Hello, Gmporr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.   Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-10-17T04:28:00.000Z","author":"Anna Frodesiak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anna_Frodesiak-2012-10-17T04:28:00.000Z-Welcome","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. You have a new message at Anna Frodesiak's talk page. 05:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-10-17T05:14:00.000Z","author":"Anna Frodesiak","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anna_Frodesiak-2012-10-17T05:14:00.000Z-Message","replies":[]}}-->

Useful links will go here...

Just found out about Talk Page Stalkers tonight. I like cats so I'm cool with that :)

Photos & Public Domain questions - Media copyright questions page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I noticed a page which is already listed as needing spelling improvement. But I also saw some inaccuracies in the page. Should I just note the inaccuracies in the talk page (if I'm not prepared to resolve them myself at this point) or should I be adding tags like "refimprove" so it will show up as needing more improvements than just spelling? If so, where do I find the listing of various templates such as "refimprove" ('cause I know that's not the right one to use for this situation). Thanks :)

Well you can do either. It's best that you add the tag AND list specifics on the talk page, but the tag is preferred. Below this comment is a bunch of links which all in turn have a bunch of different tags you can use to indicate that there are problems with the article. Legoktm (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-10-20T16:33:00.000Z","author":"Legoktm","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Legoktm-2012-10-20T16:33:00.000Z-HelpMe_-_Question_re_Use_of_Talk_Pages","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you. Yes please, add the necessary information yourself. Thanks --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 01:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-11T01:34:00.000Z","author":"Camilo Sanchez","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Camilo_Sanchez-2012-11-11T01:34:00.000Z-Paula_Broadwell","replies":[],"displayName":"Camilo S\u00e1nchez"}}-->

Why am I getting that warning on the file? Could you help me with that? Thanks --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 01:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-11-11T01:43:00.000Z","author":"Camilo Sanchez","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Camilo_Sanchez-2012-11-11T01:43:00.000Z-Paula_Broadwell","replies":[],"displayName":"Camilo S\u00e1nchez"}}-->

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bluetooth keyboard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thumbing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-11-30T08:59:00.000Z","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-2013-11-30T08:59:00.000Z-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_November_30","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->

In response to your question about the Tony Romo article, the Dallas Cowboys bio of Romo lists some of his community involvement as:

• 2008 Poker for Pets for SPCA of Texas. <-Society for Prevention
• Make-A-Wish Foundation - Several ONE-ON-ONE visits with children each season.
• Cowboys/United Way Hometown Huddle to play Bingo with senior citizens at The Brady Center.

In the reference, click the "more" in the bio to see the full list. Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-12-25T23:27:00.000Z","author":"Arbor to SJ","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arbor_to_SJ-2013-12-25T23:27:00.000Z-Romo\/community_involvement","replies":[]}}-->

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Did something get broken with the citation templates? When I'm editing an article (any article) and I try to use "cite web", it's acting goofy. My screen goes kind of grey, and I only see the template pop up if I scroll down a bit. But then none of the typical fields are there to be filled in (URL, Title, Author, Access Date, etc). Other than the "Web Citation" title in the popup window the only other stuff there is the row of buttons at the bottom - Insert, Show/hide extra fields, Preview, Cancel, Reset form. I thought it might be my browser (Firefox on Linux) 'cause I just updated it today, but I tried Safari on Mac and am having the same problem. Just started occurring today. Thanks.

Gmporr (talk) 18:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-21T18:38:00.000Z","author":"Gmporr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gmporr-2015-08-21T18:38:00.000Z-Help_me!_-_Are_the_Citation_Templates_broken?","replies":["c-Nthep-2015-08-21T20:44:00.000Z-Gmporr-2015-08-21T18:38:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, see Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Cite_tool_fails. Nthep (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-21T20:44:00.000Z","author":"Nthep","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Nthep-2015-08-21T20:44:00.000Z-Gmporr-2015-08-21T18:38:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Ahh... Thanks a bunch. Nice to know I'm not crazy (well, at least not with regard to this). Glad to know about Village Pump; hadn't seen it before. Gmporr (talk)

Please consider using the article talk page rather than "null edits" in the article history to complain. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-25T02:12:00.000Z","author":"VQuakr","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-VQuakr-2015-09-25T02:12:00.000Z-Nobel","replies":["c-VQuakr-2015-09-25T03:17:00.000Z-VQuakr-2015-09-25T02:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

@VQuakr: No, your attitude that the nomination wasn't a "big deal" pissed me off enough that I didn't want to interact with you. Gmporr (talk)

Replying to me in an article edit summary is still interacting. Like I said in the revert edit summary, it really isn't a big deal. To explain in more detail, Nobel prize nominations are secret so any claim that an entity has been nominated is heresay until 50 years after the fact (unless they subsequently are awarded the prize, obviously). More commonly, (as in this case), someone creates an open letter or petition for an eligible individual to submit a nomination; this is sometimes misreported as a "nomination." You can read more about it here. This has been discussed at the village pump a few times as well. VQuakr (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-25T03:17:00.000Z","author":"VQuakr","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-VQuakr-2015-09-25T03:17:00.000Z-VQuakr-2015-09-25T02:12:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T16:59:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T16:59:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Gmporr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:15:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:15:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T02:32:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T02:32:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->