Archives

Romano Germanic-Deletions

you can should never stop improving your faith. especially studying bible. my favorite quote: psalms 78:57-58; isaiah 2:20; 42:8; romans 1:23-25

this is also a good study https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trail_of_Blood

I am not sure whether you are familiar with a WikiProject or not (a description can be found here) but I'm planning on starting one for the Latin language. This is mainly because Latin is and has been such an important language in the history of western civilization but the article is only rated a 'C'. If you support my proposal then please sign your name on the proposal page here. 95jb14 95jb14 (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-13T12:58:00.000Z","author":"95jb14","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-95jb14-2009-08-13T12:58:00.000Z-Latin_WikiProject","replies":["c-95jb14-2009-08-17T15:10:00.000Z-95jb14-2009-08-13T12:58:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks! 95jb14 (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-17T15:10:00.000Z","author":"95jb14","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-95jb14-2009-08-17T15:10:00.000Z-95jb14-2009-08-13T12:58:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

No problem I will do what I can and what time will allow. I do think it was a good idea to start a WikiProject on the Latin language though. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 11:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-20T11:35:00.000Z","author":"Lucius Sempronius Turpio","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2009-08-20T11:35:00.000Z-Latin_WikiProject","replies":[]}}-->

The article Amazing Chicago's Funhouse Maze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blatant advertising using unsourced editorial statements and spam link to company operating the attraction. No encyclopedic value.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pknkly (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-06T15:00:00.000Z","author":"Pknkly","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pknkly-2009-09-06T15:00:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Amazing_Chicago's_Funhouse_Maze","replies":[]}}-->

I have launched the WP and got it set up and running. I was wondering whether you would have a look. 95jb14 (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-07T18:31:00.000Z","author":"95jb14","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-95jb14-2009-09-07T18:31:00.000Z-Latin_WikiProjest_launched","replies":["c-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2009-09-22T16:41:00.000Z-95jb14-2009-09-07T18:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Sorry was on a break. Yes I do plan on taking a look at it, and even helping with the project. Thanks for the invite the project is sure to be fun. At the risk of sounding "nerdy" I must say anything that has to do with Latin is always fun. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 16:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-22T16:41:00.000Z","author":"Lucius Sempronius Turpio","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2009-09-22T16:41:00.000Z-95jb14-2009-09-07T18:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-95jb14-2009-09-23T17:35:00.000Z-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2009-09-22T16:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

• • I agree, that's exactly the attitude we should all have!! 95jb14 (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-09-23T17:35:00.000Z","author":"95jb14","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-95jb14-2009-09-23T17:35:00.000Z-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2009-09-22T16:41:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. Concerning your contribution, George Anderson (psychic), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.georgeanderson.com/georgeandersonbio.htm. As a copyright violation, George Anderson (psychic) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. George Anderson (psychic) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:George Anderson (psychic) and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:George Anderson (psychic) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:George Anderson (psychic).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 05:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-09T05:25:00.000Z","author":"Corvus cornix","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Corvus_cornix-2011-04-09T05:25:00.000Z-Copyright_problems_with_George_Anderson_(psychic)","replies":["c-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2011-04-09T05:52:00.000Z-Corvus_cornix-2011-04-09T05:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Thanks, but I'm not sure I get what makes you think I am in violation of wiki copyright rules. The article is not a cut and paste, It obviously contains facts taken from other articles, but it is written in my own words. Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 05:52, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-09T05:52:00.000Z","author":"Lucius Sempronius Turpio","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lucius_Sempronius_Turpio-2011-04-09T05:52:00.000Z-Corvus_cornix-2011-04-09T05:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Having never formally studied Latin, I am still pondering the Omnis v. "Omnia Gallia" debate. About 65% of Google-Search sources say "Omnia Gallia" ("All Gaul"), while 30% say "Omnis Gallia" ("Every Gaul"?):

• Omnia Gallia in tres partes divisa est (...and the other...)
• Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres.

Any opinions about this, or finding the original rewrites of Commentarii de Bello Gallico which would show either "Omnia Gallia" or "Omnis Gallia"? There's no hurry on this: it's been a few thousand years. -Wikid77 (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-27T03:02:00.000Z","author":"Wikid77","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wikid77-2011-05-27T03:02:00.000Z-Omnis\/Omnia_Gallia","replies":[]}}-->

The article Roman Knights of America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Organization does not appear to be notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-03T06:56:00.000Z","author":"Sven Manguard","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sven_Manguard-2011-06-03T06:56:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Roman_Knights_of_America","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pictures-of-knights-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Michael Guillen, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://premierespeakers.com/michael_guillen/bio.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-15T03:37:00.000Z","author":"CorenSearchBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CorenSearchBot-2012-01-15T03:37:00.000Z-Michael_Guillen","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Michael Guillen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-15T03:53:00.000Z","author":"B.wilson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B.wilson-2012-01-15T03:53:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Michael_Guillen","replies":[],"displayName":"Bryce"}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgio A. Tsoukalos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgio A. Tsoukalos (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 01:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-08-10T01:25:00.000Z","author":"JzG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JzG-2016-08-10T01:25:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Giorgio_A._Tsoukalos_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!