Sorreh I couldn't have given you a better opinion. =\ I'll check back later to see if there's anything more I can add. Luna Santin 06:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-04T06:48:00.000Z","author":"Luna Santin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Luna_Santin-2006-09-04T06:48:00.000Z-MapleStory","replies":[]}}-->

I don't think it would be wise to re-add the link at this point. I've given User:219.75.107.97 the opportunity to more clearly outline their objections about having the site listed. If the reasons are good, then everyone can accept them - if they're bad, then everyone can point out why they're bad. Either way, we can come to a consensus and resolve the underlying issue. But more to the point of answering your question: the revert-war has stopped, and people seem interested in talking, so now is definitely not the time to make any more edits regarding the link. Not before there is a clear consensus on the talk page. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 08:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-04T08:15:00.000Z","author":"Peruvianllama","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Peruvianllama-2006-09-04T08:15:00.000Z-Regarding_Maplestory","replies":[],"displayName":"P"}}-->

Here you go, check out this page for info on the different warning levels and their codes: Wikipedia:Vandalism. TJ Spyke 01:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-18T01:35:00.000Z","author":"TJ Spyke","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TJ_Spyke-2006-09-18T01:35:00.000Z-Warnings","replies":[]}}-->

I know MapleGlobal has Gachapon, but they said GlobalMS twice, so I removed MapleGlobal. I probably should have removed GlobalMS, though,...

—Ortensia 04:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-26T04:29:00.000Z","author":"Ortensia","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ortensia-2006-09-26T04:29:00.000Z-MapleStory_(Gachapon)","replies":[]}}-->

What exactly do you mean by categories? Like reactors, monsters, items? I haven't looked at his code for a while, but check the directory structure and it should help a bit. If you're asking about if it tells what type of item each item is, IIRC thats also in the directory structure (not the one his program makes but what is stored in the file). -- Prod-You 04:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-26T04:52:00.000Z","author":"Prod","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Prod-2006-09-26T04:52:00.000Z-Data.wz","replies":["c-Prod-2006-09-26T15:32:00.000Z-Prod-2006-09-26T04:52:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Prod-You"}}-->

I'm actually writing my own program on not really using the other one. ATM I'm still trying to get pics working. I'll take a quick peek over the weekend at the items, but I can't promise anything. -- Prod-You 15:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-26T15:32:00.000Z","author":"Prod","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Prod-2006-09-26T15:32:00.000Z-Prod-2006-09-26T04:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Prod-2006-12-07T06:08:00.000Z-Prod-2006-09-26T15:32:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Prod-You"}}-->

Unfortunately, the comp I use for that is dead right now. So I can't try anything. I do know Wizet was trying a new encryption in their KMS beta archives so that could be the problem. I find that unlikely though, as I would assume it would take longer to get working in more than just the tester version. -- Prod-You 06:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-12-07T06:08:00.000Z","author":"Prod","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Prod-2006-12-07T06:08:00.000Z-Prod-2006-09-26T15:32:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Prod-You"}}-->

The main reason I haven't moved forward on this is because I can't read Korean :/. If the new encryption comes to MSEA or GMS, it shouldn't take too long to get past the string encryption. However, they may not even bother. Encryption in KTMS might be just to keep the new info secret as long as possible (once in the main clients, the whole world has access anywayz). They also changed the image format, which I haven't even tried to figure out yet. Additionally, I am hesitant to give out any information about the new encryption since last time public info was available, they changed it. Next time it may not be as easy to crack. -- Prod-You 05:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-03-21T05:06:00.000Z","author":"Prod","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Prod-2007-03-21T05:06:00.000Z-Data.wz","replies":[],"displayName":"Prod-You"}}-->

Screenshots only need the screenshot tag, see Image:Maple0495.jpg Mapletip 01:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-27T01:28:00.000Z","author":"Mapletip","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mapletip-2006-09-27T01:28:00.000Z-Screenshots","replies":["c-Carnildo-2006-09-28T06:07:00.000Z-Mapletip-2006-09-27T01:28:00.000Z"]}}-->

Screenshots also need to say what they're a screenshot of. It's rarely self-evident. --Carnildo 06:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-09-28T06:07:00.000Z","author":"Carnildo","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Carnildo-2006-09-28T06:07:00.000Z-Mapletip-2006-09-27T01:28:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Now that I can edit again, let me jest say something. The reason why I get pissed of was bcause I saw this one episode of Kappa Mikey. So I wanted to add some more facts to the article, but everything I added the facts I saw in the episode, it got counted as vadalizism. Ican't believe that. How can someone think of blocking of someone else just for adding facts?

you must be brain-dead! did you watch the premiere? ask any other user who watched it premiere on September 22nd. I bet you they'll say that patrick smartpants re-aired with it. It did premiere with new leaf because I watched the premiere and patrick smartpants did re-air with new leaf--74.128.245.70 18:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)(chikinpotato11)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-22T18:50:00.000Z","author":"74.128.245.70","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-74.128.245.70-2006-10-22T18:50:00.000Z-it_did","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I noticed that you put up a AFD tag on Blue Frog in today (October 29)'s page. I would like to notify you the correct order to nominate an article for deletion, which can be seen here.

AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  17:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-29T17:51:00.000Z","author":"AQu01rius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T17:51:00.000Z-AFD_on_Blue_Frog","replies":["c-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T17:55:00.000Z-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T17:51:00.000Z"],"displayName":"User"}}-->

Ok I will try. It's been nominated for deletion before however, and I don't think it will reach consensus. I will try to list it anyway. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  17:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-29T17:55:00.000Z","author":"AQu01rius","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T17:55:00.000Z-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T17:51:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"User"}}-->

It's listed now in here. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  18:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-29T18:17:00.000Z","author":"AQu01rius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AQu01rius-2006-10-29T18:17:00.000Z-AFD_on_Blue_Frog","replies":[],"displayName":"User"}}-->

Nice to see you're on the good side of wikipedia now :) --froth^{T C} 05:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-11-10T05:26:00.000Z","author":"Froth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Froth-2006-11-10T05:26:00.000Z-Liiiife_hey!","replies":[],"displayName":"\u206afroth"}}-->

I am also a maplestory player and I know that both Hidden Street and Maple Tip are famous fansites in the community. However, wikipedia articles are targetting general audience so I use Alexa to determine which one should be mentioned. Wikipedia is not a collection of links. Also, since you're a webmaster of Maple Tip, you are at direct conflict of interest. According to Alexa, Hidden Street has an overall rank of 1863 while Maple Tip has a ranking of 14,406. This indicates that Hidden Street is more than 9 times popular than Maple Tip. Now let's go through other fansites. Basil Market could be kept because it has a ranking of 2950. Happy Mapling has a ranking of 175,891. These are my determining factors for considering which fansites should be posted and which shouldn't be. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 08:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-22T08:06:00.000Z","author":"OhanaUnited","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-OhanaUnited-2007-06-22T08:06:00.000Z-MapleTip_Link","replies":["c-OhanaUnited-2007-06-25T05:48:00.000Z-OhanaUnited-2007-06-22T08:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

Don't you realize that Alexa's ranking already included these already? If the users find the information useful, they will go there more, thus increasing traffic of that site. Any features (e.g. marketplace, wiki, forum, sig creator) will attract people, so Alexa has taken these factors in. Contents are subjective, but website traffic is objective, they can be counted and compared with easily. Regardless, I'll be taking out Happy Mapling because it's outdated and ranking is way too low to deserve to be mentioned. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-25T05:48:00.000Z","author":"OhanaUnited","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-OhanaUnited-2007-06-25T05:48:00.000Z-OhanaUnited-2007-06-22T08:06:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

If that is the reasoning, Sleepywood wouldn't qualify because it doesn't breach the 25,000 mark, why exclude one because it isn't as popular, thats conflict of interest as well - DaMirrorLink^{Talk page} 18:12, 14 July 2007 (GMT)

I was bold and merged another article (abusive relationship) into this one, as per your suggestion on WP:PM. Bearian 00:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-07-10T00:48:00.000Z","author":"Bearian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bearian-2007-07-10T00:48:00.000Z-Relational_aggression","replies":[]}}-->

nationalledger.com unfortunately does not quality as a reliable source. As such, I have reverted your recent addition to Vanessa Anne Hudgens. You will also want to build consensus for this disputed addition on the article's discussion page if you plan on readding it. --Yamla 13:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-08-18T13:51:00.000Z","author":"Yamla","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yamla-2007-08-18T13:51:00.000Z-Reliable_sources","replies":[]}}-->

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Lane Technical College Prep High School) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-11T18:55:00.000Z","author":"TonyTheTiger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TonyTheTiger-2008-08-11T18:55:00.000Z-WP:CHICAGO","replies":[]}}-->

Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting unique and interesting stories from Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I found your user name on this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email ([email protected]) along with any questions you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas Victor Grigas (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-04T22:51:00.000Z","author":"Victorgrigas","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Victorgrigas-2011-11-04T22:51:00.000Z-Wikimedia_Stories_Project","replies":[],"displayName":"Victor Grigas"}}-->

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T13:50:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T13:50:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Mapletip. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

The file File:Albertglane.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-06-19T01:00:00.000Z","author":"FastilyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FastilyBot-2019-06-19T01:00:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_File:Albertglane.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for uploading File:Albertglane.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-06-27T01:01:00.000Z","author":"FastilyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FastilyBot-2019-06-27T01:01:00.000Z-File_source_problem_with_File:Albertglane.jpg","replies":[]}}-->