Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 19:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-02T19:31:00.000Z","author":"The Earwig","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Earwig-2013-01-02T19:31:00.000Z-Notice_of_Dispute_resolution_discussion","replies":["c-Amadscientist-2013-01-03T08:10:00.000Z-The_Earwig-2013-01-02T19:31:00.000Z"],"displayName":"operator"}}-->

I don't see your removal of the request to trim your opening at DR/N as harmful or against policy in anyway as long as you were complying. It is not my rule. We make these requests regularly and I see nothing wrong with that or your removal of the notice left on my talkpage. Seemed like a lot of nonsense to me. Thank you.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T08:10:00.000Z","author":"Amadscientist","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Amadscientist-2013-01-03T08:10:00.000Z-The_Earwig-2013-01-02T19:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-03T08:24:00.000Z-Amadscientist-2013-01-03T08:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

Since HPotato registered his account after editing using two IPs in Leicester, there have been trolling edits targeting me connected with HPotato's editing. These have been made by two different open proxy accounts, both blocked soon after they were reported. This kind of disruptive targeting rarely happens to me. My assumption is that the same user is operating both proxies and it doesn't take a genius to guess who that might be. Mathsci (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T08:24:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-03T08:24:00.000Z-Amadscientist-2013-01-03T08:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! It appeared to me that your overwriting another editor’s posting here was accidental—you didn’t mention it in the edit summary—so I restored it. Please feel free to revert if you had good reason for removing the message.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T10:22:00.000Z","author":"Odysseus1479","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Odysseus1479-2013-01-03T10:22:00.000Z-Restored_deletion_of_a_posting_at_WP:FTN","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-03T10:29:00.000Z-Odysseus1479-2013-01-03T10:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, this is a known glitch in WP software caused by edit-conflict. Thanks for noticing and correcting it. Mathsci (talk) 10:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T10:29:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-03T10:29:00.000Z-Odysseus1479-2013-01-03T10:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You can't even have copyvio in a sandbox, I've told him that. Also, have you read WP:Close paraphrase? Dougweller (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-03T12:17:00.000Z","author":"Dougweller","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dougweller-2013-01-03T12:17:00.000Z-Note_on_copyvio","replies":[]}}-->

I appreciate you reporting this. I wasn't sure if we should file SPI reports for IPs and now I know:) Hope you are returning to good health. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 08:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T08:28:00.000Z","author":"ArtifexMayhem","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ArtifexMayhem-2013-01-09T08:28:00.000Z-Thanks","replies":[]}}-->

Last time at AE, you were instructed to refrain from filing new requests without first consulting with administrators. Did you? If not, I'd strongly recommend you remove the filing. As far as I'm concerned, I logged a warning for him and he hasn't edited since, so I don't really see why this shouldn't be put to rest now. Escalation is, again, in nobody's interest. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z","author":"Future Perfect at Sunrise","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z-AE_request","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:37:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z","c-Darkness_Shines-2013-01-09T11:14:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Fut.Perf."}}-->

I did contact an arbitrator twice yesterday with no reply. I will continue with the SPI report and remove the report at AE. Mathsci (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T10:37:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:37:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:44:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you. Just for the record, the AE outcome said you should in any case wait for agreement from an uninvolved admin, so you should certainly not have gone ahead in the absence of a response (especially since you contacted them yesterday but the main offending edit you had to complain about was only today.) About an SPI, how would that relate to the Arbcom's prior statement that the account is a legitimate clean start [2]? Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T10:44:00.000Z","author":"Future Perfect at Sunrise","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:44:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:50:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:44:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Fut.Perf."}}-->

As far as communicating with arbcom is concerned, the previous sockpuppet account Zeromus1 misrepresented themselves to the arbitration committee in their appeal, claiming to edit from China. FtA has a previous history of misrepresenting sockpuppetry issues to arbitrators. I communicated with an arbitrator a month ago about the possibility of sockpuppetry, during the run-up to ACE 2012. At that stage I had no clear idea of who the puppetmaster might be (at that early stage I incorrectly suspected John245/Chester Markel/Alessandra Napolitano). Per WP:BEANS, it might be a better idea to send a report by email directly to a checkuser on arbcom, who can pass it on to other arbitrators if they see fit. That's what happened with Zeromus1. Mathsci (talk) 10:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T10:50:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T10:50:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:44:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• YRC just beat me to it, but do not remove other editors comments per WP:TPG Darkness Shines (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T11:14:00.000Z","author":"Darkness Shines","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Darkness_Shines-2013-01-09T11:14:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T10:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:17:00.000Z-Darkness_Shines-2013-01-09T11:14:00.000Z"]}}-->
  • Which "talk page" are you referring to? If you mean WP:AE, then that is not a talk page. The talk page is at WT:AE, so Youreallycan's hyperbolic trolling should be moved there or deleted. The instructions at the top of the page are easy enough to read. Mathsci (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T11:17:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:17:00.000Z-Darkness_Shines-2013-01-09T11:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T11:29:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:17:00.000Z"]}}-->
    • Indeed. Well, somebody is certainly going to get around removing it again, soon enough, so it's probably not worth bothering about right now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T11:29:00.000Z","author":"Future Perfect at Sunrise","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T11:29:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:58:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T11:29:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Fut.Perf."}}-->
      • Sandstein seems to have agreed with me about WT:AE. Mathsci (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T11:58:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:58:00.000Z-Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise-2013-01-09T11:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-Enric_Naval-2013-01-09T18:59:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:58:00.000Z"]}}-->
        • For reference removal by Sandstein. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-09T18:59:00.000Z","author":"Enric Naval","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Enric_Naval-2013-01-09T18:59:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-09T11:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I'm dropping these templates on the talk pages of every user who has posted at Talk:Men's rights in the last two sections. This is not meant to imply that I necessarily find any of your edits problematic, and is simply meant to inform you. Kevin Gorman (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-11T07:01:00.000Z","author":"Kevin Gorman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kevin_Gorman-2013-01-11T07:01:00.000Z-ANI_notification","replies":[]}}-->

That was my quote in response to YRC's personal attacks which I immediatelty selfreverted.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 23:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-22T23:53:00.000Z","author":"Maunus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Maunus-2013-01-22T23:53:00.000Z-Thanks,_but...","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:38:00.000Z-Maunus-2013-01-22T23:53:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u00b7\u028daunus"}}-->

Oops, sorry about that. The editing boxes were messed up on WP:ANI, which partly explains the confusion. I did also verify that your old user page is still viewable using the wayback machine ... but Youreallycan has no business enquiring or making guesses about your nationality. Mathsci (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-23T00:38:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:38:00.000Z-Maunus-2013-01-22T23:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Maunus-2013-01-23T00:41:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well obviously he hasn't. Thanks for the hint about the waybackmachine - I am guessing there is no way to do anything about that?·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 00:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-23T00:41:00.000Z","author":"Maunus","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Maunus-2013-01-23T00:41:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:54:00.000Z-Maunus-2013-01-23T00:41:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u00b7\u028daunus"}}-->

Not really but it could disappear eventually. At the moment records seem to start in late 2011. Mathsci (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-23T00:54:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-23T00:54:00.000Z-Maunus-2013-01-23T00:41:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I think it's a great thing that you're doing with the Doncram Orlady interaction. I really don't have time to do any of it myself (I wasn't even able to get any evidence provided), but the whole Nyttend angle has completely been missed, so if you have the time, it would be great if you could do a Doncram Nyttend interaction. Ryan Vesey 08:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-27T08:21:00.000Z","author":"Ryan Vesey","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ryan_Vesey-2013-01-27T08:21:00.000Z-Editor_interaction","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-28T14:38:00.000Z-Ryan_Vesey-2013-01-27T08:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Ryan"}}-->

Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to, unless there's a better, more refined kind of interaction tool. Nyttend has over 3,000 common srticles with Doncram, so my manual method would take too long. Mathsci (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-28T14:38:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-28T14:38:00.000Z-Ryan_Vesey-2013-01-27T08:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-ArtifexMayhem-2013-01-29T07:19:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-28T14:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

I think I understand what you are doing and might be able to help. Would something like this be useful? I can also generate the regular side by side diff format (which would be faster). I'd be happy to gen up some samples if you'd like. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 07:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-29T07:19:00.000Z","author":"ArtifexMayhem","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-ArtifexMayhem-2013-01-29T07:19:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-01-28T14:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-01-29T09:03:00.000Z-ArtifexMayhem-2013-01-29T07:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks. That is on one single article, abortion. In the current case, AGK, one of the drafting arbitrators, raised a question about Orlady on the workshop page. My statistics and analysis were designed to help Orlady answer that question. The statements about Nyttend are about the use of his admin tools for users or articles involved with WP:NRHP. The Devil's Advocate and possibly Doncram have made general statements about Nyttend in their evidence which seem misleading if not wrong. Mathsci (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-29T09:03:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-01-29T09:03:00.000Z-ArtifexMayhem-2013-01-29T07:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Upon reading the sections above and below the spot where I left my comment, I was rather confused, since I saw absolutely no indication that anyone except Doncram was claiming that Orlady and I were following people around. This confusion is why I said "It doesn't look like anyone here is suggesting wikihounding". I was also rather confused by the IP coming in suddenly, but since I had no evidence of malevolence, I didn't see any reason to bring it up. Your message helps resolve the issue in my mind; thank you. Nyttend (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-29T00:13:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nyttend-2013-01-29T00:13:00.000Z-Re:_User_using_tor_nodes_to_edit","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keir-Collection-Quran-Bukhara-1545.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-29T14:58:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-01-29T14:58:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Keir-Collection-Quran-Bukhara-1545.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keir-Collection-Andalusian-Morrocan-Quran-1300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-29T14:58:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-01-29T14:58:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Keir-Collection-Andalusian-Morrocan-Quran-1300.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

This is in response to concern raised at the Doncram Arbcom case regarding recent edits to pages cited as evidence... The standard recommendation is to provide diffs of a particular edit or links to a particular page version. That way, everyone sees the same evidence. You might want to replace some of your wikilinks to pages with links to a particular version of the page you cited. --Orlady (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-04T14:50:00.000Z","author":"Orlady","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Orlady-2013-02-04T14:50:00.000Z-Permanent_links_to_a_particular_page_version","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-02-04T14:57:00.000Z-Orlady-2013-02-04T14:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm not sure that I'll have time to do that. I used diffs in my evidence and links to edit histories on the workshop talk page, with a few diffs. However, the redlinks problem cannot be handled by providing diffs, except possibly to give the diffs for the modifications. I tend to agree with Mangoe's point about redlinks appearing in long lists to provide a centralised place for people to see which articles need to be created. Mathsci (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-04T14:57:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-02-04T14:57:00.000Z-Orlady-2013-02-04T14:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi - in reply to your message, the rules are a bit unclear, but I see nothing in Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions that prohibits non-admins, or even involved editors, from issuing and logging warnings.  Sandstein  08:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-11T08:45:00.000Z","author":"Sandstein","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sandstein-2013-02-11T08:45:00.000Z-Your_message","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for restoring the section title 'RfC close goes beyond the RfC question' which I appear to have deleted inadvertently. I was seconds behind you on the fix, but good to know you were on it! Jusdafax 22:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-13T22:36:00.000Z","author":"Jusdafax","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jusdafax-2013-02-13T22:36:00.000Z-Thanks_2","replies":[],"displayName":"Jus"}}-->

Did someone contact you asking you to place that case on hold? The IP address in question is an open HTTP proxy running on 8080 (I have verified this myself by using it). Cheers, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 14:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-27T14:46:00.000Z","author":"Spitfire","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spitfire-2013-02-27T14:46:00.000Z-SPI_case_2","replies":["c-Spitfire-2013-02-27T16:00:00.000Z-Spitfire-2013-02-27T14:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sweet. That's fine thanks. Spitfire^Tally-ho! 16:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-27T16:00:00.000Z","author":"Spitfire","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Spitfire-2013-02-27T16:00:00.000Z-Spitfire-2013-02-27T14:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass in B minor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedictus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-04T11:26:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-03-04T11:26:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_4","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Glad to see that you are finding some amusement (not to mention literary allusions) amongst the musty old U.S. buildings on the National Register of Historic Places. Thanks for your efforts to lighten things up (not to mention your fine work on explicating edit histories). --Orlady (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-04T20:12:00.000Z","author":"Orlady","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Orlady-2013-03-04T20:12:00.000Z-No-neck_monsters","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-03-04T20:16:00.000Z-Orlady-2013-03-04T20:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Glad you enjoyed it :) I played Sonny when I was young. Mathsci (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-04T20:16:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-03-04T20:16:00.000Z-Orlady-2013-03-04T20:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Crazynas ^t 07:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-06T07:50:00.000Z","author":"Crazynas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Crazynas-2013-03-06T07:50:00.000Z-AN_Notice","replies":[]}}-->

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-06T23:45:00.000Z","author":"Callanecc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Callanecc-2013-03-06T23:45:00.000Z-Tea_Party_movement_arbitration_case_opened","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Complexification (Lie group), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Section and Chow's theorem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-12T13:02:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-03-12T13:02:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_12","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Regarding your comment on ACN: I agree that content is more important than performers. Andreas Scholl wasn't created by me, but seemed in need of improvement, as a person I know. I create performer's articles if they sing for us, or if I want to show content on the Main page but can't expand it 5*. - We just found Riana as a content editor. - Content more important than performers: I believe that is true for us editors also, I respect what George Ponderevo added to this project (and don't care which mind is behind the account), - I think I said the same in other words in the other forum, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-17T13:53:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2013-03-17T13:53:00.000Z-Performers","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monument-terreslointaines-Marseille.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-19T01:38:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-03-19T01:38:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Monument-terreslointaines-Marseille.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, Mathsci, as silly as I think the ANI thread is, I don't think it's a good idea for you to keep moving the archive tag. It's only going to make things worse, from a drama point of view. Writ Keeper (t + c) 01:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-26T01:55:00.000Z","author":"Writ Keeper","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Writ_Keeper-2013-03-26T01:55:00.000Z-Maybe_not_the_best_idea?","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-03-26T02:05:00.000Z-Writ_Keeper-2013-03-26T01:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Agreed. I am in fact continuing the discussion with Tom Harrison on his talk page. Have a look if you wish. Cheers, Mathsci (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-26T02:05:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-03-26T02:05:00.000Z-Writ_Keeper-2013-03-26T01:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for the improvements. I am in love with the piece. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-02T13:05:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-02T13:05:00.000Z-Membra_Jesu_nostri","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-04-02T13:22:00.000Z-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-02T13:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes indeed. I am a fan of Buxtehude too and this Passiontide collection in particular. Mathsci (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-02T13:22:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-04-02T13:22:00.000Z-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-02T13:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-02T13:29:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-04-02T13:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

I wonder why it is termed an oratorio in the lead? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-02T13:29:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-02T13:29:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-04-02T13:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Bach music
Thank you for treating Bach's instrumental music with profound knowledge, namely Clavier-Übung III and now Orgelbüchlein, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (4 December 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-03-21T08:18:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2012-03-21T08:18:00.000Z-Precious_again","replies":[]}}-->

A year ago, you were the 102nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-21T12:15:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2013-04-21T12:15:00.000Z-Precious_again","replies":[]}}-->

User:Qaz122a is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vvv321. Keri (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-28T16:52:00.000Z","author":"Keri","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Keri-2013-04-28T16:52:00.000Z-Not_Echigo_Mole","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-04-28T17:01:00.000Z-Keri-2013-04-28T16:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks. There has also been confusion with Grawp socks. He likes to imitate other sockpuppeteers. Mathsci (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-28T17:01:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-04-28T17:01:00.000Z-Keri-2013-04-28T16:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Keri-2013-04-28T17:05:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-04-28T17:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hm. I did wonder about that, whether Qaz122a was actually User:Silicate minerals just trolling... Keri (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-28T17:05:00.000Z","author":"Keri","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Keri-2013-04-28T17:05:00.000Z-Mathsci-2013-04-28T17:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I like the use of a duck quacking into a megaphone. It made me chuckle. :) Rockfang (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-28T21:19:00.000Z","author":"Rockfang","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rockfang-2013-04-28T21:19:00.000Z-A_very_loud_duck","replies":[]}}-->

Your remarks at Talk:Hurwitz algebra here, in which you praise your own articles and belittle mine, are not appropriate for an article talk page. I remind you of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines: Talk pages are for improving the encyclopedia, not for expressing personal opinions on a subject or an editor. Deltahedron (talk) 06:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-29T06:18:00.000Z","author":"Deltahedron","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Deltahedron-2013-04-29T06:18:00.000Z-Your_remarks_at_Talk:Hurwitz_algebra","replies":[]}}-->

Your stubs are just stubs. No need to pretend otherwise. They won't suddenly become extended articles useful for learning. Your error is to imagine that the lede of an extended article can be treated as if it were a stub. On the contrary, the lede summarises the article and the article is a summary of material from the sources selected. So please don't editorialise in a lede to write content at odds with the main body of the article, treating it as if it were a stub.

If an article is drawn from sources that use the real and complex numbers, suggesting otherwise in the lede is misleading and unhelpful to the reader. The normal method of teaching and presentation in textbooks (wikipedia articles are no different) is first to treat the standard cases where matters are simple (e.g. Lie elgebras over R and C, compact Lie groups, etc) and then mention greater generality in later subsections, comments or footnotes.

You are at the moment concentrating on one of the smaller and easier parts of a theory that is part of the Jordan algebra approach to Hermitian symmetric spaces, the theory treated in the excellent source of Jacques Faraut and Adam Koranyi, pioneered by Max Koecher and his school. That material is not properly represented on wikipedia. I am now adding that material. You are discussing a tiny part of that programme. If you want to add comments about what might happen in general for arbitrary fields, do not do so prominently in the lede. That is WP:UNDUE. You can easily a section called "Further directions" summarising generalisations and surveying the literature. That is normal practise. No article on Lie algebras would treat anyhting other than R and C first and foremost.

In 2011 and 2012, I made a similar series of edits related to the theory of univalent functions, quasiconformal mappings and Teichmüller theory, again an under-represented topic area on wikipedia. A classic source is Ahlfors' book on quasiconformal mappings. Here are some of the articles I created there ( I revamped other articles like Beltrami equation): Farrell–Markushevich theorem,Singular integral operators on closed curves, Neumann–Poincaré operator, Symmetrizable compact operator, Sobolev spaces for planar domains, Radó–Kneser–Choquet theorem, Douady–Earle extension, Singular integral operators of convolution type, Markov–Kakutani fixed-point theorem, Earle–Hamilton fixed-point theorem, Uniformly bounded representation, Weyl–von Neumann theorem, Oscillator representation, Positive harmonic function, Carathéodory kernel theorem, Loewner differential equation, Dirichlet space, Littlewood subordination theorem, Nevanlinna's criterion, Grunsky matrix (expanded), Grunsky's theorem, Koenigs function, Denjoy–Wolff theorem, Hartogs–Rosenthal theorem.

With barely 3,500 content edits and less than a year here, you are a relatively new editor. As far as I am aware, I am among the main contributors in mathematics.

So in summary please don't treat ledes as if they are stubs, with your own WP:OR editorilaising. A lede just summarises an article and needless generality confuses the reader. You're not helping to improve content at the moment. By agitating on my talk page, you are showing an unwillingless to repect WP:DEADLINE. A longer attention span is required for producing extended content. Mathsci (talk) 07:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-29T07:46:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-04-29T07:46:00.000Z-Your_remarks_at_Talk:Hurwitz_algebra","replies":[]}}-->

The other day you wrote that if a Euclidean algebra is strictly larger than R then "the argument above shows that it contains H" (the quaternions). But earlier the article says that C is a Euclidean algebra. So isn't your statement wrong? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 12:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-01T12:20:00.000Z","author":"Eric Kvaalen","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Eric_Kvaalen-2013-05-01T12:20:00.000Z-Hurwitz's_theorem_(composition_algebras)","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-05-01T23:32:00.000Z-Eric_Kvaalen-2013-05-01T12:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

There is an obvious missing sentence. Mathsci (talk) 23:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-01T23:32:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-05-01T23:32:00.000Z-Eric_Kvaalen-2013-05-01T12:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Uh, I already noticed that and reverted myself. You have now restored the sock's edit... Apteva (talk) 06:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-04T06:15:00.000Z","author":"Apteva","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Apteva-2013-05-04T06:15:00.000Z-AE","replies":["c-Apteva-2013-05-04T06:21:00.000Z-Apteva-2013-05-04T06:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

Much better! All is well that ends well. Apteva (talk) 06:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-04T06:21:00.000Z","author":"Apteva","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Apteva-2013-05-04T06:21:00.000Z-Apteva-2013-05-04T06:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symmetric cone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-05T16:44:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-05-05T16:44:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_5","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -Jordgette [talk] 23:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-10T23:05:00.000Z","author":"Jordgette","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jordgette-2013-05-10T23:05:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Einstein\u2013Cartan\u2013Evans_theory_for_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"-Jordgette"}}-->

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 21, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-14T01:56:00.000Z","author":"Ks0stm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ks0stm-2013-05-14T01:56:00.000Z-Arbitration_case_\"Race_and_politics\"_opened","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan operator algebra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebesgue space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC) =__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-14T15:38:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-05-14T15:38:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_May_14","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

I wish to notify you of a discussion that you were involved in.[3] Thanks. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-22T15:40:00.000Z","author":"A Quest For Knowledge","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Quest_For_Knowledge-2013-05-22T15:40:00.000Z-Premature_closing_of_MathSci's_Rfe_against_D.Lazard_by_Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise","replies":[]}}-->

I need to apologise to you for my behaviour -- it was wrong, and I am sorry. A.K.Nole (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-24T16:00:00.000Z","author":"A.K.Nole","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.K.Nole-2013-05-24T16:00:00.000Z-An_apology","replies":["c-Salix_alba-2013-05-24T20:32:00.000Z-A.K.Nole-2013-05-24T16:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

Just a courtesy note to say a discussion on the standard offer is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Standard offer for User:A.K.Nole. I hope this will workout better than the sock-puppet campaign you have experienced.--Salix (talk): 20:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-24T20:32:00.000Z","author":"Salix alba","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Salix_alba-2013-05-24T20:32:00.000Z-A.K.Nole-2013-05-24T16:00:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Salix"}}-->

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Octacube (mathematics), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Octacube (mathematics)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-24T22:16:00.000Z","author":"VoxelBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-VoxelBot-2013-05-24T22:16:00.000Z-Article_notability_notification","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hermitian symmetric space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan frame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-16T11:51:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-06-16T11:51:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_June_16","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

I was actually in the process of moving that to WP:AN (where it should be) before it was deleted :) Dusti^*poke* 06:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-20T06:46:00.000Z","author":"Dusti","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dusti-2013-06-20T06:46:00.000Z-You_know_what's_funny?","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-06-20T06:55:00.000Z-Dusti-2013-06-20T06:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, that is the appropriate place. However, as Dennis Brown wrote, it's probably advisable to allow a few days for the dust to settle before bringing this up again. Mathsci (talk) 06:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-20T06:55:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-06-20T06:55:00.000Z-Dusti-2013-06-20T06:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Evidence you asked for posted on the RFAR. PumpkinSky talk 10:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-22T10:48:00.000Z","author":"PumpkinSky","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PumpkinSky-2013-06-22T10:48:00.000Z-Jmh649_evidence","replies":[]}}-->

for fixing Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case; I tried to fix it myself but was unable to. I appreciate the help. Drmies (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-06-23T20:55:00.000Z","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmies-2013-06-23T20:55:00.000Z-Thanks_3","replies":[]}}-->

Could you please tell me why the File:Spangenberg-1545.png is not allowed to use in the german and portuguese versions of Wikipedia? I would be glad to illustrate the biography of this author with it. Thank you very much.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-02T05:08:00.000Z","author":"Claudio Pistilli","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Claudio_Pistilli-2013-07-02T05:08:00.000Z-Johann_Spangenberg","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-07-02T05:44:00.000Z-Claudio_Pistilli-2013-07-02T05:08:00.000Z"]}}-->

Why is it not allowed? I actually paid for the print having searched for it on the web. It can be copied over to commons, provided that you attribute me as the original uploader. Mathsci (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-02T05:44:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-07-02T05:44:00.000Z-Claudio_Pistilli-2013-07-02T05:08:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, do you remember: File:Ocnacube.jpg? It may have a copyright issue because of Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. If you can contact the good professor then that may be the easiest to sort it out. More details are at a fledgling project here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Canoe1967/Sculptors --Canoe1967 (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-03T20:28:00.000Z","author":"Canoe1967","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Canoe1967-2013-07-03T20:28:00.000Z-Nostalgia","replies":["c-Salix_alba-2013-07-03T20:40:00.000Z-Canoe1967-2013-07-03T20:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

The same file has also been asked about today at Talk:Octacube (sculpture), not sure if the two are related. Your input there would be welcome.--Salix (talk): 20:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-03T20:40:00.000Z","author":"Salix alba","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Salix_alba-2013-07-03T20:40:00.000Z-Canoe1967-2013-07-03T20:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-07-03T21:13:00.000Z-Salix_alba-2013-07-03T20:40:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Salix"}}-->

The picture was taken with his camera and given to me. He gave me several others, which I cannot locate at the moment. I also have a scan of the relevant page in Playboy made by another expert in von Neumann algebras. I am not sure I can be of any more help. If you want to contact Adrian Ocneanu, please do so on your own at Penn State. Mathsci (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-03T21:13:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-07-03T21:13:00.000Z-Salix_alba-2013-07-03T20:40:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marseille may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-08T19:14:00.000Z","author":"BracketBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BracketBot-2013-07-08T19:14:00.000Z-July_2013","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mucem-Villa-de-la-Mediterannee-Marseille.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-09T09:16:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2013-07-09T09:16:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Mucem-Villa-de-la-Mediterannee-Marseille.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Hi: You mentioned this as a "standard downloadable reference" Algebraic theory of spinors and Clifford algebras which I would be interested in obtaining myself, and adding to the article. At the time I had assumed you had also meant "free," but my searches only turned up shady pirate sites. Can you point me to a legitimate free source for this? Thanks. Rschwieb (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-17T17:02:00.000Z","author":"Rschwieb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rschwieb-2013-07-17T17:02:00.000Z-Chevalley's_\"Algebraic_theory_of_spinors_and_Clifford_algebras\"","replies":["c-Mathsci-2013-07-17T17:15:00.000Z-Rschwieb-2013-07-17T17:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

I cannot remember where I found it. It is volume 2 of his collected works which for example can be found on this French site http://carlossicoli.free.fr/cartes/oeuvres.html or are viewable on amazon.com. Mathsci (talk) 17:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-17T17:15:00.000Z","author":"Mathsci","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Mathsci-2013-07-17T17:15:00.000Z-Rschwieb-2013-07-17T17:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 31, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ²¹ 17:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-17T17:58:00.000Z","author":"Hahc21","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hahc21-2013-07-17T17:58:00.000Z-Infoboxes_ArbCom_case_opened","replies":[],"displayName":"\u039b\u03a7\u03a3"}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symmetric cone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex structure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-27T10:55:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-07-27T10:55:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_July_27","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

I agree with you, but so far they've made only the one edit. I believe it's a standard dynamic IP (Geolocate is not working at the moment), so I'll just try to keep an eye on them to see if they persist. It would be helpful to know if other IPs in that range are currently editing. Feel free to alert me to anything you see.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-28T13:42:00.000Z","author":"Bbb23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bbb23-2013-07-28T13:42:00.000Z-Your_message_2","replies":[]}}-->

You have done a lot on this article. I put a few questions on the talk page yesterday. If these were to be discussed and answered within the article, they would be helpful to those who are mathematically similar to me. So, if and only if you have the inclination and the time,...-Thanks!76.218.104.120 (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-08-21T04:17:00.000Z","author":"76.218.104.120","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-76.218.104.120-2013-08-21T04:17:00.000Z-orbifold_article-questions_on_talk_page","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Square root of a matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minimal polynomial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-08-24T12:01:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-08-24T12:01:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_24","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

I noticed your passing reference to a stay in the hospital that is now over. A speedy and complete recovery to you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 07:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-08-26T07:29:00.000Z","author":"UseTheCommandLine","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-UseTheCommandLine-2013-08-26T07:29:00.000Z-hopefully_you're_better_now","replies":[]}}-->

In an effort to resolve the discussion at AN/I regarding Wer900, I have offered a new proposal at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Alternative proposal: Restriction on venues for complaints. Since you have weighed in on previous proposals regarding this user, I am notifying you of the new one in case you wish to opine. Regards, alanyst 18:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-05T18:46:00.000Z","author":"Alanyst","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Alanyst-2013-09-05T18:46:00.000Z-New_proposal_regarding_Wer900_at_AN\/I","replies":[]}}-->

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a motion which involves you has been proposed at the above named request for clarification. The motion can be viewed here. Please feel free to register your comments at the clarification request. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 19:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-13T19:53:00.000Z","author":"Ks0stm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ks0stm-2013-09-13T19:53:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Arbitration\/Requests\/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request","replies":[]}}-->

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mathsci. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.