Hello, Marcin Suwalczan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Darwinek20:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-02-13T20:13:00.000Z","author":"Darwinek","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Darwinek-2007-02-13T20:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Thank_you_for_your_Poland-related_contributions-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Thank_you_for_your_Poland-related_contributions"],"text":"Thank you for your Poland-related contributions","linkableTitle":"Thank you for your Poland-related contributions"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Thank_you_for_your_Poland-related_contributions-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Thank_you_for_your_Poland-related_contributions"],"text":"Thank you for your Poland-related contributions","linkableTitle":"Thank you for your Poland-related contributions"}-->
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Thank_you_for_your_Poland-related_contributions","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland"],"text":"Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland","linkableTitle":"Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland"],"text":"Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland","linkableTitle":"Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland"}-->
Zerknij na powyzszy projekt; ja sie tym akurat nie zajmuje ale dobre miejsce na takie pytania to ww. WP:PWNB.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 15:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2007-03-15T15:43:00.000Z-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
Czesc. Pytalem sie wtedy mailem pana historyka z instytutu, ktory jest wlascicielem tej oto fotografii. Pisal cos w tym stylu, ze mozna uzywac to zdjecie, jesli sie poda informacje, skad ono pochodzi. - Darwinek22:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-30T22:28:00.000Z","author":"Darwinek","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Darwinek-2007-03-30T22:28:00.000Z-Licencja","replies":[]}}-->
Thanks a lot for your recent support in my RfA. I have been promoted. J Milburn16:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-10T16:51:00.000Z","author":"J Milburn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-J_Milburn-2007-04-10T16:51:00.000Z-Thanks","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-List_of_Poland-related_topics-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z-List_of_Poland-related_topics"],"text":"List of Poland-related topics","linkableTitle":"List of Poland-related topics"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Piotrus-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-List_of_Poland-related_topics-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-Piotrus-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z-List_of_Poland-related_topics"],"text":"List of Poland-related topics","linkableTitle":"List of Poland-related topics"}-->
Umm, ale my juz ja raz skasowalismy (zobacz). Takie projekty warto uzgadniac na noticeboardzie wlasnie...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2007-04-21T20:24:00.000Z-List_of_Poland-related_topics","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
Hey, Marcin, can we keep standard? Vovivodeship (not: Voivodship), Villagename, Lublin Voivodeship (not: Villagename, Voivodship Lublin). Otherwise, we will make few thousand unneeded redirect pages, and perhaps some villages will have two articles or even more. Regards Lajsikonik07:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-23T07:14:00.000Z","author":"Lajsikonik","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lajsikonik-2007-04-23T07:14:00.000Z-Polish_Communes","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Standardisation:_back_to_\"Gmina_Name\"-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z-Standardisation:_back_to_\"Gmina_Name\""],"text":"Standardisation: back to \"Gmina Name\"","linkableTitle":"Standardisation: back to \"Gmina Name\""}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Standardisation:_back_to_\"Gmina_Name\"-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z","replies":["c-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z-Standardisation:_back_to_\"Gmina_Name\""],"text":"Standardisation: back to \"Gmina Name\"","linkableTitle":"Standardisation: back to \"Gmina Name\""}-->
Hello again. Look at the Category:Gminas of Poland and subcategories: Category:Rural gminas of Poland and Category:Urban-Rural gminas of Poland. Most of them are titled "Gmina Name" or "Gmina of Name". Titles like "Name Commune" can caused mistakes, mostly in mixed, urban-rural type. And look on the list of communes in Poland. There is unable to change standard by using "Find&replace", because of reverse order. I'll move the articles that we created. I'll revert your changes at "A" on list. Other question. I agree with you that Polish villages should be named as: "Name", if one, "Name, X Voivodeship", if no other village of that name in this voivodeship, then "Name, X County" and Name... Hmm. Commune or gmina? Houston, we have got a problem. By now, I'm sure that we should use notation which is prefered on English wikipedia, 'cause we are there. So, comma, not brackets, after name. I think we should put the problem there, and find a consensus, I hope without voting, I really don't like votings. Regards Lajsikonik16:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z","author":"Lajsikonik","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T16:25:00.000Z-Standardisation:_back_to_\"Gmina_Name\"","replies":[]}}-->
I see. If so, we have plenty of articles to move, and I have to ask any admin to reverse redirects I was made. Just 4 or 5, it's not a big deal. Regards Lajsikonik20:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-04-25T20:31:00.000Z","author":"Lajsikonik","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lajsikonik-2007-04-25T20:31:00.000Z-Communes","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BetacommandBot-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Fair_use_disputed_for_Image:Logo_demokraci_pl.jpg-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-BetacommandBot-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z-Fair_use_disputed_for_Image:Logo_demokraci_pl.jpg"],"text":"Fair use disputed for Image:Logo demokraci pl.jpg","linkableTitle":"Fair use disputed for Image:Logo demokraci pl.jpg"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-BetacommandBot-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Fair_use_disputed_for_Image:Logo_demokraci_pl.jpg-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z","replies":["c-BetacommandBot-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z-Fair_use_disputed_for_Image:Logo_demokraci_pl.jpg"],"text":"Fair use disputed for Image:Logo demokraci pl.jpg","linkableTitle":"Fair use disputed for Image:Logo demokraci pl.jpg"}-->
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo demokraci pl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot23:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z","author":"BetacommandBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BetacommandBot-2007-09-13T23:21:00.000Z-Fair_use_disputed_for_Image:Logo_demokraci_pl.jpg","replies":[]}}-->
Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland misses you! Please consider coming back to Wikipedia, and editing with us again! You may want to look at our current discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland and look at our article news to see what we are currently doing! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-24T19:34:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2009-03-24T19:34:00.000Z-Wikipedia:WikiProject_Poland","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.
In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:
once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on
newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project
This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!
With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?
You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-25T21:11:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2011-04-25T21:11:00.000Z-Monitor._WikiProject_Poland_Newsletter:_Issue_1_(April_2011)","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-25T21:19:00.000Z","author":"EdwardsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EdwardsBot-2011-04-25T21:19:00.000Z-Monitor._WikiProject_Poland_Newsletter:_Issue_1_(April_2011)","replies":[]}}-->
WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!
In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:
we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!
With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?
It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa.10:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-06T10:04:00.000Z","author":"Ser Amantio di Nicolao","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ser_Amantio_di_Nicolao-2016-11-06T10:04:00.000Z-Europe_10,000_Challenge_invite","replies":[]}}-->