. It is known for its unique educational policy that attaches importance to initiative of students. One of the examples is Yumekobo (夢...
River in Connecticut, United StatesBigelow BrookBigelow Brook in Eastford, CT, along the Natchaug Trail.Location of the mouth within ConnecticutLocationCountryUnited StatesStateConnecticutCountiesTolland, WindhamPhysical characteristicsSourceMashapaug Lake • locationUnion, CT, Tolland County, Connecticut, United States • coordinates42°00′19″N 72°07′43″W / 42.00524°N 72.12868°W / 42.00524; -72.12868 • elev...
Socialism in the UK – created by the Socialist Party of Great Britain Part of a series onSocialism inthe United Kingdom Ideologies Agrarian socialism Bennism Black radical tradition Chartism Christian socialism Corbynism Democratic socialism Eco-socialism Ethical socialism Guild socialism Marxism (Centrist · Humanist · Marxism–Leninism · Trotskyism) Owenism Republicanism Revolutionary socialism Ricardian socialism Utopian socialism Principles Anti-capitalism Anti-imperialism Anti-raci...
Diocèse de Tulle Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Tulle. Informations générales Rite liturgique romain Type de juridiction diocèse Création 1317 Affiliation Église catholique en France Siège Tulle, France Titulaire actuel Francis Bestion Langue(s) liturgique(s) français Calendrier grégorien Territoire Corrèze Population totale 232 000 Site web www.correze.catholique.fr (en) Notice sur www.catholic-hierarchy.org modifier Le diocèse de Tulle (en latin : Dioecesis Tutelensis...
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Serio river – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) River in ItalySerioLocationCountryItalyPhysical characteristicsSource • locationMonte Torena, Italy •...
American politician Clem ShaverChair of the Democratic National CommitteeIn officeJuly 22, 1924 – July 11, 1928Preceded byCordell HullSucceeded byJohn J. Raskob Personal detailsBornClement Lawrence Shaver(1867-01-22)January 22, 1867Marion County, West Virginia, U.S.DiedSeptember 1, 1954(1954-09-01) (aged 87)Mannington, West Virginia, U.S.Political partyDemocraticEducationFairmont State University (BA)George Washington University (LLB) Clement Lawrence Shaver (January 22, 1867 ...
