PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Introduction to contentious topics - gender and sexuality

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note, per WP:ARBGSDS GamerGate is considered to be a gender-related dispute or controversy for the purpose of this contentious topic designation. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Moon darker! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 00:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack at Talk:Sweet Baby Inc.

In Special:Diff/1213076502, you posted, "With due respect, your reaction seems to be emotional and related to your affiliation with certain subcultures", a comment directed at an editor who has disclosed personal information on her user page. That comment is inappropriate because Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks prohibits "Using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream". Please do not post personal attacks on Wikipedia.

See below for the standard warning template for personal attacks. — Newslinger talk 00:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged, thanks for the warning. Moon darker (talk) 04:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack warning

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Sweet Baby Inc.. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. — Newslinger talk 00:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

This is WP:CANVASSing; given the context, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that you notified them based on their opinion. It's against policy to selectively ask editors to contribute to a discussion in that manner. --Aquillion (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can calm down, I don't plan on posting anything on this toxic cesspool of a page anyway. Talk:Sweet Baby Inc. was bad enough already --FMSky (talk) 18:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did that based on their experience if anything. Everyone supporting your opinion is already there on the WP:RSN, FMSky seemed to be the only one from the talk page who could add new valuable input. Do you have any other users in your mind that could be invited there for productive discussion regardless of their opinion? --Moon darker (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Talk about CANVASSing, Aquillion --Moon darker (talk) 05:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. Not to mention FMSky knew about the ongoing discussion at RSN, I was just wondering why didn't they leave a comment. --Moon darker (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]