This is an archive of past discussions $5 $2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current $4 page.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39

This page has archives. Sections older than 12 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220917193000","author":"Naypta","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Naypta-20220917193000-Feedback_request:_Wikipedia_proposals_request_for_comment","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220919221400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220919221400-Tech_News:_2022-38","replies":[]}}-->

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220923211600","author":"Buidhe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buidhe-20220923211600-October_2022_New_Pages_Patrol_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

Hello @JPxG. I noticed you're one of the editors in chief at the Signpost. Well, we've got a little problem over there. We've got four days left for writing and not a single one of the articles is ready yet. I was thinking to message the copyeditors about this issue, but I don't know what would be preferable to you to do. Thanks! Helloheart (talk) 18:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220925182700","author":"Helloheart","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Helloheart-20220925182700-Little_problem_at_the_Signpost","replies":["c-JPxG-20220927060600-Helloheart-20220925182700"]}}-->

@Helloheart: This is what we call a "situation normal" -- it's almost always the case that a vast proportion of the issue isn't ready until the writing deadline. Generally, everything tends to sort itself out by publishing time. Well, no, it doesn't sort itself out, people sort it out. But you know what I mean. jp×g 06:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220927060600","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JPxG-20220927060600-Helloheart-20220925182700","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220927002800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220927002800-Tech_News:_2022-39","replies":[]}}-->

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

• New instant-access collections:
  • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
  • Project MUSE
  • Taylor & Francis
  • ASHA
  • Loeb
• Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220930122000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220930122000-Books_&_Bytes_\u2013_Issue_52","replies":[]}}-->

The Wizard of Oz joke was unexpected, but I laughed. Even reminds me that in cribbing from a song lyric I almost brought the next line too, as "taking lives denied" fits with the last #1. igordebraga ≠ 04:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221001043500","author":"Igordebraga","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Igordebraga-20221001043500-Traffic_report","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221004002100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221004002100-Tech_News:_2022-40","replies":[]}}-->

Issue 19—October 2022

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. A short newsletter reflecting a quiet month in recognized content. If there's other types of content you'd like to see in the newsletter feel free to post suggestions here. Otherwise, here's your update for the month:

Newly recognized content

Sesame allergy nom. David notMD, reviewed by Nolabob

Nominated for review

Thiamine nom. David notMD, under review by Mertbiol Blood donation in India nom. Blood donation in India, under review by Larry Hockett COVID-19 pandemic nom. Ozzie10aaaa Cold medicine nom. That Coptic Guy

WP:MED News

• No news, which may be good news. Happy editing.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Ajpolino (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221004033200","author":"Ajpolino","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ajpolino-20221004033200-WikiProject_Medicine_Newsletter_-_October_2022","replies":[]}}-->

14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can. Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221014030700","author":"Baffle gab1978","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Baffle_gab1978-20221014030700-Guild_of_Copy_Editors'_October_2022_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221015173000","author":"Naypta","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Naypta-20221015173000-Feedback_request:_Wikipedia_policies_and_guidelines_request_for_comment","replies":[]}}-->

Hello JPxG,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

From where did your bring the number of casualties with out any reference?? Please, either give reference or remove casualties tag 2409:4062:2D8A:83FB:0:0:5788:F310 (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221017165100","author":"2409:4062:2D8A:83FB:0:0:5788:F310","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2409:4062:2D8A:83FB:0:0:5788:F310-20221017165100-About_the_casualties...","replies":[]}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221017214400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221017214400-Tech_News:_2022-42","replies":[]}}-->

This search Figured you would be interested in cleaning this up. There are some false positives, but also a ton of old stuff similar to the sort you cleaned up a few months ago. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220913025800","author":"Pppery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pppery-20220913025800-More_malformed_old_AfDs","replies":["c-Pppery-20221017210800-Pppery-20220913025800"],"displayName":"* Pppery *"}}-->

Restored from User talk:JPxG/Archive20 since you seem to have missed this. I started cleaning it up myself, and encountered a second "Anagnorisis" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//Communist Workers Organisation (Marxist–Leninist). I elected to just redirect to the correctly-titled entry rather than shuffling things around. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221017210800","author":"Pppery","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pppery-20221017210800-Pppery-20220913025800","replies":["c-JPxG-20221017211100-Pppery-20221017210800"],"displayName":"* Pppery *"}}-->

Ha! I had actually made myself a comprehensive list of all the malformed AfDs that I was working through prior to my untimely demise prolonged inexplicable absence. If memory serves, there were a few hundred, mostly from 2007 and before. I wonder what the overlap with this one is! I'd actually forgotten about it completely until just now -- I should go check. jp×g 21:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221017211100","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JPxG-20221017211100-Pppery-20221017210800","replies":["c-Finngall-20221018195800-JPxG-20221017211100"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Per WP:BADAFD, there's still some cleanup to be done from these bizarre adventures, mainly removing REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE templates. --Finngall ^talk 19:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018195800","author":"Finngall","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Finngall-20221018195800-JPxG-20221017211100","replies":[]}}-->

Check contribs around this time for specific characters. I suspect Unicode control characters are stymieing the process, but will remove them to confirm before writing a patch. 0x200d, 0x200b and 0x200e I remember: there is a fourth as well. These should be stripped in the script. jp×g 12:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018124800","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-20221018124800-Note_to_self_re:_dog's_breakfast_at_September_Oracle_index","replies":["c-Skynxnex-20221018133700-JPxG-20221018124800"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Apologies that one of my comments had a 0x200e. I'm not entirely sure how I ended up copy-and-pasting one when I signed that comment after the fact. I'll try to pay attention if I need to in the future to see if I can figure out where it came from. Skynxnex (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018133700","author":"Skynxnex","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Skynxnex-20221018133700-JPxG-20221018124800","replies":["c-JPxG-20221018135000-Skynxnex-20221018133700"]}}-->

I was wondering how that happened too, lol. A lot of the time, weird glitches like that are made from visual or mobile editing, but I guess this was pure homegrown weirdness. It really shouldn't be a problem, though -- the scripts should be able to handle it. The only reason I went through and removed these ones just now was because I wanted to make sure that was actually the problem before trying to fix it. I appreciate the concern though... few understand this. jp×g 13:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018135000","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JPxG-20221018135000-Skynxnex-20221018133700","replies":["c-Skynxnex-20221018141200-JPxG-20221018135000"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Not that it matters that much but it may possibly be useful: I looked at my edit history then and tried to remember what I did and I am pretty sure this was the course of events: 1) I realized I had neglected to sign; 2) did a preview to get the signature there; 3) I then copy and pasted from the AfD history page to get the correct timestamp. And, sure enough, doing that now into Vim I see: 14:08, 22 September 2022<200e> so there are left to right marks between some of the different fields (confirmed also using the browser's inspector and seeing it prints them as ‎). Skynxnex (talk) 14:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018141200","author":"Skynxnex","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Skynxnex-20221018141200-JPxG-20221018135000","replies":["c-JPxG-20221018144700-Skynxnex-20221018141200"]}}-->

Strange but true... jp×g 14:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018144700","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JPxG-20221018144700-Skynxnex-20221018141200","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

• I have made a bizarre discovery: logging into Toolforge and running the script directly from the server resulted in a page with no errors. Then I reintroduced the Unicode characters and tried again, so that I could pinpoint which part of the script needed to have its input sanitized.......... and it just didn't break. So I have no idea what the hell happened to make it throw all those errors. It's possible it had nothing at all to do with the Unicode.

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221024212000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221024212000-Tech_News:_2022-43","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, JPxG,

The work you've done on the Oracle pages is so impressive but also overwhelming. So, I hope I can ask a direct question and since you are familiar with the data, you can give me a simple answer. I can tell from the data that these days, there are much fewer AFDs than, say, 15 years ago. But are there fewer participants in AFD discussions than there were 5 or 10 years ago? I just started helping out closing AFD discussions in January of this year and I think the low participation has been the biggest surprise. There also seems to be a flurry of new editors, most often sockpuppets, flooding into participate at AFDs but I don't think Oracle can offer any insight on whether this is a new or persistent phenomena. Thanks for any clarity you can provide. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221024235800","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20221024235800-Oracle","replies":["c-Liz-20221025000300-Liz-20221024235800"]}}-->

Oh, I also brought up at WP:VPT about whether or not there were any stats on how different closers closed AFDs. I know, of course, NACs would close AFD discussions as Keep or No Consensus but it seems like some admins primarily close discussions as Delete while others tackle a variety of complex discussion decisions. I don't think there is any use for this data, I was just more curious rather than anything...and I doubt that any tech minded person would go to a lot of trouble just to satisfy my curiosity but I thought I'd ask. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025000300","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Liz-20221025000300-Liz-20221024235800","replies":[]}}-->

If I am going to be in charge of the damn thing, I ought to read the damn thing first. There are only 7,960 articles so this should not take too long. Here we go, I guess. jp×g 01:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025010600","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-20221025010600-Note_to_self","replies":["c-JPxG-20221025011300-JPxG-20221025010600"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

False: there are 6,557 articles. I can simply transclude this list into User:JPxG/test zone and read them (althogh the page will get too big so I have to do it in batches). jp×g 01:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025011300","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JPxG-20221025011300-JPxG-20221025010600","replies":["c-JPxG-20221025011600-JPxG-20221025011300"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

False: of those 6,557 there are 404 single-page editions (for all of them from 2010-01-04 on), 26 special pages and templates, 663 archive pages, and one readback page. This leaves a mere 5,464 articles. jp×g 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025011600","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JPxG-20221025011600-JPxG-20221025011300","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Note: I have moved my liveblog of the entire Signpost archive to User:JPxG/The Illuminated Signpost. jp×g 10:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025102700","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-20221025102700-Note_to_self","replies":[],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Hello, JPxG. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

jp×g 22:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221024224600","author":"JPxG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JPxG-20221024224600-Nominated_for_Administrator","replies":["c-Firsfron-20221025031000-JPxG-20221024224600"],"displayName":"jp"}}-->

Awesome! I've made the nomination page here; when the co-noms are finished, the page will have to be transcluded. Good luck! Let me know if I can help in any way. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 03:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025031000","author":"Firsfron","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Firsfron-20221025031000-JPxG-20221024224600","replies":["c-Tamzin-20221025041000-Firsfron-20221025031000"],"displayName":"Firsfron of Ronchester"}}-->

(talk page watcher) @Firsfron: Is the candidate also presented to those of us other than ladies and gentlemen? /lh -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025041000","author":"Tamzin","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Tamzin-20221025041000-Firsfron-20221025031000","replies":["c-Firsfron-20221025041600-Tamzin-20221025041000"]}}-->

This IMO excellent candidate is presented to everybody. I suppose I should have said "ladies and gentlefolk". Rewording suggestions for a more gender-neutral approach are very welcome, @Tamzin. Firsfron of Ronchester 04:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025041600","author":"Firsfron","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Firsfron-20221025041600-Tamzin-20221025041000","replies":["c-Tamzin-20221025042400-Firsfron-20221025041600"],"displayName":"Firsfron of Ronchester"}}-->

@Firsfron: Personally I use a modified David Bowie approach of "Ladies, gentlemen, and everyone else", but I also really like the ring of "ladies and gentlefolk". -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025042400","author":"Tamzin","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Tamzin-20221025042400-Firsfron-20221025041600","replies":["c-Firsfron-20221025042900-Tamzin-20221025042400"]}}-->

@Tamzin Done and done, with my apologies. Firsfron of Ronchester 04:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025042900","author":"Firsfron","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Firsfron-20221025042900-Tamzin-20221025042400","replies":["c-Tamzin-20221025045500-Firsfron-20221025042900"],"displayName":"Firsfron of Ronchester"}}-->

@Firsfron: No worries. Consider it an innoculation against RfA-GENSEX-dispute-itis. Hear that's been going around lately.  Kinehore -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025045500","author":"Tamzin","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Tamzin-20221025045500-Firsfron-20221025042900","replies":["c-Ritchie333-20221025143100-Tamzin-20221025045500"]}}-->

I've generally not bothered with "ladies and gentlemen" in RfA nominations as it doesn't tell me anything about the candidate, and gone straight for "'x' has done 'a', 'b' and 'c' yada yada this is why I think they'll make a good admin" .... but that's just me. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025143100","author":"Ritchie333","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Ritchie333-20221025143100-Tamzin-20221025045500","replies":[]}}-->

for when you start the gauntlet! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 14:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221025143500","author":"TheresNoTime","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheresNoTime-20221025143500-Good_luck","replies":[]}}-->

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221026193000","author":"Naypta","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Naypta-20221026193000-Feedback_request:_Wikipedia_technical_issues_and_templates_request_for_comment","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, JPxG. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221028201300","author":"Clovermoss","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Clovermoss-20221028201300-Email_from_Clovermoss","replies":[],"displayName":"Clovermoss\ud83c\udf40"}}-->

MediaWiki message delivery 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031211300","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221031211300-Tech_News:_2022-44","replies":[]}}-->

I don't think anyone's being malicious, but I can't stand the level of incompetence and unfriendliness I'm finding in the Signpost of late. The Signpost lost multiple articles because HaeB decided to reset its contributions page three days before publication. You published the Gallery I repeatedly marked as a draft to be postponed, basically ruining my attempts to get image donations. I was literally begging for help for weeks with September's featured content on the talk page, and got no reply until the day before publication, at which point I was already completely burned out. I was told the Signpost wanted to interview me when I hit 600 featured pictures, and then, once actual work was required, decided not to, apparently.

It's killed my enthusiasm for doing anything with them, made all the worse by the fact I was doing three to five of the articles every issue for the last few months.

It feels like there's no appreciation for contributors, the readership is tiny, and... well, it's really hard to get enthusiasm for continuing after all that. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 00:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221101002300","author":"Adam Cuerden","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Adam_Cuerden-20221101002300-...","replies":["c-HaeB-20221101024700-Adam_Cuerden-20221101002300"]}}-->

As detailed here, I question the claim that The Signpost lost multiple articles, and reject the "incompetence and unfriendliness" accusation. Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221101024700","author":"HaeB","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-HaeB-20221101024700-Adam_Cuerden-20221101002300","replies":[]}}-->

JPxG: You probably figured this out already, but this is very much a WP:HIGHMAINT situation and has been for a long time - speaking with fond memories of the time more than 12 years ago when Adam Cuerden "quit. Both the Signpost, and Wikipedia" after a failed attempt to "throw out" the Signpost EiC at the time (myself ;-) ). Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221101024700","author":"HaeB","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HaeB-20221101024700-...","replies":["c-Adam_Cuerden-20221101065000-HaeB-20221101024700"]}}-->

You mean after Jimbo went around deleting hundreds of images from Commons to please Fox News, and was eventually demoted from having the ability to ever do that again? Yeah, that was something worth protesting. I'm impressed at the dredging up of ancient history.

But, never mind. I really, really can't be bothered anymore. Good luck finding someone else to do all the stuff I did. I don't know why you've chosen this route, but... there we are Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs} 06:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221101065000","author":"Adam Cuerden","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Adam_Cuerden-20221101065000-HaeB-20221101024700","replies":[]}}-->