User talk:HaEr48/Archives/2019/March
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:HaEr48. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Precious | |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-03T08:17:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2019-03-03T08:17:00.000Z-Precious_anniversary","replies":[]}}-->
|
Your Military History Newsletter
|
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z","author":"Nick-D","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nick-D-2019-03-10T11:00:00.000Z-The_Bugle:_Issue_CLV,_March_2019","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Your submission of Pacu jawi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-18T14:10:00.000Z","author":"Andrew Davidson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andrew_Davidson-2019-02-18T14:10:00.000Z-DYK_nomination_of_Pacu_jawi","replies":["c-Andrew_Davidson-2019-03-31T10:01:00.000Z-Andrew_Davidson-2019-02-18T14:10:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Andrew D."}}-->
- I've done a full review. It passes in most respects but I'm still not content with the exact wording of the hook. Please take another look. Andrew D. (talk) 10:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-31T10:01:00.000Z","author":"Andrew Davidson","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Andrew_Davidson-2019-03-31T10:01:00.000Z-Andrew_Davidson-2019-02-18T14:10:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Andrew D."}}-->
WikiCup 2019 March newsletter__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_March_newsletter","replies":[],"uneditableSection":true}}-->
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
- L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
- Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
- MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
- Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
- Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
- Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).
|
|