Hello Lafuzion, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. I hope this welcome I borrowed from the one posted on my user page helps. Happy editing! Wakedream (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Ancient Greece, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RJC ^Talk_Contribs 17:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I apologize for that. I had a typo and just updated it. I didn't know that was incorrect. (Angel Avendano 21:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC))

So what? It does not matter ... used as they are known and not as their name appears on the kit.

Aka is one thing .... yes we give Ronaldinho. Now there is no need to use "V. Valdés" just because it's on his kit ... arises only "Valdés". And Sergio Busquets is not known as Sergio ... it is Busquets ...

Chapecoense 22 January 2010

—Preceding undated comment added 20:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC).

• Continue on then... (Angel Avendano 21:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC))
• It has been the same for every other season. This season is no difference. (Angel Avendano 23:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC))

Please do not assume Ownership, see WP:OWN, and stop just reverting edits - instead solve disagreements on the talk page, as has been pointed out before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandman888 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Demanding sources is fine, but you shd then say that on the talkpage. I've stated reasons for using Busquets there, and you have not responded, therefor I've changed it. Wikipedia is about sources, but also about consensus. Sandman888 (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SANDMAN, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding your discussion with User:Chapecoense and User:Sandman888, the former has asked me to help, which i accepted. Please read this (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:FC_Barcelona#OUT_ON_LOAN), then tell me your views.

Also, regarding the players on "everyone's lips" now, Sergio Busquets and Yaya Touré; the first is referred to more as Busquets, but Sergio is not uncommon. The last usually with the two names. No point entering an edit war over this. As far as the removal of the youth players in the first team article, i think SANDMAN is correct, FC Barcelona Atlètic already has own WP page.

Attentively, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I see your point. So, if that is the case, Sergio Busquets has "SERGIO B." on his back, whilst Yaya Touré has both names (still can't remember 100% if it's that or "TOURE YAYÁ", but it's both, that for certain). Cheers, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya,

I'm writing because you edit the current season a lot so I thought maybe you cd help. Do you know how this list is determined? Do the coach or sport director determine it? Best Regards Sandman888 (talk) 22:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Do you have any references on that? I know there's a book at the camp nou museum with legends in it but can't remember the name. I'm trying to get a list promoted to featured status, but the editors think it's just the webmanager who adds stuff. Sandman888 (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found it! Here's the book legends - thanks though!Sandman888 (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you think we shouldn't include the full team names in the article and the bracket at 2010 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup qualification? -- Grant.Alpaugh 19:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, but I think it's important to be consistent from article to article. Plus, your assumption that everyone knows the team names isn't necessarily true since this is an encyclopedia that can be accessed by anyone anywhere in the world, you know? If it's alright with you, I'm going to list the full names, okay? -- Grant.Alpaugh 21:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lafuzion. I'm Airplaneman. When creating redirect pages, such as FC Barcelona season 2010–11, please use the #REDIRECT magic word to redirect the page. Happy editing, Airplaneman ✈ 22:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Copa del Rey 2010–11 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Immunize (talk) 14:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Immunize (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and you seem to appreciate the Barça football team so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm part of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like supporting some of the goals of the Barça! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Capsot (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for being so nice, muchísimas gracias, bye! Capsot (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw you reverted an edit on FC Barcelona, and thought that perhaps you would be interested in reviewing the list of players, which is nominated for FL here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of FC Barcelona players/archive2. Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry to bother you again, but the lists urgently needs reviews to form a consensus. Could you check the list and say whether you support, are neutral or oppose the nomination here. Best regards, Sandman888 (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your edits to update match results for the USMNT. However, Your formatting changes such as reverting the use of the "stack" field in {{Footballbox collapsible}} are disruptive to the uniformity of the whole page and reject an accepted parameter for a widely used template. The whole point of the collapsible box is to preserve space – the article is in great need of prose, and conservation of space will be even more necessary once it is added – and adding breaking lines runs counter to that purpose. If you'd like to discuss it I'll be watchlisting this page. Thanks again for your efforts. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 18:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have created a list of all presidents of Barcelona here, and I would like to hear you input on the featured list nomination here, because it has not received any reviews for 14 days now. If you could add whether you support, (are) neutral or oppose the list, that would be very helpful as well. Cheers! Sandman888 (talk) 06:47, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I posted a few sections on Talk:2010 New York Red Bulls season that need a little input. If you find a few minutes to look it over I would appreciate it. Thank you. Birdy (talk) 23:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! A list I've nominated is needing reviewers and input at WP:Featured list candidates/List of FC Barcelona honours/archive1. You have previosly shown interest in this subject area and/or similar lists. If you could check it against the FL-criteria and indicate you oppose or support, that would be appreciated. Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you rate it? Antoinefcb (talk) 01:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't doubt your good intentions in labelling lots of international football managers with flags, you should be aware that this is, for at least two reasons, contrary to the encyclopaedia's manual of style. Flags should be accompanied by the name of the country that they represent, at least on the first time of showing in an article, and flags should not be used in infoboxes to indicate place of birth. Please revert that series of edits. Kevin McE (talk) 07:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just expanded La Masia. If you have a ref that 9 of the squad members in the WC 2010 final where from La Masia and six of the starters as well, that would be great. Otherwise I can't add it in. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 15:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done is all I can say! :) Maybe the only thing left is to write the season to season section that you can find in any other team article of Tercera División. But the rest is just great. Well done! Qampunen (talk) 20:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Being a regular contributor I thought you would like to know that FC Barcelona is currently at FAC with 1 support, but could do with more reviews. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/FC Barcelona/archive3. Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you beat me to just about every Barca edit I was trying to make after the game. I was wondering if you can connect me to whatever group helps improve coverage of FC Barcelona, as I'd like to help. Also, FYI, I'm from Miami, so :) Sven Manguard _Talk 22:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. BTW is there a Wikigroup for Barca editors? Sven Manguard _Talk 22:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I have not taken ownership of the article. It seems you have. But that's irrelevant. What is relevant is the changes I made. Any changes I made were made because I may know a little thing here or there that you may not. I do know how to make the template:footballbox collapsible look better when you use more than one of them. I also know you should not use flagicons to indicate the national association of a referee (you used a piped link for that). And I also know that we don't say F.C. København in English Wikipedia articles; we say F.C. Copenhagen. That's pretty much the extent of my edits. Anything else in the article I really don't care to edit unless it is in need for correction. That's all. Cheers. Digirami (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work with the DeRo trade. At first I thought it was an April Fool's joke.Bubbagump24 (talk) 22:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reported him. He is blocked for the next 31 hours. Digirami (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed some text you added under the Season overview section were directly copied from the references provided so I removed them. Please refrain from copying texts from sources. Vanadus (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I don't know what you're problem is against me or my edits. I have tried to do thing right. I took things to the talk page and argued my points in a manner appropiate for the site. But, you seem to have it out for any edits made by me to the page (this is not the first time). You do not own the article. Furthermore, do not disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, which is what you're doing by adding the player's legal name. You have not reach any level of consensus for that on any level. You're the only editor that seems to favor displaying the jersey name in the squad information and football box. Take it to the talk page and keep things civil. Thanks. Digirami (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#2011–12 FC Barcelona season. Digirami (talk) 21:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you should go take a look at the 2010-11 FC Barcelona season page. Someone messed it up real bad and i dont even know where to begin to fix it. User:c46943 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:55, 13 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Patriotas F.C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Berton (talk) 16:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bogotá F.C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Berton (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not understand your doubt. Maybe a redirect? Berton (talk) 17:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Bogota FC. Berton (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LISTEN. When you input goal information in match boxes, and are trying to show that a goal is a penalty, it is not 13' (p), BUT 13' (pen.), for example. Cheers, and stop changing it, Italia2006 (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb – has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Fb – requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 07:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In 2011–12 Atlético Madrid season, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT go by the names on players' jerseys. In match information boxes, it's not F. Coentrao, it's simply Coentrao. Same for David Villa. There's only one, so it's simply Villa. The same for Sergio Ramos (Ramos), Kevin-Prince Boateng (NOT PRINCE, ITS BOATENG), Thiago Silva, Andrés Iniesta, Víctor Valdés, Alexis Sánchez, etc. THANK YOU Italia2006 (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Alexander Hleb. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. There is no link suggesting that Hleb has signed for Olympiacos. – Kosm1fent 19:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sven Manguard Wha? 20:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it will be easier for people to have it match the bracket - as most won't go to the source and see that they are different. I worry how much the draw for the 3rd round will cause shifting in the brackets. I setup the brackets to match the second round rather than the first since the announcement didn't line them up. Also, I'm wondering how you feel about breaking up the 7 round bracket into preliminary rounds (1-3) and final rounds (4-finals). I hate that even on my 1920 pixel wide monitor, the names still wrap, and on a 1000px wide about half the names wrap. --Trödel 18:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I modified the template to show the first three rounds only - We could have it also do the right thing based on who wins (by right thing I mean show the link between the first round and the person who clears to the 2nd round), but it will be significant editing. For example:

		Round 1					Round 2				Round 3
	ABC	Team Alpha winner	3			ABC	Team Alpha winner	1			MLS	Team Blue	3(3)
	XYZ	Team Beta loser	0			USLP	Pro side 2nd rd win	3			USLP	Pro side 2nd rd win	3(4)
	ABC	Team delta loser	0			XYZ	Team gamma winner	1			USLP	USL Pro B 2nd rd win	1
	XYZ	Team gamma winner	2			USLP	USL Pro B 2nd rd win	3			MLS	Team Red	2

Any feedback on the changes to the preliminary bracket? --Trödel 21:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure I like the preliminary bracket being removed (but trying to decide if that's because I spent 90 minutes on it or because the bracket format is useful). I do like the idea of moving the finals bracket near those rounds. Let's see what others do to the page. --Trödel
  • No worries - as an earlier version of MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyrightwarning said (paraphrasing), "If you do not want your writing to be edited, deleted or modified mercilessly...do not submit it." That's all part of a wiki. --Trödel 23:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to comment on the removal of the bracket for the initial rounds Talk:2012 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup --Trödel 14:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 Athletic Bilbao season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 FC Barcelona season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

there is important discussion about messi's page at [footbal]

the discussion about :

1-adding back the assists which have been removed ( and i think its really important ) especially most notable players have it and even less known player than messi have this statistics which is important for any striker .(remember the debate about messi vs ronalod have lots about messi makes more assists than ronaldo )

2-adding back the youth and under -23 goals because they are different statistics from senior one and u cant merge them together . since fifa themself separate them differently .

3-about the table of messi goals and if its important info or just long statistics(useless one).

Thank you all . adnan^talk 12 pm 16 october 2012 (UTC)

Hola, creo que sabes español, así pues permíteme que me exprese así, gracias. Te envío este mensaje con tal de evitar guerras de ediciones estúpidas acerca de las abrevaciones que se usan para equipos españoles. Cada uno podemos tener nuestro criterio sobre si debemos llamar Real Betis o Betis, Valladolid o Real Valladolid, Sporting de Gijón o Real Sporting de Gijón, Celta o Real Club Celta de Vigo. Creo que no hay normas para como se deben abreviar estos equipos, pero bien hay un "consenso" de cual es la abreviatura más usada, en el artículo de La Liga usamos unas abreviaturas, si en Copa usamos otras, se denota una falta de homogeneización y de que cada editor lo pone como quiere, creo que siempre se debe abreviar igual. Por favor, no edites según tu criterio, creo que llevas tiempo colaborando aquí y no entiendo que te pongas a hacer ediciones para imponer tu criterio personal, imagínate que todos hiciesen igual, cada vez que entrasen, lo pusieran todo como le gusta más, creo que sería de locos y habría una guerra de ediciones muy estúpida, supongo que me comprendes y pido respeto por el consenso general y por mi trabajo y el de los demás. Acerca de las abreviaturas, esta mañana sobre las 8 hora española me he puesto a "homogeneizar" abreviaturas, adoptando algunas propuestas tuyas como Celta Vigo en vez de Celta de Vigo, Sporting Gijón o Sporting de Gijón, pero por otra parte he quitado varios "Real", puesto que solo Real Sociedad, Real Unión y Real Madrid son los únicos equipos cuyo prefijo "Real" es intrínseco en el nombre abreviado, pero si nos ponemos a hacer un criterio arbitrario sobre que equipos deben tener Real o no, creo que va a ser lioso y estúpido, si pones Real Valladolid, Real Betis, Real Zaragoza, Real Jaén (este lo he mantenido puesto que en competición liguera también se abrevia así) también deberías llamar Real Celta de Vigo, Real Sporting Gijón, Real Racing Santander, Real Espanyol, Real Mallorca... nos volveríamos locos sobre cuales sí y cuales no, está más o menos consensuado como se abrevian la mayoría de equipos, espero que entiendas y me comprendas mi argumentación y desistas realizar ediciones según tu criterio personal. Muchas Gracias. - tot-futbol (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lafuzion, una cosa es como se autonombren "oficialmente" y otra el nombre más popular y más consensuado aquí en la wikipedia, se abrevian siempre sin el Real puesto que es prescindible y no nos liamos con la ciudad, espero que aunque tu criterio esté en las autodenominaciones de las webs oficiales asumas que esto es la wikipedia y esas no son las reglas a seguir para las nomenclaturas, se sigue un consenso y nunca les ponemos Real, puesto que ese es el nombre oficial y no una abreviación. Espero que no vuelvas a entrar en una guerra de ediciones por esta tontería, hemos de seguir un único criterio para los artículos de la temporada, por profesionalidad. - tot-futbol (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, disculpa si te he ofendido califcándolo de tonterías, solo quería decir que son cambios sin importancia, que no hacen falta, en ningún momento quería transmitir aires de superioridad, lo siento si te lo ha parecido. Saludos - tot-futbol (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Levante UD season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there LF, AL from Portugal here,

i apologize for my mistake, wanted to eliminate something else and i thought the rollback would take care of that, i was going to reinstate your additions after dinner (now), see you already took care of that. However, i think we should have the two paragraphs together as both belong to same "situation" (his beginnings as Barcelona assistant).

Keep up the good work, sorry for any incovenience --AL (talk) 20:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 New York Red Bulls season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Martin Petrov, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 03:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just a short question here. In the match template, is there a rule to put the events in the order in which they happened? Because its kinda confusing if you don't put the goals first and/or if you put yellow cards in between goals. --Janisterzaj (talk) 10:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is getting me frustrated, first there isn't still any official release of the squad number but they keep changing it !

second Bojan has been bought by barca this season again as a part of the deal they made two years ago! I can't see why they keep removing it. it's stupid !! finally another one removing the statistic section saying it's blank ?!

I don't know if there is a way to prevent all this or not. im not familiar with wikipedia as much as you .

Thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3878:81E0:C55:AF6:8AF2:2315 (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I edit the Real Madrid season page, and a current large-scale discussion regarding the deletion of the assists section is undergoing at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Assists. Can you please comment on that page? Thanks. Bobby (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 FC Barcelona season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[:es:Miguel Ángel Ayza Gámez|Ayza Gámez]] ([[Valencian Football Federation|Valencian Community]]))
• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 FC Barcelona season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO FRIEND. I will never understand your obsession with using jersey names to refer to players in the info boxes, but enough is enough. Stop putting Neymar Jr every time he scores or gets cautioned. He is NEYMAR. No one refers to him as Neymar Jr except himself. I've left 'Alexis' alone because I don't see that as being as big a deal, but it really should be Sánchez. I've spoken with you about this before but you ignored that. Continue to put Neymar Jr and I will continue to remove it. Italia2006 (talk) 13:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Estadio Reino de León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I'm really getting tired of your obsession with having the jersey names as the visible link. I'm not sure if you even speak English (and I don't mean that as an insult) but here I go. Why should we put Jordi Alba when there is only one Alba on the team? Why Sergio when his name is Busquets? Why? And for God's sake enough with the "Neymar Jr" stuff already. Italia2006 (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 New York Red Bulls season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Eckersley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 New York Red Bulls season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I have seen your edit at 2013–14 FC Barcelona season and wanted to inform that live updating are not accepted. Based on Wikipedia policies and guidlines we should not provide livescores and live updates. This based on WP:LIVESCORES and WT:FOOTY consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 81#Live scoring and it has also been discussed many more times. This also applies to tables and list such as top goalscorers, squad statistics and other match info, which you can also read about at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 81#Live updates (again). Please wait until matches are finished before adding the statistics. Wikipedia is not for livescoring and should wait for update until sources are updated. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 New York Red Bulls season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Alexander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there LF, AL from Portugal "here",

just because you link something in the introduction to an article, does not mean when it first appears in the storyline it should not be linked, it should. ONCE in intro and ONCE in storyline is not overlinking, it's 100% correct.

Happy editing --AL (talk) 16:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2014–15 FC Barcelona season page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014–15 FC Barcelona season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}
• |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Selena, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. jona^(talk) 15:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a ridiculous assumption to make. Where's the source that she has been elevated to sainthood-like? La Fuzion (K lo K) 15:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you know that Sevilla and Vill-real are wrong and just lead to redirects? So, please stop chaning it. Kante4 (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 FC Barcelona season. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. See #Livescores and live updates Qed237 (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you had some comments on the Bill Cosby talk page and was hoping you could help us resolve an issue. Please see the section titled "Discussion: Should the lead sentence mention the sexual assault accusations?". Thanks! Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 03:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This thread is forum shopping and IDHT behavior. Hamster totally reordered talk page sections, placing them in opposite order and thus changing the meaning and progression. They also changed headings made by others, and also created an improperly formed RfC to hijack the discussion. All is now restored. We had a consensus until this disruption occurred. This is massive IDHT behavior, and this thread should be closed. Such behavior should not be rewarded. Hamster should be blocked for this. -- {{u|BullRangifer}} {Talk} 20:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~ Richmond96 T • C 16:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain to me why you changed the format of the team's schedule on this article? There is a format for college basketball schedules that every other season article uses so that there is no need for wikitables. It's currently too busy with too much going on. Please respond ASAP as I will be undoing your edits in 24 hours to the standard format unless you give me a reason to leave it.

BUPetey (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and maybe I jumped the gun changing it, but the original format was too bulky and too many wrap around. This one I think simplifies it w/o losing all the information from the original. You can reverted if you like since it's not that serious... La Fuzion (K lo K) 16:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I`ve been editing some European Cup articles recently, and a lot of them do not have a picture of the stadium that hosted the final unlike the UEFA Champions League articles, who have their final venue pictured in every article. So I wanted to ask if it`s ok to put the final venues photographed in the articles. I await your answer in my talk page, Thank You TheSoccerBoy (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 FC Barcelona season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claudio Bravo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 New York Red Bulls season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 U.S. Open Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Javi Varas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kerri Chandler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page METI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Unai Dufur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. His 'debut' for Eibar was against Tercera Division team (which isn't fully-pro)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

good morning, may I ask why did you delete the Spanish flag next to the name of spanish clubs in Barca season page?

thank you 108.30.205.112 (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those clubs are in the same country so the norm is not to add the flag. La Fuzion (K lo K) 12:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok!

thank you! 108.30.205.112 (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any norms like that. I dont think there is... Check out..City , Chelsea.. pages; You can see the flag from same country. So, better to add flags.It will be nice to see. Thank you. Eagle Site (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagle Site, if you look at all the past seasons articles along with the other Spanish teams pages, the flags of the same country are normally not added. I don't know how it started, but it's been done for a while. I don't normally edit a English teams so I don't know how they do it. La Fuzion (K lo K) 14:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2022–23 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case I'm using the IP from my home so what are you guys even talking about? I've been editing since 2007 w/o any issues. Also, it's crazy this came about after I had some disagreement with "The Penfield Homunculus" on the Talk:2023–24 FC Barcelona season. you guys take ownership of these things to a whole crazy level. La Fuzion (K lo K) 12:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 Supercopa de España Femenina. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward-Woodrow I thought about doing that and should've. Will keep it in mind for the next time. La Fuzion (K lo K) 20:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Per last seasons, it was done the same. What about the position by round table? Does it stay empty and filled afterwards? If a game is rescheduled a lot for or back it can be "16 (3rd), 17 (17th), 18 (3rd)". Makes no sense. Per WP:BRD you were bold, i reverted so you should start a discussion and not revert again. Kante4 (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have to keep it as week 12 and then you move it in between whichever weeks the game is rescheduled to; i.e., if its replay between Round 20 and 21 then you add Round 12 to in between those rounds. El Clasico is on Round 35, so you can't change their round numbers. Lafuzion (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, if round 12 is played between 25 and 26, the results by round table is incorrect (example above). Please see last seasons for examples how we dealt with it, you can't just come in and change it without consensus. Pinging @Leprazoori: as another contributor at that article. Kante4 (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valencia vs Real Madrid is a Round 12 match whether it was play on its original date or next year in May, it doesn't become a new round. I'm genuinely confused whether you understand what I am conveying.. Lafuzion (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but it's not the 12th game for Real, that's how we handled it the last seasons and i do not see a reason to change it. Kante4 (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The number is not the matches they've played in chronological order, but the specific round in the League's calendar. Last year when Barcelona's match vs Osasuna was postponed (Round 20), it was slotted between Round 22 and 23. The result by round was added to Round 20 when the match was completed, but their position can be added chronologically because there's movement in the table due the games that were actually played. Lafuzion (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, the order in the results by round table can be changed and "be in wrong order" but the order at the matches should stay the same? Kante4 (talk) 10:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

for more input. Kante4 (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 LIDOM season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austin Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]