This is my talk archive; please do not edit this record of past discussions. If you need to contact me, please leave a message on my active talk page.

Please drop all {{talkback}} type messages (aka "I have responded to your message on my own talk page") in this section. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-01T16:04:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2011-01-01T16:04:00.000Z-Talkback_sink","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Kralizec!. You have new messages at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Kralizec!. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 16:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-10T16:08:00.000Z","author":"MikeLynch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MikeLynch-2011-01-10T16:08:00.000Z-Talkback_sink","replies":[]}}-->

Excuse me for my inturruption good sir. My user, meikeric was just block by you for 72 hours. I wish to file a protest against this. I contributed valuable content to two articles. One being the Outer Banks article consisting of information on the seasonality of weather patterns on the Outer Banks due to it's geographical location as well as an external link to a site providing web cams of the Outer Banks. Both of this I feel is relevant and adds quality to this particular article. Unfortunately, I got into a revert war with CutOffTies, as she feels that the external link qualifies as spam. However, this page serves as a good resource to wiki users to get a live view of a place they are interested in that they may not think to search for through traditional sources. Honestly though, isn't this what the spirit of Wikipedia is about? Discovery of resources on the Internet. The other article was about the Wright Brothers National Memorial. I added an external link directly to a web can pointing directly at this memorial. Which I feel is highly relevant and interesting.

Therefore, I respectfully ask that my account be unbanned. However, if you feel that is not the correct action and I should continue to be blocked than I ask that CutOffTies be blocked for the same amount of time as a punishment for revert warring should be dolled out equally.

Thank you for your time, Meikeric —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.14.99 (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-01T22:38:00.000Z","author":"166.205.14.99","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-166.205.14.99-2011-01-01T22:38:00.000Z-Block_of_Meikeric","replies":[]}}-->

...just vandalized my page again. What level warning is appropriate? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-07T11:26:00.000Z","author":"Anna Frodesiak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-01-07T11:26:00.000Z-User:XXxTheproxXx","replies":["c-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-01-07T11:27:00.000Z-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-01-07T11:26:00.000Z"]}}-->

Nevermind. I see he just got blocked. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-07T11:27:00.000Z","author":"Anna Frodesiak","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-01-07T11:27:00.000Z-Anna_Frodesiak-2011-01-07T11:26:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-01-18T21:10:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-01-18T21:10:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LVIII,_December_2010","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for uploading File:Dolza from Robotech Macross.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 04:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-10T04:29:00.000Z","author":"Courcelles","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Courcelles-2011-02-10T04:29:00.000Z-File_source_problem_with_File:Dolza_from_Robotech_Macross.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-21T16:07:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-02-21T16:07:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Volume_LVIX,_January_2011","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Paternity (House), Occam's Razor (House), Maternity (House), Damned If You Do, The Socratic Method (House), Fidelity (House), Poison (House), DNR (House), Histories (House), Detox (House), Sports Medicine (House), Cursed (House), Control (House), Mob Rules (House), Heavy (House), Role Model (House), Babies & Bathwater, Kids (House), Love Hurts (House) and Honeymoon (House) are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 12:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-07T12:46:00.000Z","author":"Xeworlebi","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Xeworlebi-2011-03-07T12:46:00.000Z-Nomination_of_season_one_episode_articles_of_House_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-17T22:09:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-03-17T22:09:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LX,_February_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Sir/Madam I am currently in post production on feature film which cost us a total of $2000 it is super low budget and I humbly request the permission of a certain pic from your site because of the low budget nature of the film we only intend it to go into local festivals and can't realistically see it going into anything big, the certain pic is crucial to the plot and there is no other one that exists. Please consider this request as it would be much appreciated

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anbangbang_gallery_Mimi_rock_art_cropped.jpg

Andrew Salter Director/Producer Gloomy Sunday [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.78.140 (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-18T00:18:00.000Z","author":"124.183.78.140","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-124.183.78.140-2011-03-18T00:18:00.000Z-Permission_for_image","replies":[]}}-->

Source supplied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agoodbadhabit (talk • contribs) 02:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-19T02:16:00.000Z","author":"Agoodbadhabit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Agoodbadhabit-2011-03-19T02:16:00.000Z-rpg.net_edits","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-01T03:59:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-05-01T03:59:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LXI,_March_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-17T22:56:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-05-17T22:56:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LXII,_April_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,

My name is Gabrielle Lussier, I am a production coordinator for a Canadian science tv show entitled Le Code Chastenay. We air on the provincial public tv network, Tele-Quebec (the Quebec province equivalent of PBS) and world-wide on TV5 Monde. The show is also available on the show’s web site (telequebec.tv/lecodechastenay).

In our show, we have segments about quebec's scientific researchs where journalists explains a subject or phenomenon about science. In one of these segments, we would like to talk about twin's genetic. To illustrate the topic, we would like to show photographies of your children on air but there-for, we need your authorization.

We need to have the rights to broadcast photographies of your children. We are going to broadcast this segment during the year 2011 or in the beginnig of 2012. We need the rights to film it and reproduce it in the television program entitled "LE CODE CHASTENAY” in all formats necessary for its insertion into the Program and the Program's subsequent exploitation and promotion.

Our company shall have the right to authorize unlimited public representation of the Material for any broadcast and distribution use of the Program in whole or in part, in any form now in existence or which may come into use into the future, including interactive transmissions, in all markets worldwide, in perpetuity.

Of course, we will give you credits, in the end credits of the show.

I will need to send you our standard release form to sign if you can give us authorization to use the photos. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks, -- Gabrielle Lussier Coordonnatrice de production Le Code Chastenay Productions Pixcom Inc Tél.: 1-514-931-1188 ext. 477 [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.41.93.242 (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-02T20:10:00.000Z","author":"206.41.93.242","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-206.41.93.242-2011-06-02T20:10:00.000Z-Perimission_request_for_le_Code_Chastenay","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-04T22:57:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-06-04T22:57:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LXIII,_May_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Little did u know that right after you requested CSOD on the Justin Bieber article....he would become an icon. LOL KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-04T02:29:00.000Z","author":"Grim Littlez","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Grim_Littlez-2011-07-04T02:29:00.000Z-LOL","replies":[],"displayName":"KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ"}}-->

Salve, Kralizec! Could you help me keep an eye on Kevin Coughlin in the next few days? Someone has been adding poorly sourced allegations against Coughlin substantiated only by a local journalist's blog. The edits are reverted for now by another experienced editor, but it's probably something we'll want to watch. Thanks! -- JeffBillman (talk) 02:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-14T02:10:00.000Z","author":"JeffBillman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JeffBillman-2011-07-14T02:10:00.000Z-Kevin_Coughlin","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-16T23:22:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-07-16T23:22:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LXIV,_June_2011","replies":[]}}-->

I'm new to wiki, so I hope I'm using this page correctly! I have noticed that your picture of fraternal twins shows what appears to be monozygotic twins. What evidence do you have that these twins are dizygotic? Has there been genetic testing? Thanks. Stickerella (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-25T19:28:00.000Z","author":"Stickerella","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stickerella-2011-07-25T19:28:00.000Z-Fraternal_twins","replies":[]}}-->

Hi! Thanks for your reply! I would say, with 99.99% certainty, that your twins are monozygotic (identical). Many ob/gyns and ultrasound techs are misinformed about twins, chorions, placentas, etc. They mistakenly believe that two placentas or amnions indicates fraternals, while it can be either. Clues can be found in the fingerprints, ear shape, irises, hair crowns, etc. With your twins, the outside observer can clearly see that they are monozygotic...they are quite obviously identical, though environment is slowly and gradually creating differences in the physical appearance. Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen, too, now understand that their physical differences do not mean they are fraternals, but mirror image twins (discussed on a recent episode of Ellen). It's just a misunderstanding that caused their mislabelling. Twins are fascinating! I do, however, think that there's a fair bit of misinformation about zygosity floating about, mostly caused by well meaning doctors who tell folks that their infants are fraternal or identical without genetic testing. Thanks for listening! Stickerella (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-30T17:52:00.000Z","author":"Stickerella","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stickerella-2011-07-30T17:52:00.000Z-Twins","replies":[]}}-->

The article Soviet aircraft carrier Kiev (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unneccessary DAB page. Hatnotes now added to the two articles disambiguated here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Haruth (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-04T19:50:00.000Z","author":"Haruth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Haruth-2011-08-04T19:50:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Soviet_aircraft_carrier_Kiev_(disambiguation)","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-14T22:28:00.000Z","author":"BrownBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BrownBot-2011-08-14T22:28:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_LXV,_July_2011","replies":[]}}-->

The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. ---LoriLee (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-17T15:10:00.000Z","author":"LoriLee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LoriLee-2011-08-17T15:10:00.000Z-Children's_Museum_backstage_pass","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

This has been sent to you requesting that you share your thoughts to an ongoing discussion that's taking place on the projects talk page.

--Kumioko (talk) 23:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-13T23:44:00.000Z","author":"Kumioko","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kumioko-2011-09-13T23:44:00.000Z-Suggestion_for_WP_United_States_to_Support_WP_Oklahoma_&_Tulsa","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Just want to know who this is. was researching my family history and i guess my GGGG grandfather started this town? hit me [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.143.33.238 (talk) 00:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-29T00:51:00.000Z","author":"209.143.33.238","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-209.143.33.238-2011-10-29T00:51:00.000Z-hi","replies":[]}}-->

This guy is appealing his block. Care to get involved? DS (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-18T00:49:00.000Z","author":"DragonflySixtyseven","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DragonflySixtyseven-2011-11-18T00:49:00.000Z-Revisiting_an_old_block","replies":[],"displayName":"DS"}}-->

I thought you might want to know that User:Sczlep1, who you blocked as a VOA back in 2009, is requesting an unblock and says he's grown beyond his previous antics. I'm inclined to believe him and unblock but thought I'd check with you, as the blocking admin, first. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-18T04:52:00.000Z","author":"The Bushranger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Bushranger-2011-11-18T04:52:00.000Z-Hello_there","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2011-11-19T16:32:00.000Z-The_Bushranger-2011-11-18T04:52:00.000Z"]}}-->

Generally speaking, I fully support the rehabilitation of former vandals, and do not object in any way to the unblocking of this editor. — Kralizec! (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-19T16:32:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2011-11-19T16:32:00.000Z-The_Bushranger-2011-11-18T04:52:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Kralizec, I just wanted you to know that I reverted a blanking from an IP. It was pretty obvious vandalism, but in the remarkably slim chance that you weren't logged in and made that edit yourself, I apologize. Achowat (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC) [reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-12-07T16:57:00.000Z","author":"Achowat","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Achowat-2011-12-07T16:57:00.000Z-Vandalism_on_your_User_Page","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Kralizec!. You have new messages at Achowat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether or not you are still an active member of WikiProject Oklahoma Please respond Here By following the instructions.

--Dcheagle 09:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-05T09:34:00.000Z","author":"Dcheagle","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dcheagle-2012-01-05T09:34:00.000Z-Wikiproject_Olahoma","replies":[],"displayName":"Dch"}}-->

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-15T23:35:00.000Z","author":"The ed17","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_ed17-2012-01-15T23:35:00.000Z-Military_Historian_of_the_Year","replies":[],"displayName":"Ed"}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Hocking River at Logan, Ohio.jpg, which you've sourced to Dustin M. Ramsey. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-20T06:19:00.000Z","author":"Sreejithk2000","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sreejithk2000-2012-01-20T06:19:00.000Z-File_permission_problem_with_File:Hocking_River_at_Logan,_Ohio.jpg","replies":["c-Skier_Dude-2012-02-01T05:18:00.000Z-Sreejithk2000-2012-01-20T06:19:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Sreejith K"}}-->

Neither party was 'wasting time' in this - the note on the deletion is (I hope) a note to the restoring admin that there weren't any other issues with the image, it was just lacking the otrs ticket. Quite often there will be additional notes (like 'source needed', ORFUD, or other cryptic wikispeak stuff) that give a 'heads up' to other admins about the state of the image. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-02-01T05:18:00.000Z","author":"Skier Dude","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Skier_Dude-2012-02-01T05:18:00.000Z-Sreejithk2000-2012-01-20T06:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Hi Kralizec, I would like to compliment you on your good work, but would also like to ask if you would correct the name and description of your image of Jabiluka mine. You have named it Ranger 3 which it is not, Jabiluka is a separate lease currently controlled by the same company, but separate all the same. Also your description says that it is part of Kakadu National Park which it is not. It is surrounded by Kakadu as is the Ranger lease and mine, but both leases were created before the park and remain separate from it. Cheers, Owen Djapa Owen 22:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Update, since you did not have time to change this I put in a new image which I labelled correctly, so now nothing need be done. Djapa Owen 10:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Survivor Tree at the Oklahoma City National Memorial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-01-27T09:22:00.000Z","author":"Bulwersator","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bulwersator-2012-01-27T09:22:00.000Z-File:The_Survivor_Tree_at_the_Oklahoma_City_National_Memorial.jpg_listed_for_del","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Dustin We have a website on Australia and would like to use your image titled......... Australian Aboriginal art rock painting of Mimi spirits in the Anbangbang gallery at Nourlangie in Kakadu National Park.......On our website and on a video..

We would attribute the work to you on the website as requested and would like to know if you would like a link to a website of yours or a particular page on Wikipedia? If so could you please provide the address to the site or page you would want the link back to..

Thanks Cheers Kim & Suzie Bell TheBellGirls — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBellGirls (talk • contribs) 02:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-02-10T02:48:00.000Z","author":"TheBellGirls","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheBellGirls-2012-02-10T02:48:00.000Z-File:The_Survivor_Tree_at_the_Oklahoma_City_National_Memorial.jpg_listed_for_del","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Kralizeci,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at [email protected] (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at [email protected]. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The photograph of Woodville on the Wikipedia site is actually looking Southwest, not Northeast as printed below the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.206.231 (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-03-29T23:05:00.000Z","author":"71.50.206.231","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-71.50.206.231-2012-03-29T23:05:00.000Z-Photo_of_Woodville","replies":[]}}-->

This user, whom you blocked in 2009, is asking for an unblock, claiming the alleged vandalism was a misunderstanding (it seems it could have been). He does not appear ever to have been warned about this, either. Could you take a look? Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-12T18:16:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2012-04-12T18:16:00.000Z-Java_Scriptus","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2012-04-12T21:02:00.000Z-Daniel_Case-2012-04-12T18:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Java scriptus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) continued to disruptively edit articles after receiving four escalating warnings. Those warnings do not appear on the user's talk page because it was deleted in March 2009. Given the nature of this person's edits (complete with false edit summaries) I am disinclined to believe his or her claims of ignorance, especially since the editor proceeded to do the exact same changes via 76.109.120.66 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS) once the Java scriptus account was blocked (compare Java scriptus versus 76.109.120.66). — Kralizec! (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC) (original reply [1] copied from User talk:Daniel Case)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-12T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2012-04-12T21:02:00.000Z-Daniel_Case-2012-04-12T18:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-Daniel_Case-2012-04-13T01:54:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2012-04-12T21:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks; I have declined. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-13T01:54:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2012-04-13T01:54:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2012-04-12T21:02:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.

For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-17T18:21:00.000Z","author":"Okeyes (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2012-04-17T18:21:00.000Z-Abuse_Filter_on_the_Article_Feedback_Tool","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias.

Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 registered to Oldham MBC public libraries, and which is permanently blocked in English Wikipedia since 2009, is the source of serious hacking activities. Today on 14 May 2012 other vulnerable Wikipedia encyclopedias are under attack from this address where it is not blocked. This source is capable of hacking Wikipedia, as it is the case today in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias, because it has erased the history archives for instance in the Azerbaijan articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedias and is doing it in other country articles as well, which no simple vandal can do. This source is freely roaming and usurping right now.

Can anyone inform the administrators of the other Wikipedia encyclopedias and help them against the IP address, 212.121.219.1, because most of the small Wikipedia encyclopedias are vulnerable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.23.137 (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-05-14T21:55:00.000Z","author":"88.224.23.137","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-88.224.23.137-2012-05-14T21:55:00.000Z-Urgent_Help_and_Warning","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

Thanks for uploading File:Ash_Cave_complex_in_Hocking_Hills_State_Park.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 01:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-09-06T01:16:00.000Z","author":"Sreejithk2000","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sreejithk2000-2012-09-06T01:16:00.000Z-File_permission_problem_with_File:Ash_Cave_complex_in_Hocking_Hills_State_Park.j","replies":[],"displayName":"Sreejith K"}}-->

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

I read through HeadMouse and Knotslanding's post history, and I agree, they're very close to what we're seeing out of Crazy Blue Eyes. At the very minimum, it passes the duck test. I'm all but tempted to go ahead and file a SPI report on this one. Thoughts, opinions? --McDoobAU93 04:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-03T04:53:00.000Z","author":"McDoobAU93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-McDoobAU93-2012-11-03T04:53:00.000Z-The_return_of_HeadMouse","replies":["c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:11:00.000Z-McDoobAU93-2012-11-03T04:53:00.000Z"],"displayName":"McDoob"}}-->

My thought and opinion is that you need to stop trying to make shit up to find a reason to attack me just because you don't like my edits on an article. I have been a member on Wikipedia for a long time now. I have edited many articles. Now just because YOU have a problem with some of my edits on this article, you're trying to claim some crap to get me blocked. Why don't you find something better to do with your time. Crazy Blue Eyes (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-05T05:11:00.000Z","author":"Crazy Blue Eyes","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:11:00.000Z-McDoobAU93-2012-11-03T04:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:23:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

P.S. Here is your duck test.

File:The Duck Test.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazy Blue Eyes (talk • contribs) 05:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-05T05:23:00.000Z","author":"Crazy Blue Eyes","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:23:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T05:11:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Looks like CBE's DUCKish behavior cooked his goose. --McDoobAU93 15:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-09T15:39:00.000Z","author":"McDoobAU93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-McDoobAU93-2012-11-09T15:39:00.000Z-The_return_of_HeadMouse","replies":["c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes2-2012-11-10T18:44:00.000Z-McDoobAU93-2012-11-09T15:39:00.000Z"],"displayName":"McDoob"}}-->

Wrong again. You falsely made claims against me with no real proof. Your "duck" test is crap. As I have posted above. Just because someone makes a post similar to another person does not make them that person. I have looked into this case and HeadMouse's history and such. He stayed on the monorail article. I have contributed to many other articles. He was blocked in 2008. I didn't join till 2010. He was very vocal. I have not been near as vocal. McDoobAU93, I can apply the DUCK test to you as an administrator. You bold faced lied to me about not being one. But you act like a jerk, you treat others like crap, and you threaten people with no reason. You MUST be an administrator. Crazy Blue Eyes2 (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-10T18:44:00.000Z","author":"Crazy Blue Eyes2","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes2-2012-11-10T18:44:00.000Z-McDoobAU93-2012-11-09T15:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-ZappaOMati-2012-11-10T23:53:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes2-2012-11-10T18:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

If McDoob is an admin, you'd be blocked by now. ZappaOMati 23:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-10T23:53:00.000Z","author":"ZappaOMati","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-ZappaOMati-2012-11-10T23:53:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes2-2012-11-10T18:44:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Zappa"}}-->

Based on your edits to the Walt Disney World Monorail System article, I presume that you are the same person who previously operated the HeadMouse (talk · contribs) and Knotslanding (talk · contribs) accounts? — Kralizec! (talk) 15:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-02T15:11:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2012-11-02T15:11:00.000Z-The_new_you?","replies":["c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:13:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2012-11-02T15:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

Excuse me? Go away and stop trying to stir shit up. You are not even part of the discussion on that article. Be gone. Crazy Blue Eyes (talk) 01:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-05T01:13:00.000Z","author":"Crazy Blue Eyes","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:13:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2012-11-02T15:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:29:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

You know I have also edited Great Locomotive Chase, Golden Spike, Crescent (train)‎, Mark VI monorail. So your assumption that I am someone else, (whom after looking at their user page I see is banned), based off my editing of this one article makes you ignorant and a troll. Crazy Blue Eyes (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-05T01:29:00.000Z","author":"Crazy Blue Eyes","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:29:00.000Z-Crazy_Blue_Eyes-2012-11-05T01:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ash Cave complex in Hocking Hills State Park.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:11, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-12-19T01:11:00.000Z","author":"Ronhjones","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ronhjones-2012-12-19T01:11:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Ash_Cave_complex_in_Hocking_Hills_State_Park.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

Thanks for uploading File:McDonald's Canada restaurant in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.jpg, which you've sourced to Dustin M. Ramsey. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-01T22:23:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2013-02-01T22:23:00.000Z-File_permission_problem_with_File:McDonald's_Canada_restaurant_in_Sault_Ste._Mar","replies":[]}}-->

If you are the photographer mentioned, please indicate this by using your on wiki name as well as a real one, Thanks. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-01T22:25:00.000Z","author":"Sfan00 IMG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sfan00_IMG-2013-02-01T22:25:00.000Z-Images","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Aye there, 'Kralizec!', I'm a member of WikiProject Ships. To help naval historians here at Wikipedia in the effort of writing and citing naval history articles sometime ago I created the List of ships captured in the 19th century and Bibliography of early American naval history pages. Over the last year(+) I have been tracking down and including names of captured ships and naval history texts for inclusion in either of these articles. I like to think that I have included most captured ships (19th century) and most naval history texts (covering the 1700s-1800s) for inclusion in these articles, so if you know of any captured ships or naval history texts that are not included would you kindly include them, either on the page or the talk page of the appropriate article? Any help would be a big help and feedback is always welcomed. Thanx! -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-01T21:50:00.000Z","author":"Gwillhickers","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gwillhickers-2013-04-01T21:50:00.000Z-Naval_History","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-06T05:57:00.000Z","author":"Nbound","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nbound-2013-05-06T05:57:00.000Z-RfC:Infobox_Road_proposal","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm seeking permission to use one of your images in a publication. Can you please contact me so I can provide you with more detail? My email is: [email protected] Many thanks, Amanda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.170.127.238 (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-21T07:04:00.000Z","author":"101.170.127.238","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-101.170.127.238-2013-05-21T07:04:00.000Z-permissions","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-22T19:53:00.000Z","author":"SarahStierch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SarahStierch-2013-05-22T19:53:00.000Z-Love_history_&_culture?_Get_involved_in_WikiProject_World_Digital_Library!","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-16T18:14:00.000Z","author":"Kirill Lokshin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kirill_Lokshin-2013-09-16T18:14:00.000Z-WikiProject_Military_history_coordinator_election","replies":[],"displayName":"Kirill"}}-->

In instances like this, you could just as easily use the "ns" argument for "insufficiently warned" and then make a followup comment along the lines of "like, never" like I do. Daniel Case (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-09-19T17:31:00.000Z","author":"Daniel Case","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Daniel_Case-2013-09-19T17:31:00.000Z-More_efficient_AIV_commenting","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Hi, Kralizec! I saw your revert and edit summary here and wanted to give you heads-up that I've been removing this link from multiple articles. If you're interested, relevant threads are here and here, and I've received good advice here. I think I found them all, but I don't foresee this being the end of it and I wanted to make another experienced editor aware of the problem. Rivertorch (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-06T05:56:00.000Z","author":"Rivertorch","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rivertorch-2013-10-06T05:56:00.000Z-FYI:_Kettani_link","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Casino Sault Ste. Marie warning sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:28:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:28:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Casino_Sault_Ste._Marie_warning_sign.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

hi my name is nicole and i noticed that your photo of your twin girls is on someones facebook page and they are claming that they your twin girls are theres — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.122.31.56 (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-11-10T02:08:00.000Z","author":"71.122.31.56","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-71.122.31.56-2013-11-10T02:08:00.000Z-hi_2","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

I invented the modern vaporizer. U.S. patent 7415982

You jammed the vaporizer page to protect vandals who added

See also:

Eagle Bill 'A for profit site that promotes pirated technology' The ATMOS VAPORIZER.

If you want to be a Wikipedia then try protecting my rights. A patent is ownership. U.S. 7415982

'I invented a cure for cancer (the vaporizer) saving countless lives and they are nobodies who never did anything.'

I do not wish to be rude but few read this and it is your responsibility.

'See how the Nazi's force me to misspell my name, address and email?'

Take me off the black list.

T i m S h e r i d a n A m e r i c a n S m o k e l e s s . C o m s p a r k y @ n a v p o I n t . c o m

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.231.193 (talk) 16:26, 19 November 2013‎

Do you think this can be unprotected now? I've blocked all the sock puppet accounts that were causing the edit wars. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-12-06T20:45:00.000Z","author":"Reaper Eternal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reaper_Eternal-2013-12-06T20:45:00.000Z-Doctor_(Doctor_Who)","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Hi there. I see you recently made an edit to the Tulsa, Oklahoma article, and that you also have admin powers. Would you mind looking at the edits on Dec. 24th and 27th? I get the feeling its a vandal using 2 IP accounts. None of the edits have a summary, and the numbers seem all wrong. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-12-28T03:32:00.000Z","author":"Magnolia677","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Magnolia677-2013-12-28T03:32:00.000Z-Tulsa,_Oklahoma","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

hey i wanted to ask you if i was able to use one of your images for a school assignment? if that's okay please tell me ASAP! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.239.202 (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-03-15T09:51:00.000Z","author":"114.76.239.202","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-114.76.239.202-2014-03-15T09:51:00.000Z-using_an_image","replies":[]}}-->

USS Truxtun did not come to Perth during her 1980 Westpac Her port visits were

Diego Garcia Pattaya, Thailand Subic Bay, Philippines Wellington, New Zealand

USS Truxtun's port visits in 1982 included

Mombasa, Kenya Perth, Australia Hobart, Australia Brisbane, Australia

How do I know this, her cruise books! Oh and I published a book on the USN visits to Western Australia. You can find it here

http://www.hesperianpress.com/index.php/booklist/2011-06-16-08-07-49/l-titles/200-liberty-call

Ian J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.169.53 (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-03-16T18:09:00.000Z","author":"58.7.169.53","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-58.7.169.53-2014-03-16T18:09:00.000Z-USS_Truxtun","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opal Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claim jumper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-03-18T08:53:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2014-03-18T08:53:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_18","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Hey Kralizec, I didn't know you were still around - good to see you're still active. What have you been up to lately? Parsecboy (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-11T20:09:00.000Z","author":"Parsecboy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Parsecboy-2014-04-11T20:09:00.000Z-Long_time_no_see","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-11T20:13:00.000Z-Parsecboy-2014-04-11T20:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

Not much really. I mostly just lend a hand with the mop every now and then. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-11T20:13:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-11T20:13:00.000Z-Parsecboy-2014-04-11T20:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-Parsecboy-2014-04-11T20:34:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-11T20:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yeah, I do that once in a while, but my activity has declined since I started a new job and had a kid - you know how that goes :) Parsecboy (talk) 20:34, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-11T20:34:00.000Z","author":"Parsecboy","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Parsecboy-2014-04-11T20:34:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-11T20:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Kralizec!. You have new messages at A.Minkowiski's talk page.
Message added 17:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T17:29:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-04-15T17:29:00.000Z-Talkback","replies":[]}}-->

A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 17:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T17:29:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-04-15T17:29:00.000Z-Talkback-1","replies":[]}}-->

You recently determined that vandalism warnings given to User talk:165.138.93.203 were "inappropriate". I don't see any 4im warnings given to this user as you suggested. The user has been given multiple warnings leading up to v4 warnings. Can you explain how the process should be followed? In the meantime, since my report this user is continuing his activity at least twice more in the past hour. — DeeJayK (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T19:22:00.000Z","author":"Deejayk","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Deejayk-2014-04-15T19:22:00.000Z-Inappropriate_vandal_warning","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T19:55:00.000Z-Deejayk-2014-04-15T19:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

@DeeJayK Thank you for reaching out to me, and my apologies for not being more specific; I was referring to the immediate jump to a level-4 warning [2]. Unless the exact same article is being vandalized for weeks, given the massively shared nature of many IPs, warnings issued to unregistered editors typically reset to level-1 at the beginning of each new calendar month. As such, the first warning should have been a {{uw-vandalism1}}, the second a {{uw-vandalism2}}, while the third was correctly issued as a {{uw-vandalism3}}. Please note that I have little tolerance for vandals myself (as the thousands of vandalism blocks I have performed will attest in my admin log), however WP:AGF and WP:BITE require us to follow the process and give editors a chance before blocking. Regardless, I would like to thank you for your efforts at containing vandalism! — Kralizec! (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T19:55:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T19:55:00.000Z-Deejayk-2014-04-15T19:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:05:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T19:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm not sure I follow the logic of vandalism warning levels being "reset" based on a calendar month -- that seems quite arbitrary to me. Further, I can't find any documentation of the vandalism process that refers to this "reset" of vandalism warning levels. That said, I understand the concept that warnings should increase in severity. In this particular case, the most recent notification prior to this vandal coming to my attention was a V3. Thus, my first warning was a V4. Since then I've added another V4. And since I reported this user, he's committed another act (which I warned at V3 due to your rebuke) and has contacted me on my talk page to ask me to leave him alone. Meanwhile in the time since this user came to my attention he has made NO constructive edits of any sort. I'd ask that you re-consider the block request. — DeeJayK (talk) 20:05, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T20:05:00.000Z","author":"Deejayk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:05:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T19:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T20:17:00.000Z-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

Since your level-3 warning at 15:17, the IP has not vandalized a single article. That sounds like mission accomplished to me, because the IP took heed of your warnings! As per WP:BLOCK#NOTPUNITIVE, blocks are preventative, not punitive. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T20:17:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T20:17:00.000Z-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:19:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T20:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yeah, I'm sure that's all it took. Thanks for your help! — DeeJayK (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-15T20:19:00.000Z","author":"Deejayk","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Deejayk-2014-04-15T20:19:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-15T20:17:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

that posted on User talk:Katieh5584...I think rev-del'ing their threats of violence/post is appropriate. Shearonink (talk) 14:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-22T14:20:00.000Z","author":"Shearonink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:20:00.000Z-That_user_you_just_blocked","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:23:00.000Z-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

Since I am not on Oversight, you will want to go to WP:OV for that request. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-22T14:23:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:23:00.000Z-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:31:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah ok, the RevDel page says "Any administrator may handle RevisionDelete requests made by users" so I thought you were able to do so. Shearonink (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-22T14:31:00.000Z","author":"Shearonink","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:31:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:35:00.000Z-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, I can delete them, but given their extreme content, my guess was that you wanted them suppressed instead. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-22T14:35:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:35:00.000Z-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:40:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:35:00.000Z"]}}-->

Ah yes...well, I just wanted it gone...For good (sometimes the specific Wiki-nomenclature trips me up). In any case, it's now been taken care of. Thanks again, Shearonink (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-22T14:40:00.000Z","author":"Shearonink","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Shearonink-2014-04-22T14:40:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-04-22T14:35:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Is there an automated way for you or another admin to revert all of the edits made by this IP?Hoops gza (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-24T19:03:00.000Z","author":"Hoops gza","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T19:03:00.000Z-User:94.189.184.169","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-24T19:15:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T19:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Hoops gza: While I am not enough of a subject matter expert on this topic to make the determination myself, if you are 100% sure that 100% of the edits made by the IP are detrimental, you may request a WP:MASSROLLBACK. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-24T19:15:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-24T19:15:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T19:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I believe that 95% of the IP's edits are detrimental. I would like to request a massrollback. Then I will undo the 5% that are not detrimental.Hoops gza (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-24T20:43:00.000Z","author":"Hoops gza","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T20:43:00.000Z-User:94.189.184.169","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T02:03:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T20:43:00.000Z"]}}-->

Done — Kralizec! (talk) 02:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-25T02:03:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T02:03:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-24T20:43:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Several of its edits still appear to be there. Would that be because it no longer has the top edit on most of the pages that it edited?Hoops gza (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-25T16:45:00.000Z","author":"Hoops gza","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T16:45:00.000Z-User:94.189.184.169","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T16:51:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T16:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, that is correct. Rollback only zaps edits that are the most recent to the page. Otherwise you have to go back and try to undo them. — Kralizec! (talk) 16:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-25T16:51:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T16:51:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T16:45:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for helping me out where you could. I shall get on the rest of that in a few.Hoops gza (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-25T18:01:00.000Z","author":"Hoops gza","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T18:01:00.000Z-User:94.189.184.169","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T18:17:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T18:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

Glad I could help! Thank you for helping keep non-constructive edits under control! — Kralizec! (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-04-25T18:17:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-04-25T18:17:00.000Z-Hoops_gza-2014-04-25T18:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, thanks for blocking user:Gololur. Now I believe he has returned with an other name user:Galastuff as a sockpuppet editing the exact same articles in disruptive way (he has now two accounts blocked for this,user:Gololur and user:Sinevik). I have opened SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gololur for days ago at which no one seems to answer. Do you know what else I can do? Should this new editor also be blocked (without good evidence he is actually sock)? Thanks in advance for all answers. QED237 (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-05-16T21:30:00.000Z","author":"Qed237","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Qed237-2014-05-16T21:30:00.000Z-Sockpuppet","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-05-28T06:47:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2014-05-28T06:47:00.000Z-Request_for_comment","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, I'm A.Minkowiski. I'm fighting against vandalism and my main focus is to revert vandal edits and reporting them. I would be very happy if I become an admin to fight against vandals directly. First I was an long term IP editor and now, few months before I created my account and started fighting against vandalism. I have requested same message to others if some one help me out. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 11:37, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-15T11:37:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:37:00.000Z-Adminship_nomination_request","replies":["c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:41:00.000Z-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:37:00.000Z"]}}-->

Plus, I'm familiar with blocking policy and other policies too. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 11:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-15T11:41:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:41:00.000Z-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:41:00.000Z"]}}-->

My apologies, but admin nominations are probably best handled by more active administrators than I. — Kralizec! (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-15T11:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-20T12:37:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z","c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-20T12:43:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you sir and please do not apologize sir. I'm almost 24-hours active editor and fighting against vandalism, you can see my work. I thought I should request you. But its Okay sir. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 12:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-20T12:37:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-20T12:37:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

and Sir, You might remember it was you who granted me Rollback rights. :) A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 12:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-20T12:43:00.000Z","author":"A.Minkowiski","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.Minkowiski-2014-06-20T12:43:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-06-20T12:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Hello You put the following notice on your picture of a Midden ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Whaleback_Shell_Midden_gully_-_20070722_07986.JPG ):

"You may NOT use this image on your own web site or anywhere else unless you release this image and any derivative works (which may include the web page or other medium where this image is used, if it is not considered a "collective work") by following the terms of the following license. Any other use will be considered a breach of copyright and I reserve the right of legal action. Please do not copy this image illegally by ignoring the terms of the license, as it is not in the public domain."

A derivative work would be if someone changed anything in the photo, cropped, translated (where possible), adjusted bright, and so on. If someone copy the photo "as is", it's not a derivative work.

Please read the article here: http://mollykleinman.com/2008/10/20/cc-howto-no-derivatives/

It's about the NoDerivatives, in which the author (copyright specialist) says:

"Examples of things that are not adaptations as defined by the ND license:

• Including a short story in a collection of short stories
• - Reproducing an unedited image on a website
• - Using an unedited video in the background of a live concert"

Using an unedited image is not an adaption, thus the page where it was published is not a derivative work either.

Here's another article about this: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/01/12/how-to-correctly-use-creative-commons-works/ read the "Derivative Work" section.

But i'm curious, could you provide us more legal info about your statement?

Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.187.89.25 (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-25T03:29:00.000Z","author":"179.187.89.25","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-179.187.89.25-2014-06-25T03:29:00.000Z-Your_concept_of_\"derivative_works\"_is_wrong_(?)","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Kralizec, I've reduced the full protection you placed on Wikipedia:Terms of use (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) as I can't see how full protection would be warranted by the protection policy in it's current form. Hope you don't mind. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-28T05:37:00.000Z","author":"Callanecc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Callanecc-2014-06-28T05:37:00.000Z-Wikipedia:Terms_of_use","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Kralizec! I placed the abovementioned IP on the block request because of constant vandalism per their contribs. I am unsure as to why others did not warn them because one look at their history and you can see it is a constant vandal. Am I wrong in thinking that they must still be continually warned even though the rules say that they don't even need to be warned when there is blatant vandalism? I would just like some clarification to that so that I do not do this again if that be the case. Thanks for your help--Canyouhearmenow 14:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-06-30T14:38:00.000Z","author":"Canyouhearmenow","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Canyouhearmenow-2014-06-30T14:38:00.000Z-176.253.72.144_Block","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-07-01T00:55:00.000Z-Canyouhearmenow-2014-06-30T14:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thank you for your message. The vast majority of admins require that editors receive multiple levels of escalating warnings -with new warnings only being issued when previous warnings have been ignored and more vandalism takes place- before a block is issued.

A good example is 122.168.59.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). The IP vandalized at 08:52 [3] and received a level-1 warning [4], ignored to vandalize at 09:12 [5] and received a level-2 warning [6], ignored it again to vandalize at 09:17 [7] and received a level-3 warning [8], ignored it to vandalize at 09:57 [9] and received a level-4 warning [10]. The IP then ignored the warnings to vandalize again at 10:11 [11], was reported to AIV [12], and blocked at 10:13 [13].

Hope this helps. — Kralizec! (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-01T00:55:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-07-01T00:55:00.000Z-Canyouhearmenow-2014-06-30T14:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Canyouhearmenow-2014-07-01T01:08:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-07-01T00:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for the clarification! Always wanting to do the right thing.Canyouhearmenow 01:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-01T01:08:00.000Z","author":"Canyouhearmenow","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Canyouhearmenow-2014-07-01T01:08:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-07-01T00:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

The User:Seshagirirao is promoting some external website in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Seshagirirao&diff=prev&oldid=184187232 his user page] and at many pages in the form of External links, [14], [15], [16], have a close look at the second section and many other pages. Just now I corrected some of them. Need your intervention.--Vin09 (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-24T14:04:00.000Z","author":"Vin09","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vin09-2014-07-24T14:04:00.000Z-Promoting_his_website","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-07-24T14:13:00.000Z-Vin09-2014-07-24T14:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

@Vin09: How exactly do you need my intervention, as the edits in question were made more than 2000 days ago? I might suggest some WP:AGF, followed by WP:TALKFIRST, and maybe WP:BRD. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-24T14:13:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-07-24T14:13:00.000Z-Vin09-2014-07-24T14:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-Vin09-2014-07-24T14:17:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-07-24T14:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

I just wanted to know about how to deal such issues, without getting in a conflict with user, thank you for info. I've removed some of the links in the wiki pages. But I want to know that, if a user page have such links, that can be removed?--Vin09 (talk) 14:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-24T14:17:00.000Z","author":"Vin09","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Vin09-2014-07-24T14:17:00.000Z-Kralizec!-2014-07-24T14:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Do you have an idea about the place on the earth where first human 'Adam and Eve' was? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.0.46.153 (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-28T21:04:00.000Z","author":"77.0.46.153","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-77.0.46.153-2014-07-28T21:04:00.000Z-Adam_and_Eve","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-07-31T14:43:00.000Z-77.0.46.153-2014-07-28T21:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

Conservapedia is that way. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:43, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-07-31T14:43:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-07-31T14:43:00.000Z-77.0.46.153-2014-07-28T21:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Hello. I read what you wrote. I did not know there is an actual policy about this(blanking). I am deleting because Bill insulted me, saying I don't speak English,my English is poor, go edit wikipedia in my native language. Read my talk page. This is the first interaction and it sets the tone for the rest, so no more interactions. That is why I removed all posts from Bill. Anything that needs to be seen is in the history. I just want to not be in the fire. I feel like it was fun for he editors/admins as many were just insulting me. Is that necessary? I have seen notices about civility but apparently admins are exempt? When I asked about this I was followed by one ofthe ones who insulted me and they commented that I am an ip editor who was recently blocked. So what ? I dont have to have an account to edit so why does me not having an account matter ? Does me being an ip editor mean I am allowed to be disrespected ? 68.50.21.190 (talk) 14:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-24T14:09:00.000Z","author":"68.50.21.190","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-68.50.21.190-2014-08-24T14:09:00.000Z-talk_page_68.50.21.190","replies":[]}}-->

Please tell bill to stop. Bill told me my english sucks. That is rude and you all may not think so but it is. I do not wish to interact with this person. Please tell them to stop writing me. Stop please. 68.50.21.190 (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-24T18:25:00.000Z","author":"68.50.21.190","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-68.50.21.190-2014-08-24T18:25:00.000Z-talk_page_68.50.21.190","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-08-25T02:26:00.000Z-68.50.21.190-2014-08-24T18:25:00.000Z"]}}-->

Looking into the issue, I support Bishonen's one month block. Your persistent removal of the {{ISP}} header from the talk page is further proof of your disruptive editing. — Kralizec! (talk) 02:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-25T02:26:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-08-25T02:26:00.000Z-68.50.21.190-2014-08-24T18:25:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for uploading File:Tristar-class cruiser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-24T18:27:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2014-08-24T18:27:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Tristar-class_cruiser.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

I echo Parsecboy's comment up above; I've not seen you in forever.

You're quite welcome! I'd spent most of the day getting National Register photos in Tiffin, Sandusky, Put-in-Bay, and mainland Ottawa County, but I'll often try to get an extra photo of an interesting building if I see one, especially for these small communities that don't often have any photos at all. Nyttend (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-26T21:05:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nyttend-2014-08-26T21:05:00.000Z-Scotch_Ridge","replies":[]}}-->

Look. [[17]]. The edits are exactly the same. And look... [[18]] he was clearly warned, several times. So you can't say the IP wasn't warned inadequetly. 85.210.185.45 (talk) 15:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-08-28T15:14:00.000Z","author":"85.210.185.45","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-85.210.185.45-2014-08-28T15:14:00.000Z-The_IP_was_warned_PLENTY_of_times.","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Kralizec, would you object to a unblock of Rachna1324? PhilKnight (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-17T10:38:00.000Z","author":"PhilKnight","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PhilKnight-2014-09-17T10:38:00.000Z-Possible_unblock_of_Rachna1324","replies":["c-Kralizec!-2014-09-17T13:44:00.000Z-PhilKnight-2014-09-17T10:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

@PhilKnight: No objections at all. — Kralizec! (talk) 13:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-17T13:44:00.000Z","author":"Kralizec!","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Kralizec!-2014-09-17T13:44:00.000Z-PhilKnight-2014-09-17T10:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-09-23T22:06:00.000Z","author":"The ed17","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_ed17-2014-09-23T22:06:00.000Z-WikiProject_Military_history_coordinator_election_2","replies":[],"displayName":"Ed"}}-->

Qadian

What is wrong in this

Every time you delete this from the page

This is true that city was founded by Ahemdiya Muslims But That's not Truth that Arya Samaj and Lek Ram has not played the Significance Role in the History Of Qadian

So Please don't delete these Information's the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by SN Pushkarna (talk • contribs) 10:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-10-03T10:21:00.000Z","author":"SN Pushkarna","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SN_Pushkarna-2014-10-03T10:21:00.000Z-WikiProject_Military_history_coordinator_election_2","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-12-07T01:35:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2014-12-07T01:35:00.000Z-Nominations_for_the_Military_history_Wikiproject's_Historian_and_Newcomer_of_the","replies":[]}}-->

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-12-07T08:41:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2014-12-07T08:41:00.000Z-Nominations_for_the_Military_history_Wikiproject's_Historian_and_Newcomer_of_the","replies":[]}}-->

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Category:Peter Paul Rubens images, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Spinster (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-12-12T21:34:00.000Z","author":"Spinster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spinster-2014-12-12T21:34:00.000Z-Category:Peter_Paul_Rubens_images","replies":[]}}-->

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-12-15T00:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2014-12-15T00:32:00.000Z-Voting_for_the_Military_historian_and_Military_newcomer_of_the_year_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

The article Quamzin Kravshera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-01-04T12:37:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2015-01-04T12:37:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Quamzin_Kravshera","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-30T13:05:00.000Z","author":"Csisc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Csisc-2015-06-30T13:05:00.000Z-Tunisian_Arabic","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal ^talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-09T18:22:00.000Z","author":"MusikAnimal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MusikAnimal-2015-09-09T18:22:00.000Z-Invitation_to_subscribe_to_the_edit_filter_mailing_list","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello,

I work with the Association of Religious Data Archives at Penn State. We are putting together an online interactive timeline of religious history in America, and would like to use your image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Praying_Hands_at_the_main_entrance_to_the_campus_of_Oral_Roberts_University.jpg to illustrate the event in the timeline about Oral Roberts University.

Thank you for considering this request,

Corielle Stickles [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.221.184 (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-22T15:01:00.000Z","author":"71.58.221.184","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-71.58.221.184-2015-09-22T15:01:00.000Z-Permission_for_image_2","replies":[]}}-->

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-25T05:20:00.000Z","author":"The ed17","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_ed17-2015-09-25T05:20:00.000Z-WikiProject_Military_history_coordinator_election_3","replies":[],"displayName":"Ed"}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T12:57:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T12:57:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:USS Barnes (CVE-7).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T23:18:00.000Z","author":"Kelly","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kelly-2015-11-24T23:18:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:USS_Barnes_(CVE-7).jpg","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Omniplex Science Museum - Red Earth Museum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T23:35:00.000Z","author":"Kelly","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kelly-2015-11-24T23:35:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Omniplex_Science_Museum_-_Red_Earth_Museum.jpg","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shenaz Culture Shock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-25T00:55:00.000Z","author":"Kelly","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kelly-2015-11-25T00:55:00.000Z-File:Shenaz_Culture_Shock.jpg_listed_for_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

Category:Pharaoh and Cleopatra, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-29T20:39:00.000Z","author":"The1337gamer","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The1337gamer-2015-11-29T20:39:00.000Z-Category:Pharaoh_and_Cleopatra","replies":[]}}-->

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-07T05:05:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-07T05:05:00.000Z-Nominations_for_the_Military_history_WikiProject_historian_and_newcomer_of_the_y","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks! I noticed it yesterday by accident, having not been told about it beforehand; I was glancing around the Main Page, noticed the image, thought "that looks vaguely familiar", and upon seeing the TFA title, realised that it indeed was my image. Quite a surprise, as I would have expected them to pick an image dating from the war period, not 180 years later, but I'm not complaining :-)

The picture was taken for a project page, User:Nyttend/Ohio, with which I'd quite appreciate your help if you're interested. This page is a list of all municipalities and townships statewide that don't have a representative photo; I've been working on removing items from the list (on the day I took the photo, I got all the remaining Fulton County locations), but I'm basically the only one, so what help you can give would be greatly appreciated. Of course, most images of northwestern Ohio that you uploaded years ago are still in place (Antwerp and Tontogany come to mind immediately), so I'm already quite appreciative. Nyttend (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-14T22:50:00.000Z","author":"Nyttend","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nyttend-2015-12-14T22:50:00.000Z-Phillips_Corners","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello, it's me, DellTG5, you probably remember the chaos I caused when I was 10, I'd like to apologize. I was wondering if you would be willing to send me the text of some of my deleted pages, I can supply my email address if you're willing. I'd appreciate it greatly if you deside to do so. ThanksDellTG5 (talk) 14:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-25T14:43:00.000Z","author":"DellTG5","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DellTG5-2016-01-25T14:43:00.000Z-Deleted_Pages","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello! Your submission of Southern Beekeeper's Nature Reserve at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 07:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-02-05T07:20:00.000Z","author":"David Eppstein","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-David_Eppstein-2016-02-05T07:20:00.000Z-DYK_nomination_of_Southern_Beekeeper's_Nature_Reserve","replies":[]}}-->

On 26 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Southern Beekeeper's Nature Reserve, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Southern Beekeeper's Nature Reserve had no official name when it was gazetted in 1979, but had been used for beekeeping for generations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Beekeeper's Nature Reserve. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-02-26T00:02:00.000Z","author":"Casliber","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Casliber-2016-02-26T00:02:00.000Z-DYK_for_Southern_Beekeeper's_Nature_Reserve","replies":[],"displayName":"Cas Liber"}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

A few years ago, you sorted out some vandalism at the wiki page for Kevin Coughlin, a former Ohio state senator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Coughlin You removed a section from it that was poorly sourced contained inaccurate info. It seems the people responsible for this are at it again, this time making statements and using two links as references that go to empty pages.

I have removed them. However, I expect the info to be republished. Rather than continue the back and forth, is there another solution?

Thanks for taking a look at it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coughlinohio (talk • contribs) 05:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-03-10T05:01:00.000Z","author":"Coughlinohio","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Coughlinohio-2016-03-10T05:01:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_CXIX,_February_2016","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Mr. Ramsey,

I would like to use your image of the Seneca Caverns tourist gift shop as a background for approximately five seconds in a music video I'm producing. The video itself will be on YouTube, for free, but will be eligible for ads.

You will be credited along with every other image/photo copyright-holder during the credits at the end of the video.

Please let me know if this is satisfactory.

QuarterbackSneak — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuarterbackSneak (talk • contribs) 00:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-05-31T00:20:00.000Z","author":"QuarterbackSneak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-QuarterbackSneak-2016-05-31T00:20:00.000Z-Use_of_your_Seneca_gift_shop_image_in_a_music_video","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-06-29T05:39:00.000Z","author":"SuperHamster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperHamster-2016-06-29T05:39:00.000Z-You're_invited!_Great_Buckeye_Wiknic_2016","replies":[],"displayName":"Super"}}-->

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-09-16T06:00:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-16T06:00:00.000Z-Military_history_WikiProject_coordinator_election","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Kralizec!. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-12T20:33:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-12T20:33:00.000Z-Two-Factor_Authentication_now_available_for_admins","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Kralizec!.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-15T13:47:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-15T13:47:00.000Z-A_new_user_right_for_New_Page_Patrollers","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Kralizec!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"Mdann52","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mdann52-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-29T05:01:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-29T05:01:00.000Z-Voting_for_the_Military_history_WikiProject_Historian_and_Newcomer_of_the_Year_i","replies":[]}}-->

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Hi!

I am new to wikipedia and was trying to create a page for my band "Kara Mosher" www.karamosher.com. My debut album is being released via itunes, etc. January 13th. I wrote a single sentence so far, but wanted to write more when I realized my page had been deleted ( Kara Mosher) . I also tried to add a photo, but without success.

Another user suggested I find someone from this list to add the article for me.

Let me know if you can help!

Thanks, Kara — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaraMosher (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-29T16:06:00.000Z","author":"KaraMosher","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KaraMosher-2016-12-29T16:06:00.000Z-Please_restore_my_page","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello. This message is in regard to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Coughlin. Over the years there appears to have been a war of insertion and deletion of un-sourced BLP-violating text on this page.

Specifically: "A 2008 Cleveland Independent article alleging that Coughlin had an extra-marital affair with a staffer, at times taking her to Ohio State football games using money from his campaign accounts. The article also revealed that the Summit County Sheriff's Office was investigating Coughlin for allegedly altering petition ballots [7]" Clicking the citation reveals that no such source exists. This should be removed and blocked from being re-published.

In addition: "Coughlin threatened to sue the author, but the author sued him, eventually dropping the charges.[8]" The article linked to this statement does not, in fact, report that Coughlin threatened to sue the author. It says that the plaintiff and his attorney accused Coughlin of the threatening legal action. Big difference and not portrayed factually on the Wiki page. Again,, this should be removed and blocked from being republished.

It appears that attempts to correct this type of violation in the past have been corrected by Wiki administrators. However, the items listed above continue to be an issue.

Thanks for your consideration — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombraider44303 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-15T18:54:00.000Z","author":"Tombraider44303","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tombraider44303-2017-02-15T18:54:00.000Z-un-sourced_BLP-violating_text_on_page","replies":[]}}-->

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-02-26T07:24:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-26T07:24:00.000Z-March_Madness_2017","replies":[]}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

The article Quamzin Kravshera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-24T13:19:00.000Z","author":"Piotrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Piotrus-2017-03-24T13:19:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Quamzin_Kravshera_2","replies":[],"displayName":"Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus"}}-->

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography Timeline: This month in World War I